The NFL God is Back

[SportsMushroom]

looking even worse 17 pages in, you are negative in mls ats and parlays

[gimpy]

I tailed SSK a few times last year. Keep your head up man, you'll do just fine.

[ssk13809]

Is this a sports betting forum or a chat room? Grow up guys. Close this thread already MODS do your job.

Yeah I'm tired of this sh*it by SportsMushroom. Everyone who kept with the thread last year knows I kept an accurate record throughout the year. Besides I've given that guy proof, and he has given nothing but "I can't read".

Posts from him will be ignored. I want to get on with my weekly ATS play (70% long-term)

[SportsMushroom]

hahah he parlays the ml with the spread and counts them as wins and claims his bookie takes the bet


not to mention there are posts of losing bets that have been edited

dude ive been through half your threads and you are an under 50% bettor, why do you claim 70%?

[crustyme]

im going to read this thread one night and have a good laugh.

[ssk13809]

hahah he parlays the ml with the spread and counts them as wins and claims his bookie takes the bet


not to mention there are posts of losing bets that have been edited

dude ive been through half your threads and you are an under 50% bettor, why do you claim 70%?

The bet was cancelled. And that was explained in the thread. And LOL from "He doesn't post his bets/records" to "They have been edited"

Honestly not wasting anymore time on "last year". I've gone over it hundreds of times and not 1 poster has found something that was wrong and hasn't been fixed. The edited posts were either edited before game, or have unedited versions somewhere in the thread before the game. This has been proven hundreds of times and not 1 person has found a counter example. You can try too.

But not wasting anymore time on your posts without proof.

[SportsPedagogy]

dude, im going thru your threads right now ..... 3 weeks down and your no where near 70% ats .... your like 5-4-1

[SportsMushroom]

The bet was cancelled. And that was explained in the thread. And LOL from "He doesn't post his bets/records" to "They have been edited" Honestly not wasting anymore time on "last year". I've gone over it hundreds of times and not 1 poster has found something that was wrong and hasn't been fixed. The edited posts were either edited before game, or have unedited versions somewhere in the thread before the game. This has been proven hundreds of times and not 1 person has found a counter example. You can try too. But not wasting anymore time on your posts without proof.

want a record? i'm half way through your threads you are barely getting 50% on mls and spreads and you are 4-18 on parlays

in one of your threads you claim to be 10-0-1 yet you are 7-6 ats

how do those figures sound?

not to mention your chase plays

and your 60 unit plays on the patriots


dude you are a brandon lang type, hype wins, hide losses and chase all day long with imaginary money

in one thread you said your bankroll was something like 30 dollars which you'd turned into 400 dollars, 5 pages later you have a team and you have a 100K bankroll

[stevo809]

SSK definitely kept a record last year. He finished 70+% ATS and up over 150 Units.

Why would you expect anything less from the NFL god. And he actually had a bad year last year. Just imagine when he has an average year.

[Educ8d Degener8]

SSK definitely kept a record last year. He finished 70+% ATS and up over 150 Units.

Why would you expect anything less from the NFL god. And he actually had a bad year last year. Just imagine when he has an average year.

I heard his average year is 102% correct picks. But this is undocumented... of course.

[kramerthekid]

you dudes are pathetic that bash him on the computer over nothing. if you seriously can't sleep at night because he posts that he has a 70% win percentage or whatever, than your just a fat degenerate loser who has no life. sportsmushroom grow up dude and get on with your life, your just giving him the shit he wants

[Full Time Hobo]

I am surprised this thread hasn't been closed; between the hilarious bickering and the ghosting of the God himself.

[phillybadboy]

teaser tiger is winning

[ssk13809]

want a record? i'm half way through your threads you are barely getting 50% on mls and spreads and you are 4-18 on parlays

in one of your threads you claim to be 10-0-1 yet you are 7-6 ats

Really 7-6 ATS? I claimed something wrong? I kept a running record all year long, at what point was that inaccurate? If you can show me at any 1 point my running record was inaccurate (and it wasn't corrected) then you have proof. Otherwise, stop making sh*it up

[ssk13809]

you dudes are pathetic that bash him on the computer over nothing. if you seriously can't sleep at night because he posts that he has a 70% win percentage or whatever, than your just a fat degenerate loser who has no life. sportsmushroom grow up dude and get on with your life, your just giving him the shit he wants

Like I said, haters have dropped to new lows. They want to change the past...wow.

[ssk13809]

Though I had a ATS play to post right now (I've already bet on it)


I'm not posting anymore plays.


For a very simple reason. There is no point. The plays I do post and win, people say I lost just because I won. Really that's as pathetic as it gets. There is no point of keeping a 'documented' record when people are going to ignore what is documented and make up their own sh*it just because I won. Everyone last year knows I hit 70% ATS, but now, just because some feel like it, are going to say I went 50% with no links to back themselves up? What's the point of even posting your plays then if what counts is what people want the results to be rather than the actual results?



No more plays from me. I'll take the 70% ATS career SBR record with links to back it up (vs. whatever the haters have with no links to back it up).




Mods can close this thread if they want to

[ssk13809]

Now for the people who are going to say "He will be back"


Tell me 1 reason I should comeback if the Wins in real-life I get will be called losses on SBR tomorrow. There is absolutely no point of posting a play if even if I win it will count as a loss. It's a lose-lose. I'm done with SBR.


Like I said, 70% ATS (last year with links to back it up) vs. whatever haters want to think I hit (with nothing to back themselves up). I'll take the 70%. And will hit about 75-80% ATS easily this year. Would've done it, haters already know this, but luckily they stopped me before I did. Perfect timing, right before I was about to play my 1st ATS play. Peace.

[ehp6737]

SSK definitely kept a record last year. He finished 70+% ATS and up over 150 Units.

Why would you expect anything less from the NFL god. And he actually had a bad year last year. Just imagine when he has an average year.

This poster joined yesterday and has 3 posts.

[andywend]

SSK,

Even if you could pick 70% winners (which of course you can't unless they are big moneyline favorites), its not worth putting up with your incredible pompous attitude.

True winners just don't go around saying how great they are by calling themselves "the NFL God".

Though I had a ATS play to post right now (I've already bet on it)


I'm not posting anymore plays.

Be a man of your word and STOP posting your plays.

If you truly are a winning sports bettor, you will SILENTLY bet your plays and enjoy counting your winnings. If you are an attention whore, then you'll continue posting either under the alias SSK or your ghost account stevo809.

[ssk13809]

SSK,

Even if you could pick 70% winners (which of course you can't unless they are big moneyline favorites), its not worth putting up with your incredible pompous attitude.

True winners just don't go around saying how great they are by calling themselves "the NFL God".Be a man of your word and STOP posting your plays.

If you truly are a winning sports bettor, you will SILENTLY bet your plays and enjoy counting your winnings. If you are an attention whore, then you'll continue posting either under the alias SSK or your ghost account stevo809.

I hit 70% last year, I have been hitting at least that much all my life, I don't see what's stopping me from doing it again. And this is ATS not big ML favorites. If you are selective enough, you can.

But yeah, not posting anymore plays. Especially if wins are going to start counting as losses on SBR. F*uck it.

[ssk13809]

And once again, I have NEVER made a ghost account. Let's get that straight.

[mstone897]

I'm not posting anymore plays.

You won't do it, bro.

[IllyPhilly[DOC]]

You want some winners for football Week 3.... you got it. Atl-2, Eagles[no line], Carolina-3.5, Sea +3.5, Cincy -2.5, Chi +3.5/under 45.5, Saints-4/under52, Detroit, KC +14.5. These are plenty of picks to choose from. Starting week 1 i am 19-25 on picks, and no i have never posted here. SO WHAT


Monday night: Washington +4/lean under.
5*ATL, Eagles, Under CHI, Washinton
3* Carolina, Cincy, Chi, Saints, Detroit
1* Sea, KC

[ssk13809]

You won't do it, bro.

Tell me why would I post plays if all my wins will count as losses a year later on SBR. What's the point of posting plays when what was posted doesn't count? It's a lose lose...why would I post plays?

[ScottLocke]

I hit 70% last year, I have been hitting at least that much all my life, I don't see what's stopping me from doing it again. And this is ATS not big ML favorites. If you are selective enough, you can.

But yeah, not posting anymore plays. Especially if wins are going to start counting as losses on SBR. F*uck it.

Selective enough??? Yet you say you made 100+ ATS plays last year lol. Yeah that sure is selective.

Close the thread!

[ssk13809]

Selective enough??? Yet you say you made 100+ ATS plays last year lol. Yeah that sure is selective.

Close the thread!

100+ plays = total plays, not ATS. Scott you were around last year, you know I hit the % I claim. In fact, you made a bet I wouldn't hit 70% ATS, so you were watching everything closely. And now 'haters' (without links or any proof) are claiming I came no where near lol.

Like I said, no point in posting plays and keeping tracking of records when a year later they don't even count. I'm done with posting plays.



Though as I showed last year, 70% is nothing for me and I will take that bet anytime again.

[mstone897]

Tell me why would I post plays if all my wins will count as losses a year later on SBR. What's the point of posting plays when what was posted doesn't count? It's a lose lose...why would I post plays?

You won't do it, bro.

[ssk13809]

You won't do it, bro.

Whats the point though? It's a lose-lose.



I give the mods permission to lock this thread. I'm done here.

[ScottLocke]

You did hit 70%, over like 20 ATS plays during the 2nd half of the year. I'll admit that much. 20 plays means shit. I could get lucky and hit 70% picking blind over 20 plays... You need at least 200-300 plays before you can start stating a win percentage. Before that its irrelevant. So just keep posting picks and stop saying you are hitting 70%. BTW there is no possible way you hit 70% over 200 plays. It just can't be done. And this is why everyone is on your case, because you think you are better than everyone else and can achieve something that cannot be done. There is not enough error in NFL lines to achieve 70%, NFL lines are sharp. 60% is real good and 65% may be attainable if you are super selective. But even so, I would rather pick 58% or so over 100 plays than pick 65% over 20 plays. Being selective and attaining a super high win % is just dumb, you are passing up value. You should be betting anything you think you have a 53%+ win rate on, not just 70%+ or you are giving up value. The sooner you learn this stuff the sooner people will start respecting you.

[ssk13809]

You did hit 70%, over like 20 ATS plays during the 2nd half of the year. I'll admit that much. 20 plays means shit. I could get lucky and hit 70% picking blind over 20 plays... You need at least 200-300 plays before you can start stating a win percentage. Before that its irrelevant. So just keep posting picks and stop saying you are hitting 70%. BTW there is no possible way you hit 70% over 200 plays. It just can't be done. And this is why everyone is on your case, because you think you are better than everyone else and can achieve something that cannot be done. There is not enough error in NFL lines to achieve 70%, NFL lines are sharp. 60% is real good and 65% may be attainable if you are super selective. But even so, I would rather pick 58% or so over 100 plays than pick 65% over 20 plays. Being selective and attaining a super high win % is just dumb, you are passing up value. You should be betting anything you think you have a 53%+ win rate on, not just 70%+ or you are giving up value. The sooner you learn this stuff the sooner people will start respecting you.

2nd half of the year? Try since the starting of my threads (week 5 i think).

I completely disagree. Just because you think it's difficult to hit 70% doesn't mean no one can do it. You saw me do it last year. Call it 'luck'. Of course you will, until you see 200+ plays. What in 10 years? Gonna keep calling it luck every year? Do you even realize the % someone has to go 70+% over 20 plays if they are flipping coins? It's actually pretty small.

Though I only posted last year, I have been tracking my NFL ATS plays for a while, and they've consistently hit 70+%. Last year was just a small example of that. What about my incredible LOCK rate? 13-1 career documented. Last year I went 6-1 on SBR, with only loss being that epic Colts vs. Titans game, where I had Colts -2.5, and Titans scored on last play of game to cut the lead from 9 to 2. You want to know the odds of going 13-1 flipping coins? What's my point? The more selective, the higher I can hit. I can hit 90% on LOCKs long-term. And once again, the 13-1 is just a small sample. I've consistently gotten my LOCKs right for as long as I can remember. Last year I just proved it on SBR, but it's always been and will be the case.



Don't need to prove my 70% ATS rate or 90% LOCK rate any more though on SBR. Did so last year with ease. And if people are just going to ignore last year and make up shi*t, then there is no need to prove some more this year because there is no point.

[shari91]

game over

[ScottLocke]

2nd half of the year? Try since the starting of my threads (week 5 i think).

I completely disagree. Just because you think it's difficult to hit 70% doesn't mean no one can do it. You saw me do it last year. Call it 'luck'. Of course you will, until you see 200+ plays. What in 10 years? Gonna keep calling it luck every year? Do you even realize the % someone has to go 70+% over 20 plays if they are flipping coins? It's actually pretty small.

Though I only posted last year, I have been tracking my NFL ATS plays for a while, and they've consistently hit 70+%. Last year was just a small example of that. What about my incredible LOCK rate? 13-1 career documented. Last year I went 6-1 on SBR, with only loss being that epic Colts vs. Titans game, where I had Colts -2.5, and Titans scored on last play of game to cut the lead from 9 to 2. You want to know the odds of going 13-1 flipping coins? What's my point? The more selective, the higher I can hit. I can hit 90% on LOCKs long-term. And once again, the 13-1 is just a small sample. I've consistently gotten my LOCKs right for as long as I can remember. Last year I just proved it on SBR, but it's always been and will be the case.



Don't need to prove my 70% ATS rate or 90% LOCK rate any more though on SBR. Did so last year with ease. And if people are just going to ignore last year and make up shi*t, then there is no need to prove some more this year because there is no point.

Dude, you already admitted you were new to gambling in one of your threads last year. Stop embarrassing yourself.

The winner of the hilton contest for 100s of thousands of dollars finishes around 67-70% every year. So you are saying you are consistently better than the best handicappers in the world??? LOL, get over yourself.

And how do you still not get the picking 58% or so can be >>> than 70% you seriously can not be this slow to catch on can you?

[ssk13809]

Dude, you already admitted you were new to gambling in one of your threads last year. Stop embarrassing yourself.

The winner of the hilton contest for 100s of thousands of dollars finishes around 67-70% every year. So you are saying you are consistently better than the best handicappers in the world??? LOL, get over yourself.

And how do you still not get the picking 58% or so can be >>> than 70% you seriously can not be this slow to catch on can you?

New to gambling (money) and keeping track of your ATS picks are not the same thing. Do you want me to give you more hints? You can keep track of your ATS picks without gambling. So that refutes your 1st statement.

Never heard of this Hilston contest. But I doubt they allow you to be as selective as I am. And I don't care, I'm still better than all of them. I can hit 70% at least every year I want to.

Let's see, 100 plays at 60% vs. 20 plays at 70%. If you bet 1 unit each play in those 100 plays (at 60%), why don't you just bet 5 units/play at 70%....you want me to tell you who finishes higher?

[mstone897]

Dude, you already admitted you were new to gambling in one of your threads last year. Stop embarrassing yourself.

The winner of the hilton contest for 100s of thousands of dollars finishes around 67-70% every year. So you are saying you are consistently better than the best handicappers in the world??? LOL, get over yourself.

And how do you still not get the picking 58% or so can be >>> than 70% you seriously can not be this slow to catch on can you?

Like you said, he's new to gambling. Maybe one day he'll understand. Probably not though.

[mstone897]

New to gambling (money) and keeping track of your ATS picks are not the same thing. Do you want me to give you more hints? You can keep track of your ATS picks without gambling. So that refutes your 1st statement.

Never heard of this Hilston contest. But I doubt they allow you to be as selective as I am. And I don't care, I'm still better than all of them. I can hit 70% at least every year I want to.

Let's see, 100 plays at 60% vs. 20 plays at 70%. If you bet 1 unit each play in those 100 plays (at 60%), why don't you just bet 5 units/play at 70%....you want me to tell you who finishes higher?

Delusion, again.