RIP Dwayne Haskins
Collapse
X
-
packerd_00SBR Posting Legend
- 05-22-13
- 17777
#106Comment -
TheMoneyShotBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-14-07
- 28672
#108Funny how we don't give Schefter a pass.... But we allow Dez Bryant to get a pass? What is he even talking about??? Ranting about nothing. Another spook.Comment -
HeadsterxSBR Posting Legend
- 12-03-16
- 22390
#109Sad news.Comment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48333
#110Yeah, imagine going back in time 50 years and showing Schefter's tweet to the people of that era, and then following it up with the fact that Schefter was subsequently called a dickhead, an asshole, probably will be called a racist if he hasn't been already, and was forced to rescind his statement to alleviate the heat. They would all think you're joking, and if any of them believed you they'd probably express some sense of relief their time may be up before that day arrived.Comment -
Eddy MunnySBR Posting Legend
- 08-13-13
- 15746
#111People were decent in the 50's. Schefter would have been punched in the mouth if he said this in the 50s. Back in the Wild West, he would have lost his life in a dual for being a dick. You're trying to explain this as if society is going soft. NOOO, society is going to hell. People say and do whatever they want to do these days. No one would have ever said that stupid shit years ago. But it's perfectly okay and you encourage it and see nothing wrong today. You are the problem. Your "I can do and say anything because it's a free country". You have no problem saying "grab em by the pussy". It's you being you. Shefty being Shefty.
And in that era, or the 50's for that matter, nobody would've given a shit about a word because people were busy leading their lives, had hobbies, and didn't obsess over trivial fluff as something to occupy the void in their minds.
You go searching for reasons to trigger your inner social justice warrior like a prospector does gold. If Cardale Jones hadn't reacted first, you would've never launched into a tirade of your own volition, even if you had came across Schefter's tweet. You're just boarding the latest bandwagon because at this point you probably get a dopamine spike to reinforce your lemming behavior.
Like I said earlier, you and your ilk hijacked a thread about Dwayne Haskins and made it about you and your self-righteous posturing.Last edited by Eddy Munny; 04-09-22, 11:09 PM.Comment -
DrunkHorseplayerSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-15-10
- 7719
#112Everything Shefter wrote was the truth; what's he supposed to write, that Haskins tore up the NFL?Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#113Tweeted the news, and added detail to clarify about whom he was tweeting, because a seasoned sports reporter understands detail even if the details weren't "necessary".
It happens all the time with tragic athlete stories. Nearly every story, whether its about a death or even a violent crime they committed, will incude a synopsis of the athletes career...not relevant to the story, but relevant to the athlete. Some think it's distasteful, but it's nothing new.
He just put all in one tweet. It's foolish to have outrage over this random, specific instance, just because it's a few word tweet. People can bitch, but to show outrage is lame.
Tragic news here about Haskins, and zero news here about Schefter. I guess for the shallow, the fact that the guy had to delete a tweet is news.
RIP
Just terrible to see this headline this morning. Just terrible.Comment -
KermitBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-27-10
- 32555
#114I think an issue with the Schefter tweet that hasn't been addressed (or maybe it was and I missed it) was that it made it seem like Haskins got cut by Washington and Pittsburgh and was a just guy who couldn't find a happy home.Comment -
gauchojakeBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 09-17-10
- 34103
#115Conversely the headline that my wife read made it seem like he was the starting QB for the Steelers.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#116Comment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48333
#11750 years ago we were in the 1970's, dumbass.
And in that era, or the 50's for that matter, nobody would've given a shit about a word because people were busy leading their lives, had hobbies, and didn't obsess over trivial fluff as something to occupy the void in their minds.
You go searching for reasons to trigger your inner social justice warrior like a prospector does gold. If Cardale Jones hadn't reacted first, you would've never launched into a tirade of your own volition, even if you had came across Schefter's tweet. You're just boarding the latest bandwagon because at this point you probably get a dopamine spike to reinforce your lemming behavior.
Like I said earlier, you and your ilk hijacked a thread about Dwayne Haskins and made it about you and your self-righteous posturing.Comment -
godukeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-17-10
- 11580
#11850 years ago we were in the 1970's, dumbass.
And in that era, or the 50's for that matter, nobody would've given a shit about a word because people were busy leading their lives, had hobbies, and didn't obsess over trivial fluff as something to occupy the void in their minds.
You go searching for reasons to trigger your inner social justice warrior like a prospector does gold. If Cardale Jones hadn't reacted first, you would've never launched into a tirade of your own volition, even if you had came across Schefter's tweet. You're just boarding the latest bandwagon because at this point you probably get a dopamine spike to reinforce your lemming behavior.
Like I said earlier, you and your ilk hijacked a thread about Dwayne Haskins and made it about you and your self-righteous posturing.
Every generation has people that speak out about stuff. Doesn’t matter if you think this is trivial or not because the point is people still called out things. I bet some people 50 years ago thought woman’s rights were trivial too. You may still think that but the point is that just because you don’t see it or get it doesn’t mean it’s not worth saying somethingComment -
godukeSBR Posting Legend
- 02-17-10
- 11580
#119Brandt's comments were absolutely retarded.
To answer your question.
You are not the guy who determines bad behaviour and then tells us what you think it is. That's not the world I live in. That's on you.
Could Adam be a dickhead. Possibly. Was his tweet enough to call him that? Imo NO.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#120Comment -
EnkhbatSBR MVP
- 04-18-11
- 3145
#121Definitely a dick move by Schefter.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82485
#123Schefter screwed up. That's why he deleted the tweet. Close this thread.Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65176
#124
My problem (and others) with Schefter is he has a reputation of overstepping.
His job in this instance was to report the death of Haskins via Twitter, nothing more, nothing less.
By including "struggling to catch on..." to his tweet he crossed the line (overstepped) from reporting to editorializing, and Schefter should know better.
A reporter reports the events of the story, the who (Haskins) the what (death by auto accident) the when (April 8) the where (Florida)
It wasn't the time or his place (at that moment) to editorialize
That's journalism 101, fact based reporting, who, what, where, when.
He earned his degree from Northwestern in journalism, like I say, he should know better.
Deliver the story as it's occurring, that's the job of a reporter.
I know this and I'm an amateur writer (blogger) without an advanced degree from Northwestern in journalism.
A (fact based) reporter disseminates the news as it's occurring to the public (nothing more, nothing less)
A journalist researches the story and then delivers the story based on the facts he discovered.
An editorialist expresses his personal opinion to a story after it's reported.
"struggling to catch on" is an opinion a lot of professionals, athlete and news people alike have trouble with.
A pontificator is one who expresses an opinion as fact without proof to back up their opinion.
I'm not accusing Schefter of pontification here (God knows SBR has too many pontificators)but he crossed the line as a reporter.
Now I'm going to editorialize.
That's why I (and others) think Schefter is an asshole.
He frequently crosses that line coming across with a "nobody does it better than me" attitude.
ESPN has too many of those "my shit don't stink" attitudes.
Mel Kiper comes to mind, several others too.
Schefter can go on one of the too many Sunday morning sports shows and give his opinions, reporting a death as it occurred isn't that time.Comment -
Mike HuntertzSBR Posting Legend
- 08-19-09
- 11203
#125My first though also. I ran out of gas once when I was 16 because I didn't have any money and was hoping to get to my friends place on fumes. Still sad he died. RIPComment -
thetrinitySBR Posting Legend
- 01-25-11
- 22430
#126I ran out of gas once when I was pulling into a gas station
Hard to run out of gas in a city
Anyways, Schefter should have just said he had passed and played for Steelers.
Everything on Twitter of course gets a life of its own though.Comment -
risKingDigitsSBR Sharp
- 12-22-21
- 467
#127This story is bizarre. I wanted to see how far my truck would go on empty. Not just after the gas light comes...but when it says 0 miles to left to go. I made 34 miles before I chickened out and fueled up.
In a City, running out of gas is hard to do in newer vehicles. Unless someone is broke or mentally altered, I don’t understand it, you get notified with 30-45 miles of driving left.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82485
#128Comment -
SnowballBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 11-15-09
- 30042
#129This happens more than you realize, whether it's running out of gas or a changing a tire, or even sitting in the car waiting for AAA.
Just in the last couple years, two Mass State Troopers lost their lives helping a broke down driver, and giving out a speeding ticket.
Pedestrians get hit all the time. Unless it happens to someone you love, it doesn't hit home.
Roads are dangerous these days. RIP Dwayne.Comment -
Mac4LyfeSBR Aristocracy
- 01-04-09
- 48333
#130Adam Schefter, a self absorbed asshole posts an insensitive tweet and the SBR resident assholes come to his defense. Even Schefter realizes his mistake, deletes the tweet but the same dumb fukks continue their obviously wrong take. Moral of the story? You can’t change dumb fukks minds, even when they know they are wrong admittedly by the asshole who put them in their position in the first place.Comment -
Eddy MunnySBR Posting Legend
- 08-13-13
- 15746
#132Notice how the only person in this thread resorting to ad hominem attacks is Mac4Lyfe.
Notice how the only person in this thread irrationally impassioned over a rather pedestrian word is Mac4Lyfe.
Notice how the only person in this thread who can't read or perform basic math (it's one or the other) is Mac4Lyfe.
Notice how when Mac4Lyfe's miscue(s) are pointed out he lashes out in anger. (see post #120)
Notice how if words are weapons which shouldn't be used to harm, then Mac4Lyfe's motto is "do as I say, not as I do."
The biggest loser of this thread is Mac4Lyfe.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#133And that's just it.
My problem (and others) with Schefter is he has a reputation of overstepping.
His job in this instance was to report the death of Haskins via Twitter, nothing more, nothing less.
By including "struggling to catch on..." to his tweet he crossed the line (overstepped) from reporting to editorializing, and Schefter should know better.
A reporter reports the events of the story, the who (Haskins) the what (death by auto accident) the when (April 8) the where (Florida)
It wasn't the time or his place (at that moment) to editorialize
That's journalism 101, fact based reporting, who, what, where, when.
He earned his degree from Northwestern in journalism, like I say, he should know better.
Deliver the story as it's occurring, that's the job of a reporter.
I know this and I'm an amateur writer (blogger) without an advanced degree from Northwestern in journalism.
A (fact based) reporter disseminates the news as it's occurring to the public (nothing more, nothing less)
A journalist researches the story and then delivers the story based on the facts he discovered.
An editorialist expresses his personal opinion to a story after it's reported.
"struggling to catch on" is an opinion a lot of professionals, athlete and news people alike have trouble with.
A pontificator is one who expresses an opinion as fact without proof to back up their opinion.
I'm not accusing Schefter of pontification here (God knows SBR has too many pontificators)but he crossed the line as a reporter.
Now I'm going to editorialize.
That's why I (and others) think Schefter is an asshole.
He frequently crosses that line coming across with a "nobody does it better than me" attitude.
ESPN has too many of those "my shit don't stink" attitudes.
Mel Kiper comes to mind, several others too.
Schefter can go on one of the too many Sunday morning sports shows and give his opinions, reporting a death as it occurred isn't that time.
What you wrote sounds good, but isn't refelctive of what journalists do.
Many think it's distasteful, like you do, but here's what happens in the real world and no amount of sudden, dowright random, backlash will change that...
...It happens all the time with tragic athlete stories. Nearly every story, whether its about a death or even a violent crime they committed, will incude a synopsis of the athletes career...not relevant to the story, but relevant to the athlete. Some think it's distasteful, but it's nothing new...
Comment -
Eddy MunnySBR Posting Legend
- 08-13-13
- 15746
#135People weren’t just doing their hobbies in the 70s man. You had watergate, you had opec embargo, you had Vietnam, you had womens rights.
Every generation has people that speak out about stuff. Doesn’t matter if you think this is trivial or not because the point is people still called out things. I bet some people 50 years ago thought woman’s rights were trivial too. You may still think that but the point is that just because you don’t see it or get it doesn’t mean it’s not worth saying somethingComment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65176
#138No Nasher, no.
What you wrote sounds good, but isn't refelctive of what journalists do.
Many think it's distasteful, like you do, but here's what happens in the real world and no amount of sudden, dowright random, backlash will change that...
"Struggling to catch on" does not have to an opinion, but it most certainly can be fact.
At the time of the tweet Schefter was in the role of reporter, not journalist or editorialist.
Now let's say Schefter was on a show like "Sports Reporters" and he used the same "struggling to catch on" line I might agree.
A show like that the line would be appropriate and not distasteful.
Doesn't change the fact I think Schefter is good at what he does, it also doesn't change the fact I think he's a giant douche and asshole.
Oh well, we disagree.
I'll live.Comment -
19th HoleSBR Posting Legend
- 03-22-09
- 18837
#139<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A TBDBITL member playing Carmen Ohio in front of a Dwayne Haskins memorial outside Ohio Stadium ❤️<a href="https://t.co/a7myEWkHR2">pic.twitter.com/a7myEWkHR2</a></p>— Barstool OSU (@BarstoolOSU) <a href="https://twitter.com/BarstoolOSU/status/1512939294264070152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >April 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65176
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code