-
Comment -
We do try to help each for the most part,might bust balls sometimes but I think we all want to see each other do well and make abit of doe.Comment -
I wouldn't ignore any of them. I'd read it EVERY day how some of these idiots REALLY did say that they would AVOID betting certain lines that they took it upon themselves to "guess" were "bad lines"!!!! When NOBODY said that they had to do that!
And they don't know whether they would have got paid or not!!
My gosh I SWEAR I think they are joking!!
Comment -
Damn JTS who the fukk is hanging that fair line knowing everyone and their dog is going hammer away on the Browns? After reading a few more Joey posts and I'm finally convinced that I'm leaving all kinds of money on the table by not betting every good number that pops across the screen and ready do the books a service and balance out their action!
Joey you should check if Jay Cohen and WSEX still have their site online. I'm pretty sure if you are willing to post up they let you just phone up, tell them how bad the line needs to be for you to make a bet, and they take all the action you want.
Anyhow it laundry day and the mat closes at 11 so I'm done with this thread. I hope tomorrow is as cheerful as the previous few for you Joey.
Comment -
Yes I do think some of you are "trolling" me just to try and get a rise out of me!
But you are strangers to me and I DON'T care what you say or do! It's a damn joke-ass posting forum!
I don't give a sheit what people WOULDN'T bet a certain line because you avoid betting the lines that you choose to "guess" are "bad lines!"
Why the hell would that bother me what a stranger says he would do in favor of the "poor wittle sportsbook"?? LOL
In fact I don't even believe you!Last edited by JoeCool20; 06-16-18, 10:40 PM.Comment -
Damn JTS who the fukk is hanging that fair line knowing everyone and their dog is going hammer away on the Browns? After reading a few more Joey posts and I'm finally convinced that I'm leaving all kinds of money on the table by not betting every good number that pops across the screen and ready do the books a service and balance out their action!
Joey you should check if Jay Cohen and WSEX still have their site online. I'm pretty sure if you are willing to post up they let you just phone up, tell them how bad the line needs to be for you to make a bet, and they take all the action you want.
Anyhow it laundry day and the mat closes at 11 so I'm done with this thread. I hope tomorrow is as cheerful as the previous few for you Joey.
Thanks Bro! I will bet ANY fuking line that I feel like betting if it is put up by the S-book! (If you wouldn't, then I don't give a flying damn!!)
If they don't pay it later, I can't do anything about it!
BUT, As soon as they paid me one of those bets that and you & the other idiots AVOIDED and DIDN'T bet it, because you took it upon yourself to "guess" that it was a "bad line" then you all become the biggest dumbasses on the planet and I'm counting my cash!!
Take care.Comment -
Bye FeliciaComment -
LOL I can't be a troll of my OWN thread you half-brained nit-wit!!
I made the thread so I'm going to reply to the posts that people make to me!
As for you, if you are REALLY that idiotic, then, "right back at ya slick"
The question is how many days are YOU gonna spend on this?!!Comment -
lol who the helll are u joecool.. never heard of ya palComment -
**"Twist word will get around about this guy, the Sports Gambling community isn't that big really when you think about it"**
LOL If "word gets around" that some of these idiots WOULDN'T bet a certain line because they avoid betting the lines that they choose to "guess" are "bad lines!"? When NOBODY said they had to do that....
Then I'm guessing the online sportsbooks will be falling all over themselves to get them as clients! LOL
Can you imagine the conversation?
"You mean you are going to take it upon yourself to 'guess' which of our lines are too good to be true and then you won't bet those lines?! YES SIR! HOW MUCH WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEND IN SIR? We'll pay the fees!!"
LOLLast edited by JoeCool20; 06-16-18, 10:58 PM.Comment -
This guy was the dude,loved his ads.Comment -
LOL I'm JoeCool.
Who the hell are these OTHER guys who say they WOULDN'T bet a certain line because they avoid betting the lines that they choose to "guess" are "bad lines!"? When NOBODY said they had to do that!!
Do you believe they are serious? Or just being stupid?Comment -
-
You would have one hell of a valid point if they really did "KNOW" which bets were going to get voided. But they DON'T! Because since THEY didn't make em, THEY can't "know" which one's will be voided!
Only the one's that made em (the sportsbook) can void em!
Read what I just posted a few minutes ago! Here it is:
"I will bet ANY fuking line that I feel like betting if it is put up by the S-book! (If you wouldn't, then I don't give a flying damn!!)
If they don't pay it later, I can't do anything about it!
BUT, As soon as they paid me one of those bets that and you & the other idiots AVOIDED and DIDN'T bet it, because you took it upon yourself to "guess" that it was a "bad line", then you all become the biggest dumbasses on the planet, and I'm counting my cash!!"Comment -
-
Yup, just like I thought.
You are a shot taker and are the exact person that forces others to suffer because the sportsbook absolutely has the right to send you packing.
You are the guy I'm talking about here...
Now your attitude makes sense.
Your dumbass shtick is your way of rationalizing your behavior.
Shameful of you.Comment -
You have to understand that if the book were perpetually unfair they would lose business. I've seen cases where SBR was looking at the price histories to see the real story.
If a book constantly offends, they won't last long; but when legit mistakes are rooted out, the marketplace shows its agreement.
Shot takers reveal themselves all too often in the rooting out.Comment -
By the way I hope you werent implying I was an idiot,I never disrespected you,I expect the same respect.
Comment -
No I wasn't calling you an idiot bro!!! And I dont bet live lines either. The only live line I ever bet was I had a hot pick on a game and the idiot at the store fuk-ed up my gift card purchase. So by the time I got it all straightened out, the game was well underway with my team winning. So I bet them on the live line and they covered the game but my live bet lost! LOL
My thread is about some idiots (not you!) on here calling a fellow player a "cheat" because he DID bet a live line.
LOL How the fuk can you be a "cheat" for betting a line that THE SPORTSBOOK has put out & allowed betting on?
It's so damn stupid! But like a great fellow (Me!) once said: "Never underestimate the stupidity of the average person!"Comment -
LOL Buddy you are never going to understand are you?!
You can try and "help the poor sportsbooks" until the cows come home by "Guessing" which bets you should AVOID betting on because you took it upon yourself to assume the line was bad!
I DIDN'T SEND MY MONEY IN TO THERE TO DO THAT!! AND NOBODY ASKED ME TO EITHER!
But you saying that I am a "shot taker" for betting lines that the SPORTSBOOK THEMSELVES put out for wagering on,
says more about your stupidity (or gayness for the S-books
)than anything I could ever say!Last edited by JoeCool20; 06-16-18, 11:45 PM.Comment -
-
You missed the part about order in the marketplace. Oh, but you don't bet do you...so you wouldn't care.
Your not even trying to understand this business.
Best of luck shot taking troll. Players with your attitude make it worse for the rest of us.Comment -
What lines can I bet on that they put out for wagering that I WOULDN'T be considered a "shot taker"? The answer is you ain't got a damn clue because YOU don't make the lines, THEY do! So your whole point just became totally moot and imbecilic!
YOU HAVE NO CLUE WHICH LINES ARE "SHOT TAKER" LINES AND WHICH LINES AREN'T BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T MAKE THEM! THEY DID!
AND Nobody asked you (EVEN THE SPORTSBOOK DIDN'T ASK YOU!) to appoint yourself the "judge" of which lines make you a "shot taker"!!
So WHY the hell would you EVER take it upon yourself to "guess" at which lines to avoid betting on when you don't know which lines will be "bad lines" and which one's won't be? ESPECIALLY when nobody asked you to do that?
PLEASE answer that?Last edited by JoeCool20; 06-17-18, 12:12 AM.Comment -
Best of luck with you appointing yourself the "guesser" of which lines are considered "shot taking"!
As soon as you DON'T bet a line that you "guessed wrong" about, and you cost yourself money with your stupid "guessing game", then you become the biggest idiot on the face of the planet!
BUT the sportsbook will love you for it!!
LOLComment -
LOL I don't even know how a line that the sportsbook has allowed to be wagered on could be considered a "shot taking" line anyway!
How can you even attempt to "guess" at which lines that are open for wagering will be paid and which ones won't?
Other than just trying to "help out the poor sportsbook" by "guessing" at which lines you think are too good to bet on! And I'd never do that! i'm there to bet and win, not "guess" at which lines I think they don't want me to bet on!
Do some lines have the letters "ST" beside them? Which means "We put this line out for betting but if you bet it, you are a shot taker."
LOLComment -
Will someone ban this JoeCoolTurd.
Annoying 16 year old.Comment -
You don't have to know Joe.
And it doesn't matter if you play dumb, or even if you genuinely don't know.
If it is an obvious error to a reasonably experienced gambler, no book cares how ignorant you claim to have been.
I've been caught out myself innocently betting a bad line. I just bet the good odds without thinking about it, but from my betting history the book could see I should have known, treated me like a shot taker, took away bonuses and perks plus lowered my limits a lot.
You must not have bet bad lines the way you claim you would do, or you would know already how it works out badly for the player so often.
And Joe... the person who inspired this rant of yours explained that they bet a stale line, well past post, after a score change. If you don't understand just how obvious and huge that error and shot is, you should be reading more and posting less until you learn a bit more about the industry.
Plus he doesn't need your help. He fully understands the situation and is happy to just tell them the truth and say he could not resist hitting the bet but understands it was a bad idea now, hasn't done it before, and wont do it again. Which is pretty much the only angle he can use to get paid.
But you've gone off screaming everyone is on the books side and he should lie and play dumb instead.
It's like you just discovered sports gambling today and feel the need to tell the world how you assume it should work but are yet to place a bet!.Comment -
I am definitely disappointed in these posting members above, when I asked of you, "Have any of your chosen Books, and especially the specific one I asked of, ever told you...We never cancel bets!" Ever, ever.
Now, could I get some responsible replies to that question? It is a very important question for all rabid gamblers on SBR, especially, when it applies to your personal wagering and let me tell you, it definitely will in your unpredictable future.
Now, I could be paranoid, but at times when you or I have challenged a Books reputation, we get snubbed or even warned at times? If that has happened to you then it open's up some serious questions and even possible issues, regarding, just who SBR chooses to protect?
Is it protection for both gambler/Book? Equally, I mean?Comment -
Look Abe, I'm the guy that calls the book and points out a bad line.
Or if I', not sure, I might ask if it's good before hitting it.
It's the only way to behave online if you have even a remote chance of beating the market or even winning.Comment -
A confused answer?
I never wagered a "bad-line?" I played what the software displayed. The opportunity to buy a 1/2 point. The line was 6 and I bought a 1/2 point. The 1/2 was processed and charged for. Making the wager I was looking for, a +6 1/2.
When, later, I checked that wager, it was back to 6 again, even though I was charged for a 1/2 point.
I then called Bovada and got the blunt statement above. The statement I posted.
And not one member has expressed his opinion concerning that Book or the question I asked. Concerning any Book. Not one.
So in conclusion: I see this forum as: "Not a friendly forum for old men." I see this forum, and it's unfortunate, as just another kiss your buddies and exchange, okay, mostly, hugging responses.
I see this forum, being needy for camaraderie. Loyal camaraderie. No doubt, it's certainly seems lacking member backup--well, depending who you are of course--when there is a definite need for backup for an individual member. And in this case, the one statement I posted several posts ago was a reminder of at least one individual needing some backup; Abe.
I see too much of this attempt to be politically correct here. Hints of being overrun with ---don't buck the system at any cost. Hinting as a place you can complain, yet, looking much like a place you have to watch your words.
And any member displaying an attempt to be appearing similar to a man such as Serpico, would have a great chance of being booted off this forum.
1. As if moderator's are...off-limits? Do not forget the fact, they are human.
2. Many times, I think Book complaints are also seen in that category?
3. Certain members also seem to be too close to being in that near, untouchable class?
* Feel free to carry on as you have though.
Comment -
Admittedly Abe, I missed something there about the specifics of your posts.
I generally agree with your attitude overall on SBR and can't argue much with what you posted.
I need to go back and read what you posted. I really do try to see both sides and always insist on fair treatment and I think you point out the unfair often.Comment
