Suppose SBR John offers you the following on a basketball total:
OVER 250 -110
UNDER 250 -110
and the market (fair) total is 200.
95% of posters would bet both sides and hope for the total to land somewhere in between. Fine.
But if you can only get the market total at -110 prices, you are maximizing expected value by only betting the Under 250. The single bet of Over 200 -110 is -EV.
If you bet 100k on the Under 250 I wouldn't blame you for wanting to minimize some of the risk, but some people here have the impression that you have to take a shot at the middle (ie. the chance of winning both bets is just too much to pass up).
So if you're just betting 200 points (ie. peanuts) on SBR John's offering, just let it ride.
- mathy
OVER 250 -110
UNDER 250 -110
and the market (fair) total is 200.
95% of posters would bet both sides and hope for the total to land somewhere in between. Fine.
But if you can only get the market total at -110 prices, you are maximizing expected value by only betting the Under 250. The single bet of Over 200 -110 is -EV.
If you bet 100k on the Under 250 I wouldn't blame you for wanting to minimize some of the risk, but some people here have the impression that you have to take a shot at the middle (ie. the chance of winning both bets is just too much to pass up).
So if you're just betting 200 points (ie. peanuts) on SBR John's offering, just let it ride.
- mathy