-
Comment -
even though what you said is incorrect I'll entertain your poor logic.
you say the corporate tax rate is comparable to the rest of the world huh?(not true, but lets pretend it is so I can still show why you're wrong)
ok... you go into a store and you find 10 items with a "comparable" price. You pick one. You come back later and now 9 of those items have a "comparable price" and 1 is on sale. According to your logic no one will have any interest in the one on sale.
The corporate tax rate must be lowered, very basic stuff.Comment -
d2bets, khicks and Australian beaver boy aka achoochy (and anyone else that wants to chime in),
We all know you aren't the biggest Trump supporters.
What do you think about this Black Lives Matter guy and what he said in this video?
full interview --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqORjy7RFBUComment -
Look Reagan cut the rates to 33%. Since then they have added deductions, exemptions, loopholes, subsidizes & what ever else to make it easy for corporations to make money in the US. Has the wages increased, are there more jobs, it the economy booming. NO, lowering corporate tax rates does not create jobs. Its a lie.
Your comparison of items for sale & corporate tax rates is not the same thing. They really have nothing to do with each other.Comment -
I agree, what you're talking about is a lie, and that is why I should have been more clear but I think trump has beat the drum enough. You're right, none of it will matter if tax laws are not changed. I didn't state that because I would have thought it went hand-in-hand when talking about trump's policies...
so yes, the corp tax rate needs lowered. Basic stuff.Last edited by brooks85; 03-19-16, 12:28 PM.Comment -
Many states now require passengers in automobiles to wear seatbelts for their own protection. Many others require anybody driving a car to have li a bility insurance. But neither the federal government nor any state requires all households to protect themselves from the potentially catastrophic costs of a serious accident or illness. Under the Heritage plan, there would be such a requirement. This man d ate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is t h e family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection. If a young man wrecks his Pors c he and has not had the foresight to obtain insurance, we may commiserate but society feels no obligation to repair his car. But health care is different. If a man is struck down by a heart attack in the street, Americans will care for him whether or not h e has insurance. If we find that he has spent his money on other things rather than insurance, we may be angry but we will not deny him services - even if that means more prudent citizens end up paying the tab. A mandate on individuals recognizes this implicit contract. Society does feel a moral obligation to insure that its citizens do not suffer from the unavailability of health care. But on the other hand, each household has the obligation, to the extent it is able, to avoid placing demands on society by protecting itself. 3) Provide help to those who cannot afford protection. A mandate on households certainly would force those with adequate means to obtain insurance protection, which would end the problem of middle-class "free riders" on society's sense o f obligation. But of course there are many lower-income households who could not reasonably afford to meet that obligation and yet are not eligible for current direct assistance programs such as Medicaid. Tax Credits. To an extent, the problems of afforda b ility among these families would be dealt with through the system of tax credits outlined above. The Heritage plan also sees these tax credits as refundable - that is, a check would be sent to the family if the total credit exceeded the tax liability. In t his way, families would receive direct assistance through the tax code to enable them to ftilfill the obligation to obtain insurance. Nevertheless, there are certain families for whom even this assistance is not sufficient. Families with a very long histo r y of health problems, for instance, may find insurance prohibitively expensive, even with generous tax benefits. In these cases, the Heritage plan envisions an expansion of subsidized risk pools operated through the states. Many states have these plans, i n which high-risk individuals are pooled together, and then insurers are invited to compete to cover the pool with rates subsidized by the government.
Obamacare is based very very closely on The Heritage Plan, not on Hillary's Plan.
Take a look at the bolded language. The Donald probably read this. And it's also probably why he said he favored a mandate, even though the next day he denied he ever said it.Comment -
Trump is singling out groups of people & saying they are the cause of a problem which they really have nothing to do with.d2bets, khicks and Australian beaver boy aka achoochy (and anyone else that wants to chime in),
We all know you aren't the biggest Trump supporters.
What do you think about this Black Lives Matter guy and what he said in this video?
full interview --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqORjy7RFBU
Just like Hitler said the Jews were Germany's biggest problem. He's picking on the most vulnerable to advance his cause. That's racism. BLM guy misspoke, but he is in the ball park.Last edited by khicks26; 03-19-16, 12:44 PM.Comment -
Dude Mexicans are rapist & murders. Lets build a wall. Is the same way Hitler used the Jews, stabbed him in the back.
That's racism, what BLM guy said is being a bigot.Comment -
Lol. It´s funny you should say this. Another day, another day of muslims blowing people to pieces in Turkey. And what happened just a few days ago in Turkey? You don´t have to have half a brain to see what has been going on in Europe. Suicide bombings, explosions, beheadings, social strife, rapes, the destruction of European culture and on and on. All because of the inclusion of Islam. You can deny the facts and put your head in the sand, but this is just the beginning.Comment -
^yeah except for what I used to prove you're wrong... lol
The tax cuts of the 80s are NOTHING like what trump is talking about which is exactly why you had to ask for the effective rate.
^he honestly doesn't have a clue. Khicks literally thinks the problems started even this century lolComment -
that isn't racism at all. Illegal immigrants aren't a race. If they were WHITE ILLEGALS coming across the border, no one would call it racist. But because they aren't white, then you throw the word out? It makes no sense at all. I'll respectfully say that you don't know the meaning of racist.
He never called all Mexicans rapist and murders which we all know. Funny, when people criticize Obama, they are deemed racist also. Just because he's black. If he were white, they couldn't use the race card. Too bad you can't see this. Or better yet, refuse to see it.
It has nothing to do with Jews or Hitler. That's a weak minded argument perpetuated by liars like The Young turks. Turn that shit off bro. Its come down to this basically .... if you disagree with liberals (mostly liberals) then you are racist. lol.Last edited by DwightShrute; 03-19-16, 01:02 PM.Comment -
Yes it is racism, he's talking about Mexican's. Think about the word for a minute. "race-ism" I'm not saying he is Hitler, but what he's doing is Hitler like.
Yes if it was white people it would not be racist, just like people of color can not be racist in the US. But it would still be wrong to blame white people crossing the border as a problem of those people.Last edited by khicks26; 03-19-16, 01:16 PM.Comment -
you are completely wrong. Its not racism. He is talking about illegals. The fact they are coming across the Mexican border illegally is only pointing out geography and doesn't make anyone racist who is against that. Once again, illegals isn't a race and neither is geography.
People of color cannot be racist? Omg. I am afraid to ask.Comment -
You have demonstrated over and over again that you deny reality. I already put the answer to your question in my prior post. To be frank, you are on the same intellectual level as those who perpetrated the Charlie Hebdo because of a cartoon. With your line of reasoning I would not find it odd that you somehow reasoned that that cartoon killing was justified.Comment -
No what those guys did was wrong, just like terror is wrong.
I just asked you to tell why those people are committing the terror. How is that denying reality. Plus were posting on SBR, how many of us are intellectuals, as far as I know Brooks is the only SBR intellectual & that's meant to be a joke.Comment -
Just seen the live video of Trump protesters shutting down the interstate in Arizona. This is ridiculous.Comment
