So let me see if I have this straight???

**Thor4140** · 07-17-12, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by opie1988

You're telling me my two choices for President of the United States are the following:

1) the colored fella who smokes, plays pick-up basketball games, wants to take more of my money to give away to those who don't want to work, and whose leadership experience never rose above running a lemonade stand, vs.............

2) a self-made billionaire businessman, former Governor of Massachusetts, who feels that the way to get America back on track is by me actually keeping more of my money, and has zero problem providing his birth certificate, school records, etc.

Hmmmmm.

Man do i hate it when a jackass two time Bush voter tries to spread a bunch of lies because he is to stupid to research things himself. Here is the so called tax steal you think Obama is trying to mount

In the coverage of President Obama’s tax proposal, New York magazine correctly notes that almost all of the media is forwarding a flat-out lie. The president’s proposal is not a tax cut only for “people earning less than $250,000 a year,” as CNN and everyone else reported it. Instead, as New York mag writes, the Democratic president proposes to let “every family keep their tax cuts on their first $250,000 of taxable income.” That, of course, includes people who make more than $250,000 a year — they too get a tax cut on their first $250,000 of income. For the richest 1 percent of households, that’s a $20,130 tax cut, to be precise.

So are professional political reporters not paying enough attention to know how the progressive tax system works in general, and President Obama’s proposal works in specific? Or are they deliberately misleading readers about what it actually does in order to manufacture a more dramatic storyline about alleged “class warfare”? The tax hike is the money over the 250.000 and i would be willing to bet my last dollar this jackass doesn't make nearly 250,000 a year.

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-17-12, 01:02 PM

Originally posted by muldoon

Good use of the typo on the word "whole"

Now back to stockpiling bullets and silver

A feast for fire and a feast for water; a feast for life and a greater feast for death!

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-17-12, 01:11 PM

Originally posted by PickWinnerAllDay

I think we already knew what kind of person you were Pauly. You didn't need to go and prove it any further. I don't wish any ill will towards you man. I know you'll be safe and sound in your mother's basement with Ron Paul posters wall to wall to jerk off to day and night.

Deem not too eagerly to catch the promises; fear not to undergo the curses. Ye, even ye, know not this meaning all.

**opie1988** · 07-17-12, 01:15 PM

Originally posted by Thor4140

Man do i hate it when a jackass two time Bush voter tries to spread a bunch of lies because he is to stupid to research things himself. Here is the so called tax steal you think Obama is trying to mount

In the coverage of President Obama’s tax proposal, New York magazine correctly notes that almost all of the media is forwarding a flat-out lie. The president’s proposal is not a tax cut only for “people earning less than $250,000 a year,” as CNN and everyone else reported it. Instead, as New York mag writes, the Democratic president proposes to let “every family keep their tax cuts on their first $250,000 of taxable income.” That, of course, includes people who make more than $250,000 a year — they too get a tax cut on their first $250,000 of income. For the richest 1 percent of households, that’s a $20,130 tax cut, to be precise.

So are professional political reporters not paying enough attention to know how the progressive tax system works in general, and President Obama’s proposal works in specific? Or are they deliberately misleading readers about what it actually does in order to manufacture a more dramatic storyline about alleged “class warfare”? The tax hike is the money over the 250.000 and i would be willing to bet my last dollar this jackass doesn't make nearly 250,000 a year.

I'm actually a 3 time Bush voter. Damn I wish there could be a 4th!

You really lost this argument as soon as you cited "New York Magazine" as your source. Like those liberal Jew prikks should be trusted. Please. I love the way you acted like saying you got from "New York Mag" was going to impress someone.

Silly Thor, you little comic book lovin' nerd!!

Don't ever change, pal.

Now, as far as your challenge ...let's set up a wager thru John or Lou at SBR. We can use whatever proof you require to determine my income. I'm 100% onboard with this starting immediately! Nothing would make me happier than to take the "last dollar" of some liberal retard like you!!

Let's do it, Thor. I'll be your huckleberry, pal!!

**ProfitBettingSov** · 07-17-12, 01:21 PM

Opie, what's your stand on the Iraq war?

**King Mayan** · 07-17-12, 01:26 PM

Opie wants to vote for more Bush dumbfukks.

But calls liberals voting for Obama, retards..

**BIGDAY** · 07-17-12, 01:28 PM

This is getting interesting...

**ProfitBettingSov** · 07-17-12, 01:28 PM

Mayan, using "

" doesn't put your point across any better. Conversely, it just makes you seem immature.

**King Mayan** · 07-17-12, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by ProfitBetting

Mayan, using "

" doesn't put your point across any better. Conversely, it just makes you seem immature.

It's ok.. Sbr brings me JOY.

Don't take this place too seriously, profit betting.

**PAULYPOKER** · 07-17-12, 01:32 PM

Paste the sheets from right to left and from top to bottom: then behold!

**SBR Lou** · 07-17-12, 01:32 PM

Originally posted by Thor4140

Lou, where were you when Romney would fall behind in the Republican primaries and then slaughter Newt and the rest with negative adds because he had the war chest to do it? Where was your outrage? It is amazing how now you and the rest of the hypocrites find this offensive, and the real funny part is what Obama is saying is true.

If Romney slaughtered Newt anywhere, it was in the debates. Nevertheless, the stakes have certainly changed. Nobody expects either side to release glowing ads, but don't act like your campaign is this beacon of positive messages as if the American people are stupid.

The Obama campaign will only be successful if they can plant the seed in peoples heads. The truth isn't going to get the job done, because the truth is our President is not the best man for the job. In 2008, he could babble about change etc, won't work this time no matter how good he can deliver a speech.

**ProfitBettingSov** · 07-17-12, 01:33 PM

Originally posted by King Mayan

It's ok.. Sbr brings me JOY.

Don't take this place too seriously, profit betting.

**King Mayan** · 07-17-12, 01:34 PM

Originally posted by ProfitBetting

Exactly.

**SteelRain** · 07-17-12, 01:36 PM

Originally posted by ProfitBetting

Mayan, using "

" doesn't put your point across any better. Conversely, it just makes you seem immature.

bush is one of the worst presidents in history, bar none.

dude has you spending hundreds of billions in iraq and afghanstian with zero return in investment

iraqis are selling oil to the chinese and the iranians

and the afghans are gaving mining rights to the chinese and other us eminies

you nation is a failure and won't exist in 50 years because stupid stooges like you

ya usa

**KingJD31** · 07-17-12, 01:38 PM

I know this may be hard for you to understand but some Americans are doing well financially that have no government or wall st affiliation

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

So let me see if I have this straight???

This is 2012,you had your hole clueless lives to figure out the government has been out to destroy you but yet you fukkin idiots are still giving them the keys to ram your ass.........

Talk about gluttons for punishment............

**muldoon** · 07-17-12, 01:44 PM

Originally posted by SBR Lou

If Romney slaughtered Newt anywhere, it was in the debates..

Selective memory

Romney’s Unprecedented Attacks

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/01/31/romney-ramps-up-attack-ads-against-gingrich-to-unprecedented-levels.html

Mitt is outspending Newt 5 to 1 on negative ads in the most negative primary season ever, says John Avlon.

In the most negative primary season ever, Mitt Romney is outspending Newt Gingrich 5 to 1 on attack ads

This tsunami of sleaze is being propelled by unprecedented advertising buys. The Romney campaign and its associated super PAC, Restore Our Future, have spent $15.3 million in Florida over the past month alone, according to Maggie Haberman of Politico. To put this in perspective, John McCain spent $11 million on ads during his entire 2008 primary campaign.

**muldoon** · 07-17-12, 01:45 PM

Originally posted by SteelRain

bush is one of the worst presidents in history, bar none.

dude has you spending hundreds of billions in iraq and afghanstian with zero return in investment

Zero return for taxpayers*

**opie1988** · 07-17-12, 01:48 PM

Originally posted by SteelRain

bush is one of the worst presidents in history, bar none.

dude has you spending hundreds of billions in iraq and afghanstian with zero return in investment

iraqis are selling oil to the chinese and the iranians

and the afghans are gaving mining rights to the chinese and other us eminies

you nation is a failure and won't exist in 50 years because stupid stooges like you

ya usa

"your nation"??

So you're telling me that you've been chiming in with all your idiotic, simpleton posts....and you're not even an American?

Fukk, pal...why didn't you say so? If I had known you were simply a foreigner, instead of just a typical liberal dumbfukk as originally though, I would've gone easier on you! Even I have a hard time being mean to some guy who most likely defecates in a hole and has never had access to running water!

Now....do me a favor an let us Americans finish up in here. Tell ya what...next time there's a thread about your king or queen or warlord or whatever the fukk you got over there....you feel welcome just to jump right in!!

**rkelly110** · 07-17-12, 01:52 PM

So who has media stock? Might as well make money off both morons.

**muldoon** · 07-17-12, 01:55 PM

Originally posted by rkelly110

So who has media stock? Might as well make money off both morons.

Bingo

Momentum is to Obama right now. Romney on the defensive. That'll change. It'll be pick'em or damn close some time before mid October. Election season for media outlets is like a year long Black Friday for shoppers after Thanksgiving.

Both sides shoot their full media wads, both sides go super negative (via PACs). Rinse repeat from 2008...2004...2000...

Negative ads and drones. Who says America doesn't produce anything anymore?

**mmaed** · 07-17-12, 01:57 PM

Originally posted by MartinBlank

I can't believe in a country of more than 300 million people-----the two best choices we have for president are these two.

It's pretty easy to see Obama's faults---but Romney gives off a "career politician" vibe.

And Op---come on brutha, in terms of political worth---these two are almost identical.

Romneys career was in private equity. He made 250 million dollars there. He has no need to make money as a politician. He is running because he wants to be president for the prestige, dream of being there, etc. Obama was surely motivated by the same two things. However you have tp recognize that obama wasnt rich before he ran and he is worth ten or fifteen million now. That is because he advanced to the highest level in his career field and became famous. This allowed to sell large quantities of books. The career politician is obama by leaps and miles. He is one of the most famous career politicians alive.

**SteelRain** · 07-17-12, 02:11 PM

Originally posted by opie1988

"your nation"??

So you're telling me that you've been chiming in with all your idiotic, simpleton posts....and you're not even an American?

Fukk, pal...why didn't you say so? If I had known you were simply a foreigner, instead of just a typical liberal dumbfukk as originally though, I would've gone easier on you! Even I have a hard time being mean to some guy who most likely defecates in a hole and has never had access to running water!

Now....do me a favor an let us Americans finish up in here. Tell ya what...next time there's a thread about your king or queen or warlord or whatever the fukk you got over there....you feel welcome just to jump right in!!

typical dumb american do you think this forum is for americans only? or that sportsbooks are american only?

how many bets did you make with pinnacle? the best sports book right now,

now go vote for romney

and discover he won't rescind obamacare aka romneycare and you get luckly and your health insurance is forced to cover your fat inbred insulin needing fuk.

**rkelly110** · 07-17-12, 02:15 PM

With that in mind mmaed, Mitt's daddy couldn't get the office. This is Mitt's 2nd time around. Is he trying
to get the office because daddy didn't? Is he just trying to prove something? Having a Romney name as
pres would add to his and daddy's already vast accomplishments?

I'm asking these questions because of his weak showing of backbone. I mean, this is his 2nd time at doing this,
you would've thought he learned something the 1st time.

**opie1988** · 07-17-12, 02:20 PM

Originally posted by SteelRain

typical dumb american do you think this forum is for americans Ionly? or that sportsbooks are american only?

how many bets did you make with pinnacle? the best sports book right now,

now go vote for romney

and discover he won't rescind obamacare aka romneycare and you get luckly and your health insurance is forced to cover your fat inbred insulin needing fuk.

Actually, I made quite a few wagers with Pinnacle last year. In fact, I'd be willing to bet I could get a larger play down with them right now than you could.

But, seeing how you're a brokedikk fukk, what the fukk would you really have to wager with??

Run along now, son. I've grown weary of burying your ass.

**spankie** · 07-17-12, 02:21 PM

opie is responsible for 9/11.

**mmaed** · 07-17-12, 02:33 PM

Originally posted by rkelly110

With that in mind mmaed, Mitt's daddy couldn't get the office. This is Mitt's 2nd time around. Is he trying
to get the office because daddy didn't? Is he just trying to prove something? Having a Romney name as
pres would add to his and daddy's already vast accomplishments?

I'm asking these questions because of his weak showing of backbone. I mean, this is his 2nd time at doing this,
you would've thought he learned something the 1st time.

I dont think he lacks backbone. Try being a white guy giving speech in front of the naacp while running against the first black president. I do agree that he is doing this in some way because of his father though. It is obvious that he looked up to him

**manny24** · 07-17-12, 02:42 PM

where we are now presidentially is about as far as you can get from where we were just a few guys ago...embarassing really.

yes ronnie very much so.

**LVHerbie** · 07-17-12, 02:48 PM

Originally posted by will2survive

Opie: it's 2012. Stop being prejudice by saying " a colored fellow. If I was African American, I hate you for using those words.

Opie's posts (racist or otherwise) make more sense once you realize he is closeted about many things and his true leanings only come out in extremely protected places (like inside the safety of a curtained ballot box). His magnified fake online persona (racist or otherwise) is mostly tongue-in-cheek and misguided overcompensation in the belief that it somehow better hides these things. Personally I refuse to believe that his masquerade has completely bleed over to point where, for instance, he would ever do things like display the ignorance he does here in front of his daughter and teach her things such as that during critic addressing African Americans using words with racist overtones somehow makes your argument stronger.

And, anticipating the imbecilic responses, yes I'm aware "colored" isn't necessarily a racist word but (as should be obvious to someone of Opie's claimed educational background) to choose to use the antiquated term to derogatorily describe someone of another race clearly is...

**MUHerd37** · 07-17-12, 02:52 PM

Originally posted by Emily_Haines

Plus the loser is anti gambling

fuk this prick. i'm voting for the black guy.

You say you're a Ron Paul guy and yet you are going to vote for the exact opposite of Ron Paul. Brilliant.

**nosniboR11** · 07-17-12, 02:53 PM

love it when foreigners try to stick there nose in Americans business

**LVHerbie** · 07-17-12, 03:13 PM

Originally posted by nosniboR11

love it when foreigners try to stick there nose in Americans business

With the United States being the most active country in world deploying troops and dropping bombs to force their views on everyone else it hardly seems like it is just our business who we elect...

**SBR Lou** · 07-17-12, 03:24 PM

Originally posted by muldoon

Selective memory

Romney’s Unprecedented Attacks

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/01/31/romney-ramps-up-attack-ads-against-gingrich-to-unprecedented-levels.html

Mitt is outspending Newt 5 to 1 on negative ads in the most negative primary season ever, says John Avlon.

Let's get real. Newt never had a chance. Things worked out for the best.

Newt is a one-trick pony in debates. When he gained some momentum he didn't know how to handle it, always needs a chip on his shoulder. Romney stole the show when things got close and IMO created the separation with his debating skills, not ads.

**jjgold** · 07-17-12, 03:35 PM

Who does Opie think he is???????

SBR created a monster and now some corporate scratching their heads

" What did we do here?

**muldoon** · 07-17-12, 03:37 PM

Originally posted by SBR Lou

Let's get real. Newt never had a chance.

Even with the "Zcode" vote?

SBR Forum - Sports Betting Talk - Sportsbook Review Forum

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/1527619-breaking-news-sbr-endoreses-newt-gingrich.html

Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.

**Bluehorseshoe** · 07-17-12, 03:37 PM

Originally posted by rickbo528

Only a bedwetting lib cares about romney's tax return. I could care less about his return. Romney definitely not my first choice but I have to vote for him. Anything else is a vote to continue suicide. In a sane world Obama wouldn't be a viable candidate.

Who cares what party is asking??? Someone who's running for the highest office need to be transparent. If Romney was hiding money in the Cayman Islands and getting away with it, you think he's going to crack down on the others doing it?

Even Romney's father showed 8 years of returns when he ran. Why can't he???