John Morrison 2012-13 NBA Thread

[Wallco99]

jm also has a system called v1 + the updates v2-3. i think you have copied it, the only different to your system is you dont buy 3points and play with 4x progression not with 3x. i wonder why the thread is called "John Morrison ...", can you tell me why? so he is the system founder or why is the thread called like that?

You may now be the dumbest person to ever log on to SBR. This will be my last response to these ridiculous comments.

[KennyM10]

We need Charlotte on many levels, but just lose by 8.

LOL they lost by 30 clueless wonder.

[KennyM10]

I hate it when the bets are against each other

It is a scam, it allows him to continuously minus off a unit loss and with 90% of the year done still in the red.

[Wallco99]

Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 62-2 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: -0.30 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-3.41 units)

(3/1/13):
#62 Charlotte (+9) (B) - Loss
#65 Utah (M/L) (A) - Win

v1 Plays
(A) 36-29
(B) 16-13
(C) 7-5
(D) 3-2
Losses: HOU (-35.91 u), ORL (-26.39 u)


Games for (3/2/13):
#62 Resumes (C) on 3/3/13/13
#66 Toronto (+5) @ Milwaukee (A) (8:35 pm EST)


We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the play. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.

[BAMAsharp]

for what i should apologize? this in the post 140 is the system updates pdf of john morrison, a friend of mine has bought that years ago. haha youre really funny. i really dont know how you come on that shit but john morrison only uses his v1, not the others v2-3 updates. i have bought his system and dont get the v2-3 picks anymore so that shows that these aren't profitable and I have checked them too, only have bigger negative series.

For your spelling and terrible grammar to start....then for being an idiot.

[alexknyc]

For your spelling and terrible grammar to start....then for being an idiot.

I'd lay off the spelling and grammar stuff... I'm thinking English is not his first language.

I think KennyM10 is an idiot; I think bateeeman22 is just a clueless newcomer.

[J.M. Disciple]

chase110 and JM overlap on TOR.

[TwoCats]

fjohn morrison only uses his v1, not the others v2-3 updates. i have bought his system and dont get the v2-3 picks anymore

I do not know why I am wasting my time answering you, but here is part of a 2009 email from morrision ...

30/11/09 07:18
objet : SportsBettingChamp-NBA System Bet(s) 11/30

Come give me a big fist bump right now as we pull in an easy-as-pie
14th straight win to start the 2009-10 NBA season, with 13 (!!)
out of those 14 wins won at the very first [A] bet!

That's right -- the [A] bets alone are winning 93% of the time!
If the [A] bets alone are winning 93% of the time, can you just
imagine what it'll take for us to lose an entire betting series!?

My v2.0 NBA system users picked up yet another easy [A] winner
tonight as well to make it a perfect 2-0 on the NBA system plays.
So far in this year, my v2.0 NBA system has won each and every
single betting series on the very first [A] bet! Tonight is
yet another winner to add to our collection . Take action
right now at www sportsbettingchamp com / 165 if you don't want
to miss out on any more easy v2.0 system winners ...

As I do not even bother reading his emails any longer (the information available in this forum is more accurate), I do not know if he is stilll selling his V2 or v3 any longer.

[bateeeman22]

I do not know why I am wasting my time answering you, but here is part of a 2009 email from morrision ...

30/11/09 07:18
objet : SportsBettingChamp-NBA System Bet(s) 11/30

Come give me a big fist bump right now as we pull in an easy-as-pie
14th straight win to start the 2009-10 NBA season, with 13 (!!)
out of those 14 wins won at the very first [A] bet!

That's right -- the [A] bets alone are winning 93% of the time!
If the [A] bets alone are winning 93% of the time, can you just
imagine what it'll take for us to lose an entire betting series!?

My v2.0 NBA system users picked up yet another easy [A] winner
tonight as well to make it a perfect 2-0 on the NBA system plays.
So far in this year, my v2.0 NBA system has won each and every
single betting series on the very first [A] bet! Tonight is
yet another winner to add to our collection . Take action
right now at www sportsbettingchamp com / 165 if you don't want
to miss out on any more easy v2.0 system winners ...

As I do not even bother reading his emails any longer (the information available in this forum is more accurate), I do not know if he is stilll selling his V2 or v3 any longer.

On that you see that all the others like wallco has copied the systems. Cause jms comment you have quoted above, jm has tested the 2.0 and 3.0 system to that time but now you see at the stats of stevex here in the thread, that the other systems have more negative series and aren't profitable, so he has stopped to send picks from the updates. It's little confusing here what wallco thinks he can win with his own creating system. With -110 odds 4 times progression he doesn't have a season without 2-3 losses and ~1800 per loss is too much. It happens every day that a -110 will lose 4 times in a row. So what a profitable system you have to save your money for each saison it will maybe get down by over 50 units, wallco. Not the matter.

[bateeeman22]

I'd lay off the spelling and grammar stuff... I'm thinking English is not his first language.

I think KennyM10 is an idiot; I think bateeeman22 is just a clueless newcomer.

yes I am european, but grammar doesn't fill here the brains only also bamasharp think that. maybe he goes to a girls school and is the only boy.

alex, why is kenny an idiot? you like progressions with 4 times -110 odds and think it gone win over the seasons? maybe youre write but keep all your money save to carry the next big loss over the hills. which systems do you use for nba? i use only the original jm v1 system, is not so much profitable but its safe over the seasons !!!

[stevex]

JM Traditional

3/2/2013

V2

1. Toronto Raptors A Bet +5.5 @ Milwaukee Bucks
Toronto Raptors A Bet (if buying 3 points) +8.5 @ Milwaukee Bucks

[Wallco99]

chase110 and JM overlap on TOR.

So does two Stifler plays the opposite way. Looks like a four play SKIP situation

[alexknyc]

On that you see that all the others like wallco has copied the systems. Cause jms comment you have quoted above, jm has tested the 2.0 and 3.0 system to that time but now you see at the stats of stevex here in the thread, that the other systems have more negative series and aren't profitable, so he has stopped to send picks from the updates. It's little confusing here what wallco thinks he can win with his own creating system. With -110 odds 4 times progression he doesn't have a season without 2-3 losses and ~1800 per loss is too much. It happens every day that a -110 will lose 4 times in a row. So what a profitable system you have to save your money for each saison it will maybe get down by over 50 units, wallco. Not the matter.

JM sent me a V2 pick in an email today.

Alex,

As a customer of my NBA v2.0 system, I want to send you a reminder
of our upcoming NBA v2.0 betting series:

Toronto [A] bet

This means that you would make the [A] wager for the road team (the
team at the top) on the date that the game is played. Remember to
purchase 3 points for the team you're betting on.

If your [A] bet happens to lose on the first day, then you would
make a [B] bet for the same team again on their next game when they
play, and a [C] bet on their last play if necessary.

Note that as long as the team you're betting on is able to cover
the point spread, you will win your wager, regardless if they had
won or lost the game. For example, let's say the game is Dallas vs.
Toronto, and Dallas had a point spread of +7 after buying 3 points,
and the final score was Dallas 85, Toronto 91, then yes, you would
have won the bet since Dallas did not lose by more than 7 points.

One more thing to keep in mind is that sometimes you may not
immediately see the game available for betting on the betting site.
If this is the case, just wait and check back later during the day.

Good luck!
John Morrison, PhD

P.S. Check out my revolutionary new service, the "Sports Picks
Buffet" where I subscribe to over 500 world-famous sports handicappers,
reveal to you in my private members area ALL of their picks every day,
and summarize for you the "best bets" of the day where most of all
handicappers tend to agree on! Go to: www.SportsPicksBuffet.com

P.S. If you're interested in putting down some more wagers for
sports - I have great news for you! Check out my daily handicapping
picks service at: www.TheChampSelections.com and start cashing in
on sports like you can't even imagine! I release anywhere from 1-5
personal picks on a daily basis. I've never had a losing season in
the last 28 years of sports handicapping!

PO Box 30175, Worcester, MA 01603, USA

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?<wbr>jAycTMwsjLSsjOwcbKwsbLRGtIzsrB<wbr >wMDJyM

[alexknyc]

yes I am european, but grammar doesn't fill here the brains only also bamasharp think that. maybe he goes to a girls school and is the only boy.

alex, why is kenny an idiot? you like progressions with 4 times -110 odds and think it gone win over the seasons? maybe youre write but keep all your money save to carry the next big loss over the hills. which systems do you use for nba? i use only the original jm v1 system, is not so much profitable but its safe over the seasons !!!

Do yourself a favor and read Kenny's posts from the last year or two. Won't take you long; it's all the same bullshit. Let me know if you still don't understand why I think he's an idiot.

As for the rest of your post, I'm not understanding what you're asking of me. I use Wallco, JM and TheLimit's 7/5 systems.

Do you think 4x -110 is somehow worse than 3x -200? Or do you not buy 3 points with JM's system?

[play4win]

toronto craptors are an embarrassment! fackin idiots!

[ABOSSSGAME]

Couldn't play D during the last 4th quarter ...

[bateeeman22]

Do yourself a favor and read Kenny's posts from the last year or two. Won't take you long; it's all the same bullshit. Let me know if you still don't understand why I think he's an idiot.

As for the rest of your post, I'm not understanding what you're asking of me. I use Wallco, JM and TheLimit's 7/5 systems.

Do you think 4x -110 is somehow worse than 3x -200? Or do you not buy 3 points with JM's system?

maybe you have bougth jm's system with updates. not the matter the v2 has too much negative series, you can see at stevex v2 stats. i dont care what you think about kenny. he is a good guy cause he looks every day on wallco's bankroll and then he makes a joke, i like that. with wallco's system you have to save your money for the bad days when it gets down in the losses maybe up later and later again down the hill. the point with jm v1 is, you have no losses each season and maybe you have big profits without a negative serie! thats for me better than to calculate big losses each season like it's in wallco's system!

[KennyM10]

Lol Toronto... Sorry wallco time for another -800 favorite tomorrow?

[cheyou]

today is charlotte c bet?

[cmdyrds]

posted this a while back, but figured i'd throw it out there again. doesn't include this year's losses which i have as v1-1 loss, v2-3 losses, v3-2 losses.

Version 1	Version 2	Version 3	Totals
2011/2012: 26-0	2011/2012: 17-0	2011/2012: 87-4	130-4
2010/2011: 58-3	2010/201 30-1	2010/201: 67-3	155-7
2009/2010: 47-2	2009/2010: 28-0	2009/2010: 67-2	142-4
2008/2009: 61-0	2008/2009: 29-0	2008/2009: 59-1	149-1
2007/2008: 56-2	2007/2008: 27-0	2007/2008: 63-1	146-3
2006/2007: 55-2	2006/2007: 23-0	2006/2007: 63-3	141-5
2005/2006: 55-2	2005/2006: 32-1	2005/2006: 63-7	150-10
2004/2005: 59-2	2004/2005: 30-2	2004/2005: 64-1	153-5
417-13	216-4	533-22	1166-39

[hagball52]

This is the email JM sent on Friday. It will be interesting to see what he sends out today.

James,

Our first [A] loss in a long streak fell for the first time with
the worst team in the league a few days ago. But no worries, I
have absolutely no doubt they will pull through this series. Let's
finish up some business today!

Today's system bet(s) are:

Charlotte [B] bet

Remember to purchase 3 points for the team you're betting on.

[alexknyc]

maybe you have bougth jm's system with updates. not the matter the v2 has too much negative series, you can see at stevex v2 stats. i dont care what you think about kenny. he is a good guy cause he looks every day on wallco's bankroll and then he makes a joke, i like that. with wallco's system you have to save your money for the bad days when it gets down in the losses maybe up later and later again down the hill. the point with jm v1 is, you have no losses each season and maybe you have big profits without a negative serie! thats for me better than to calculate big losses each season like it's in wallco's system!

JM has no losses each season?

[Wallco99]

Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 62-2 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: -0.30 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 2 (-4.51 units)

(3/2/13):
#66 Toronto (+5) (A) - Loss

v1 Plays
(A) 36-30
(B) 16-13
(C) 7-5
(D) 3-2
Losses: HOU (-35.91 u), ORL (-26.39 u)


Games for (3/3/13):
#62 Charlotte (+7½) @ Sacramento (C) (6:05 pm EST)
#66 Resumes (B) on 3/4/13



We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the play. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.

[ghislaine]

Hey guys, where are we at JM ? I already put down Charlotte for +10.5 as a C bet.
Seems we pushed with TOR playing it +8 ?? Are we betting that B bet or no ?
Anything I am missing, was away for two days and kinda out the loop.

[J.M. Disciple]

Hey guys, where are we at JM ? I already put down Charlotte for +10.5 as a C bet.
Seems we pushed with TOR playing it +8 ?? Are we betting that B bet or no ?
Anything I am missing, was away for two days and kinda out the loop.

If your playing the system by official rules, then it was a win. CLosing line at covers was +6 which would make it +9 on a 8 point loss. If you are playing 1-3-5 or labby then you would play the B bet. If you are playing official rules or 7/5 then its a no play.

[ghislaine]

Thanks, so just Charlotte for me !

[Kev the Brit]

This season Charlotte wins only 1 game in 3 ATS, so they don't fill me with any confidence. I didn't play the first 2 Chase 110 games because I couldn't (away). Now that I can, I won't.

JM has just posted them as a C Bet with a warning that they are the worst road team in their conference. Not quite. They are the 2nd worst. Its still a good reason to pass on them in the JM system. However, buying 3 points might get them across the line.....

[Kev the Brit]

posted this a while back, but figured i'd throw it out there again. doesn't include this year's losses which i have as v1-1 loss, v2-3 losses, v3-2 losses.

Version 1	Version 2	Version 3	Totals
2011/2012: 26-0	2011/2012: 17-0	2011/2012: 87-4	130-4
2010/2011: 58-3	2010/201 30-1	2010/201: 67-3	155-7
2009/2010: 47-2	2009/2010: 28-0	2009/2010: 67-2	142-4
2008/2009: 61-0	2008/2009: 29-0	2008/2009: 59-1	149-1
2007/2008: 56-2	2007/2008: 27-0	2007/2008: 63-1	146-3
2006/2007: 55-2	2006/2007: 23-0	2006/2007: 63-3	141-5
2005/2006: 55-2	2005/2006: 32-1	2005/2006: 63-7	150-10
2004/2005: 59-2	2004/2005: 30-2	2004/2005: 64-1	153-5
417-13	216-4	533-22	1166-39

Posts like this are always welcome, even if they are posted regularly. Thanks cmdyrds

Regards
Kev

[ChiLLx]

The Bobcats are playing the Kings who aren't exactly worldbeaters. That being said I think it's reasonable if people pass on playing this sorry ass team.

[Mmingo]

Is the Limit no longer posting for the 7/5?

[dlunc3]

Is the Limit no longer posting for the 7/5?

been mia since Wednesday

[hagball52]

Morrison has changed his tune on Charlotte from yesterday. If they lose this he'll come out and say "well you shouldn't have bet on them because they are the worst road team in the league".



The Sports Betting Champ
<dt id="hdr-to" class="hdr-info">To</dt><dd class="hdr-info"></dd>
James,

Today's system bet(s) are:

Charlotte [C] bet

Note: The Charlotte Bobcats have the worst road record in the league

Remember to purchase 3 points for the team you're betting on.

[Wallco99]

For those of you concerned, Charlotte is a bet 2 for 7/5.

[jcygts6]

Bye bye charlotte

[ChiLLx]

Bobcats are a sad bunch. JM really is having a bad year this season. I may stop playing it altogether for the rest of the season after this debacle.