Nba road system 2010 - 11

[Dbear13]

Soloman, Quick question. Houston starts a 4 game road trip today. Why is Dallas not a play? I've been following for a couple of years with great success. Thanks for your hard work.

Playing against Houston will start to be a play on the 29th against San Antonio because it is the last 3 games of the road trip.

[thelimit0310]

Playing against Houston will start to be a play on the 29th against San Antonio because it is the last 3 games of the road trip.

This is correct, you play the last 3 games in the road trip as stated in the first post. So the first game in a 6 game away trip would be the 3rd game.

[doubledime]

Playing against Houston will start to be a play on the 29th against San Antonio because it is the last 3 games of the road trip.

Thanks.... as my daughter says...My Bad

[julio_cat]

I'm scared of the Kings, but hopefully, this will work

[doubledime]

Fasten your seat belts ...... 5 plays the 29th is coming.

[marku]

waiting for your 5 plays! good luck

[leafsfan19]

This is correct, you play the last 3 games in the road trip as stated in the first post. So the first game in a 6 game away trip would be the 3rd game.

...you mean the 4th game

[thelimit0310]

...you mean the 4th game

Whoops, little bit of a type there my fault. Yes games 4,5,6 would be the series games in a 6 game trip.

[SOLAMAN]

NBA ROAD SYTEM
HALVES / ATS
FEB 2011

POR @ DEN (2/2), IND (2/4), CLE (2/5)

DAL @ NY (2/2), BOS (2/4), CHA (2/5)

CHI @ POR (2/7), UT (2/9), NO (2/12)

DAL @ SAC (2/9), DEN (2/10), HOU (2/12)

POR @ TOR (2/11), DET (2/13), MN (2/14)

SA @ WAS (2/12), NJ (2/14), CHI (2/17)

PHI @ MN (2/12), MEM (2/15), HOU (2/16)

DEN @ MEM (2/13), HOU (2/14), MIL (2/16)

MIA @ BOS (2/13), IND (2/15), TOR (2/16)

LAL @ ORL (2/13), CHA (2/14), CLE (2/16)

LAC @ OKC (2/22), NO (2/23), LAL (2/25)###

UT @ DAL (2/23), IND (2/25), DET (2/26)

SAC @ ORL (2/23), CHA (2/25), MEM (2/26)

BOS @ DEN (2/24), LAC (2/26), UT (2/28)

NY @ CLE (2/25), MIA (2/27), ORL (3/1)###

ATL @ GS (2/25), POR (2/27), DEN (2/28)

DAL @ WAS (2/26), TOR (2/27) PHI (3/1)

### optional series . These series could be
a no play.

[madmiek]

Can you explain why the 2 optional series could be a no play please. Everyone would appreciate it a lot. thanks.

[thelimit0310]

Can you explain why the 2 optional series could be a no play please. Everyone would appreciate it a lot. thanks.

It's been said a thousand times, rule #8 for the system says that if the team is a favorite of -5 or more it is optional. The losses from the last few seasons were all from series' where the team we bet on fell under rule #8.

[jas19illini]

Can someone please explain this part to me? This is from this threads original post.

"6. Series games must be 3 games or less between games or the series is a no play."

[jas19illini]

It's been said a thousand times, rule #8 for the system says that if the team is a favorite of -5 or more it is optional. The losses from the last few seasons were all from series' where the team we bet on fell under rule #8.

So is Solaman assuming the spread for those series will be greater than -5?

[thelimit0310]

So is Solaman assuming the spread for those series will be greater than -5?

No, if you notice, only the games that have been completed have the asterisk, this is because he doesn't know until the game is posted whether or not it will be a -5 favorite. Pretty much just check the system plays on the day they come up, check the spread, over -5 and it's a higher risk. So far all optional bets have won, but applying the filter would have made the system undefeated the past 3-4 years.

[jas19illini]

No, if you notice, only the games that have been completed have the asterisk, this is because he doesn't know until the game is posted whether or not it will be a -5 favorite. Pretty much just check the system plays on the day they come up, check the spread, over -5 and it's a higher risk. So far all optional bets have won, but applying the filter would have made the system undefeated the past 3-4 years.

Scroll up to post #464 from Solaman. Two plays have ### which means optional. Both plays are in FEB, so obviously havent been played yet. So im not understanding how your post is relevant. Just trying to figure this stuff out.

[madmiek]

No, if you notice, only the games that have been completed have the asterisk, this is because he doesn't know until the game is posted whether or not it will be a -5 favorite. Pretty much just check the system plays on the day they come up, check the spread, over -5 and it's a higher risk. So far all optional bets have won, but applying the filter would have made the system undefeated the past 3-4 years.

Yes i understand this, but the series with the asterisks are not for another month. How could he possibly know what types of lines this teams are gonna get. Im guessing they are optional for another reason,could be wrong.

[thelimit0310]

Scroll up to post #464 from Solaman. Two plays have ### which means optional. Both plays are in FEB, so obviously havent been played yet. So im not understanding how your post is relevant. Just trying to figure this stuff out.

Ahh, I didn't see the feb schedule, my bad. I'm not sure why those are there, though I assume they pertain to another filter.

[jas19illini]

Ahh, I didn't see the feb schedule, my bad. I'm not sure why those are there, though I assume they pertain to another filter.

Ok thanks for clarifying your part.

[oklahoma]

hornets next game against kings doesnt look to bad actually. kings last game against hornets was also a back to back and they tied the first half(chances are kings had +spread). and their first game this season the kings were ahead by 10 or so at halftime in new orleans.

im assuming solaman thinks okc will be a -5 halftime fav against clippers which would mean that series is a no play. why the knicks wouldnt be a play against cleveland though has to be a totally different reason.

[SOLAMAN]

Can you explain why the 2 optional series could be a no play please. Everyone would appreciate it a lot. thanks.

I see alot of questions about the optional series....

It has nothing to do with the (-5 spread). It is all about the road team with 3 consecutive games on the road without returning home.

This is another series not included on the Feb schedule....

Hou @ no (12/27), por (3/1), lac (3/2)

Reason: There is no doubt that Hou will return home before the trip to por.

Lac road series.. Lac returns home against the Lakers. Since it the last game of series, it has a good chance to be a series in play.

Ny road series.. The question here is ... will Ny return home after clev before the trip to Miami?

Both series very well could be plays but I just wanted wait before a final decision is made on these series. Also the Dal road series starting on feb 9 is similar.

Every month, there are series in question but if I am not sure of a return home, the series is in play.

[doubledime]

Soloman, Where can you find out if a team returns home during a road trip?

[ClimbSomeRocks]

NO is hot, I'm not chasing any farther against them.

[thelimit0310]

Should have 2 plays today:
den @ cle (1/28), phi (1/30), nj (1/31)

bos @ pho (1/28), lal (1/30), sac (2/1)

Clev at +5 and Pho at +2

[The Resurrection]

I have a bad feeling about Cavs. They'll probably not cover 1H, and I see nothing that points towards them covering the 2H (without knowing what the line will be). I know I should follow the system, but yeah, I am not so sure about this. What do you guys think?

[bauerranch]

I have a bad feeling about Cavs. They'll probably not cover 1H, and I see nothing that points towards them covering the 2H (without knowing what the line will be). I know I should follow the system, but yeah, I am not so sure about this. What do you guys think?

I have no faith in Cleveland and need to rely on my instincts more. I would rather be wrong than broke.

[The Resurrection]

Yeah, no bet for me. My bookie offers Cavs 2H +1.5 at -152.

[thelimit0310]

I have no faith in Cleveland and need to rely on my instincts more. I would rather be wrong than broke.

I completely agree, my book has Cleveland 2nd half at HALF A POINT. No thanks. I'm with you on rather being wrong than broke.

[thelimit0310]

I didn't take Cleveland, but I'm glad they pulled through. I'd rather be wrong and have even more proof the system works. Makes me feel more confident moving into Feb.

[bauerranch]

I didn't take Cleveland, but I'm glad they pulled through. I'd rather be wrong and have even more proof the system works. Makes me feel more confident moving into Feb.

I agree and learned more

[JJV]

Disappointed I didn't play the cavs tonight but it happens

[bauerranch]

Phoenix got it done!

[bulichme]

Great night guys.

[bulichme]

I read earlier in this thread not to play -500 home teams (as a suggestion) and passed on the first half with the same concerns as you guys were having, but could not pass up the +1 at -110 thinking that Den would coast a little with that 20 pt half time lead. Great work Solaman on this thread, glad I found it!!!!!!!!!

[on3]

2x tap on phoenix for tonight too. im gonna see if anti-DENVER has a double tap in store. stay tuned...

[marku]

good luck on ur pick