CanuckG and No Coincidences plays thread

[No coincidences]

Wisconsin +3 (1U)

[BaLLcappin99]

No coin I just noticed u have 29,757 posts since you joined roughly two years ago. Anywho, if you take 29,757 / 730 days that's 40.76 posts per days since you joined. How on ******* earth do you post 40 times per day every single day for two years lol. Does it really take two years of 40 posts per day to fade the public? This is a serious question

[dynamite140]

No coin I just noticed u have 29,757 posts since you joined roughly two years ago. Anywho, if you take 29,757 / 730 days that's 40.76 posts per days since you joined. How on ******* earth do you post 40 times per day every single day for two years lol. Does it really take two years of 40 posts per day to fade the public? This is a serious question

His argument is his job requires him to be on computer 10 hours a day and that he is a great multitasker

[Dexter]

Memphis Grizzlies -4.5 (2U)

i knew you would be on this.

[Pauulzcappin]

No coin I just noticed u have 29,757 posts since you joined roughly two years ago. Anywho, if you take 29,757 / 730 days that's 40.76 posts per days since you joined. How on ******* earth do you post 40 times per day every single day for two years lol. Does it really take two years of 40 posts per day to fade the public? This is a serious question

You are one annoying fukking ghost. you've been here for a day or some shit and all you do is bash others, including lb and no coin.

mods are really slacking around here.

[BaLLcappin99]

You're the first guy to say that paul. And it was a serious question b/c I feel like No Coin is holding back on his real analysis behind his picks. Problem?

[PR9]

You are one annoying fukking ghost. you've been here for a day or some shit and all you do is bash others, including lb and no coin.

mods are really slacking around here.

He's a total moron with no life trying to ruin every thread. Everyone just ignore the troll

[Pauulzcappin]

You're the first guy to say that paul. And it was a serious question b/c I feel like No Coin is holding back on his real analysis behind his picks. Problem?

I looked at your post history. Your VERY FIRST POST was bashing LB. Care to mention why? From what I've seen you been around.

[BaLLcappin99]

I already told in several posts I am not a ghost, but actually dontbuythehook aka michaelmakesit

[hawley]

michaelmakesit as in that drumming video on youtube?

[hawley]

the TNT 1h trend finally comes to an end

[No coincidences]

i knew you would be on this.

And?

[Dexter]

And?

i just knew you would play an RLM to the favorite. i didnt even have to look in your thread.
i guess the "and" is a chest thump for winning the bet......great capping. lol
hopefully one day you'll get that the true sharps played this at 3/3.5 and the square bet was taking them -4.5.
actually a 2.5 open at BM....

[dynamite140]

i just knew you would play an RLM to the favorite. i didnt even have to look in your thread.

i guess the "and" is a chest thump for winning the bet......great capping. lol

hopefully one day you'll get that the true sharps played this at 3/3.5 and the square bet was taking them -4.5.

actually a 2.5 open at BM....

The And Part is his arrogant comment when he wins his pick. Had he not, he create a thread about how bad the Grizzlies are.


Small bettors are like this

[Dexter]

The And Part is his arrogant comment when he wins his pick. Had he not, he create a thread about how bad the Grizzlies are.

Small bettors are like this

you need to stop already bro....my intentions with that post was not to spur on more hate posts from you. you've made it crystal clear over and over how you feel about him.

the size of someones bet has nothing to do with how good of a sports gambler they are. its all relative. i actually commend nocoin for not being a liar and claiming bullshit units.

[dynamite140]

The problem with him is not only that. You see how negative he is to you as well? Small bettors like him are bitter and insecure and make delusional lies.

The thing is he can't even admit that almost every play of his is line movement. He denies it and says its MUCH MORE THAN THAT yet he can't accept the truth. If it was much more, then have you ever seen him give the reasoning? There isn't

[CanuckG]

Canucks +105 (1U)
Ducks +115 (1U)

Well vancouver won so guaranteed profit with ducks pending

[mikea33]

Well vancouver won so guaranteed profit with ducks pending

[No coincidences]

i just knew you would play an RLM to the favorite. i didnt even have to look in your thread.
i guess the "and" is a chest thump for winning the bet......great capping. lol
hopefully one day you'll get that the true sharps played this at 3/3.5 and the square bet was taking them -4.5.
actually a 2.5 open at BM....

I agreed.

I have a feeling I caught that Memphis line at its peak and that it's a bad number. I'd be willing to guess a -4 will be available at the very least later. Should've taken the -3.5 last night.

I took the Grizzlies because they desperately needed a win, the Knicks are erratic and I thought Gay would be a matchup problem for them. Plus, the line said it all. No reason for the Knicks to be more than a single possession dog here.

[dynamite140]

I agreed.



I took the Grizzlies because they desperately needed a win, the Knicks are erratic and I thought Gay would be a matchup problem for them. Plus, the line said it all. No reason for the Knicks to be more than a single possession dog here.

Self denial again. No Coincidences uses this reason as oppose to looking at the line movement as his primary reason. He said, plus, the line said it all as if that wasn't the number 1 reason for his pick.


Like No Coincidences will ever get the -3.5. The only way that would happen is he bet it first. The problem with this is he won't make a bet unless he looks at where the line movement is going. Then again if he did bet it at -3.5 and it moves to -3, he will say his bet is going to lose before the game even started. How many times have he heard that.

[No coincidences]

St. Mary's -3.5 (2U)
Memphis Grizzlies -4.5 (2U)

Orlando/Golden State under 189 (1U)

Knicks/Grizz over 98.5 1H (1U)

Wisconsin +3 (1U)

Hopefully St. Mary's cashes, because the Orlando/GS under is shot.

2-1, +1.9U with those two pending.

[Dexter]

I agreed.

I took the Grizzlies because they desperately needed a win, the Knicks are erratic and I thought Gay would be a matchup problem for them. Plus, the line said it all. No reason for the Knicks to be more than a single possession dog here.

couldnt disagree more....the knicks were playing btb and traveling vs a rested memphis team. a 4pt spread made complete sense.

my bad then.....thought you played it b/c of the serious RLM to the favorite.

[BetterBizness]

Memphis at home is generally never a bad bet esp when favored within a couple of buckets...

[CanuckG]

Canucks +105 (1U)
Ducks +115 (1U)

1-1 +5 bucks

13-13 +$129

[BaLLcappin99]

No coin I think you need to furnish us a betting slip to prove this dynamite guy wrong once and for all that you don't risk $20 per game. I mean if you are betting $20 a game, then technically we all should be betting $5 or less since the handicapper tends to have the bigger bankroll and generally way more risk averse than the tailers. Will you do that for your fans?

[Ace_of_Spades]

Anyone want to tell me why the GS warriors total was so low? Seriously, they blitzed that total. I didn't touch the total, but GS

[dynamite140]

couldnt disagree more....the knicks were playing btb and traveling vs a rested memphis team. a 4pt spread made complete sense.

my bad then.....thought you played it b/c of the serious RLM to the favorite.

Dexter, i'm not sure if you are aware of it or not. Many posters have said no coin we know you like Team A because of the line movement. Each time a person says this, no coincidences will deny it and give some BS reason.

Something like what he said earlier with memphis. This clown just makes up delusional lies. He can't even ADMIT the only reason he liked Memphis was because of the line movement. This clown doesn't even talk about matchup problems, he just spills BS out of his mouth. The only thing that went on his mind about this game was its a trap and public loves Knicks getting 4.5 and he will fade the public because the line went from knicks +3.5 to +4.5. He uses reasons like I like Memphis b/c Knicks are a bad matchup for them or stuff like I felt like Memphis will play harder.

Look at his previous posts and you will see this over and over. Just like how he creates useless threads when his team is losing and OF COURSE when someone say NO COIN... WE KNOW YOU BET THAT TEAM, his defense will be THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY BET AND I WAS MAKING AN OBSERVATION.


Why in the world should you apologize to him for assuming you are wrong for assuming he like Memphis because of the line movement. That is the reason. He just don't want to admit it and say line movement is just one of the ways he makes picks yet it doesn't decide everything.

[CanuckG]

Cleveland Cavaliers +10.5 (2U)

[YOUNGBUCK]

You are one annoying fukking ghost. you've been here for a day or some shit and all you do is bash others, including lb and no coin.

mods are really slacking around here.

Ya no $hit I dont think theres any mods here at all 95% of this site is useless turds at least NoCo spurs discussion 90% of ppl here couldnt hit 50% if they tried.... Ive read the stupidest things in my life on this forum ppl who dont know sports they just have systems which is a joke to me mos likely everyone on here is a fat unathletic turd who never played a sport

And if there is a mod can I get my trivia pts yet orrrrrrrrrrrrr..........

[SlickRick1382]

Ya no $hit I dont think theres any mods here at all 95% of this site is useless turds at least NoCo spurs discussion 90% of ppl here couldnt hit 50% if they tried.... Ive read the stupidest things in my life on this forum ppl who dont know sports they just have systems which is a joke to me mos likely everyone on here is a fat unathletic turd who never played a sport And if there is a mod can I get my trivia pts yet orrrrrrrrrrrrr..........

I once rolled down a flight of stairs and felt athletic doing it. Does that count as playing a sport?

[ApricotSinner32]

Ya no $hit I dont think theres any mods here at all 95% of this site is useless turds at least NoCo spurs discussion 90% of ppl here couldnt hit 50% if they tried.... Ive read the stupidest things in my life on this forum ppl who dont know sports they just have systems which is a joke to me mos likely everyone on here is a fat unathletic turd who never played a sport

And if there is a mod can I get my trivia pts yet orrrrrrrrrrrrr..........

Knowing sports/Being an athlete does not usually correlate well with profitable sports betting.

[SpreadSniper]

da **** is wrong with people on this forum?.... starting to bother less and less with it due to the overall sour taste left in my mouth after visiting.

Im perfectly capable of losing money on my own. Don't need some knowledgeable asshat interjecting common sense and sound reasoning into my otherwise cloudy recipe for success or lack there of.

[No coincidences]

couldnt disagree more....the knicks were playing btb and traveling vs a rested memphis team. a 4pt spread made complete sense.

my bad then.....thought you played it b/c of the serious RLM to the favorite.

Obviously that didn't hurt -- I mean, the line technically opened at +1 for Memphis at BetOnline and Glantz-Culver -- so the fact that it reached -5 in some spots throws up warning signs all over the place if you're on the Knicks. That goes without saying. What do you want me to do -- pretend that's not an issue and ignore those factors, especially when I like the team it's favoring? Why would I do that?

I did think I was getting a bad number, though, with the -4.5. Turns out it didn't matter. But yes, I'll get burned by sharps looking for a middle more often than not betting the peak number vs. getting it before it makes a huge move.

[No coincidences]

No coin I think you need to furnish us a betting slip to prove this dynamite guy wrong once and for all that you don't risk $20 per game. I mean if you are betting $20 a game, then technically we all should be betting $5 or less since the handicapper tends to have the bigger bankroll and generally way more risk averse than the tailers. Will you do that for your fans?

What are you talking about? Each of my units is $20, so my single-game bet sizes are anywhere from $20 to over $200. I've said that since day one. I'm not forcing anyone to follow me, fade me or anything in between. You act like there are "rules" to having a thread and posting plays. What in the hell does it matter how much I bet per game, or you for that matter? That's your own personal preference chief.

[YOUNGBUCK]

Knowing sports/Being an athlete does not usually correlate well with profitable sports betting.

Ya not really wat I was saying but true and in some cases it may help like everytime everyone bets against Baylor