Somebodies gotta teach you fuks how to win

[Sam Odom]

Patty , I have the UN-Edited version as my computer's wallpaper

[ApricotSinner32]

Patty , I have the UN-Edited version as my computer's wallpaper

I'm flattered

[CarpeDime]

Like I said many times before... wouldn't I be outraged about the pic and get the mods to remove it/get the people who are posting it banned if it was a real photo of me?

not at all

once the pic is up and out there, it is out there for good

trying to get the pic to disappear would be utterly futile

the correct strategy would be to act like you don't care on the grounds that the pic is photoshopped and not really you, and then use the fact that you are acting like you don't care as evidence that the pic must be photoshopped and not really you

[King Mayan]

[ApricotSinner32]

Maybe that's how you would handle it but I would in that situation freak the fuk out and get it deleted and/or never come back to sbr again in utter embarassment. Loshak how are them bath salts treatin ya?

[opie1988]

not at all

once the pic is up and out there, it is out there for good

trying to get the pic to disappear would be utterly futile

the correct strategy would be to act like you don't care on the grounds that the pic is photoshopped and not really you, and use the fact that you are acting like you don't care as evidence that the pic must be photoshopped and not really you

Unbelievably, the fukkin libtard here took the words right out of my mouth. Well said, Peter.

Don't try to bullsh*t us, Patty. This ain't Bobby you're takin too, pal.

[hugh_morris]

Teach? Who? How to win?.....Just another assclown.....peace

[CanuckG]

Lots of tourists playing cash games 1/2 and 2/5 nl at casino is equilavent to 10/25 cent online. Anyone saying playing wsop events to make money or profit is better than playing cash is insane. Must run like god to win a wsop event.

[ApricotSinner32]

Teach? Who? How to win?.....Just another assclown.....peace

Fade me I dare ya.

[cant call it]

lol you fukin idiot.i am the best here and no one even close

06/04/2012 05:46 AM	Roxxyfish edited 1 of their picks
04/21/2012 05:47 AM	Roxxyfish deleted 105 pick(s) from their spreadsheet.

[ApricotSinner32]

Lots of tourists playing cash games 1/2 and 2/5 nl at casino is equilavent to 10/25 cent online. Anyone saying playing wsop events to make money or profit is better than playing cash is insane. Must run like god to win a wsop event.

Not saying you can't make money in the long run playing but it's so swingy because of the massive fields. A lot of the good players got their start with their poker careers from shipping a big tourney.

[CanuckG]

Of course if you bink a tourney it helps but most of these guys are cash broke and staked because they degen their money in the pits. bankroll management, discipline and patience the three fukkin things you need.

[a4u2fear]

lol you fukin idiot.i am the best here and no one even close

no one gives a crap about the WNBA.

[hugh_morris]

Fade me I dare ya.

Absolutely...Kershaw's gang are goin wild tonite....cha ching...thanks for the play...peace

[ApricotSinner32]

Absolutely...Kershaw's gang are goin wild tonite....cha ching...thanks for the play...peace

We'll see if you're back to comment if the dodgers lose.

[jjgold]

no one gives a crap about the WNBA.

Great record there

One of best I have seen here

[ApricotSinner32]

What do you mean nobody gives a crap about the wnba? Making money is making money. Not that roxxy is really making money because he's a fraud.

[jjgold]

Roxy does not bet that much on wnba games
most books have small limits also
its not that hard to be in green when you bet all different amounts and martingale at times with play money

[hugh_morris]

We'll see if you're back to comment if the dodgers lose.

"If" is better than "When"....which leaves to think your doughting your play.....which i can understand...peace..

[ApricotSinner32]

Not doubting my methods I just understand that i'm not going to hit 100% over my lifetime that's not an attainable goal.

[hugh_morris]

Not doubting my methods I just understand that i'm not going to hit 100% over my lifetime that's not an attainable goal.

Alright...Lets see who is going to be the better team tonite....enough said....I'll be back to comment whatever happens...

[frizzelli]

A goof stiff taking shots at people!!! Unfukkinreal I have seen it all on this site. Patricia van dildo shouldn't you be scamming money from Bobby you piece of trash thief?

[hawley]

Patty the image was being removed initially then the mods stop caring.

You really expect anyone to believe that isn't you?


You are the biggest piece of shit stiff on the forum. Taking some pics to get 20 bucks or so is well within the realm of possibility

[CarpeDime]

A goof stiff taking shots at people!!! Unfukkinreal I have seen it all on this site. Patricia van dildo shouldn't you be scamming money from Bobby you piece of trash thief?

i'll scam every mot*erfu**er in this whole thread i do not give a fuk i'll start a fukin picks service fudge my record give out both sides of every game take your money get a cut of your losses from the books i send you to and disappear i do not give a fuk lets just get some winners tonight boys

i took bc -6.5 in the cfl

i dont know how you fuks can bet the kershaw game on or against but gl to all who do

[MonkeyF0cker]

never been to vegas yet you know the cash games are better than the wsop?

the main event is the most +ev poker tournament in the world - half the field are dumb celebrities, rich dudes that just want the experience, and scared money

the big cash games are filled with sharks yet the main event is filled with donkeys, and your choice is to play against the sharks?

Have you ever played in the main event?

That might have been true 6-7 years ago. Not anymore. There are probably 6-7 pros at every table.

The difference with cash games is that you can pick your tables. You don't get that luxury in the WSOP.

And there are a lot of cash games to choose from when the WSOP is running.

[CanuckG]

Agreed table selection is huge

[Br0nxer]

Unreal

Brokest mother fukker on the board running his goof stiff mouth

Hey sinner u find any new autistic kids to fleece in live bj

Sinner please go to the bash.

I personally know for a fact if u do go a certain poster is gonna put u in the fukkin hospital for that shit u pulled with bobby

I'll run circles around you capping every fukkin day u \*\*\*\*\*\*

[Br0nxer]

Patty only starts threads like this when hes broke

Ya need a couple bucks kid

[milwaukee mike]

Have you ever played in the main event?

That might have been true 6-7 years ago. Not anymore. There are probably 6-7 pros at every table.

The difference with cash games is that you can pick your tables. You don't get that luxury in the WSOP.

And there are a lot of cash games to choose from when the WSOP is running.

this is a solid post

but i still can't get past the fact that you kept arguing with me that house edge % is the same as hold %

[milwaukee mike]

and let me point out a simple and little known fact

over 1,000,000 sessions, no matter how good of a table you find, with a huge amount of time and effort invested, you will almost certainly be behind playing poker. the rake is almost always more than your advantage in the long run. of course, in the short run you might find some no limit tables with drunk morons throwing $1000 away but i have probably lost almost as much as i've won in those games.

back in stu ungar's day when only 5% of the players understood math and situations you could've made a living. but now even quite a few of the major pros go broke because almost all of the players are really good vs a generation ago. and almost nobody can make a living unless they've pimped themselves out with endorsement deals, books, etc.

why do you think esfandiari and other top pros sold off 90% of their entry into the $1,000,000 game? hellmuth has more money than god and considers himself the best tournament player in the world, and still he didn't want to have any of his own money on the line.

[MonkeyF0cker]

this is a solid post

but i still can't get past the fact that you kept arguing with me that house edge % is the same as hold %

Well, I'll argue it until I die because it's true. Theoretical hold = house edge. House hold != house edge.

When you tell players there is an edge in a game, it does not mean "house edge" nor theoretical hold.

[MonkeyF0cker]

and let me point out a simple and little known fact

over 1,000,000 sessions, no matter how good of a table you find, with a huge amount of time and effort invested, you will almost certainly be behind playing poker. the rake is almost always more than your advantage in the long run. of course, in the short run you might find some no limit tables with drunk morons throwing $1000 away but i have probably lost almost as much as i've won in those games.

back in stu ungar's day when only 5% of the players understood math and situations you could've made a living. but now even quite a few of the major pros go broke because almost all of the players are really good vs a generation ago. and almost nobody can make a living unless they've pimped themselves out with endorsement deals, books, etc.

why do you think esfandiari and other top pros sold off 90% of their entry into the $1,000,000 game? hellmuth has more money than god and considers himself the best tournament player in the world, and still he didn't want to have any of his own money on the line.

Your net worth would need to be close to $100 million to play in that tourney. That's why no pros are buying themselves in. It goes back to what Peter was saying about EG. There are plenty of pros that do just fine for themselves.

Poker has become more difficult, but it is still possible to make a living playing. Rake is pretty insignficant in games higher than $2/$5 NL.

Lower limit players can take advantage of casino/online rakeback promotions as well. They didn't have those when I started playing.

[drnkyourmlkshk]

Your net worth would need to be close to $100 million to play in that tourney. That's why no pros are buying themselves in. It goes back to what Peter was saying about EG. There are plenty of pros that do just fine for themselves.

Poker has become more difficult, but it is still possible to make a living playing. Rake is pretty insignficant in games higher than $2/$5 NL.

Lower limit players can take advantage of casino/online rakeback promotions as well. They didn't have those when I started playing.

Im not certain why or how I got drawn into this conversation but I have to comment. I play poker for a living 300 days a year I will gladly buy anyone a beer when they are in LV and shoot the hey about anything pretty much I'm a down to earth guy. I have to say you have made a few false statements and I for some reason have felt compelled to correct as best as possible.

First off many players including myself until this year have always bought in for themselves even if not tourney players because the EV of the ME is so high. Many of us at the Bellagio who played in the 20-40 & 30-60 limit whether it be 08 or hold me played a ton of ssatellites last year and pooled our money together at times to do so.. There's a huge difference between nLHE deep big field tourneys and NL cash obv and after discussing it there was no way anyone who's an advantage player doesn't understand 4000 people of dead money in any poker tournament. Satellites are very EV especially closer to the ME on weekends.

Second thing you stated that got me to Post was the rake comment above. First off there are very few big bet pros who can sustain a 5/100 bb win rate at 2/5 NL that doesn't feel the pressure to move up ASAP due to the rake and the variance of the lower limits this goes for all forms. Also many times when you move up you no longer pay rake! You pay time! There's a huge difference! It's the difference of paying -105 & -110 over the course of all of your wagers for the rest of your life. I believe I understand what you were trying to say.
TBC The main event at the WSOP is the best +EV spot you'll find in any form of gambling regardless of how you get in.
Second rakes significant to every single poker player who depends on any income from the game no matter how small or large. You should never stop tracking rake and what you're paying if you don't continue to know and see what it's doing to your personal bottom line you'll never realize the game you're playing isn't capable of being beat any longer.
srry for interrupting, MILK
plz carry on

[MonkeyF0cker]

Im not certain why or how I got drawn into this conversation but I have to comment. I play poker for a living 300 days a year I will gladly buy anyone a beer when they are in LV and shoot the hey about anything pretty much I'm a down to earth guy. I have to say you have made a few false statements and I for some reason have felt compelled to correct as best as possible.

First off many players including myself until this year have always bought in for themselves even if not tourney players because the EV of the ME is so high. Many of us at the Bellagio who played in the 20-40 & 30-60 limit whether it be 08 or hold me played a ton of ssatellites last year and pooled our money together at times to do so.. There's a huge difference between nLHE deep big field tourneys and NL cash obv and after discussing it there was no way anyone who's an advantage player doesn't understand 4000 people of dead money in any poker tournament. Satellites are very EV especially closer to the ME on weekends.

Second thing you stated that got me to Post was the rake comment above. First off there are very few big bet pros who can sustain a 5/100 bb win rate at 2/5 NL that doesn't feel the pressure to move up ASAP due to the rake and the variance of the lower limits this goes for all forms. Also many times when you move up you no longer pay rake! You pay time! There's a huge difference! It's the difference of paying -105 & -110 over the course of all of your wagers for the rest of your life. I believe I understand what you were trying to say.
TBC The main event at the WSOP is the best +EV spot you'll find in any form of gambling regardless of how you get in.
Second rakes significant to every single poker player who depends on any income from the game no matter how small or large. You should never stop tracking rake and what you're paying if you don't continue to know and see what it's doing to your personal bottom line you'll never realize the game you're playing isn't capable of being beat any longer.
srry for interrupting, MILK
plz carry on

I wasn't talking about buying into the main event by yourself. I was talking about buying into the Big One by yourself. No poker player can afford to drop $1 million of their own money on a single buyin. Nobody.

The main event can have +EV. Most of the +EV that you're talking about is related to satellites rather than the tournament itself though. The field is huge and gets competitively tougher every year. I played my first main event in 2005 and I wish they were all like it.

I think you're agreeing with me about rake. I never said that it shouldn't be tracked or regarded. My point was that it isn't as large of a factor at higher limits.

[Goat Milk]

Go slither back into your hole you fukkin snake