LOCK CITY! I have this one 35-0 Steelers. Tampa shouldn't even be on the same field as this Pitt team......
Lock of the Year #2 Steelers -1
Collapse
X
-
Patrick McIrishSBR MVP
- 09-15-05
- 2864
#36Comment -
ManBearPigSBR MVP
- 12-04-08
- 2473
#37The under is a better play here IMO and I would give that stronger consideration than Pitt on the side. Their offense is non-existent and their defense isn't scoring 35 pts alone, I see a 17-14 type game here with TB playing getting the W. The public is all over Pitt and the line has dropped (RLM)...I wouldn't bet on that fact alone but I would watch and see how it plays out. Each to their own though...good luck!Comment -
fedtpelsSBR Sharp
- 01-08-10
- 407
#38who does the steelers have as back up qb? leftwich was released right and dixon got injured?Comment -
Reno PaulSBR MVP- 02-11-10
- 1647
#39Charlie BatchOriginally posted by fedtpelswho does the steelers have as back up qb? leftwich was released right and dixon got injured?Comment -
TheCommishSBR MVP
- 03-23-09
- 1013
#40Love the Steelers this week. THe D can win game alone.. and Batch is better than Dixon.Comment -
floridagolferSBR MVP
- 12-19-08
- 2762
#41When I saw this line earlier in the week, I told a friend of mine, "Please stop me from going all-in on the Steelers." This game does look too easy. But you never know when someone gets a fluke TD for a back-door cover or even an outright upset. And as much as I think the Steelers win if they manage to score 14 points, I don't know if they can even do that. When you get seven turnovers like they did last week, the last thing you should be doing is worrying about batting down a Hail Mary pass in the final minute. Pittsburgh's QB situation is such a mess, the offense truly should worry anyone backing this team.
How many first downs did Pittsburgh manage with Batch at QB last week? I think it was one, but regardless . . .
I want to unload on Steelers, but I think going a bit more conservative might be the way to go.
Good luck to all.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#42Leftwich was released but then re-signed just the other day. I expect they would start Batch and because he is a better QB in my opinion and Leftwich would be the backup.. It doesn't matter who the steelers start start though. They will pound the football and play defense and stick it to the bucs.Originally posted by fedtpelswho does the steelers have as back up qb? leftwich was released right and dixon got injured?Comment -
sweetjones55SBR Hall of Famer
- 04-07-09
- 5257
#43How does this seem too easy? Pittsburgh is on the road, playing an undefeated team, and are starting their 3rd string quarterback.Originally posted by sundin4prezseems to easy....Scared money don't make money
182-120-6 (60.26%) Final Total NBA Record over 308 plays
37-20-1 (65%) Record for the 2010 NBA PLAYOFFSComment -
EDDIE MONEY LINESBR Hall of Famer
- 02-24-10
- 6298
#44i love when everyone hops on a team like pitt in this situation- so once the closing line is +3 or 3.5 I jump on for the kill
Comment -
CHAZSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 4978
#45As much as I like the Steelers and feel like its an easy win, I'll bet on the Bucs.
WHEN I SEE A VEGAS LINE AND THINK WTF!?! THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT ON....
Vegas doesn't give giftsComment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#46Some of you are missing the point. I keep hearing "tampa bay 2-0".. Again, tell me who in the fukk the bucs beat. That's right they beat the cleveland clowns who are gonna end up starting 0-10 before they even get a win (look at their schedule) and the carolina panthers who are starting rookie jimmy clausen. On the other side you have the steelers who with the same qb situation(minus dixon now) beat the falcons(who scored 40+ in week 2 after losing to pitt) and the titans(7 turnovers) both playoff teams. Both weeks the steelers seemed "too easy". Steelers were 3 point and 6 point dogs. For those expecting Tampa Bay to go 3-0 go to your doctor and get ur head checked.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#47That's what vegas want you to think that way you second guess yourself. It's happened to me before where a line looked too easy and i thought it was a trap so i bet the other side and lost. Been there done that. Just use common sense.Originally posted by CHAZAs much as I like the Steelers and feel like its an easy win, I'll bet on the Bucs.
WHEN I SEE A VEGAS LINE AND THINK WTF!?! THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT ON....
Vegas doesn't give gifts
What vegas does has NO EFFECT on the how the players on the field perform..Comment -
EDDIE MONEY LINESBR Hall of Famer
- 02-24-10
- 6298
#48all i know is I thought the same thing last year when pitt played oakland- with big ben, and pitt trying to make the playoffs and what happened???Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18130
#49You got lucky with Houston, which was no lock. You were probably shitting your pants watching your lock and wishing for your money back.
NE -1 was a lock last week too.
If the line goes up to 4 then at least you have a decent line/play but no such things as lock on the road in the NFL.Comment -
k13SBR Posting Legend
- 07-16-10
- 18130
#50Lets review Las Vegas locks so far
Indy -1 vs Houston Loss
Sf -1 vs Seattle Loss
GB -1 vs Philly Win
NE -1 vs NYJ LossComment -
CHAZSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 4978
#51"Thats what Vegas whats you to think" lol Are you people serious that say that? Do you really believe Vegas is more concerned about trying to throw people off then coming out with the closes line possible. They are giving no one a lock or free money, that I guarantee. Steelers could easily win here, but obviously Vegas thinks the Bucs have a good chance as well. LOCKS don't exist in gambling.Originally posted by SmokeThat's what vegas want you to think that way you second guess yourself. It's happened to me before where a line looked too easy and i thought it was a trap so i bet the other side and lost. Been there done that. Just use common sense. What vegas does has NO EFFECT on the how the players on the field perform..Comment -
thebestthereisSBR Posting Legend
- 03-01-09
- 11459
#52definitely no locks only game of the year or game of the century depending on what century you are currently inComment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#53I think polamalu was injured and not playing. Polamalu means everything to this steelers team. Their defense is lost and struggles to win games without him.Originally posted by EDDIE MONEY LINEall i know is I thought the same thing last year when pitt played oakland- with big ben, and pitt trying to make the playoffs and what happened???Comment -
TiTlistRestricted User
- 09-06-10
- 402
#54i think the under is the best play here. 33.5 , vegas knows freeman wont do much and pitts will be all about running and field to win a low scoring game 13-10
Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#55All that matters is the win, it doesn't matter how you get there. Houston was the better team and the better team won even though it took icing the kicker to get it done. NE-1 was not a lock, the jet's were not gonna go 0-2 with both games being at their brand new stadium. The ravens defense is light years ahead the patriots defense and the jets only lost to the ravens by one. I wouldn've had jets if i had to take that game. Sanchez is a decent QB but he ran into the wall that was ray lewis and the ravens. He got it right in week 2Originally posted by k13You got lucky with Houston, which was no lock. You were probably shitting your pants watching your lock and wishing for your money back.
NE -1 was a lock last week too.
If the line goes up to 4 then at least you have a decent line/play but no such things as lock on the road in the NFL.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#56No matter what, it does throw people off and get them to second guess themselves. All over this thread i keep hearing "Steelers seems too easy, i'll take the bucs." That's a direct result of the the line that vegas put out. As far as the word "lock" i do agree that there is no suck thing as a lock, it's just a flashy word that we use for the fukk of it. To me the word "Lock" means "best chance of winning" or "win of the week". I just use the word for the fukk of it.Originally posted by CHAZ"Thats what Vegas whats you to think" lol Are you people serious that say that? Do you really believe Vegas is more concerned about trying to throw people off then coming out with the closes line possible. They are giving no one a lock or free money, that I guarantee. Steelers could easily win here, but obviously Vegas thinks the Bucs have a good chance as well. LOCKS don't exist in gambling.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#57Sounds good but i don't touch totals anymore. I stick with sides. If i had to take the total in this game i would agree with you on this one, glOriginally posted by TiTlisti think the under is the best play here. 33.5 , vegas knows freeman wont do much and pitts will be all about running and field to win a low scoring game 13-10
Comment -
CHAZSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 4978
#58Goodluck to you this week sir. I'm passing on the game anyways.Originally posted by SmokeNo matter what, it does throw people off and get them to second guess themselves. All over this thread i keep hearing "Steelers seems too easy, i'll take the bucs." That's a direct result of the the line that vegas put out. As far as the word "lock" i do agree that there is no suck thing as a lock, it's just a flashy word that we use for the fukk of it. To me the word "Lock" means "best chance of winning" or "win of the week". I just use the word for the fukk of it.

I was thinking of betting the UNDER before the number came out but 33 is to low of a number for me.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#59Thanks chaz and good luck to you on ur plays as well.Originally posted by CHAZGoodluck to you this week sir. I'm passing on the game anyways.

I was thinking of betting the UNDER before the number came out but 33 is to low of a number for me.
Comment -
Plu$MoneyRestricted User
- 10-28-08
- 395
#6085% of the public on the steelers and dropped from -3 to -1.. I'll take the bucs at homeComment -
$Burm$Restricted User
- 12-03-09
- 3019
#61Remember last year when the Bucs started off the year 0-7 and then they hosted the Packers at home and beat them 38-28. Well that was an 0-7 Buccs team facing a team that had a QB and also a defense, now this team is 2-0 and have a young QB who is gaining confidence facing a team that has no offense to bring to the table. I dont think this line is off at all. I would actually be very surprised if the line moves in the Steelers favor, I say it'll be at a pick'em by game time.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#62Not sure where you got that 85% number at. It's more like 69%.. Also the line dropped due to sharps pounding the steelers because batch or leftwich will be starting, not dixon. As I said before, it doesn't matter who is the QB for the steelers this week, the steelers will win this game on defense. However, the steelers will still put up points on offense. They are a run the ball play hard nosed defense team.Originally posted by Plu$Money85% of the public on the steelers and dropped from -3 to -1.. I'll take the bucs at homeComment -
KACKSBR Wise Guy
- 11-19-09
- 976
#63If the line looks to good to true than maybe it might be.... Do you really think Vegas makes line mistakes like this one.... I smell a sucker bet.... but GLComment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#64The line isn't a mistake. Big Ben and Dixon are out, leaving Batch and Leftwich which forced the oddsmakers to adjust. I think if dixon was starting the line would still be the same but if Big Ben was playing this line would be more like 6 or 7Originally posted by KACKIf the line looks to good to true than maybe it might be.... Do you really think Vegas makes line mistakes like this one.... I smell a sucker bet.... but GLComment -
kempfSBR Rookie
- 09-18-10
- 25
#65my problem with this is that we know points will be at a huge premium in this one and while yes i agree tb really hasnt played anyone im pretty convinced there d will keep pit in check and i am a big time Freeman believer, he isnt always pretty but the kid makes plays and in a game like this it gonna be one or two plays that wins this game. It could be pits D that makes them or the kid could get roughed up all day and still burn them with a play or two..honestly i doubt i play this game but i will be taking tb in all my pools as this the kind of game that keeps me winning them.......gl to everyoneComment -
kempfSBR Rookie
- 09-18-10
- 25
#66Freeman=Big Ben minus the roofiesComment -
uanlSBR Wise Guy
- 10-10-09
- 825
#67your theory about vegas wanting to throw people off is just not right...vegas doesn't play games like that, the percentages right now according to http://www.twominutewarning.com/bettracker.htm are at 85% for the steelers thus far... who's second guessing themselves? the recreational bettor doesnt look at things like public % and RLM or anything like that, they just see a line and they bet it if they like it...vegas is definitely not trying to make people "second guess" themselves...Originally posted by SmokeNo matter what, it does throw people off and get them to second guess themselves. All over this thread i keep hearing "Steelers seems too easy, i'll take the bucs." That's a direct result of the the line that vegas put out. As far as the word "lock" i do agree that there is no suck thing as a lock, it's just a flashy word that we use for the fukk of it. To me the word "Lock" means "best chance of winning" or "win of the week". I just use the word for the fukk of it.
Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#68The question is are people second guessing themselves?? The answer is yes. "Steelers look too easy, bad line, bucs for me." So many times i have seen a line that was considered to be too easy and it ends up covering. To be truthfull unless you was once and oddmaker or have been around one or know one you really don't know what things they do to come up with a line. Your probably right about the oddsmakers but they do put on weird lines that do have people second guessing themself.. I'm one that likes to look at percentages and bet on sharp plays with RLM, but certain situations call for common sense. In my opinion this is one of them.Originally posted by uanlyour theory about vegas wanting to throw people off is just not right...vegas doesn't play games like that, the percentages right now according to http://www.twominutewarning.com/bettracker.htm are at 85% for the steelers thus far... who's second guessing themselves? the recreational bettor doesnt look at things like public % and RLM or anything like that, they just see a line and they bet it if they like it...vegas is definitely not trying to make people "second guess" themselves...
Comment -
ChugsSBR MVP
- 11-01-09
- 1560
#69UNDER! ... Neither of these teams score more then 17 points.Comment -
SmokeSBR Aristocracy
- 10-09-09
- 48111
#70Sounds like a winner, although it is possible that pitt scores 17 but don't worry i doubt tampa bay get's more than 6 points... goodluckOriginally posted by ChugsUNDER! ... Neither of these teams score more then 17 points.
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
