Originally posted by BiffTFinancial
-
i got 129 and 60 1st half...Comment -
totally missed that BetUS 1H at 60. getting that now.Comment -
Just caught the last 15/20 minutes of LaSalle @ Mia. LaSalle looked awful. Off my radar. Shocked when they said they were 9-3. Thoughts?Comment -
Saturday 1.5.2013
2* Pitt/Rutgers 1H under 60Comment -
My local just dropped the 1st half total to 58. I got it at 59.5. BOLOriginally posted by BiffTFinancialComment -
havnt played anyone, decent win vs iona at home but that not exactly marque and i believe that was also laury's 1st gm...every yr im pretty low on la salle, why i dunno, maybe cause they pad their schedule with a ton of cup cakes and tend to be not as good as their record may appear.. that just off top of my head but always the impression i have of them..Originally posted by MadisonComment -
been a while since i had every total on board available to me, they caught me slipping today as i just got on with bol yesterday and i missed a few numbers that i would have liked as i forgot how fast those bitches move...im so excited, like yesterday had to play GW when i really wanted under, that shit not happening any more!!!!Comment -
rutgers total dropping like a rock..Comment -
Got under 60 1st half also(a few hrs. ago) sometimes with theses early starts the players are "off" a little bit.............................glOriginally posted by 2daBankComment -
fukkers not off at all....shit rutgers on fire,,good for my rutgers bet, bad for our 1st half under....Originally posted by CappinTerpComment -
damn so many 3's in this early game already. Played game total under 128... good luck guysComment -
Rutgers averages 14 assists and 4 3PTRs a game. at the second tv timeout, they have 7 and 4 respectively.Comment -
banker,
Does the total dropping to 145 in the zags game bother you? Also the GT/MIA game total is now 119. Those moves seem huge.Comment -
you can blame this one on me,, of coarse the 1st time Madison puts me on a money autoplay it goes down,,lol..Originally posted by BiffTFinancialComment -
no, you can blame me. ever since the Vandy game Monday, i can't hit anything. all i have to do to get Louisville to open the game with a pick six is take their TT under. all i have to do to turn Oklahoma into the worst red zone team this side of the Browns is take their game over.Originally posted by 2daBankComment -
Pitt and Rutgers average 9 threes/game between them. they have hit 10 today in under 16 minutes.Comment -
Originally posted by Shark
what bothers me is i was kinda overanxious to play totals since i havnt had a book that offers them all the last yr or so and i jumped the gun on the wrong ones....the zags one bothers me a little as even tho my numbers have it higher it could have to do with the same reason i like santa clara that zags playing 3rd road gm in a weeK and could lead to some tired legs for jump shooters, that said sc will get up and down the floor so if zags tired clara might just pull the upset (which i will prob be playing their ml), but i mean far as getting shitty number yes it bothers me, far as my opinion on it not really...with the mia one it was pure stupidity by me as generally these low ass totals have a tendency to go up, i dont think it reflects what will happen but again i got a shit number which sux (little rusty on totals, may take me a week to get back in the swing as i missed a few that moved away from where i wanted), i will more than likely play the mia/gt under again as i have it much closer to 110 as i think 55-57 is enough to win this one....but far as moves as indicators ive never been a believer, look at this rutgers gm, total dropped like a rock and it flying over. again sux i got bad numbers and i will tighten that up to where more than not i beat closer hopefully, but still think those are the right sides...hope that answers..Comment -
2* Pitt/Rutgers 1H under 60 - LOSER
Nightmare week continuesComment -
they almost still stayed under after that crazy ass start,,still dont hate gm under and think 2nd half under worth a look...Comment -
good stuff, thanks for taking the time to answer. I agree that those real low totals always seem to creep and penetrate with my head when that happens. I dont think I can take the zags over with their 3rd road game this week. The tired legs always hurts me.Comment -
adding
2* Clemson
sorry to ruin this one too, Bank, but i like it.
Saturday 1.5.2013 updated card
2* Pitt/Rutgers 1H under 60 - LOSER
2* Clemson -3Comment -
it's worth a look, but if i lose anymore money on this game, i might seriously come unglued. i simply can't do it.Originally posted by 2daBankComment -
rutgers +7 should keep me from losing anything (hopefully)...have you had chance to look thru rest of my sides?Originally posted by BiffTFinancialComment -
i know you know JMU,,are the loss of moore and semenov to much for them?Comment -
You guys need to get on a roll here! Your favorite "Tailer" is back.
Missed the early 1H loss so I'm going to make up with Rutgers +7 2H and 2H U68.
GLComment -
LOL - Pitt already up 7 - yikesComment -
time to turn it aroundOriginally posted by BiffTFinancial
GL todayComment -
oh shit rick...i played pit-7 2nd half for the very large middle (hopefully)..i think my card is pretty string but i guess we shall see...SH hanging tough early..Comment -
haven't had time to cap a lot of them but here are thought based upon now.
tex+10 - tough one, lean Texas but hate Rick Barnes; upside: hate that balding chap that coaches for Baylor too; like your 1H angle
marq-2 - like it, not sure that i'll play it
stan+6.5 - not so crazy about it.
indy st +14 - agree
clem-3 - agree; already gave it the kiss of death
mia-1.5 (possibly under, same w clem) - agree, U and under
oak+11 (another one i could drop) - no opinion
marist+13.5 - no opinion
santa clara +7 (or over depending on number) - like
uc irvine +3.5 - like
uc davis-1 - no opinion
siu+8 (kinda iffy) - no opinion
troy+2.5 - no opinionComment -
not as up on JMU as i should be right now. however, i have seen one guy at CTG who is pretty sharp on them.Originally posted by 2daBankComment -
Not to worry Bank. I'm a very small player and I hope you middle. Hopefully the under will work out.Originally posted by 2daBankComment -
adding
2* Marquette -3
Saturday 1.5.2013 updated card
2* Pitt/Rutgers 1H under 60 - LOSER
2* Marquette -3
2* Clemson -3Comment -
yea tex +6 1st half is where im at...thier d is solid enough to keep them in most gms but they do have tendency to fold up late,,stupid ncaa screwin with their team, once the pg comes back they could be tough out. although i share your disdain for barnes.. think santa clara could very well pull the upset later on and did sprinkle ml....marist ugly as hell but think they find a way to stick around in this second meeting, they did put their highest total of the yr up in 1st meeting and while they not much of a team that a huge number for a defensively challenged canisius team to cover.. i could see passing on trees, i dont think they win and generally i like to have at least 7 when that is the case...thanx for posting the thoughts..Originally posted by BiffTFinancialComment -
okay, out for a bit (the boy's first skating lesson today), back later. leans that i might add for 4 pm or later: St. Bon, Beach, S Clara, UW, UCIComment -
sure thing, brother. this morning got a bit rushed. i will put a good effort into capping the 5 leans that i just posted before those tip. sorry for my venting, fellas. BOL to you guys today and i'll be back with a stiff upper lip.Originally posted by 2daBankComment
