Is Nadal the world's best athlete?
Collapse
X
-
I/OSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-26-11
- 7922
#71Comment -
JerseyRobbySBR MVP
- 12-14-11
- 1494
#72People who don't think Nadal is on PED's are the same who were shocked when Lance got busted. The red flags are everywhere.Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#73
Any person in a sport where they are getting a rest every 3 minutes thanks to ad breaks and play stoppages can't be compared to what a tennis player does. Get an NBA guy to play a basketball game ALONE and for 4+ hours with very limited breaks and you might be able to make a case.Comment -
KaabeeSBR MVP
- 01-21-06
- 2482
#74
Any person in a sport where they are getting a rest every 3 minutes thanks to ad breaks and play stoppages can't be compared to what a tennis player does. Get an NBA guy to play a basketball game ALONE and for 4+ hours with very limited breaks and you might be able to make a case.Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82839
#75Best athletes in the world are soccer defensive midfielders. They run 8-10 miles per game. And they play 60 games a year or more. Not just 4 Grand Slams like Nadal.Comment -
HenchSBR Sharp
- 12-14-12
- 304
#76Don't know about Nadal being ripped. Takes his shirt off after each game and he's nowhere near defined in the torso as he is in his arms.Comment -
I/OSBR Hall of Famer
- 05-26-11
- 7922
#77No doubt. They roll on the field 40 to 50 miles per game acting like they have been shot if another player touches them.Comment -
matt1216SBR Posting Legend
- 10-27-11
- 14683
#78U have to be super hydrated from these matches. He will be even leaner between tournaments
Comment -
matt1216SBR Posting Legend
- 10-27-11
- 14683
#79I have to disagree. The mental stress fatigues your body at a incredible rate.... If any of you guys have sweated out your largest wager u know afterwards your body is a bit drainedComment -
TheMLBKingSBR MVP
- 04-20-13
- 1129
#80
Any person in a sport where they are getting a rest every 3 minutes thanks to ad breaks and play stoppages can't be compared to what a tennis player does. Get an NBA guy to play a basketball game ALONE and for 4+ hours with very limited breaks and you might be able to make a case.Comment -
TheMLBKingSBR MVP
- 04-20-13
- 1129
#81There are people on here who think Nadal is a better athlete than LeBron?
No wonder why this forum is full of life-long losers if that's the case.Comment -
faceSBR Posting Legend
- 01-31-11
- 14740
#82michael phelps for the win
all those medals;
champ.Comment -
TheMLBKingSBR MVP
- 04-20-13
- 1129
#84Nadal honestly isn't even one of the top 10 best athletes in the world. Can name at least 10 soccer/NBA/NFL players who would literally run circles around the rat.Comment -
InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 11-23-09
- 23983
#85
Any person in a sport where they are getting a rest every 3 minutes thanks to ad breaks and play stoppages can't be compared to what a tennis player does. Get an NBA guy to play a basketball game ALONE and for 4+ hours with very limited breaks and you might be able to make a case.
interesting
so tell me why some guey in kenya isnt the best athlete in the world based on that logicComment -
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#86no.
Cam Newton.Comment -
TheMoneyShotBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-14-07
- 28672
#87Interesting post. I'm always the one thinking PED's myself. Never thought this way of Nadal. I just think the kid is in his prime. Might be just his diet. Federer looking past his prime.Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 61738
#89That means ZERO. Swimmers get a shot at 8 or 10 golds per Olympics. Doesn't make them better than athletes that can only go for one.
In fact swimmers golds should count as a percentage of events entered if trying to create a real olympic medal ranking.
Phelps was amazing for a moment in his life. But does that really compare to someone like Steve Redgrave who won 5 golds in 5 different Olympics?.Comment -
SharkAASBR MVP
- 11-10-13
- 2005
#90Not sure if he's the world's best athlete as how do you really measure that? So many guys are dominant in other sports. But is he the best male tennis player we'll ever see in our lifetime? Yes. If you look at who his road to Slam titles vs Fed it's a bit of a joke. And then of course if Fed is supposed to be the G.O.A.T then surely the guy who has dominated him should be given an even higher title than that. I think a guy like Usain Bolt should be taken out of the equation as sprinters have an extremely short shelf life and only dominate for a relatively short period of time. However when you look at soccer, NFL, AFL (ie Gary Ablett Jr) or NBA players it's a tough comparison. None of them have his stamina and they're all backed up by way too many teammates if they're having an off night. But for the footy players (AFL/NFL) players, they're also getting the crapped knocked out of them on a weekly basis although again their season is very short.
Ok I've talked myself around to it... yes he is.
And NoCoin, they do get tested. Usually when they leave the court in big matches but also often at home or randomly otherwise. Players complain because sometimes they're woken up at say 6am on match day for a piss test and obviously they can't refuse so their training/rest schedule is fukked up.
Second of all, I've been watching tennis for 20 years and never saw anything like Federer's versatile game. Rafa is clearly more physically stronger than Federer, on which he gains his advantage over the others, but his skills are nowhere near Federer's.Comment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388179
#91Raffy owns Federer
Raffy played 10x better competition to win slams
game over
First of all, concerning the thread title. There can't be officially the world's best athlete, because every individual sport is a story for itself. So the answer is NO-he's not the world's best athlete.
Second of all, I've been watching tennis for 20 years and never saw anything like Federer's versatile game. Rafa is clearly more physically stronger than Federer, on which he gains his advantage over the others, but his skills are nowhere near Federer's.Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65674
#92
Last season, 2013, Nadal played in 17 tournament events, and he started in February.
Those 17 tournament run 1 week minimum, some two weeks plus.
Of those 17 tournaments, Nadal played 81 matches, you said soccer players play 60 matches.
16 of those tournaments Nadal was in, went four or more matched (rounds)
He was knocked out in the first round once, and the other 16 went deep.
Now, we haven't mentioned the four doubles tournament he was in last year, not to mention the exhibitions.
Does this look like just the four grand slams?
Comment -
InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 11-23-09
- 23983
#93
they might have played ten matches while they were both in their prime
the 2008 wimbledon final is pretty much where the torch was passedComment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388179
#94Raffy is a better tennis player than Fed even in both primes
Fed still beats everybody so that prime arguement is BS
Fed was lucky to be in an era when tennis was on a lull
He could never win now..scared to fukkin death
If you want to get real technical Lendl best player ever because he played in the toughest era of all times and still got to 19 grand slam finals..yes 19
Nadal will go down as greatest ever
Its getting close to not even being a debate anymoreComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#95First of all, concerning the thread title. There can't be officially the world's best athlete, because every individual sport is a story for itself. So the answer is NO-he's not the world's best athlete.
Second of all, I've been watching tennis for 20 years and never saw anything like Federer's versatile game. Rafa is clearly more physically stronger than Federer, on which he gains his advantage over the others, but his skills are nowhere near Federer's.Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#96Comment -
InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 11-23-09
- 23983
#97Raffy is a better tennis player than Fed even in both primes
Fed still beats everybody so that prime arguement is BS
Fed was lucky to be in an era when tennis was on a lull
He could never win now..scared to fukkin death
If you want to get real technical Lendl best player ever because he played in the toughest era of all times and still got to 19 grand slam finals..yes 19
Nadal will go down as greatest ever
Its getting close to not even being a debate anymore
even though feds didn't beat rafa in the french that he won he's also the only other guey who's won it since 2005
rafa is right there with the best ever and could very well be at the top by the end of this seasonComment -
jjgoldSBR Aristocracy
- 07-20-05
- 388179
#98I can see if Fed was getting whipped by mid level players but he is not
Even at 30 Fed was in his prime which does say a lot for him
Of course he is an all time greatComment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65674
#99
Three, three minute rounds. Nine total minutes, of which, with brief stoppages, 8 of thosee you are in combat, providing there is not a pinfall.
The back of your throat goes sandpaper dry before the 45 second mark of the first round.
Your muscles are put into dozens of postitions God did not intend them to be put in.
Extremely difficult.Comment -
InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 11-23-09
- 23983
#100
"coming out of his prime" is not the same as "out of his prime"
pete sampras's run of slams slowed at the exact same time as feds
so yes...THAT is what I'm saying
there will always be other examples like agassi who reach their peak later but to claim it's unheard of is just ignorantComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#101believe it or not but things arent always black and white
"coming out of his prime" is not the same as "out of his prime"
pete sampras's run of slams slowed at the exact same time as feds
so yes...THAT is what I'm saying
there will always be other examples like agassi who reach their peak later but to claim it's unheard of is just ignorantComment -
InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 11-23-09
- 23983
#102I never said it was unheard of but Sampras won 6 Slams at 26+ and made the finals of 2 more so I don't think he's the best example to use. Fed has won 8 - almost half his total Slams - after that age and has made 6 other Finals since. Again not sure he'd agree with your theory that he was coming out of his prime at 26. I'm not ignorant... Those are the facts.
federer won THREE slams 3 out of 4 years until he was 26 and never did again....again, that's the definition of prime
did he win more? yes...he even won two in a season one time after....because he's the greatest player ever....just because he has won more doesnt mean thats the prime of his careerComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#103sampras won 2 slams for 4 out of 5 years until he was 26 and never did again....that's the definition of prime
federer won THREE slams 3 out of 4 years until he was 26 and never did again....again, that's the definition of prime
did he win more? yes...he even won two in a season one time after....because he's the greatest player ever....just because he has won more doesnt mean thats the prime of his career
Or could it be that he's now facing Nadal, Djokovic and Murray and every year now Fed stays on Tour, just like Sampras, will be one extra year to bring down that average? Again: Fed won 8 of his 17 Slams after the point you said Rafa was only beating him because he was coming out of his prime. That's not the case. Fed was winning 3 out of 4 Slams a year for the EXACT reason we've been saying: His competition was relatively shithouse for a big chunk of his early to mid career. Surely if you've been following tennis for 20 years as you said then you would know that.Comment -
InTheDrinkSBR Posting Legend
- 11-23-09
- 23983
#104
Or could it be that he's now facing Nadal, Djokovic and Murray and every year now Fed stays on Tour, just like Sampras, will be one extra year to bring down that average? Again: Fed won 8 of his 17 Slams after the point you said Rafa was only beating him because he was coming out of his prime. That's not the case. Fed was winning 3 out of 4 Slams a year for the EXACT reason we've been saying: His competition was relatively shithouse for a big chunk of his early to mid career. Surely if you've been following tennis for 20 years as you said then you would know that.
if you paid attention i am ceding that rafa will most likely end up better than feds but im also pointing out that its not as black and white as jjer's post made it out to be
youre telling me im saying things i never said so it's not even really worth debating
would you care to tell me what your definition of prime is? i mean the funniest part is that what you're arguing about is probably the least arguable thing i've said....but then again i see that you wont touch my lebron comment because you know that's completely ridiculous to think nadal is a better athlete than lebronComment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65674
#105Drinker getting buried by Shari.
Never thought I'd see the day that Drinker gets pwnd'edComment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code