Donald Trump To Run For President in 2016!!!!!!!!

[Scorpion]

78% of protestors are illegal aliens, 80% are mexicans

[brooks85]

Yes because objectivity is your best trait. LOL

certainly one of them! This is a new khicks, telling the truth. Good for you!

What about the jar head yelling at her.

what about him?

He is there for an actual reason, to hear trump. Not some ignorant sheepy hispanic.

[DwightShrute]

BS is heads above Hilarity when it comes to a decent human being. He's a nice guy. Too nice to beat her in an election. History will remember him that way.

Trump would have already suspended his campaign if he was as nice as BS is. There is no doubt about it. Instead, Trump figured out how it can work and implemented a plan to win. So far so good. No reason to think he wouldn't be as effective as president.

[Maximo]

^ title of that video doesn't make sense

The border is already a mess, even without trump's wall... no shit, that is why we need a wall

The bank's security is already a mess, even without security guards... no shit, that is why you need guards

The cake is already a mess, even without eggs.... no shit, that is why you need eggs

Eating the cake is a mess, even without forks... no shit, that is why you need a fork


Also, 2:20 mark


"even if he built a wall coast to coast, people would just get in a boat go around..."


lol I've heard enough from this fool.

You really believe that this wall will be built? If you say, do you think it will be effective?

[khicks26]

certainly one of them! This is a new khicks, telling the truth. Good for you!



what about him?

He is there for an actual reason, to hear trump. Not some ignorant sheepy hispanic.

Well then I'm sure you seen how there are many rich land owners on that border. In order to have the wall you would have to seize their property. Sounds like this wall thing could be in the courts for awhile.

OH I thought he was there to yell at women.

[brooks85]

^It sure could be in the courts for a while, thankfully we have plenty of time, and the government will win if they want just a small portion of the land on the border.

You really believe that this wall will be built? If you say, do you think it will be effective?

I certainly hope so and, of course, it will be effective. That is why walls have been used for millennia. Are the walls of your house effective?

[khicks26]

^It sure could be in the courts for a while, thankfully we have plenty of time, and the government will win if they want the land.

He will never get that wall in 4 years or even 8 years if it comes down to that. Just like he will not bring jobs back to the US.

[brooks85]

He will never get that wall in 4 years or even 8 years if it comes down to that. Just like he will not bring jobs back to the US.

solid reasoning!

[khicks26]

solid reasoning!

Just as solid as yours. Give us your Trump jobs program. Does he have one.

We know the wall will not happen.

[brooks85]

No, not really as solid as mine. I didn't make baseless claim and follow it up with "hope" as my reasoning lol

Just as solid as yours. Give us your Trump jobs program. Does he have one.

We know the wall will not happen.

not a complicated process at all which speaks volumes to your level of knowledge on the subject. All you have to do is get rid of obamacare, lower corp tax rate, stop with the "living wage" propaganda and kill garbage like NAFTA. Very basic stuff to understand if you understood the basics of economics.


And what is hillary's plan for job creation? To kill jobs... lol

pay attention khicks

[khicks26]

No, not really as solid as mine. I didn't make baseless claim and follow it up with "hope" as my reasoning lol



not a complicated process at all which speaks volumes to your level of knowledge on the subject. All you have to do is get rid of obamacare, lower corp tax rate, stop with the "living wage" propaganda and kill garbage like NAFTA. Very basic stuff to understand if you understood the basics of economics.

Sounds like the same crap we have been doing since the 1980's, tax breaks for the rich & no raises for workers. But yet the jobs keep leaving & wealth divide keeps getting bigger & the economy worse.

Sounds like a rip off, not basic economics. Or are you not paying attention.

What else you got.

[brooks85]

Sounds like the same crap we have been doing since the 1980's, tax breaks for the rich & no raises for workers. But yet the jobs keep leaving & wealth divide keeps getting bigger & the economy worse.

Sounds like a rip off, not basic economics. Or are you not paying attention.

nope, not at all... lol

[khicks26]

nope, not at all... lol

solid reasoning! Your full of shit.

[khicks26]

lower corp tax rate. Why? What is the effective corporate tax rate? Mr basic economics.

Your full of shit, no need to lower the corporate tax rate.

What else you got OH wise one?

[brooks85]

" no need to lower the corporate tax rate. "


lol you have made it clear many times over how ignorant you are, no need to reinforce it.

solid reasoning! Your full of shit.

thanks! It was solid of me to point out your lie/ignorance.

"Sounds like the same crap we have been doing since the 1980's,"


100% false.

[khicks26]

" no need to lower the corporate tax rate. "


lol you have made it clear many times over how ignorant you are, no need to reinforce it.





thanks! It was solid of me to point out your lie.

"Sounds like the same crap we have been doing since the 1980's,"


100% false.

Tax rate have been going down since Reagan. WTF are you talking about? You fuking lie, that's all you got.

Your getting your dick kicked in the dirt again. Would you like to continue.

[khicks26]

You got anymore of your make believe libertarian BS.

[khicks26]

" no need to lower the corporate tax rate. "


lol you have made it clear many times over how ignorant you are, no need to reinforce it.





thanks! It was solid of me to point out your lie/ignorance.

"Sounds like the same crap we have been doing since the 1980's,"


100% false.

answer the question. What is the effective corporate tax rate?

[khicks26]

Well if you can't answer a basic economics question. We shall all just assume your full of shit.

You should try a youtube vid college boy.

[brooks85]

not a complicated process at all which speaks volumes to your level of knowledge on the subject. All you have to do is get rid of obamacare, lower corp tax rate, stop with the "living wage" propaganda and kill garbage like NAFTA. Very basic stuff to understand if you understood the basics of economics.

Sounds like the same crap we have been doing since the 1980's

lol khicks showing his stellar ability to not be able to focus on one thing for more than one post before his mind has changed it to something else. The tax cuts in the 80s only moved money into tax havens and shelters which is EXACTLY why you had to ask what the "effective" rate was because you have no defense. I have no doubt you don't understand this but that is ok. So again, if you read what I said it is NOTHING like what was done in the 80s. The nominal corp tax rate needs lowered with obvious changes in deductions plus everything else I said that you didn't mention lol. But that is who you are, youtubeU educated.


Also, the corp tax rate has not "been going down since reagan." Another lie from khicks. It went down between '86-'88 and ticked back up in '93. It hasn't moved since and is still the highest in the free world.






This is similar to when you had to prove something about UK's parliament but then quoted a stat on demographics of the country lol. Your weasel-y ineptitude is entertaining at least. Buried and it is barely noon khicks lol, nice work.

[khicks26]

lol khicks showing his stellar ability to not be able to focus on one thing for more than one post before his mind has changed it to something else. The tax cuts in the 80s only moved money into tax havens and shelters which is EXACTLY why you had to ask what the "effective" rate was because you have no defense. I have no doubt you don't understand this but that is ok. So again, if you read what I said it is NOTHING like what was done in the 80s. The nominal corp tax rate needs lowered with obvious changes in deductions.


Also, the corp tax rate has not "been going down since reagan." Another lie from khicks. It went down between '86-'88 and ticked back up in '93. It hasn't moved since and is still the highest in the free world.






This is similar to when you had to prove something about UK's parliament but then quoted a stat on demographics of the country lol. Your weasel-y ineptitude is entertaining at least.

All this BS & you still don't answer the QUESTION.

What is the corporate tax rate, & what is the effective corporate tax rate, & how does the US compare to the rest of the world.

GWB also gave big tax breaks to the rich. Some companies make billions & get a refund from the government.

Now quit with the BS & answer the question. Or are you full of shit.

[brooks85]

All this BS & you still don't answer the QUESTION.

What is the corporate tax rate, & what is the effective corporate tax rate, & how does the US compare to the rest of the world.

GWB also gave big tax breaks to the rich. Some companies make billions & get a refund from the government.

Now quit with the BS & answer the question. Or are you full of shit.

lol, all of it true too. Think before you post. Just buried yourself again.


you're right, instead I just proved what an ignorant weasel you are and why you had to ask what the "effective" rate was. You're not hard to see through khicks, you've been doing this for years now. When you're wrong you try to change the argument just enough and it never works. Again, no different than you quoting demographics of UK when you were asked about the parliament.

[khicks26]

lol, all of it true too. Think before you post. Just buried yourself again.


you're right, instead I just proved what an ignorant weasel you are and why you had to ask what the "effective" rate was. You're not hard to see through khicks, you've been doing this for years now. When you're wrong you try to change the argument just enough but you know it won't work with me.

Yet you still don't answer the question.

What is the corporate tax rate, & what is the effective corporate tax rate, & how does the US compare to the rest of the world.

You won't answer because your whole argument about lowering corporate tax rates falls apart.

[brooks85]

Yet you still don't answer the question.

What is the corporate tax rate, & what is the effective corporate tax rate, & how does the US compare to the rest of the world.

You won't answer because your whole argument about lowering corporate tax rates falls apart.

lol no it doesn't. All you're doing is proving you have no idea what you're talking about other than numbers you're reading. You don't understand them or the economics behind them obviously. youtubeU will do that to ya though. Just throw out numbers, connect them to things and say "see, proof!" haha

it is like looking at the final score of a game and thinking you know what happened. That is downfall of your youtubeU education.

[JIBBBY]

You really believe that this wall will be built? If you say, do you think it will be effective?

If Trump is elected that wall is being built.. That's been the basis of his entire campaign and there is no way he's not gonna keep his word on that..

Will the wall be penetrated by under ground tunnels, over access with latter and rope?..Probably yes at certain points but overall it will stop the majority of illegals from coming across and at minimum make them think twice.. Drug cartels will still have their tunnels though for sure..

Illegals would try to get smuggled in hiding places in cars and trucks more then ever if that wall is built.... I hope Trump ups the boarder cross screening as well in all vehicles..

This would be a huge step in the fight against ILLEGAL immigration.. It's not about division or dividing people either like the Dem anti Trump campaigns try to preach...

[DwightShrute]

No, not really as solid as mine. I didn't make baseless claim and follow it up with "hope" as my reasoning lol



not a complicated process at all which speaks volumes to your level of knowledge on the subject. All you have to do is get rid of obamacare, lower corp tax rate, stop with the "living wage" propaganda and kill garbage like NAFTA. Very basic stuff to understand if you understood the basics of economics.


And what is hillary's plan for job creation? To kill jobs... lol

pay attention khicks

I can't remember a candidate running for president saying she wants to kills jobs.

[brooks85]

lol she was quick to apologize. Wrote somebody in the state saying she didn't mean it



Good thing is if hillary becomes president we can all profit off the future kids of this country who are not even born yet because she is going to borrow money from them to put up a bunch of tax-funded solar panels and call it "job creation" lol

[khicks26]

lol no it doesn't. All you're doing is proving you have no idea what you're talking about other than numbers you're reading. You don't understand them or the history obviously. youtubeU will do that to ya though. Just through up numbers and connect them to things and say "see! proof!" lol

You deflect more than Obama & Trump put together.

So I will answer for you, dumb ass.

Corporate Tax rate in the US is high. But if you use the effective corporate rate, which is after deductions, exemptions, loopholes, which are the laws in the US. The US corporate tax rate is comparable to the rest of the industrialized world.

So either Mr Brooks is lying, stupid or both. There is no need to lower corporate income tax, its a BS campaign promise.

Shall we move on to the min wage?

[brooks85]

lol khicks showing his stellar ability to not be able to focus on one thing for more than one post before his mind has changed it to something else. The tax cuts in the 80s only moved money into tax havens and shelters which is EXACTLY why you had to ask what the "effective" rate was because you have no defense. I have no doubt you don't understand this but that is ok. So again, if you read what I said it is NOTHING like what was done in the 80s. The nominal corp tax rate needs lowered with obvious changes in deductions plus everything else I said that you didn't mention lol. But that is who you are, youtubeU educated.


Also, the corp tax rate has not "been going down since reagan." Another lie from khicks. It went down between '86-'88 and ticked back up in '93. It hasn't moved since and is still the highest in the free world.






This is similar to when you had to prove something about UK's parliament but then quoted a stat on demographics of the country lol. Your weasel-y ineptitude is entertaining at least. Buried and it is barely noon khicks lol, nice work.

lol poor khicks, just can't put the shovel down.


Sure we can move onto minimum wage, you know I'll let you keep digging that hole.

[jtoler]

I can't remember a candidate running for president saying she wants to kills jobs.

When you listen to her talk alot of the time she's just winging it, just saying stuff on the spot, people buy into it for some reason.

[Otters27]

Trump odds are going down. Why

[d2bets]

Trump odds are going down. Why

His odds of becoming Republican nominee remain steady. His odds of winning Presidency are falling. Why? Because the numbers and demographics are awfully clear. The informed can see how this shakes out. If Hillary vs. Trump were to happen today, Trump loses in a historic blowout. Trump will have to somehow pull off changing his stripes, despite all he the evidence that he has no ability change his stripes.

[khicks26]

lol poor khicks, just can't put the shovel down.


Sure we can move onto minimum wage, you know I'll let you keep digging that hole.

What your saying does not matter. Because the US is comparable to the rest of the world when it comes to corporate tax. So lowering them more will not bring jobs back to the US. It never has & it never will.

[d2bets]

Polling Data

RCP Average	2/11 - 3/6	--	--	47.3	41.0	Clinton +6.3
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl	3/3 - 3/6	1200 RV	2.8	51	38	Clinton +13
ABC News/Wash Post	3/3 - 3/6	864 RV	4.0	50	41	Clinton +9
Rasmussen Reports	2/29 - 3/1	1000 LV	3.0	41	36	Clinton +5
CNN/ORC	2/24 - 2/27	920 RV	3.0	52	44	Clinton +8
FOX News	2/15 - 2/17	1031 RV	3.0	47	42	Clinton +5

[d2bets]