John Morrison 2010 NBA

[MakeItRain14]

Wow what a good night!!

[J.M. Disciple]

Why would you state this when you are not even a subscriber / do not understand the system properly?

If you were either of these things you would know that detroit yesterday was a TPS 'B' loss yesterday, not a C

Kev already corrected me on this. I was checking Detroits Double digit point spreads that they lost in the past, apparently their game vs NOH wasn't above +500 ML so it didn't count as a bet. I was mistaken that is all.

[stevex]

NOT to mention, SBP Original and CRUSHER NBA coming through with W's. Lets keep the train rollinggggg!

[Pick'nParlays]

winner!

this thread is living in the past....Please update to 2011 not 2010

[Pick'nParlays]

[stevex]

Please....

[J.M. Disciple]

Should we wait until near game time to bet on the Thunder [C] bet vs Dallas?

[stevex]

Figure I'd add this in as well......

Whether you buy the 3 points or you don't, whether you use the injury filter or whether you dont, whether you use Stanleys filter or not, where all in this thing to make money and all of us that follow the JM NBA systems know that it makes money for us in the long term. So what I don't pay for some handicapper that touts "GOY" or "GOM." Cheers to making some more money for the rest of the year and all you guys that contibute to the thread.

[jphil]

winner!

this thread is living in the past....Please update to 2011 not 2010

I like your avitar! Would ya mind if i steal it for a while?

[knugen]

What an amazing night , 4 w 1 Push, best night betting so far 

[PanamaKid]

HE is talking about an 18 unit loss over the 3 game series, A. B, and C loss included.

If you only bet B/C you are up good money this season. I discussed this a week or so ago when I did the calculations showing where u at betting only B/C as compared to A/B/C (currently down 15 units for a/b/c (when you included the A losses from series pending), and up well over 10 units for B/C only, approximately)

Wilba, what if you did only the A and B bets and dropped the C? What do the numbers look like for that?

[Wrecktangle]

HE is talking about an 18 unit loss over the 3 game series, A. B, and C loss included.

If you only bet B/C you are up good money this season. I discussed this a week or so ago when I did the calculations showing where u at betting only B/C as compared to A/B/C (currently down 15 units for a/b/c (when you included the A losses from series pending), and up well over 10 units for B/C only, approximately)

Good stuff, now we are data mining JM results.

[imotiv8]

Good job last night everyone! Lets make some money!

[MakeItRain14]

Okla c bet today?

[COYLO]

v3?

[knugen]

yes v3, i dont got any lines yet at my book

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA system:
01/05/2011 San Antonio @ Boston - V1, B bet - WIN
01/05/2011 Toronto @ Cleveland - V3, B bet - WIN

V1record so far (finished series): 21-2
(A): 7-16
(B): 11-5
(C): 3-2
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10

V2 record so far (finished series): 13-1
(A): 9-5
(B): 2-3
(C): 2-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03

V3 record so far (finished series): 29-1
(A): 15-15
(B): 13-2
(C): 1-1
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07

Next JM's plays:
01/06/2011 Oklahoma City @ Dallas - V3, C bet
01/07/2011 New York @ Phoenix - V1, A bet
01/07/2011 Cleveland @ Golden State - V1, A bet
01/07/2011 Miami @ Milwaukee - V2, A bet

[COYLO]

let's cash that mofo

[teecee]

linesmakers can come up with spreads for nfl games a week in advance, but cannot, for the life of them, come up with a fair line for the okc/dallas affair? very odd, in my view.

[qwerty123]

linesmakers can come up with spreads for nfl games a week in advance, but cannot, for the life of them, come up with a fair line for the okc/dallas affair? very odd, in my view.

Its because they need to know if Dirk is playing or not.

In the NBA, an allstar like Dirk (I wouldn't call Dirk a superstar) affects the line and is adjusting accordingly if he is playing or not.

[COYLO]

jm just sent me an email about "Biggest Money-Maker Ever NBA Betting System Version 2.0" ?????

is this just the v2 from the below versions or a new scam

V1record so far (finished series): 21-2
(A): 7-16
(B): 11-5
(C): 3-2
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10

V2 record so far (finished series): 13-1
(A): 9-5
(B): 2-3
(C): 2-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03

V3 record so far (finished series): 29-1
(A): 15-15
(B): 13-2
(C): 1-1
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07

[teecee]

how in the fukk do they not know if he's playing? if you're a game-time decision, you might as well just sit out. i know i'm just p'ed off b/c they won't have a line out b4 i leave for work, and i just lose whatever i lost on the b bet.

[MakeItRain14]

No lines in a local book either

[SportsTerminator]

Well some lines are out and Dirk Nowitzki is out too. One book has the line opener as a pk others 1.5 or 2. This is interesting...

[teecee]

cool. someone has finally made a decision. like it's so tough. dallas is off to a great start, and there are 82 regular season games. if dirk is hurt, keep him out. seems easy enough.

[MakeItRain14]

So it's a good thing right

[MakeItRain14]

Okc -2... ill just play ML at -130

[El_Pateaux]

OKC opens at -2 in my book.

So does that make the play be +1 or just the ML?

[artena]

I think some bettors have many reasons to bang their heads against the wall trying to make money betting into well-handicapped lines

Fact 1:
In order to break even using Morrison's system you have to win 95% of the series that you wager on

Fact 2:
There are all sorts of exceptions to Morrison's system and all of these exceptions were added on the rare occassions when the system failed

Fact 3:
When compiling the overall win loss record for the system, the lines being used are very often not available as I read over and over again postings from system followers saying they lost a game when Morrison counted it as a win due to Morrison using a more favorable line than what was really available sports arbitrage

This is a system that requires a bare minimum of a 95% success rate just to break even and when you factor in all these exceptions that were implemented to cover up system losses along with the problem of questionable lines being used to inflate the record of the system makes this system totally worthless

Systems like this one become very popular because it wins so often (remember the 95% win rate required just to break even)

Finally, the only book that will let you buy 3 points at the fair rate of -170 is BetUs which is shaky financially and also skews the lines offered on the Morrison games

In the world of sports betting, there just isn't any shortcuts to making profits. On the rare occassion where a real +EV system comes along (i.e. correlated parlays being one example), the books are very quick at making the proper adjustment to render the system worthless

I'll never understand why so many bettors continue to bang their heads against the wall trying to make money betting into well-handicapped lines when there are so many easier ways to make profits betting on sports

Anyone who is planning on following this Morrison system for the upcoming NBA season should tread very carefully

[COYLO]

OKC opens at -2 in my book.

So does that make the play be +1 or just the ML?

yeah wouldnt mind knowing the rule to this also

[venture]

yeah wouldnt mind knowing the rule to this also

Morrison always uses the best line and it opened at -1.5 on pinnacle so you should buy to +1.5. Per sonly i'm taking the ML -130, there is just to much value at -130 compared to -170 at +1. Is it worth it to lay 40 more juice to just push if it happens to be a 1 point win by mavs, i think not. but if mavs do win by 1 morrison will call it a win so be prepared for that.

[MakeItRain14]

No sense to be +1 .. I think ML is the play

[Stanley77]

I feel that it's good to bet on teams on the point spread without buying 3 points on teams if they're on a road trip of at exactly 3 games and didn't cover the point spread with 3-point buying if they went to one state, then didn't cover the point spread with 3-point buying in another state, and then back to the same state of where they were previously. The Thunder are an example. They didn't cover point spreads with 3-point buying against the Spurs (Texas) and then against the Grizzlies (Tennessee). And now they're back in Texas to face the Mavericks.

That reminds me of the Lakers last season when they didn't cover point spreads with 3-point buying against the Heat (Florida) and then against the Bobcats (North Carolina). But they were able to cover the point spread without 3-point buying against the Magic (Florida).

[J.M. Disciple]

OKc ML [C] for JM
Sac +5 [C] for SBP updated.

[DustyDiamond]

Morrison sent me an email trying to sell me another NBA system today