Green Bay is a PK at home against Philly?

No coincidences · 11-09-13, 03:00 AM

Originally posted by BigDeem5

No coin off basis again.

Have you seen my NFL thread? Moron.

The fact that you and Smoke are trolling this play makes me like it even more.

GunShard · 11-09-13, 03:57 AM

The public wins on the Eagles.

jjgold · 11-09-13, 07:57 AM

Packers are a 4-12 type team without Rogers

many of you reading game wrong

I am the one · 11-09-13, 08:28 AM

All nocoin does is talk about games and never bets

ChiLLx · 11-09-13, 10:50 AM

Originally posted by BigDeem5

No coin off basis again.

Packers just lost at home to a backup QB. This team wins the NFC with Rodg. You're undervaluing him. This line was going to be -8 with him. Rodgers worth well over 7.

I'm not saying GB loses but the line is accurate. Lacy isn't nearly as effective, nor Nelson without A Rodg.

Not to mention Packers D gave up 27 points to McCown.

Except none of this makes sense because the Bears are better than the Packers. Bears avg 30 ppg so 27 is normal.

meader99 · 11-09-13, 01:51 PM

You mean now what Rodgers is out the Bears are better?

ChiLLx · 11-09-13, 03:00 PM

Originally posted by meader99

You mean now what Rodgers is out the Bears are better?

Not sure what you mean. Bears are better overall team regardless.

k13 · 11-09-13, 03:09 PM

Originally posted by SteveRyan

Philly is the smart play here.

Don't fade Foles with the hot hand right now. He's gonna light it up just like last week. Don't let this one pass without getting on board.

GB is always the play here as long as they stay favorites.

Public road dogs are a losing proposition long term.

SteveRyan · 11-09-13, 03:11 PM

Originally posted by zsr

Is Rodgers worth NINE points? No player in the NFL is worth that. Still have to take GB here.

He's worth 10. You can count out at least 1 TD and 1 FG.

Philly is the play. Foles could go 6 straight games like this. You want to get on it from the start. Even if Philly loses, the concept is solid. Go with the hot hand and ride it for as long as possible. Don't wait until 2 or 3 games have passed to decided that Philly is a good bet. Jump on it early and don't let any of these games pass.

ChiLLx · 11-09-13, 03:14 PM

Originally posted by SteveRyan

He's worth 10. You can count out at least 1 TD and 1 FG.

Philly is the play. Foles could go 6 straight games like this. You want to get on it from the start. Even if Philly loses, the concept is solid. Go with the hot hand and ride it for as long as possible. Don't wait until 2 or 3 games have passed to decided that Philly is a good bet. Jump on it early and don't let any of these games pass.

Just...no

k13 · 11-09-13, 03:27 PM

I got Philly 300-1 to win SB, they won't do anything but that was a silly line.

Bears were 175-1 last week, win one game, 40-1 now...lol

BigDeem5 · 11-09-13, 03:28 PM

Originally posted by ChiLLx

Except none of this makes sense because the Bears are better than the Packers. Bears avg 30 ppg so 27 is normal.

So Jay Cutler and their back up make no difference?

Learn to read, dumb fuk.

Not to mention Packers D gave up 27 points to McCown.

k13 · 11-09-13, 03:29 PM

Originally posted by k13

GB is always the play here as long as they stay favorites.

Public road dogs are a losing proposition long term.

Pinnacle must have read my post, Philly is -1 now like a minute later...

ChiLLx · 11-09-13, 03:30 PM

Originally posted by k13

I got Philly 300-1 to win SB, they won't do anything but that was a silly line.

Bears were 175-1 last week, win one game, 40-1 now...lol

The swing in futures is so stupid...Niners were like +1200 when they were 1-2. Now top 3 favs where they should have been the whole time

k13 · 11-09-13, 03:33 PM

Originally posted by ChiLLx

The swing in futures is so stupid...Niners were like +1200 when they were 1-2. Now top 3 favs where they should have been the whole time

You can pick up some great bargains but you have to be quick.

225-1 Baltimore looks tasty now, good chance they beat Bengals...

Love to get Packers if they lose a few more and then get Rodgers back. Top 2 in NFC.

jjgold · 11-09-13, 04:31 PM

Going over this game I really like Philly I will let you all know tomorrow how much I'm putting on it

PAULYPOKER · 11-09-13, 05:18 PM

Coin, you will never reach Paco fame.

You have absolutely no charisma....

The sooner you realize this the sooner you can be content n' happy with who you are........

meader99 · 11-09-13, 05:43 PM

Originally posted by ChiLLx

Not sure what you mean. Bears are better overall team regardless.

Really? The only chance the Bears had at beating Green Bay was Rodgers getting hurt. Better team? Laughable.

meader99 · 11-09-13, 05:45 PM

Originally posted by BigDeem5

So Jay Cutler and their back up make no difference?

Learn to read, dumb fuk.

Not to mention Packers D gave up 27 points to McCown.

Since Cutler has been a Bear, the two highest scores the Bears have posted against the Packers were both led by McCown.

Big Bear · 11-09-13, 06:47 PM

Originally posted by PAULYPOKER

Coin, you will never reach Paco fame.

You have absolutely no charisma....

The sooner you realize this the sooner you can be content n' happy with who you are........

charisma?

keyboard charisma?

Goat Milk · 11-09-13, 07:17 PM

Originally posted by k13

GB is always the play here as long as they stay favorites.

Public road dogs are a losing proposition long term.

You understand that you have to bet every game for the year for that proposition to hold true. you can't just pick and chose based of 52%. no one is gonna bet every game every week w/ that theory to end with a couple bills at the end of the season. they'd rather take risks and lose a thousand or have a chance at winning much more.

ChiLLx · 11-09-13, 10:01 PM

Originally posted by k13

GB is always the play here as long as they stay favorites.

Public road dogs are a losing proposition long term.

Well GB is now a dog at home...hmm

Eric22174 · 11-09-13, 10:57 PM

Green Bay Packers general manager Ted Thompson places the responsibility for the backup quarterback position squarely on his own shoulders.The playoff picture

"If something went wrong at the backup quarterback position, it's my fault," Thompson told USA Today on Friday. "It's not somebody else's fault. It's not even one of those quarterbacks' fault. I just didn't get it worked out right."Thompson spoke with USA Today's Tom Pelissero in a wide-ranging Q&A that touched on everything from thePackers playing through injuries, Thompson's love of scouting and even mentions Brett Favre. You can -- and should -- check out the entire interview.During the discussion, Thompson explained why he chose Seneca Wallace as his backup, despite not having the quarterback in training camp or with the Packers in the preseason.

It's fairly obvious to me that even the GM thinks Seneca Wallace could be a huge problem at the back up position as his career record is 6-15

blankoblanco · 11-09-13, 11:32 PM

Originally posted by SteveRyan

Philly is the play. Foles could go 6 straight games like this. You want to get on it from the start. Even if Philly loses, the concept is solid. Go with the hot hand and ride it for as long as possible. Don't wait until 2 or 3 games have passed to decided that Philly is a good bet. Jump on it early and don't let any of these games pass.

Your "concept" is essentially to overreact to every blowout and 1-game outlier that happens in the NFL. I don't think that's a solid concept in sportsbetting. That's the sort of thing that every square I know does

SEAHAWKHARRY · 11-10-13, 12:09 AM

No but Seneca Wallace is that bad .......put$$on int. Prop it will hit 1st half

Stevedore · 11-10-13, 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Eric22174

Green Bay Packers general manager Ted Thompson places the responsibility for the backup quarterback position squarely on his own shoulders.The playoff picture

"If something went wrong at the backup quarterback position, it's my fault," Thompson told USA Today on Friday. "It's not somebody else's fault. It's not even one of those quarterbacks' fault. I just didn't get it worked out right."Thompson spoke with USA Today's Tom Pelissero in a wide-ranging Q&A that touched on everything from thePackers playing through injuries, Thompson's love of scouting and even mentions Brett Favre. You can -- and should -- check out the entire interview.During the discussion, Thompson explained why he chose Seneca Wallace as his backup, despite not having the quarterback in training camp or with the Packers in the preseason.

It's fairly obvious to me that even the GM thinks Seneca Wallace could be a huge problem at the back up position as his career record is 6-15

Nice post!! Quite possibly the most revealing interview Thompson has given in a long time; guy usually is tight lipped and doesn't say much.

lakerboy · 11-10-13, 01:03 AM

Pack should have kept vince young.

No coincidences · 11-10-13, 01:07 AM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Pack should have kept vince young.

Agree.

I still think that if you take the whole of these two teams into consideration, the Packers have an advantage here -- especially at home. I'm perplexed by this line. I figured GB would be -3 with Rodgers out minimum. And yes, I know Seneca is awful. He's had a week to work with the first string offense now in practice, though. Plus, I think both Clay and Hawk are playing tomorrow.

vividjohn45 · 11-10-13, 01:24 AM

Id think philly. But i smell trap. Gb. A pk at home to no one. Wont even go near this game

CDMKMP · 11-10-13, 02:08 AM

Everyone so caught up in how bad Seneca is when he basically had zero first team reps and got thrown into the fire last week. With a full week to practice he'll definitely be better. Yeah he's not an all-star, or even 1/3rd of what Rodgers is, but he'll be better.

They don't need him to do anything other than provide the smallest of credible pass threats. The run game is more stout in GB than it has been in YEARS with Lacy/Starks/Franklin trio.

I don't think the Eagles will be able to stop that, so it's all about whether GB can handle the Eagles offense.

coitus_maximus · 11-10-13, 02:34 AM

All of you are basing this game about how bad Wallace is. Yes, he needs work, but GB can run the ball with a few play actions. Even in that blowout against Oakland, they gave up 210 rushing yards. Watch alot of Lacy, Starks, and Franklin. GB to the bank to win.

greenhippo · 11-10-13, 02:42 AM

And you're basing this off the fact that an NFL team is going to ignore how bad their run game was and that in order for GB to win they'll need to run. They know this so they'll force Wallace to beat them.

Art Vandelay · 11-10-13, 02:55 AM

Everything points to Philly - Huge game by Foles last week and easy win; GB in disarray with poor backup and just got shredded by McCown. That's why GB will win. Things are never as easy as they seem in the NFL...

greypimps · 11-10-13, 02:58 AM

I think greenbay defense gonna have a long day

2daBank · 11-10-13, 03:48 AM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Have you seen my NFL thread? Moron.

The fact that you and Smoke are trolling this play makes me like it even more.

getting plus money id say pack are just about a must play, reading this thread and the ppl that like phily pretty much backs that up.. everyone banging wallace at qb is fine but didnt matt flynn get paid off playing a gm with this offense? and that was with a shit run gm. pack will own the time of possession, lacy and starks will wear philly down, foles will go back to looking like a backup, mccarthy will figure out a gm plan rolling wallace out and giving him easy throws.. i never would have touched this gm with discount double bitch and a 10 point spread but now that pack are gonna be a run 1st gm which actually plays into the olines strength and everyone back in luv with philly which strange cause they all liked oak last week, ill take me some pack + whatever they will give me..