lot of talk about this recently here....and everywhere really
i'm wondering..... who are the guys that would have made the HOF without Steroids but took them anyways... obviously we have to speculate quite a bit... but for some guys like Bonds its obvious when he started using....
someone like Clemens...prob makes the HOF without roids
same for Bonds.
someone like Sosa, prob achieved HOF type numbers with roids....its debatable if he would have made it to 500 hr's without them.... I'd say he wouldn't though.
Palmerio? ect.
now for the most part I think guys that have HOF type numbers that we know of taking roids, prob would have gotten in anyways....
its the guys like Brady Anderson, and Luis Gonzalez that benefitted the most from roids...
but since, by and large everyone was taking roids during this era... do we just throw out numbers like 500 hr's as hof benchmarks and just compare how guys did compared to one another in this era to be considered for the Hall? Isn't that kind of how they do it anyways?
so for instance Rafael Palmeiro was a good hitter and got the HOF numbers through longevity and alot of help from injecting the needle.....
IMO he WOULD NOT BE A HOF player... he was not head and shoulders above his peers...ever
Sosa and big mac were... so they would get in the HOF
guys like Frank Thomas...(who I think was clean) get in due to their numbers and his dominance in the early 90's one of the best decades of hitting all-time
whaddya think?
i'm wondering..... who are the guys that would have made the HOF without Steroids but took them anyways... obviously we have to speculate quite a bit... but for some guys like Bonds its obvious when he started using....
someone like Clemens...prob makes the HOF without roids
same for Bonds.
someone like Sosa, prob achieved HOF type numbers with roids....its debatable if he would have made it to 500 hr's without them.... I'd say he wouldn't though.
Palmerio? ect.
now for the most part I think guys that have HOF type numbers that we know of taking roids, prob would have gotten in anyways....
its the guys like Brady Anderson, and Luis Gonzalez that benefitted the most from roids...
but since, by and large everyone was taking roids during this era... do we just throw out numbers like 500 hr's as hof benchmarks and just compare how guys did compared to one another in this era to be considered for the Hall? Isn't that kind of how they do it anyways?
so for instance Rafael Palmeiro was a good hitter and got the HOF numbers through longevity and alot of help from injecting the needle.....
IMO he WOULD NOT BE A HOF player... he was not head and shoulders above his peers...ever
Sosa and big mac were... so they would get in the HOF
guys like Frank Thomas...(who I think was clean) get in due to their numbers and his dominance in the early 90's one of the best decades of hitting all-time
whaddya think?