John Morrison 2010 NBA

[DabbledonaLOCK]

Can someone interpret what the plays are for tonight regarding if its an A, B, or C bet

[qwerty123]

been repeated a few times but here are todays plays:

OKC Bet B
TOR Bet A
SAS Bet A
POR Bet A

[Kev the Brit]

been repeated a few times but here are todays plays: OKC Bet B TOR Bet A SAS Bet A POR Bet A

You would think so at this late stage but actually, in fairness to dabbledonaLOCK, that info hasn't been posted already; well not accurately, anyway.

[DabbledonaLOCK]

been repeated a few times but here are todays plays:

OKC Bet B
TOR Bet A
SAS Bet A
POR Bet A

Thanks I just got confused with all the explaining about labbys and stuff it was hard to follow

[DabbledonaLOCK]

Also are these all John Morrison plays or are they SBP and Crushers like JM displine was trying to do

[qwerty123]

these are all john morrison plays.

also for port/dal game, no dirk, no butler, looks like a easy cover...hopefully.

reading reports bargs is back but will be given limited minutes, calderone is out and bayless starting.

[JW Cash]

Yes, I know JW uses a 2 line labby, that is why I am asking him.

I want to know how he does a 2 line labby in this case. Will he continue playing on San Antonio for the B- and C- bets, or will he stop stop playing them and move on to the next series?

Spooky....

The way I play Spurs is the same as I outlined in my previous post on how
I do the labby..

The A Bet is on Spurs ML on Line 1

If it loses.....I play B Bet on Line 2
and if it loses , I will play C Bet on Line 1.....with the money allocation
percentages I described...




AND J M Disciple.....I dont need any help in
questions that are directed at me.....ok? ...........just sayin

[jahred6999]

Best morrison since Adam!

[jphil]

jphil:

Yeh, sure. He wanted clarification that V2 includes V1, which it does. V2 requires at least 2 opponents from the opposite conference so, by definition, that must include any series when all 3 are from the opposite conference. Therefore, there is only one Version applicable at any one time, which means that there is only one bet on any one game.

Also, V3 must include V2 and V1.

There will be the odd occasion when a 4 game (or more road) series starts as V3 (or V2), which loses and switches to V2 (or V1) for the next 3 games. Its happened twice (I think) this season already.

Regards

Kev the Interpreter

oh. ok. so then do ya agree w/ posts 2974 & 2997? was wonderin if ya treat each ver. as being completely independent of one another, like they appear in those posts. thanx. I could have very well misunderstood ya.

[jordanfreak]

yo jphil get off on my dillz you dont gotta bite my picture i had that shit before you

[jordanfreak]

you can ask anybody in this shit i was rocking that before anybody

[jphil]

yeh, sorry JF! Just sittin in while ya were on vacation!!

Wonder if anyone can tell us apart!?

[jordanfreak]

its coo dude i know its a tight picture by the way i havent kept up with the record whats is it so far?

[jphil]

its coo dude i know its a tight picture by the way i havent kept up with the record whats is it so far?

Well BOSS, it's like this, it's lookin pretty damn good so far. Lots of records have been broken in your absence. So many, that i'd have to go back through 40 - 50 pgs. of posts in order to give ya a final tally. Will have it on your desk by morning.

[jphil]

Seems as though dec. 1st was the last official loss for Det. w/ TPS sys. On 12/8 & 1/3, det. didn't qualify w/ the ML filter. Det. seems good to go today. GL to those playin.

[COYLO]

what was the spread on the spurs game??

[jmjj]

nice job Spurs one of the best records in the league and ponies away this game away cute nice job aholes

[COYLO]

so i take it wasnt +13.5

[atari5200]

so far we have a loss, loss and another loss.

[DANO74]

So 2 (b) bets & 1 (c) bet coming up

[mattd83]

Anyone know why the "James Jones" TPS thread is suddenly closed?

[jphil]

Anyone know why the "James Jones" TPS thread is suddenly closed?

i just recently came across it this wk., and no one had posted for a wk. before that.

Now i just noticed that it's marked closed like ya said. Don't that beat all. Some mod. w/ nothin else to do.

[JW Cash]

so far we have a loss, loss and another loss.

Sooooooooooooo, I take it that you didnt play CRUSHER or Solaman tonite....


The CRUSHER went 3-0

and Solaman went 3-0...


If you didnt play them atari......you left a lot of money on the table...

[knugen]

Oh 3-0 for solaman, damn i missed them, maybe gonna stat up all night when he has à play....

[J.M. Disciple]

01/05/11
V3: Toronto B +4
v1: San Antonio B +4.5

[J.M. Disciple]

01/05/11
TPS: Milwaukee +14.5 Opened at +550.

[J.M. Disciple]

yes, Jw i wont be answering any more questions regarding them being directed toward someone else. I was just trying to help him get his answer as quick as possible. I will keep my post directly to plays for now on. Wont be helping out any more i guess. Too many people get confused or take offense to it. Strictly posting plays or nothing at all for now on.

Good Luck to everyone.

3 plays for tomorrow based on the games that are up currently listed above.

[knugen]

JW CASH: if à bet under JM system win With the 3 point bought but u loss cause u didnt bought Any point, do u continue With the B or C bet them or do u count it as à loss?

[teecee]

knugen, if you don't buy the 3 points, you're not following the system. it would be considered a win, so continue to chase with this thought in mind.

[knugen]

What i understand in here, that 3 points almost never matter, just à few Times' this season That u lost because of the points.... And its so much bettet odds without buying..

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA V3 system:
01/04/2011 Oklahoma City @ Memphis - V3, B bet - LOSS
01/04/2011 Toronto @ Chicago - V3, A bet - LOSS
01/04/2011 Portland @ Dallas - V3, A bet - WIN

V3 record so far (finished series): 28-1
(A): 15-14
(B): 12-2
(C): 1-1
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07

Next V3 plays:
01/05/2011 Toronto @ Cleveland - V3, B bet

[MakeItRain14]

I understand what v1 v2 and v3 are.... But which one would u consider the best to lay a few more $ on

[Kev the Brit]

What i understand in here, that 3 points almost never matter, just à few Times' this season That u lost because of the points.... And its so much better odds without buying..

You are right, "almost never matter". Thats not the same as "never matter" and I'll return to that shortly. Yes, we know that the odds are tighter when you buy the points but, crucially, it is still profitable in the long term. You need to know that the system, when buying points, still loses occasionally, but the occasional loss is quite acceptable in a profitable system. Nothing is perfect.

Now, here is the key issue: If you don't buy the points you will lose a few more series, in addition to the ones that you would have lost had you bought the points. The cumulative effect of losing more series, when not buying the points, is that the small profit you would have had, if you had bought the points, is wiped out and you risk going into loss. Buying points is the insurance premium for a profitable system. Occasionally you will need the insurance, but daily you have to pay for it.

Buy the points.

Kev

[Kev the Brit]

jphil:extracted from the V3 pdf -

V3.0 System Update
In order to maximize your NBA winnings, we will get less strict on the filter for our 3-game series.
The v2.0 system calls for one team to be on 3 consecutive road games against at least 2 teams of the opposite conference in order for a play to be eligible.
Now, you may be surprised to know that as long as a team is starting a 3-game road trip, it is profitable to play them regardless of what conference their opponent may be in.
Basically, you want to bet on all 3-game road trips with the v3.0 system, with the same betting mechanics as in the original system.

Strictly speaking, this means that V3 is all road series and that V2 is V1 plus a few more series where only 2 teams are from the opposite conference.

However, as a discussion group we have come to accept the following informal definitions so that we know which "version" we are working with:

V1 = a road series where all 3 opponents are in the opposite conference
V2 = a road series where only 2 opponents are in the opposite conference
V3 = a road series where only 1 or none of the opponents is in the opposite conference

I know you and I are singing from the same hymn sheet.

Regards
Kev

[million2one]

I understand what v1 v2 and v3 are.... But which one would u consider the best to lay a few more $ on

v1 is the original and best IMO, only one i play