So are you ignorantly trying to say you're up pts with me on our bets?
I see how you conveniently left out the 5k that Donkey stiffed from our poker bet.
I never asked to be spotted a lead. DS was ignorant enough to do so, how is that my problem & why wouldn't I accept it? I clearly demonstrated smacking DS around by a 1,500+ margin, without any "leads."Here's another link proving this: http://www.sportsbookreview.com/foru...-a.html?slf=36

As DS notes, you haven't managed to beat him in a straight forward contest...even that 29k crutch you keep falling back, 26k of it you won from being the underdog (acknowledged by the board and you yourself through your actions) who was spotted a large lead. Winning with a head start doesn't prove you're the better player, and you losing almost every time you're not spotted a lead demonstrates the exact opposite. How does that fit into your master plan of re-imagined excuses?
