Steroids and HOF

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chi_archie
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 07-22-08
    • 63172

    #1
    Steroids and HOF
    lot of talk about this recently here....and everywhere really


    i'm wondering..... who are the guys that would have made the HOF without Steroids but took them anyways... obviously we have to speculate quite a bit... but for some guys like Bonds its obvious when he started using....


    someone like Clemens...prob makes the HOF without roids
    same for Bonds.

    someone like Sosa, prob achieved HOF type numbers with roids....its debatable if he would have made it to 500 hr's without them.... I'd say he wouldn't though.

    Palmerio? ect.

    now for the most part I think guys that have HOF type numbers that we know of taking roids, prob would have gotten in anyways....

    its the guys like Brady Anderson, and Luis Gonzalez that benefitted the most from roids...

    but since, by and large everyone was taking roids during this era... do we just throw out numbers like 500 hr's as hof benchmarks and just compare how guys did compared to one another in this era to be considered for the Hall? Isn't that kind of how they do it anyways?

    so for instance Rafael Palmeiro was a good hitter and got the HOF numbers through longevity and alot of help from injecting the needle.....

    IMO he WOULD NOT BE A HOF player... he was not head and shoulders above his peers...ever

    Sosa and big mac were... so they would get in the HOF

    guys like Frank Thomas...(who I think was clean) get in due to their numbers and his dominance in the early 90's one of the best decades of hitting all-time


    whaddya think?
  • seaborneq
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 09-08-06
    • 22556

    #2
    Griffey, Bonds, ARod, Hurt, Chipper, Piazza, and Pedro would have gotten in regardless. Clemens would not have not gotten in, he was done at 35.
    Comment
    • Chi_archie
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 07-22-08
      • 63172

      #3
      not sure that chipper gets in yet....
      Comment
      • seaborneq
        SBR Posting Legend
        • 09-08-06
        • 22556

        #4
        Originally posted by Chi_archie
        not sure that chipper gets in yet....

        Chipper has been in. Only player a few years ago with switch hitter, 300 homers, and 300 stolen bases and a .300 average or some strange stat.
        Comment
        • Chi_archie
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 07-22-08
          • 63172

          #5
          Originally posted by seaborneq
          Chipper has been in. Only player a few years ago with switch hitter, 300 homers, and 300 stolen bases and a .300 average or some strange stat.

          not sure that chipper has stolen 20 bases in a recent season...he must have been alot faster then I remember him when he fast came up...to get 300 for his career....cuz i never remember him being that great of a base-stealer
          Comment
          • roasthawg
            SBR MVP
            • 11-09-07
            • 2990

            #6
            The HOF is so screwed up because of this...it's almost to the point where you just have to let them all in because most of them were probably using. Maybe if there's conclusive evidence like a failed test you keep em out. Now that it's been established what steroids can do for a baseball player they'll never be able to keep them out of the sport.
            Comment
            • Chi_archie
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 07-22-08
              • 63172

              #7
              Originally posted by roasthawg
              The HOF is so screwed up because of this...it's almost to the point where you just have to let them all in because most of them were probably using. Maybe if there's conclusive evidence like a failed test you keep em out. Now that it's been established what steroids can do for a baseball player they'll never be able to keep them out of the sport.


              yeah, what i'm saying is

              don't let guys in just based upon 500 homers...... that number is no longer what it once was....
              Comment
              • roasthawg
                SBR MVP
                • 11-09-07
                • 2990

                #8
                Originally posted by Chi_archie
                yeah, what i'm saying is

                don't let guys in just based upon 500 homers...... that number is no longer what it once was....
                Well a non-roided 500 homers is still sick...the thing is no one will ever know whether or not it's legit. So yeah, if they're just gonna ignore the whole roids thing then 500 probably isn't a key number by itself anymore.
                Comment
                • tullamore
                  SBR MVP
                  • 07-17-07
                  • 3586

                  #9
                  If to be a HOF you need to be the best of your generation and one goes under the assumption the majority of players have used steroids or some other substance since the late 1980's then no one player really had that much of an advantage the past 20 years. If you are able to look at it in this context then the Bonds, Clemens, and McGwire should be HOF.

                  Many will not be able to look at it this way, and will compare what Bonds did to what Mantle did in the 50's and wonder what Mantle's career would have been like with PED? Also many voters will punish the steroids users and those suspected of using steroids for tarnishing the legacy of the game and they will not get votes.
                  Comment
                  • Chi_archie
                    SBR Aristocracy
                    • 07-22-08
                    • 63172

                    #10
                    If mantle had roids, didn't abuse alcohol and stay out till 4 am every night, during the day baseball era....
                    had a strength coach, off season routine, didn't have his bad legs and injuries....and had the DH to extend his career....

                    He might have hit 900 homers and stole 500 bases
                    Comment
                    • tullamore
                      SBR MVP
                      • 07-17-07
                      • 3586

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Chi_archie
                      If mantle had roids, didn't abuse alcohol and stay out till 4 am every night, during the day baseball era....
                      had a strength coach, off season routine, didn't have his bad legs and injuries....and had the DH to extend his career....

                      He might have hit 900 homers and stole 500 bases
                      This is the problem with voting for the Hall, a writer with a hard on for Mantle and being all nostalgia for the past says what you just said, and therefore all the players for the past 20 years are cheaters and do not belong.

                      Then there is another writer who votes for Jay Bell. HOw the hell can you vote for Jay Bell. He was a nice player made an all-star team, but in my opinion is no HOF. Writers will vote for a player because he was a nice guy or a good interview.
                      Comment
                      • Chi_archie
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 07-22-08
                        • 63172

                        #12
                        they need to let the radio and tv announcers vote too..... the writers are nazi's
                        Comment
                        • 3PtShooter
                          SBR MVP
                          • 04-13-08
                          • 3936

                          #13
                          Albert Bell ?????
                          Comment
                          • tullamore
                            SBR MVP
                            • 07-17-07
                            • 3586

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Chi_archie
                            they need to let the radio and tv announcers vote too..... the writers are nazi's
                            I am all for that. The other thing I hate is no one gets 100%. How is Ricky Henderson not 100% a HOF? But since Babe Ruth didn't get 100% back whenever, a writer will not vote for Ricky.
                            Comment
                            • element1286
                              Restricted User
                              • 02-25-08
                              • 3370

                              #15
                              They need more younger writers as well.
                              Comment
                              • seaborneq
                                SBR Posting Legend
                                • 09-08-06
                                • 22556

                                #16
                                I don't need writers to tell me that the stats were inflated for a decade plus. I will tell you a few things that let me know that something was very wrong with baseball stats. Brady Anderson, Sammy Sosa, Big Mac, Lois Gonzalez, Todd Helton, and Vinny Castilla all had out of whack seasons. Impossible.
                                Comment
                                • InTheHole
                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                  • 04-28-08
                                  • 15243

                                  #17
                                  What's the time frame...was this stuff used prior to 1975?
                                  Comment
                                  • reno cool
                                    SBR MVP
                                    • 07-02-08
                                    • 3567

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by seaborneq
                                    Griffey, Bonds, ARod, Hurt, Chipper, Piazza, and Pedro would have gotten in regardless. Clemens would not have not gotten in, he was done at 35.

                                    Come on man, I'm no fan of his, but Clemens was dominant throughout. Of course junior was too.
                                    Bonds wasn't.

                                    But Archie makes a good point. Certainly somebody would've excelled from this era without steroids. I guess if steroids were so prevalent, put an asteric besides the whole era and move on.

                                    BTW, isn't Hank Aaron great
                                    The first book I read in English was about him, he just turned 75
                                    bird bird da bird's da word
                                    Comment
                                    • Chi_archie
                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                      • 07-22-08
                                      • 63172

                                      #19
                                      I think Clemens was a bit like Nolan Ryan and was just a freak of nature that worked his ass off after he started to show the effects of aging, and literally turned the clock back. The steroids helped, but without his crazy workout regimen and his killer instinct it wouldn't have mattered.

                                      If Nolan had taking Roids, he might have pitched till 48,49 and thrown 10 no-hitters....
                                      Comment
                                      • JoshW
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 08-10-05
                                        • 3431

                                        #20
                                        It is hard to tell when half of baseball was likely taking something.
                                        Comment
                                        • fiveteamer
                                          SBR Posting Legend
                                          • 04-14-08
                                          • 10805

                                          #21
                                          I think Clemens started juicing when he signed with the Jays...
                                          Comment
                                          • seaborneq
                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                            • 09-08-06
                                            • 22556

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Chi_archie
                                            I think Clemens was a bit like Nolan Ryan and was just a freak of nature that worked his ass off after he started to show the effects of aging, and literally turned the clock back. The steroids helped, but without his crazy workout regimen and his killer instinct it wouldn't have mattered.

                                            If Nolan had taking Roids, he might have pitched till 48,49 and thrown 10 no-hitters....
                                            He nearly did without the Roids, he retired at 47 and threw 7 no no's. Tearing a ligament is the only thing that stopped him. Clemens was done before he went to the Jays. Duquette was right. Clemens started juicing.
                                            Comment
                                            • seaborneq
                                              SBR Posting Legend
                                              • 09-08-06
                                              • 22556

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by reno cool
                                              Come on man, I'm no fan of his, but Clemens was dominant throughout. Of course junior was too.
                                              Bonds wasn't.

                                              But Archie makes a good point. Certainly somebody would've excelled from this era without steroids. I guess if steroids were so prevalent, put an asteric besides the whole era and move on.

                                              BTW, isn't Hank Aaron great
                                              The first book I read in English was about him, he just turned 75
                                              Pedro runs circles around Clemens during the same time frame. Clemens was good but not dominant like Pedro. Take Pedro's prime years versus Clemens years before he left for Toronto. No contest.
                                              Comment
                                              • Willie Bee
                                                SBR Posting Legend
                                                • 02-14-06
                                                • 15726

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by element1286
                                                They need more younger writers as well.
                                                Hmmm, not sure I understand that statement element. Someone's age has nothing to do with whether or not they can form an objective opinion. For every old fart that pines, "In the good ol' days..." there's a young whippersnapper saying, "The old guys weren't as good as the new age players."

                                                As for the original topic, I've always just judged players against their contemporaries. Times change, equipment changes, the whole demographics of any sport has changed dramatically over the course of the last 100 years. Take today's ballplayer and set 'em back to the 20s and see how they handle traveling overnight by train to play a doubleheader in woolen uniforms and without batting helmets, gloves, etc. Do the same, bring someone like Jimmie Foxx forward to this day and age and see how he fares from the 7th inning on when he's not likely to see the same pitcher he faced his first three at bats.

                                                While it's a fun topic for debate to ponder how Babe Ruth would've done against Nolan Ryan or how Mickey Mantle would've approached a 9th-inning AB against Francisco Rodriguez, it's all conjecture. I simply don't think I'm smart enough to say this or that would be the outcome.
                                                Comment
                                                • seaborneq
                                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                                  • 09-08-06
                                                  • 22556

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Willie Bee
                                                  Hmmm, not sure I understand that statement element. Someone's age has nothing to do with whether or not they can form an objective opinion. For every old fart that pines, "In the good ol' days..." there's a young whippersnapper saying, "The old guys weren't as good as the new age players."

                                                  As for the original topic, I've always just judged players against their contemporaries. Times change, equipment changes, the whole demographics of any sport has changed dramatically over the course of the last 100 years. Take today's ballplayer and set 'em back to the 20s and see how they handle traveling overnight by train to play a doubleheader in woolen uniforms and without batting helmets, gloves, etc. Do the same, bring someone like Jimmie Foxx forward to this day and age and see how he fares from the 7th inning on when he's not likely to see the same pitcher he faced his first three at bats.

                                                  While it's a fun topic for debate to ponder how Babe Ruth would've done against Nolan Ryan or how Mickey Mantle would've approached a 9th-inning AB against Francisco Rodriguez, it's all conjecture. I simply don't think I'm smart enough to say this or that would be the outcome.

                                                  Bottom line. Do you think the Roids elevated stats and careers of the best players of this era? I do. The best of the best in the 70's and early eighties couldn't hit 40 homers in a season no matter how well they started the season. Fatigue would set in. 50 homerun seasons were an after thought. No one would even inquire about it being done. Too tough, too hard, season too short. Now it became ordinary.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • rm18
                                                    SBR Posting Legend
                                                    • 09-20-05
                                                    • 22291

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by 3PtShooter
                                                    Albert Bell ?????

                                                    supposedly swung a corked bat his whole career?

                                                    In terms of production one of the top right handed batters ever although had back problems shortened his career.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • Willie Bee
                                                      SBR Posting Legend
                                                      • 02-14-06
                                                      • 15726

                                                      #27
                                                      Sure, there are definitely players whose stats were inflated. I don't think that's even debatable. If they didn't inflate a season number, then they kept a player's career going longer.

                                                      I really woudn't be surprised if 90% or more of the players from 1985-2005 used some sort of 'performance enhacing drug.' The name Cal Ripken came up yesterday here and as much as that guy seemed to be legit, what's to say he didn't use something at some point in that streak to ward off an injury? But does this mean that mere suspicion that he MIGHT have should take away from the streak?

                                                      Compare players against their contemporaries. Compare Craig Biggio to Roberto Alomar, Rafael Palmeiro to Mark McGwire, Roger Clemens to Pedro Martinez and make your call on that basis, not Biggio to Babe Ruth, Martinez to Lefty Grove.
                                                      Comment
                                                      • Chi_archie
                                                        SBR Aristocracy
                                                        • 07-22-08
                                                        • 63172

                                                        #28
                                                        I said somewhere else, but I think Amphetamines and large does of ephedrine/caffeine are at least close to as big a part of the equation as steroids, when it comes to talking about inflated numbers.

                                                        Willie, makes a great point..... there are way way way more things dis-similar to the baseball player of today, and the player of yesteryear.... can't compare in any way shape or form...gotta compare the player to the era...and based upon that

                                                        I'd say 500 Hr's and 3,000 hits will no longer be automatic HOF bench marks...

                                                        and maybe 225 or 250 wins will be the new 300 win benchmark...

                                                        but all in all its just sad, that it no longer is just about performance on the field, stats, how dominant a star was ect..... off field and performance-enhancing drugs will come up in discussions with these players and the HOF forever more.... and that sucks....


                                                        Where have you gone Joltin Joe?
                                                        Comment
                                                        • seaborneq
                                                          SBR Posting Legend
                                                          • 09-08-06
                                                          • 22556

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Chi_archie
                                                          I said somewhere else, but I think Amphetamines and large does of ephedrine/caffeine are at least close to as big a part of the equation as steroids, when it comes to talking about inflated numbers.

                                                          Willie, makes a great point..... there are way way way more things dis-similar to the baseball player of today, and the player of yesteryear.... can't compare in any way shape or form...gotta compare the player to the era...and based upon that

                                                          I'd say 500 Hr's and 3,000 hits will no longer be automatic HOF bench marks...

                                                          and maybe 225 or 250 wins will be the new 300 win benchmark...

                                                          but all in all its just sad, that it no longer is just about performance on the field, stats, how dominant a star was ect..... off field and performance-enhancing drugs will come up in discussions with these players and the HOF forever more.... and that sucks....


                                                          Where have you gone Joltin Joe?

                                                          Let's move it way out of reach for the steroid cheats. 900 homers and 4500 hits. That will slow them down or make them cheat more. Put all the pressure on them. That will solve it all. Leave the pitchers alone, they were outmanned even though they used also. Steroids in the arms is no match for steroids in the entire body.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • Willie Bee
                                                            SBR Posting Legend
                                                            • 02-14-06
                                                            • 15726

                                                            #30
                                                            Seaborne, what about the players that you DON'T suspect used any PEDs? Who are the players from the past 20 years or so that you think didn't use them and should be in Cooperstown?
                                                            Comment
                                                            • Chi_archie
                                                              SBR Aristocracy
                                                              • 07-22-08
                                                              • 63172

                                                              #31
                                                              lol @ steroids in the arms...
                                                              Comment
                                                              • Chi_archie
                                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                                • 07-22-08
                                                                • 63172

                                                                #32
                                                                I think it is safe to say that Eugenio Velez and alexi ramirez are not taking steroids....
                                                                Comment
                                                                • seaborneq
                                                                  SBR Posting Legend
                                                                  • 09-08-06
                                                                  • 22556

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by Willie Bee
                                                                  Seaborne, what about the players that you DON'T suspect used any PEDs? Who are the players from the past 20 years or so that you think didn't use them and should be in Cooperstown?

                                                                  They would not have made the Hall of fame anyway. You have throw the baby out with the bathwater. You have to stop the KNOWN Cheats, and if the non cheats don't make it too bad. They still got paid millions of dollars to watch each other cheat the game and the fans. They have already won, that was their hall of fame. The average player would rather make millions upon millions than be in the hall of fame. Many can make millions, only a few can make the hall. Let's not fool ourselves. No matter the league, no matter how elite, there are only going to be a few greats. There are 600+ players in MLB on rosters in any given year. Maybe 10 are considered greats, and even fewer all time greats. Punish the minority and the majority will be happy.
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • Willie Bee
                                                                    SBR Posting Legend
                                                                    • 02-14-06
                                                                    • 15726

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Seaborne, I'm not questioning your position on the steroids/PED issue. Just wondering if there are any players from the past 20 years that you think played clean and deserve to be enshrined among the game's very best.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    • seaborneq
                                                                      SBR Posting Legend
                                                                      • 09-08-06
                                                                      • 22556

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by Willie Bee
                                                                      Seaborne, I'm not questioning your position on the steroids/PED issue. Just wondering if there are any players from the past 20 years that you think played clean and deserve to be enshrined among the game's very best.
                                                                      Absolutely Not. If cheating was that prevelent, no player could have achieved Hall status by being clean. The equivelent would be expecting a high school player to play Hall of Fame football his only season in the NFL. Everyone is bigger, stronger, faster, better conditioned and the high schooler is eating a ham sandwich and going to class and the prom instead of studying the game and working out all week.
                                                                      Comment
                                                                      Search
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      SBR Contests
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                      Collapse
                                                                      Working...