Sloane Stephens vs Serena Williams - Who says Serena is going to win?!
Collapse
X
-
UntiedSBR MVP
- 01-27-11
- 1294
#176Comment -
Trigger7672SBR High Roller
- 08-24-12
- 103
#177Great call!Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#178
I did mention some facts, check my original post.
I did mention Serena had a long Doubles match.
I said it clearly, what was in Brisbane where Serena won in 2 sets is not going to repeat itself, I took into consideration these facts.
You are just refusing to appreciate my bet, so I'm not going to argue with you anymore.
As I said enjoy yourself and keep on betting in BetIslands.Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#179
Congrats to those who took Sloane on the ML!Comment -
OptionalAdministrator
- 06-10-10
- 60946
#181Same as Shari. Walked in and sat down just as Stephens won.
What a shocking start to the day!
Nice work dog backers.Comment -
UntiedSBR MVP
- 01-27-11
- 1294
#182No, I don't understand what is it you're asking.
I did mention some facts, check my original post.
I did mention Serena had a long Doubles match.
I said it clearly, what was in Brisbane where Serena won in 2 sets is not going to repeat itself, I took into consideration these facts.
You are just refusing to appreciate my bet, so I'm not going to argue with you anymore.
As I said enjoy yourself and keep on betting in BetIslands.Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#183I'm a logical person. Obviously you are not. The ankle injury you referred to, was completely separate from the injury that affected Serena. I don't deny there was value in taking Stevens today, but don't act like it was never in doubt. And your NBA under: you can't seriously bet on patterns, like you claim. And expect to win long term. It's foolish. It's almost like you have no knowledge of these sports whatsoever.
I'm done arguing with you.
Keep on being logical and bet in BetIslands.Comment -
UntiedSBR MVP
- 01-27-11
- 1294
#186Comment -
tto827SBR Hall of Famer
- 10-01-12
- 9078
#188Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
-
zoo youkSBR Posting Legend
- 10-23-11
- 10701
#190Sir,
This is what you guys always say, you guys like to remain idiots so be my guests ... it's just proving to me why I won't have an official topic with all the bets I've placed because you never appreciate what people do here, never.
I guess the NBA under 190.5 was also "got lucky", right?
Seriously, this is why I was fed up arguing with people here .... keep on betting in BetIslands .... I'm sure you would make money this way.Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#191
The injuries were only a bonus, I wouldn't bet on Kirilenko to beat Serena if she had to play instead of Stephens in that match because Serena would have buried her.
Young players are the best ones to bet on, because the bookies dont "know" them yet, this is why I liked these odds very much.
I'm sorry but you're trying to take away the credit for me on this bet, this is nasty.Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#192No, you guys underestimated Stephens as a player, I didn't, that's what my bet was based on.
The injuries were only a bonus, I wouldn't bet on Kirilenko to beat Serena if she had to play instead of Stephens in that match because Serena would have buried her.
Young players are the best ones to bet on, because the bookies dont "know" them yet, this is why I liked these odds very much.
I'm sorry but you're trying to take away the credit for me on this bet, this is nasty.
Here from the 1st page:
Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#193And here's shari's tip for me ...
Personally just from being the staff member who sees most of your posts, I'd think you'd be better off wagering to win $10 on Serena than wasting anything on Sloane. But you're right... shit happens. But it's not going to happen in this one particular match barring a massive injury = retirement or some fluke event. Not yet for Sloane. GL though!
And when I do come with a 1.05 bet you guys are laughing at me....
Either way the purpose is to make money, be it 1.05 odds or 11.00 odds.Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
-
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#196No, I won't touch this match because it doesn't worth the bet now the bookies will factor Sloane's performance, the odds won't worth it...
Seriously you are annoying person.
The odds on either player don't worth it, these were the odds I was actually expecting to see for Stephens-Williams.
I hope you got an answer now, argghhh... so annoying.Comment -
UntiedSBR MVP
- 01-27-11
- 1294
#197
Now go stand next to a car bomb, you Israeli prick!Comment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#198Why are you bringing me up? That was totally my tip. And I still stand by it. Seems the event Sloane needed to happen, happened. I didn't see you or anyone else predicting Serena would have back spasms so you might want to simmer down on that one.Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#200
Personally just from being the staff member who sees most of your posts, I'd think you'd be better off wagering to win $10 on Serena than wasting anything on Sloane.
I have no idea why you guys have problems if I like to bet on 1.05 odds ... betting on high odds like today are very rare, which is why I usually like small odds.
Regarding back problems - it's coming all together, you play lots of matches so don't expect to be 100% fit, although I still think she WAS fit, she just missed points and she had a break and missed it as well, and that wasn't the back, that was Stephens playing so well if you haven't noticed ...Comment -
UntiedSBR MVP
- 01-27-11
- 1294
#201This is the 2nd half of Shari's post. And this is exactly what happened, and Shari was correct. Serena's back injury in this match was barely enough to cost her the match. "fluke event"Comment -
kenzSBR MVP
- 12-09-12
- 4879
#202
Your record speaks for itself. You just waste too much energy for justifying yourself. It will also bring negativity to your perspective and picks. Just ignore comments and enjoy your bets and money, you dont need negativity in gambling. This much attention seeking will be detrimental in the long run.
Anyway great call, keep killin' itComment -
shari91BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 02-23-10
- 32661
#203I was referring to this:
Personally just from being the staff member who sees most of your posts, I'd think you'd be better off wagering to win $10 on Serena than wasting anything on Sloane.
I have no idea why you guys have problems if I like to bet on 1.05 odds ... betting on high odds like today are very rare, which is why I usually like small odds.
Regarding back problems - it's coming all together, you play lots of matches so don't expect to be 100% fit, although I still think she WAS fit, she just missed points and she had a break and missed it as well, and that wasn't the back, that was Stephens playing so well if you haven't noticed ...Comment -
Cuse0323BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-09-09
- 30169
#204It was all because of her back. Those unforced errors were on the back but those overhead slams were just grit and determination.
Comment -
Cuse0323BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-09-09
- 30169
#205And that back was sure hurting when she destroyed her racket.Comment -
UntiedSBR MVP
- 01-27-11
- 1294
#206Couldve been an excuse, and she sabotaged herself. Maybe she got a cortisone injection, and it kicked in after a few games. Whatever the case, I lost some respect for Serena there. Not very professional IMO.Comment -
Cuse0323BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-09-09
- 30169
#207Nothing new from her, she's a sore loser and if she's gonna lose it's because of an injury.Comment -
kenzSBR MVP
- 12-09-12
- 4879
#208When her legs are not working and her mind is not 100% into it, she is very beatable.
On a given day, if some mediocre-to-promising player wants the game 100% when Serena is 50-60% into it she may lose.
Makarova, Razzano, Kerber, Stephens... She was close to losing the Wimbledon Final to Agnieszka Radwanska when Radwanska was having serious respiratory problems... These players are not even remotely close to what Serena is capable of
Azarenka and Sharapova show more heart in similar circumstances.Last edited by kenz; 01-23-13, 01:22 AM.Comment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#209
Your record speaks for itself. You just waste too much energy for justifying yourself. It will also bring negativity to your perspective and picks. Just ignore comments and enjoy your bets and money, you dont need negativity in gambling. This much attention seeking will be detrimental in the long run.
Anyway great call, keep killin' itComment -
dontknowhowtobetSBR MVP
- 01-21-09
- 2896
#210When her legs are not working and her mind is not 100% into it, she is very beatable.
On a given day, if some mediocre-to-promising player wants the game 100% when Serena is 50-60% into it she may lose.
Makarova, Razzano, Kerber, Stephens... She was close to losing the Wimbledon Final to Agnieszka Radwanska when Radwanska was having serious respiratory problems... These players are not even remotely close to what Serena is capable of
Azarenka and Sharapova show more heart in similar circumstances.
I took UNDER in one of the NBA plays with Portland ... and it did go under only there was OVERTIME and it screwed my bet.
So same day halftime with the Lakers line was 212, way more than original line and most games ended OVER and lakers had a pattern of ending it UNDER so I took UNDER 212 and recovered it easily, match ended with less than 190 pts if I remember correctly, I don't remember the dates and teams .... just saying sports has surprises, so when you bet you gotta factor in all the conditions ...
It doesn't work 100% but if it works for you 70% that's enough to make lots of profit long term.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code