John Morrison 2012-13 NBA Thread

[bateeeman22]

teams with a pct over .500 with -110 chase

Has someone tested the teams with over .500 win percentage only with -110 chase in the jm system? Would be interested. Of the 4 lost teams have ever lost since season 2008-09 in jm v1 only one team Utah Jazz with a win percentage of .675 has lost. Of this season with -110 chase I can tell you not yet lost, 23-0 serie. The two losses of the v1 (with 3p buying) are both from teams under .500 win percentage.

Maybe stevex wants check the stats of the last seasons.

[Kev the Brit]

Has someone tested the teams with over .500 win percentage only with -110 chase in the jm system? Would be interested. Of the 4 lost teams have ever lost since season 2008-09 in jm v1 only one team Utah Jazz with a win percentage of .675 has lost. Of this season with -110 chase I can tell you not yet lost, 23-0 serie. The two losses of the v1 (with 3p buying) are both from teams under .500 win percentage.

Maybe stevex wants check the stats of the last seasons.

I believe that english is not your best language, so I'll try to be accommodating.

Am I right in thinking that you are suggesting a new JM version (A-C bets) without buying points, but only chasing teams with win percentage .500 or better?

If so, I think your concept is worth looking at, However....

Back-testing systems in which a team's stats (at the time of selection) are used as a filter cannot be done. Anyone can find the historical results of a team online, but I don't think it is possible to find the team's associated stats at that moment in time. So, I am sure no-one here has the stats that you want.

The best anyone (you, that is) can do is to design a potential system and then collect the data over the years that follow. Good luck...

In the meantime, please be polite. It costs nothing.

[bateeeman22]

I believe that english is not your best language, so I'll try to be accommodating.

Am I right in thinking that you are suggesting a new JM version (A-C bets) without buying points, but only chasing teams with win percentage .500 or better?

If so, I think your concept is worth looking at, However....

Back-testing systems in which a team's stats (at the time of selection) are used as a filter cannot be done. Anyone can find the historical results of a team online, but I don't think it is possible to find the team's associated stats at that moment in time. So, I am sure no-one here has the stats that you want.

The best anyone (you, that is) can do is to design a potential system and then collect the data over the years that follow. Good luck...

In the meantime, please be polite. It costs nothing.

i can sort out the stats, cause there're sites to look in the -110 odds of last years and the win percentage you can follow on espn team schedule at the related game. so it's easy only take some time. i more have asked the users with statistic ability not you brainless kid looking to explain others. if you want explain something, then explain ghislaine how to download the jm schedule!

[Wallco99]

i can sort out the stats, cause there're sites to look in the -110 odds of last years and the win percentage you can follow on espn team schedule at the related game. so it's easy only take some time. i more have asked the users with statistic ability not you brainless kid looking to explain others. if you want explain something, then explain ghislaine how to download the jm schedule!

Then stop asking everybody to do shit and do it for yourself, and if you are going to type in English, then learn how to speak it first. You really sound like a babbling idiot every time you type. You've been here a couple of weeks, and in that short time you have asked for at least 9 favors, and have insulted several people in this thread, not to mention, posting completely inaccurate data about v1 while hanging off of John Morrison's Vietnamese rooster. Now you are being a complete douche to Kevin who is probably the most polite person on here, what exactly is your purpose at SBR anyway?

[bateeeman22]

Then stop asking everybody to do shit and do it for yourself, and if you are going to type in English, then learn how to speak it first. You really sound like a babbling idiot every time you type. You've been here a couple of weeks, and in that short time you have asked for at least 9 favors, and have insulted several people in this thread, not to mention, posting completely inaccurate data about v1 while hanging off of John Morrison's Vietnamese rooster. Now you are being a complete douche to Kevin who is probably the most polite person on here, what exactly is your purpose at SBR anyway?

i have asked in general of .500 win percentage teams stats for the jm system. you haven't got that or? please count your negative units then you have a lot to do!

[J.M. Disciple]

hagball did you ever tally up the ABC?

[J.M. Disciple]

i have asked in general of .500 win percentage teams stats for the jm system. you haven't got that or? please count your negative units then you have a lot to do!

Not impossible to track, but I doubt anyone wants to spend those type of hours trying to backtest that. Back testing the closing lines in general is very time consuming. Any time you apply a filter just takes a shit load of extra time. No one is this thread back test anything for anyone. NO spoon feeding here. Gotta do this kind of stuff yourself. ALmost end of the season, so i look forward to YOUR results next season. Take your time over the summer with it. GOod luck

[bateeeman22]

Not impossible to track, but I doubt anyone wants to spend those type of hours trying to backtest that. Back testing the closing lines in general is very time consuming. Any time you apply a filter just takes a shit load of extra time. No one is this thread back test anything for anyone. NO spoon feeding here. Gotta do this kind of stuff yourself. ALmost end of the season, so i look forward to YOUR results next season. Take your time over the summer with it. GOod luck

sure its able to track. the history odds you can find on f.e. http://nowgoal.com/. the .500 rate is always quoted behind the last game on espn each team schedule. can you follow me? if nobody has stats of the .500 teams with -110 betline, i will do it myself. have it already of this season till march 13th, serie is 23-0 in v1. thanks for your advice, i will come back with the stats after finishing.

[knugen]

Aaahhh what happening with bulls. Down 40 point against sacramento

[KennyM10]

Guys you all on edge having lost so much, take a deep breath and roll up this system like a paper ball and throw into trash.

[knugen]

Please hang on pistons, knicks are also embarrassing tonight

[KennyM10]

mia (a) bet tomorrow for JM. GET ON IT EARLY!! -8.5 right now vs PHILLY. GOING UP!!!

did not happen line held still.
Should have thrown up a red flag but most in big hurry to catch bad line like you.

[knugen]

At least one cover with pistons, on to knicks again tomorrow against portland

[petermans23]

I´m going all in tomorrow with Chicago and New York with the C bets!!!

[KennyM10]

LOL kruger stay positive next games what 100 units to win 4?

[KennyM10]

I´m going all in tomorrow with Chicago and New York with the C bets!!!

perfect ask for free mug on your way out the door.

[Wallco99]

Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 68-3 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: -12.75 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 0

(3/13/13):
#71 Atlanta (M/L) (A) - Win

v1 Plays
(A) 40-31
(B) 16-15
(C) 8-7
(D) 4-3
Losses: HOU (-35.91 u), ORL (-26.39 u), CHA (-18.46)



There are no system plays for (3/14/13):


We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the play. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.

[hagball52]

hagball did you ever tally up the ABC?

Yeah got it. Just been having some health issues and have been focusing on that. Sorry for the delay. These figures are through the end of Feb. and are taken from the closing lines at vegasinsider. I did not move to a v1 if a v2 lost on some of those series. That may be where these totals don't jive with stevex's. I was trying like everybody else to find a way to use this system without the high risk involved with (C) bet losses and buying points. The 3 point buy has been pretty significant this season.

V1
(A) 23-13
(B) 6-7
(C) 3-4

V2
(A) 15-12
(B) 5-7
(C) 4-3

V3
(A) 32-26
(B) 16-10
(C) 4-6

If you add all of the (A) bets together they total 70-51 with a 57.8% win rate. That's not too shabby. The beginning of March may change that figure a little but its not bad. Once again these are without buying 3 points.

[hagball52]

Just wanted to give you all a heads up on today's NYK (C) bet. Here is Morrison's email. Now keep in mind that both Chandler and Anthony (best player) are injured and Anthony is doubtful for tonight.

James,

It is time for us to cash in! I have no doubt that we're going
to close out the series today! Today's system bet(s) are:

New York [C] bet

Remember to purchase 3 points for the team you're betting on.

Bet this as you will but Morrison will most surely disqualify it if it loses and Carmelo doesn't play.

[knugen]

For how long are carmelo out?

[hagball52]

For how long are carmelo out?

He's listed as doubtful, meaning he could actually play tonight but probably won't. The Knicks actually play better as a team when he's not on the floor. The one that worries me is Chandler. If he doesn't play they have a slim chance.

[knugen]

Damn, took knicks at +5,5, now they are at +6,5

[knugen]

Hope that aldridge, pavlovic, batum not play either

[thelimit0310]

7/5 Plays MAR 13

Detroit +11.5 vs Golden State - Bet 2
Chicago -3 vs Sacramento - Bet 1
NY Knicks +8.5 vs Denver - Bet 1

7/5 Plays MAR 14

NY Knicks +6 vs Portland - Bet 2

Results: -5.03
Bet 1: 19-22
Bet 2: 10-9
Utah 11/2
Portland 11/25
Boston 12/14
Houston 1/9
Minnesota 1/9
LA Lakers 1/20
Orlando 1/28
Golden State 2/5
Charlotte 3/1

Chicago Bet 2, NO Hornets Bet 1, Phoenix Bet 1, Miami Bet 1 on 3/15

Have a Question about 7/5?
Click here for your Answer

[stevex]

Big C Bet tonight fellas on the NY Knicks.

Lets get this one!

[knugen]

Knicks have to play chandler now

[knugen]

Thos is noot looking good

[chief42]

is anyone here still playing the original jm system buying 3 or just playing 7/5 and wallco systems?

[knugen]

Hahah pathetic knicks... Play chandler

[stevex]

Hahah pathetic knicks... Play chandler

Dude, Chandler got hurt last night against Denver? What is with you saying play Chandler? He's a defensive player, not a scorer either way...

[stevex]

Another C Bet loss for JM, ouch.

[knugen]

I dont care where he play, i only know hes a good player and it cant be that serious since they had him on tve bench

[chief42]

Another C Bet loss for JM, ouch.

well guess that answers my question. Tough loss for all of you followers, hope the bankrolls are still in the black.

[stevex]

That's why you labby with any system. Flat out chasing is a recipe for disaster.

[play4win]

knicks are just garbage and don't deserve a playoff spot!