-
Comment -
-
-
Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
The "color revolution" and "regime change" techniques that George Soros perfected in the former Soviet bloc and elsewhere have come home to roost. However you feel about Trump (and we're no fans), the fact is that Soros has turned his gazillion dollar democracy subversion machine on inside the United States and he is using nefarious tactics to undermine the US electoral system. Are we to become a banana republic under puppet-master Soros?
Soros Disruption: American-Style
Comment -
So trump called me a rapist, but he's actually the rapist???
oh shit.
Comment -
dude, I remember you posting that video months ago and when watching it, I kept thinking if Cenk was being charged for being a scumbag liar reporter and you were his lawyer, there is no way you would show that video in court. If you did, everyone would be thinking why his lawyer would purposely sabotage his client like that? The video is filled with Cenk using sarcasm and stupid childish voices when he is 'supposedly' telling Trump's side of the story. I am surprised he didn't wink at the same time. Probably too hard for him.
Cenk is the poster child for when people rightfully accuse the media of being disgusting. He's a psychopath.
▬▬▬ஜ۩☆۩ஜ▬ ★☆★☆★ MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN ☆★☆★☆★ ▬ஜ۩☆۩ஜ▬▬▬▬Last edited by DwightShrute; 03-21-16, 10:27 AM.Comment -
The media’s $2 billion gift to Trump
By Jennifer Rubin March 15 Follow @JRubinBlogger
<article itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump pauses while speaking at a rally in Millington, Tenn., in February. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)
The New York Times confirms what media and Donald Trump critics (overlapping groups) have been saying about Trump’s domination of so-called earned media:Mr. Trump earned $400 million worth of free media last month, about what John McCain spent on his entire 2008 presidential campaign. Paul Senatori, mediaQuant’s chief analytics officer, says that Mr. Trump “has no weakness in any of the media segments” — in other words, he is strong in every type of earned media, from television to Twitter. Over the course of the campaign, he has earned close to $2 billion worth of media attention, about twice the all-in price of the most expensive presidential campaigns in history. It is also twice the estimated $746 million that Hillary Clinton, the next best at earning media, took in. Senator Bernie Sanders has earned more media than any of the Republicans except Mr. Trump.
Yes, 2 billion dollars.
So while anti-Trump forces have dropped millions in the past month, understand that is a drop in the bucket of the flood of free air time Trump has received for months. Moreover, the difference between essentially free air time during the programming and a sprinkling of 30-second ads is tremendous. Trump was the show — for months — on all the cable and network news outlets. The excuse that “Trump made more news” does not fly when one considers the dozens of interviews Trump was allowed to do by phone and nonstop coverage of campaign rallies that did not differ all that much from one another.
This leads to a few conclusions. First, when analyzing “how Trump happened,” TV talking heads should be honest and acknowledge their unprecedented role. Second, it likely will not continue in the general election when Hillary Clinton’s aggressive campaign and the media’s natural bias will kick in, allocating a more even distribution of air time. Third, if not weighing in in favor of doing away with all campaign finance limits, this year’s cycle certainly speaks for allowing candidates additional leeway if an opponent convinces the media (however one would measure it) to collectively grant him an enormous advantage in air time. Fourth, it is not clear what if any pressure the Republican National Committee or other campaigns put on cable and TV news, but they should have raised complaints early and often. (Would this have made a difference? Probably not, but perhaps the media would have leveled the playing field with regard to call-in interviews.)
Democrats may find this all amusing, but they should be just as concerned and rethink their fixation with limiting third-party spending. Trump could easily have run as a Democrat, and other media impresarios will come along in the future. Unless Democrats are willing to roll the dice on the media’s willingness to self-police (a poor bet), they should reflect on the Trump lessons as well.
</article>
Comment -
Its a news story, not a court case.
Did he call Trump a rapist?
The point of the story is Trump is accusing others in mass, as being rapist. When the charge of rape is applied to Trump (which I say is more than likely true) the Trump campaign is outraged. Do you see the hypocrisy? That is what is disgusting.Last edited by khicks26; 03-21-16, 10:36 AM.Comment -
Excellent points.The media’s $2 billion gift to Trump
By Jennifer Rubin March 15 Follow @JRubinBlogger
<article itemprop="articleBody" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump pauses while speaking at a rally in Millington, Tenn., in February. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)
The New York Times confirms what media and Donald Trump critics (overlapping groups) have been saying about Trump’s domination of so-called earned media:Mr. Trump earned $400 million worth of free media last month, about what John McCain spent on his entire 2008 presidential campaign. Paul Senatori, mediaQuant’s chief analytics officer, says that Mr. Trump “has no weakness in any of the media segments” — in other words, he is strong in every type of earned media, from television to Twitter. Over the course of the campaign, he has earned close to $2 billion worth of media attention, about twice the all-in price of the most expensive presidential campaigns in history. It is also twice the estimated $746 million that Hillary Clinton, the next best at earning media, took in. Senator Bernie Sanders has earned more media than any of the Republicans except Mr. Trump.
Yes, 2 billion dollars.
So while anti-Trump forces have dropped millions in the past month, understand that is a drop in the bucket of the flood of free air time Trump has received for months. Moreover, the difference between essentially free air time during the programming and a sprinkling of 30-second ads is tremendous. Trump was the show — for months — on all the cable and network news outlets. The excuse that “Trump made more news” does not fly when one considers the dozens of interviews Trump was allowed to do by phone and nonstop coverage of campaign rallies that did not differ all that much from one another.
This leads to a few conclusions. First, when analyzing “how Trump happened,” TV talking heads should be honest and acknowledge their unprecedented role. Second, it likely will not continue in the general election when Hillary Clinton’s aggressive campaign and the media’s natural bias will kick in, allocating a more even distribution of air time. Third, if not weighing in in favor of doing away with all campaign finance limits, this year’s cycle certainly speaks for allowing candidates additional leeway if an opponent convinces the media (however one would measure it) to collectively grant him an enormous advantage in air time. Fourth, it is not clear what if any pressure the Republican National Committee or other campaigns put on cable and TV news, but they should have raised complaints early and often. (Would this have made a difference? Probably not, but perhaps the media would have leveled the playing field with regard to call-in interviews.)
Democrats may find this all amusing, but they should be just as concerned and rethink their fixation with limiting third-party spending. Trump could easily have run as a Democrat, and other media impresarios will come along in the future. Unless Democrats are willing to roll the dice on the media’s willingness to self-police (a poor bet), they should reflect on the Trump lessons as well.
</article>
The media has been so good to Trump. They handed him the nomination. But in a one on one general election, it will be a different landscape.Comment -
there is no hypocrisy whatsoever. 80% of women illegally crossing the Mexican border into the US are being raped and sexually assaulted. You are comparing that to someone's ex saying nasty things about their ex? Seriously? Like that's never happened before and everyone tells the truth after they break up. LMFAO!
Bottomline, its a non story unless you're an 'ambulance chaser' reporter type on youtube pretending to be legitimate.
Comment -
^^ Close the focking borders already... It's a no brainer!!! Force illegal immigrants to come to America thru the legal process or not at all..
This should not even be up for discussion!!!!Comment -
Then you didn't watch the whole vid. 80% sounds high, & who is raping those women. What Trump is saying is its the men crossing & raping women here also.there is no hypocrisy whatsoever. 80% of women illegally crossing the Mexican border into the US are being raped and sexually assaulted. You are comparing that to someone's ex saying nasty things about their ex? Seriously? Like that's never happened before and everyone tells the truth after they break up. LMFAO!
Bottomline, its a non story unless you're an 'ambulance chaser' reporter type on youtube pretending to be legitimate.
His wife said he raped her. Then changed her story after being paid to say he didn't.
Your a Trump guy & will never see the hypocrisy.Comment -
Comment -
LOL Why do you fight with me, if your just going to get mad. LOL You can't win.
I am happy I finally got my name in one of your meme's.Comment -
Comment -
Comment -
Comment -
Comment
Originally Posted by khicks26 
