The NFL God is Back

[SportsMushroom]

I went through your old threads you had a horrible record bellow 50% capper

stop the crap about 70%

[ssk13809]

^^^
No links? No proofs? The guy who bet me 300 points I wouldn't hit 70% is wrong? The hundreds who followed me are wrong? But the guy who skims my threads in 5 minutes and makes this claim without any links is right?
Please....is this trolling/hating or just downright pathetic?

[ssk13809]

I will keep posting this till you counter it exposing what a fraud you are


Alrite enough of this BS.


We have guys who bet me I won't hit 70% last year, they followed my picks very closely. Here is what he had to say just yesterday in this thread
Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset"> Originally Posted by ScottLocke
You did hit 70%
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
You, who 'skimmed' through my threads, and without ANY links to back yourself up, are going to claim otherwise against a guy who followed my threads closely last year with 300 points on the line? Do you think people are dumb enough to believe you?

How about the 100 or so that followed me live last year. They all know I hit 70%. Are they all wrong and you, WITHOUT any links, is right? Do you really think anyone believes you?


But I'll still give you a chance. I kept a running ATS record all year that had me hitting 70% for the season. For me to not have hit 70%, that record at some point must have been wrong. Find me that point. Give a link to back yourself up or GTFO and stop making up BS

[SportsMushroom]

he said you hit 70%? I say you didnt

prove me wrong, you cant because you are full of shit

[ssk13809]

he said you hit 70%? I say you didnt

prove me wrong, you cant because you are full of shit

He had 300 points on the line. You didn't.
He followed me all last year closely. You skimmed through the threads.

Here are links of my run and the proof

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nfl-handic...ml-thread.html (Thread 1)
http://forum.sbrforum.com/nfl-handic...fl-thread.html (Thread 2)
http://forum.sbrforum.com/nfl-handic...hread-3-a.html (Thread 3)

You have? Nothing. Not 1 link. Just 'your word'. A running record was kept from thread 1 to 3, if I didn't hit 70%, that running record must have been wrong at some point. Find that point. Prove yourself right. Or GTFO





No one is stupid enough to believe your dumbass

[SportsMushroom]

nah, no record keeping in those threads, you just claim numbers out of your head

as I said, I went through your threads, bellow 50% and a chaser, that is all I will say

[ssk13809]

nah, no record keeping in those threads, you just claim numbers out of your head

as I said, I went through your threads, bellow 50% and a chaser, that is all I will say

Okay once again, if my running record "out of my head" was wrong at some point, find when it was 1st wrong then. Give me a link. Prove yourself. Give something than "the word from a brainless piece of mushroom sh*t" .

Enough of this BS.


We have guys who bet me I won't hit 70% last year, they followed my picks very closely. Here is what he had to say just yesterday in this thread

You did hit 70%

You, who 'skimmed' through my threads, and without ANY links to back yourself up, are going to claim otherwise against a guy who followed my threads closely last year with 300 points on the line? Do you think people are dumb enough to believe you?

How about the 100 or so that followed me live last year. They all know I hit 70%. Are they all wrong and you, WITHOUT any links, is right? Do you really think anyone believes you?


But I'll still give you a chance. I kept a running ATS record all year that had me hitting 70% for the season. For me to not have hit 70%, that record at some point must have been wrong. Find me that point. Give a link to back yourself up or GTFO and stop making up BS

[ssk13809]

Does this mushroom piece of sh*it still not realize how dumb he sounds?


"I am right, I skimmed through your threads in 5 minutes but the guy who bet you 300 points you won't hit 70% ATS, oh he is wrong and so are all the hundreds who were watching your thread closely, but I am right, I can read 5,000 posts in 5 minutes, btw I have no links to back myself up....and i hate you"


Is this loser for real? Does he actually think everyone is this retarded? I mean this is SBR, but still...if anyone believes this sh*it even on SBR its kind of sad.

[ssk13809]

And once again, I'm not posting any more plays (No point in doing so if my wins in a year will be losses on SBR), what my ATS rate would've been this year will go down as undetermined (I would've hit at least 70% again though), but last year? I know what I hit last year, and I can only win this battle of 70+% from last year.

[SportsMushroom]

ok we got it, you are not gonna post your plays anymore, nobody cares

you keep repeating it like you are waiting for people to beg you to post again, aint gonna happen

why dont you have one of your ghosts post as someone else and beg you to stay?

[ssk13809]

ok we got it, you are not gonna post your plays anymore, nobody cares

you keep repeating it like you are waiting for people to beg you to post again, aint gonna happen

why dont you have one of your ghosts post as someone else and beg you to stay?

I'm still waiting on links from last year. As I already showed, do you really think anyone is stupid enough to believe your dumbass over people who actually had points on my 70% and others who were following that thread? Without any links?

Come on does it trouble you that much I hit 70%? Jealous? Which is it?

[kcDdegenerate]

I spent most of my bullsht time at work going through pages and pages of those links where all the threads are all closed by mods...no record keeping and most of it is a bunch of nonsense where others are calling you out with a few good plays here and there..70%

[ssk13809]

I spent most of my bullsht time at work going through pages and pages of those links where all the threads are all closed by mods...no record keeping and most of it is a bunch of nonsense where others are calling you out with a few good plays here and there..70%

A running record was kept throughout. If you think it wasn't at all, I can give you links to that.
If a running record was kept, and it resulted in 70%, then at some point it must have been wrong, show where it must have gone wrong. In other words, back yourself up.



We have guys who bet points that I won't hit 70% for the season, and they agreed I hit 70% for the season. They watched closely. You think they are wrong?



But like I said, back yourself up with links or GTFO

[kcDdegenerate]

btw...you still havent answer my questions? 1-how many ats plays have you posted this year? and 2-then why the fck would you proudly state that you are undefeated against the spread this year?

[SportsMushroom]

But like I said, back yourself up with links or GTFO

nope, you are the one who desperately wants people to believe him so you'll have to do the work if you want to prove you are not a fraud

we already looked at your threads and you are a horrible gambler who tries to convince people otherwise

[ssk13809]

nope, you are the one who desperately wants people to believe him so you'll have to do the work if you want to prove you are not a fraud

we already looked at your threads and you are a horrible gambler who tries to convince people otherwise

I've already posted links dumbass.

enough of this BS.


We have guys who bet me I won't hit 70% last year, they followed my picks very closely. Here is what he had to say just yesterday in this thread

You did hit 70%

You, who 'skimmed' through my threads, and without ANY links to back yourself up, are going to claim otherwise against a guy who followed my threads closely last year with 300 points on the line? Do you think people are dumb enough to believe you?

How about the 100 or so that followed me live last year. They all know I hit 70%. Are they all wrong and you, WITHOUT any links, is right? Do you really think anyone believes you?


But I'll still give you a chance. I kept a running ATS record all year that had me hitting 70% for the season. For me to not have hit 70%, that record at some point must have been wrong. Find me that point. Give a link to back yourself up or GTFO and stop making up BS

[kcDdegenerate]

Scott locke posted that you did hit 70% during a 2 week stretch but not for the season...go back 3-5 pages from yesterday..nice try

[ssk13809]

Scott locke posted that you did hit 70% during a 2 week stretch but not for the season...go back 3-5 pages from yesterday..nice try

He did not say 2 week stretch. He said 2nd half. And he exaggerated, it was more from Week 5 (not 2nd half) when my threads started.

2 weeks


Come on

[SportsMushroom]

He did not say 2 week stretch. He said 2nd half. And he exaggerated, it was more from Week 5 (not 2nd half) when my threads started. 2 weeks Come on

you tried to manipulate what was said, which is more proof of your deceiving nature

[kcDdegenerate]

You did hit 70%, over like 20 ATS plays during the 2nd half of the year. I'll admit that much. 20 plays means shit. I could get lucky and hit 70% picking blind over 20 plays... You need at least 200-300 plays before you can start stating a win percentage. Before that its irrelevant. So just keep posting picks and stop saying you are hitting 70%. BTW there is no possible way you hit 70% over 200 plays. It just can't be done. And this is why everyone is on your case, because you think you are better than everyone else and can achieve something that cannot be done. There is not enough error in NFL lines to achieve 70%, NFL lines are sharp. 60% is real good and 65% may be attainable if you are super selective. But even so, I would rather pick 58% or so over 100 plays than pick 65% over 20 plays. Being selective and attaining a super high win % is just dumb, you are passing up value. You should be betting anything you think you have a 53%+ win rate on, not just 70%+ or you are giving up value. The sooner you learn this stuff the sooner people will start respecting you.

original post.....funny how you cut everything out after the "you did hit 70%" part

[kcDdegenerate]

[ssk13809]

original post.....funny how you cut everything out after the "you did hit 70%" part

I still read 2nd half. At least I'm not CHANGING what he said to 2 weeks. Changing is a lot worse, which is exactly what you and mushroom are doing for my past records. Changing my wins to losses.

Changing = lying


Keep it up guys. 2 weeks

[kcDdegenerate]

[kcDdegenerate]

btw...you still havent answer my questions? 1-how many ats plays have you posted this year? and 2-then why the fck would you proudly state that you are undefeated against the spread this year?

still waiting for an answer lmao

[kcDdegenerate]

I still read 2nd half. At least I'm not CHANGING what he said to 2 weeks. Changing is a lot worse, which is exactly what you and mushroom are doing for my past records. Changing my wins to losses. Changing = lying Keep it up guys. 2 weeks

[ssk13809]

still waiting for an answer lmao

Still hit 70% ATS last year (I actually have links and people to back me up) and went undefeated ATS this year.


^^^ 2 facts right above

[SportsMushroom]

Still hit 70% ATS last year (I actually have links and people to back me up) and went undefeated ATS this year. ^^^ 2 facts right above

no you didnt, fact

[ssk13809]

no you didnt, fact

I have proof u don't

Fact

[SportsPedagogy]

i went through your first thread. Blatant lies. Here are the notes that i took. Tell me where i am wrong and i will show you where i am right.

Week 5

ML
49ers LOSE
Titans WIN
Bears WIN
Vikings LOSE
ATS
Texans -3 LOSE
49ers -3.5 LOSE
Bengals -6.5 LOSE
Bears -3 WIN
Titans +6.5 WIN
Parlay
Bengals/Colts LOSE
Week 5: 2-3ATS 2-1 ML 0-1 PARLAY
Week 6
ATS
Falcons +3 LOSE
Vikings -1.5 Win
Texans -4.5 Lose
Texans -4 Push
Saints -4 Win
Rams +8 Win
Colts -3 Push
ML
Falcons Win
Rams WIN
Vikings Win
Parlay Win
Steelers/Saints/Colts Win
Week 6: ATS 3-2-2 ML 3-0 Parlays 1-0
Week 7
ML
Falcons Win
Cowboys LOSE
ATS
Falcons -3.5 Win
Seahawks -5.5 Win
Giants -3 2nd Half LOSE
Parlay
*Not counting his Falcons ML/ATS parlays because it is an invalid parlay
Ravens/Saints/Seahawks Lose
Bears/Dolphins/Titans Lose
Week 7: ATS 2-1 ML 1-1 Parlay 0-2
Through 3 weeks, SSK is 7-6-2 ATS, 4-2 ML and 1-3 Parlay
He writes his own updates as 3-0-1 ATS and 5-3 ML and 1-3 Parlay
Week 8
ATS
Rams -3 Win
Chargers -3 Win
ML
Rams Win
Saints Win
Bucs Win
Parlay
Packers/Redskins/Seahawks Lose
Week 8: 2-0 ATS 3-0 ML 0-1 Parlay
He ends the thread with a good week. The thread is close over arguments of his record. Apparently the Mod did not review his actual record vs what he was posting. A new thread is started.
His current record is 9-6-2 ATS, 7-2 ML and 1-4 Parlays
He states his record at 5-0-1 ATS, 8-4 ML and no mention of his Parlays

Decent Job on the ML's but you are very delusional to claim that you are hitting 90% ATS. i dont feel like weeding through the 2nd thread, nor do i feel the need too

[kcDdegenerate]

thanks for the entertainment during my work day...its a shame you're an idiot and dont know it .

[ssk13809]

I claimed 70% not 90 on ATS...and are we really counting games I didn't bet on?

[SportsPedagogy]

10-05-10, 08:11 PM #18
ssk13809


Become A Pro!
Joined: 08-25-10
Posts: 2,436
SBR Points: 91

Message Me


Week 1 Bets:


49ers -175 (Risk 10 Units to Win 5.7 units)
Titans +240 (Risk 4.2 units to win 10 units)


I'll probably have more later. But those are value plays.



ATS Plays:

Texans -3
49ers -3.5
Bengals -6.5

Texans -3 Giants 34, Texans 10 LOSE
49ers -3.5 Eagles 27, 49ers 24 LOSE
Bengals -6.5 Bucs 24, Bengals 21 LOSE

Tell me where you didnt bet them

[DrStale]

Wait...his "70% claim" is based on a 15 game sample? Seriously?

[ScottLocke]

Scott locke posted that you did hit 70% during a 2 week stretch but not for the season...go back 3-5 pages from yesterday..nice try

^^This.

You hit 70% over like a 5-6 week stretch betting 300 points against me. NOT for the entire season. In fact you were well below 70% before that. AND there was a Giants second half bet you made during that 5-6 week stretch that you lost that would have brought you under 70% but it was not counted as an ATS pick cause it was a halftime bet. When in reality it still should be counted. But whatever, continue on deluding yourself of unachievable fairy tail records that you will never attain over the long haul.

[ScottLocke]

Wait...his "70% claim" is based on a 15 game sample? Seriously?

Ya... hey this one time I went 7-0 over a 7 game sample.

HEY guys I am a 100% ATS capper look at me!!!