So after 3 steps and getting touched by the opponent he goes to the ground and it isn't a catch??? penetrating bullshit
-
-
Very penetrating bullshit.Comment -
AgreeComment -
What happened?
Did they lose?Comment -
Yeah that was a catch. That rule only applies when you haven't made a move and went straight to the ground.Comment -
There was NFL yesterday?Comment -
Been watching this catch over and over on replay... I blame Dez Bryant... he leaped too early. If he's such a bad ass receiver... he should of timed his jump better... never would of stumbled... and everything would of been fine. Would of walked right into the end zone.Comment -
Just the universe balancing out that Pass Interference blunder last week.Comment -
Green Bay's next then, holding the hot potato. F 'em.Comment -
been upset with cowboys since drew PEarson cheated on push off against Nate Wright.. too bad cowgirls...I can die peacefully now..Comment -
whether it was a catch or not, KARMA IS A FUKKING BITCH!!!
not just in football but in life. remember that...Comment -
Dez Bryant grabbing too much attention. The blame should be on romo and his end of the half blowup. Guy ended up creating a 6 point swing for the packers. That margin is the game. Romo = chokeComment -
Any vids of play you're talking about?Comment -
There is not a video of the catch, just take my word for itComment -
Cowboys 6 rings.
As most as any.
fyaComment -
Comment -
....Comment -
rule has been around awhileComment -
Ball can't hit the ground unless hand is under the ball. His hand was not under the ball.Comment -
[QUOTE=Chi_archie;23387803]rule has been around awhile
But it was in the end zone SFB.Comment -
One time i was at the Bank's drive thru in my old lady's Mercedes. She was the passenger. I got my money and was overpaid 300 dollars. I go back around and back thru the drive thru and tell the young teller that she gave me 300 to much. She was so thankful. I leave and cut the corner to sharp and ruin my girls rim. Set me back 300. Is it possible i have reverse karma? Or maybe Karma is just a bunch of bullshit?Comment -
http://static.nfl.com/static/content...ass_Fumble.pdf
N.F.L. Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 1: Going to the ground.If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete.Comment -
he went to ground and didn't maintain control when ball touched ground..... simple
not a great rule 100% of time but thats what it isComment -
You are missing the key phrase that this is all about, which is "if a player goes to the ground IN THE ACT OF CATCHING A PASS..." That is what we are debating. I'm saying that he caught the pass, had clear control, stepped with right foot, stepped with left foot, tucked ball under left wrist, stepped right foot again, then reached left arm with ball toward goal line. He had already caught the pass and then did all of that before going to the ground. That s not "in the act of". Going to ground in the act was always intended to cover leaps and dives, not this situation. And it doesn't IMHO. But the meaning of "in the act of" is sufficiently ambiguous for you to further your position that it was all part of the same act. And I will disagree. Capish?Comment -
wellComment -
Archie....I understand it's a rule. And no amount if arguing is gonna change things.
But the fact that yankee jew prikk jerkoff Mike Perieira has an opinion on it doesn't mean a motherfukkin thing.
He's a Cowboy hater.Comment -
It was an obvious catch, really no debate. Anyone saying it wasn't is either a hater or a troll
Dallas was obviously robbed by the rulesComment
