NBA history, the team that wins game 3 wins the series 84% of the time

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eidolon
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 01-02-08
    • 9531

    #1
    NBA history, the team that wins game 3 wins the series 84% of the time
    NBA history, the team that wins game 3, wins the series 84% of the time, when going up 2-1.
    So why is Golden State a small favorite over the Cavs to win the series?
  • Pauulzcappin
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 04-23-10
    • 20295

    #2
    Cavs are shorthanded and will be gassed tomorrow, Warriors will regain homecourt and win the series
    Comment
    • JameisBrady
      SBR MVP
      • 03-15-15
      • 1023

      #3
      Because the warriors were huge pre-series favorites and have HCA. Literally no other reasons.
      Comment
      • The fiddler
        SBR Wise Guy
        • 01-27-10
        • 554

        #4
        Anybody that doesn't jump on the Cavs plus money for the series right now is a blooming idiot. Cavs will win in 5. Book it. GS...this aint the marshmallow conference you're dealing with. Cavs obliterated the marshmallow conference the entire second half of the season. Oh yeah...and LeBron plays for Cleveland.
        Comment
        • TheLangster
          SBR High Roller
          • 09-20-14
          • 185

          #5
          because cavs only have one nba player on their team
          Comment
          • Seto
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 12-16-11
            • 12906

            #6
            That's nonsensical. So by the same logic, teams that win game 1 win the series like 76% of the time or something. So you're saying if, say, the Pelicans had won game 1 against Golden State this would have meant they should have been favoured to win the series at that point?

            Every series is different.
            Comment
            • lakerboy
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 04-02-09
              • 94379

              #7
              Originally posted by JameisBrady
              Because the warriors were huge pre-series favorites and have HCA. Literally no other reasons.
              Nope.
              Comment
              • kosmos4
                SBR High Roller
                • 06-04-15
                • 106

                #8
                Originally posted by eidolon
                NBA history, the team that wins game 3, wins the series 84% of the time, when going up 2-1.
                So why is Golden State a small favorite over the Cavs to win the series?

                Ask the grizzlies
                Comment
                • bryant81
                  SBR Sharp
                  • 03-23-10
                  • 326

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Seto
                  That's nonsensical. So by the same logic, teams that win game 1 win the series like 76% of the time or something. So you're saying if, say, the Pelicans had won game 1 against Golden State this would have meant they should have been favoured to win the series at that point?

                  Every series is different.
                  Well said.

                  And to add to that, you must also look at WHICH team was up 2-1. For example, if the higher seed (or the team with HCA coming into the series) is up 2-1, then they are more likely to win the series since even if they lose game 4, they still have HCA with a pivotal game 5 at home (and possibly game 7). Whereas if the lower seed is up 2-1, then losing game 4 means they have lost HCA and a pivotal game 5 is on the road (only 1 home game left). Two very different scenarios.

                  I would like to know, what are the percentages that the team who won game 3 wins the series based on:

                  1. Higher seed up 2-1

                  2. Lower seed up 2-1

                  That would give us a more accurate picture.
                  Comment
                  • Seto
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 12-16-11
                    • 12906

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bryant81
                    Well said.

                    And to add to that, you must also look at WHICH team was up 2-1. For example, if the higher seed (or the team with HCA coming into the series) is up 2-1, then they are more likely to win the series since even if they lose game 4, they still have HCA with a pivotal game 5 at home (and possibly game 7). Whereas if the lower seed is up 2-1, then losing game 4 means they have lost HCA and a pivotal game 5 is on the road (only 1 home game left). Two very different scenarios.

                    I would like to know, what are the percentages that the team who won game 3 wins the series based on:

                    1. Higher seed up 2-1

                    2. Lower seed up 2-1

                    That would give us a more accurate picture.
                    Only 2 teams that have ever done it are the 2011 Mavs and 2013 Heat. One had HCA and the other didn't.

                    Not sure how many of the 13 teams that did hold the 2-1 advantage had HCA though. Pretty sure it's 87% and not 84 come to think of it, it was 11/11 teams before the 2011 Finals and 2/4 since.
                    Comment
                    • bryant81
                      SBR Sharp
                      • 03-23-10
                      • 326

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Seto
                      Only 2 teams that have ever done it are the 2011 Mavs and 2013 Heat. One had HCA and the other didn't.

                      Not sure how many of the 13 teams that did hold the 2-1 advantage had HCA though. Pretty sure it's 87% and not 84 come to think of it, it was 11/11 teams before the 2011 Finals and 2/4 since.
                      Interesting. Hard to compare if we're only looking at Finals since the format was 2-3-2 until last season.
                      Comment
                      • 2Shirts
                        SBR MVP
                        • 03-11-11
                        • 4402

                        #12
                        So your saying the Warriors have no nba players, or they're just a bad team. One would think if what you say holds water GS would be one game away from sweeping.

                        Originally posted by TheLangster
                        because cavs only have one nba player on their team
                        Comment
                        • jjgold
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 07-20-05
                          • 388179

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Pauulzcappin
                          Cavs are shorthanded and will be gassed tomorrow, Warriors will regain homecourt and win the series
                          That is what most think

                          I would of lost almost everything chasing gsw and would do it again tomorrow
                          Comment
                          • Seaweed
                            BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                            • 01-19-12
                            • 26318

                            #14
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	97.8 KB
ID:	29130379
                            Comment
                            • jizay
                              SBR Wise Guy
                              • 08-07-09
                              • 975

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Seto
                              That's nonsensical. So by the same logic, teams that win game 1 win the series like 76% of the time or something. So you're saying if, say, the Pelicans had won game 1 against Golden State this would have meant they should have been favoured to win the series at that point?

                              Every series is different.
                              Winning game 3 is updating information. If your prior on GS winning the series before game 3 wasn't as high as 84%, it's reasonable to say this new info makes Cavs the favorite. Thinking of it a different way, GS is a fave to win at least 3 out of the next 4. Do you think the lines are gonna be -300 GS each game? Seems high.
                              Comment
                              • Seto
                                SBR Posting Legend
                                • 12-16-11
                                • 12906

                                #16
                                Originally posted by jizay
                                Winning game 3 is updating information. If your prior on GS winning the series before game 3 wasn't as high as 84%, it's reasonable to say this new info makes Cavs the favorite. Thinking of it a different way, GS is a fave to win at least 3 out of the next 4. Do you think the lines are gonna be -300 GS each game? Seems high.
                                The first part of your post makes no sense.

                                Yeah, it updates the line before game 3, no shit. The line before game 3 was -230/+210. After game 3 it was -120/+100. Is that not an update? One game where they were 2 point faves is not gonna change the line more than that.

                                Did you not see the game 2 line? GS will obviously be above -300 in both games 5 and 7. They will be a short fave in game 6 if down 3-2 and a short dog if up 3-2 most likely. I'm too lazy to do the math but I figure that makes the fact that they're a fave for the series logical. LT Profits check in, I know you have a model for this kind of thing.
                                Comment
                                • Menses
                                  SBR MVP
                                  • 03-15-13
                                  • 2755

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by eidolon
                                  NBA history, the team that wins game 3, wins the series 84% of the time, when going up 2-1.
                                  So why is Golden State a small favorite over the Cavs to win the series?
                                  The question I have is how much are they favored over Joey Crawford?
                                  Comment
                                  • jizay
                                    SBR Wise Guy
                                    • 08-07-09
                                    • 975

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Seto
                                    I'm too lazy to do the math
                                    We agree on something.
                                    Comment
                                    • The fiddler
                                      SBR Wise Guy
                                      • 01-27-10
                                      • 554

                                      #19
                                      Teams that lead 3-1 in NBA finals are 32-0. Warrior backers are in deep shit if Cavs hold serve in game 4.
                                      Comment
                                      • vasilli07
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 05-08-11
                                        • 3955

                                        #20
                                        I think Warriors will play better tomorrow. I hope Cavs is prepared to deal with David Lee.
                                        Comment
                                        • astrobloke
                                          SBR MVP
                                          • 09-17-10
                                          • 1928

                                          #21
                                          I love the fact everyone is still dissing the cav's even though they are the better team, and up 2-1.

                                          Seems that my cav bets, are safe and secure.
                                          Comment
                                          • new era
                                            SBR MVP
                                            • 07-28-13
                                            • 1470

                                            #22
                                            Means nothing considering they were using the dumb 2-3-2 format.
                                            Comment
                                            • QuangX
                                              SBR MVP
                                              • 02-03-11
                                              • 2756

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by jjgold
                                              That is what most think

                                              I would of lost almost everything chasing gsw and would do it again tomorrow
                                              this is a brilliant statement. let us chase to our death today JJ
                                              Comment
                                              Search
                                              Collapse
                                              SBR Contests
                                              Collapse
                                              Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                              Collapse
                                              Working...