John Morrison 2010 NBA

[atari5200]

guys theres a stanley rule situation with memphis. its a v3 b bet but they have another 3 game road trip (v2) starting on the 8th. I loved the a bet against the kings but i didn't love the halfcourt shot that ruined it. be careful with this series.


stevex, please get back to me on the pm, thanks.

[luzviminda]

Detroit is a looser, i hope they don't work with the mafia to loose all the game.

[stevex]

Yeh Detroit is tough to watch, but that is where the labby comes in. See Detroit fits EVERY stupid filter that JM makes up so when it does lose (which Detroit did lose 3 in a row when even buying 3 points each time) last V.1 series they had, you don't suffer as much.

[J.M. Disciple]

Jan 01, 2011
v3: Memphis [B wager]
v3: OKC [A wager]

SBP & Crush Should have [C wagers tomorrow]
Also GSW should meet the TPS system. [A bet I believe]

GSW could also be a Reverse system bet i believe since they covered A & B after buying 3pts. Still unsure if im understanding this correctly. It would be a bet on Miami if this was the case though at -12. Again as WIlba said it does not have enough back testing to prove the reverse bets to be profitable. So its either Miami -9 or GSW +15 depending on what system you want to follow or bet both and hope it lands between -10 and -14.

GL to all.

[jphil]

JM

there was a thread started by seth i believe about reversing this system. i know i followed it early on and it wasn't profitable. not to say it isn't now but figured i'd pass along info first hand. GL.

Yeh, that seemed to have died out fast.

[jphil]

until i've seen more dope on a solid rev. sys., i think i'll just continue w/ B/C bets on jm, & the TPS sys.

[bauerranch]

JM said 258 wins and 2 losses.
Its that true.

No that is not true

[PanamaKid]

I did mention that even though Detroit was a JM bet, it would probably be best to avoid that series. The series to focus on is Atlanta, which I still don't understand why it isn't a JM play.

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA V3 system:
01/01/2011 Oklahoma City @ San Antonio - V3, A bet
01/01/2011 Memphis @ Utah - V3, B bet

V3 record so far (finished series): 26-1
(A): 14-13
(B): 11-2
(C): 1-1

[GGPLAYER]

until i've seen more dope on a solid rev. sys., i think i'll just continue w/ B/C bets on jm, & the TPS sys.

I tell you what guys last year I tried betting both for a while and it just did not work out that well. I was always chasing and suffered a few C loses. Personally I just like the feeling when a chase ends and I'm on to the next.

This year I have stuck to the B and C bets and it's the most relaxed easy money I have made in a long time. I have always found if you get too greedy you end up taking a hit at some point. Despite Wilba's feelings that the A's will start to pick up I did end up not playing them last night. Just did not like either game after looking at them. Since Christmas day A bets have gone 2 (and that is giving GS an A win) and 7. Maybe they will turn around soon but doing I am doing so well with the B and C's right now I guess I don't see a reason to change.

[COYLO]

could someone post an update on how the different versions are doing at the moment.

[rickbo528]

Yeh Detroit is tough to watch, but that is where the labby comes in. See Detroit fits EVERY stupid filter that JM makes up so when it does lose (which Detroit did lose 3 in a row when even buying 3 points each time) last V.1 series they had, you don't suffer as much.

Just dont play teams like the Pistons and you will come out ahead.

[Simba]

Jan 01, 2011
v3: Memphis [B wager]
v3: OKC [A wager]

SBP & Crush Should have [C wagers tomorrow]
Also GSW should meet the TPS system. [A bet I believe]

GSW could also be a Reverse system bet i believe since they covered A & B after buying 3pts. Still unsure if im understanding this correctly. It would be a bet on Miami if this was the case though at -12. Again as WIlba said it does not have enough back testing to prove the reverse bets to be profitable. So its either Miami -9 or GSW +15 depending on what system you want to follow or bet both and hope it lands between -10 and -14.

GL to all.

What about Cavs (B)bet and Sac (A)bet under TPS?
Is there anybody on JM and Solaman's road system together? As I believe these two systems are quite opposite to each other but not completely; JM plays teams that on a road trip while Solaman plays home teams against those are on a road trip. I find solaman's system this year is +45unit or above without a loss. Any thoughts?

[PanamaKid]

could someone post an update on how the different versions are doing at the moment.

Yes, I would like to see this too if someone doesn't mind.

[cmdyrds]

is there a thread for the TPS system. i think i remember reading it but can't find it. thanks for the help.

[cmdyrds]

What about Cavs (B)bet and Sac (A)bet under TPS?
Is there anybody on JM and Solaman's road system together? As I believe these two systems are quite opposite to each other but not completely; JM plays teams that on a road trip while Solaman plays home teams against those are on a road trip. I find solaman's system this year is +45unit or above without a loss. Any thoughts?

kings are only +450 on the ML so it doesn't qualify. i have the plays as the cavs and the warriors. anyone care to confirm?

[fotzan]

Happy New Year to everyone! Could you explain the labby system or give us a link to read about the labby?

[Simba]

Kings are now +534 at pinnacle. What causes this line movement?

[Wallco99]

JM's NBA V3 system:
01/01/2011 Oklahoma City @ San Antonio - V3, A bet
01/01/2011 Memphis @ Utah - V3, B bet

V3 record so far (finished series): 26-1
(A): 14-13
(B): 11-2
(C): 1-1

What is the V3 system, does that tell you to bet all three game road series. I noticed these two picks are all in conference games, I am new here and missed the new criteria for V3 over V2. Last I remember we were wagering on at least two out of conference games in V2. Please clarify if you don't mind.

[EasyHustlin]

What about Cavs (B)bet and Sac (A)bet under TPS? Is there anybody on JM and Solaman's road system together? As I believe these two systems are quite opposite to each other but not completely; JM plays teams that on a road trip while Solaman plays home teams against those are on a road trip. I find solaman's system this year is +45unit or above without a loss. Any thoughts?

I play them both but you have to be careful. What I do is play Solaman's system (w/ a labby) regularly and wait until a "A" bet loses to start playing JM. That way I'm never playing both systems for the same game. You can make a killing this way. Solaman's "A" bets are winning at >68% this year. Not to mention there is no buying points so you're still getting -110. When you compare that to JM's "A" bets it's not even close.

[EasyHustlin]

Happy New Year to everyone! Could you explain the labby system or give us a link to read about the labby?

Link is not working- Removed-)

[SilkBC]

JM plays teams that on a road trip while Solaman plays home teams against those are on a road trip.

So is Solaman's criteria the same as JM's, except you bet the home team until you have a winner?

[J.M. Disciple]

I do not know for sure, but it looks like

JM plays for today are:
Memphis +10 [B wager] to win 3 units
OKC +9.5 {A wager] *I dont bet A bets.

TPS:
GSW +15 [A] Risk 2 units
Cavs +16 [B] Risk 2 units
*I flat bet Double digit under dogs

SBP has Cavs at +13.5 for his "C bet"

[EasyHustlin]

So is Solaman's criteria the same as JM's, except you bet the home team until you have a winner?

His only criteria is to fade a team on a road trip of 3 games or more. Conference doesn't matter and the official plays begin on the last 3 games of the road trip. Also his system plays halves, not full games. So you could actually play both Solamans and JM and get middled, but to me it's not worth the risk of losing to juice. I stay away from JM A bets.

[Simba]

So is Solaman's criteria the same as JM's, except you bet the home team until you have a winner?

Solaman's criteria is quite different to apply playing home team as below;

THE PLAN: The idea of the nba road system (halves/ats) is to play against a road team that is out of its comfort zone and with the fatigue factor to consider, so we play up to the last 6 halves of a 3 or more games road trip. Stop the series when a cover is made by the home team. Find your best line for the first half and if the first half loses bet at half-time for the 2nd half.Betting progression: To win one unit... double bet plus juice until it covers. -quote from Solaman's thread

Thanks to EasyHustlin for sharing info.

[Wallco99]

His only criteria is to fade a team on a road trip of 3 games or more. Conference doesn't matter and the official plays begin on the last 3 games of the road trip. Also his system plays halves, not full games. So you could actually play both Solamans and JM and get middled, but to me it's not worth the risk of losing to juice. I stay away from JM A bets.

Does anyone have the .pdf for JM system V3, or at least explain the new features from V2? Much appreciated. I also have working excel spreadsheets, which I have created, which are all color coded and does math and keeps track of all wagers for all sports seperately as well as grand totals, which if anyone wants, I can post on here soon. I just want to revise it with JM V3 plays, and I don't know what the criteria is for those wagers. Please help soon. I want to bet the two plays tonight, but would like to know why I am wagering on them before I do. Thanks.

[isg2010]

JM - why isn't SAC on your list for TPS?

[lawalahmed]

JM - why isn't SAC on your list for TPS?

SAC is "B" Bet, according to the system rule.....

[jphil]

Does anyone have the .pdf for JM system V3, or at least explain the new features from V2? Much appreciated. I also have working excel spreadsheets, which I have created, which are all color coded and does math and keeps track of all wagers for all sports seperately as well as grand totals, which if anyone wants, I can post on here soon. I just want to revise it with JM V3 plays, and I don't know what the criteria is for those wagers. Please help soon. I want to bet the two plays tonight, but would like to know why I am wagering on them before I do. Thanks.

post # 2518.

[jphil]

SAC is "B" Bet, according to the system rule.....

so if i'm just starting sac. tonight(if the ml @ betus goes above +450), then it's an A bet for me, correct?

[J.M. Disciple]

so if i'm just starting sac. tonight(if the ml @ betus goes above +450), then it's an A bet for me, correct?

I thought it had to be +500 to qualify? +9 or more and +500 or more i thought it was. Thats why i didn't list it as a system bet for TPS>

[jphil]

I thought it had to be +500 to qualify? +9 or more and +500 or more i thought it was. Thats why i didn't list it as a system bet for TPS>

i meant above +450 to +500 or above.

[jphil]

if someone doesn't get jones's emails, one just has to start w/ any gm. that qualifies, & do 3 gm. chase from there? correct? i wouldn't know how to detect what's his A bet from his C bet otherwise.

[jphil]

if a betus bettor has ml @ +450 currently for SAC.(TPS), & pinny has it above .500, can that still be considered a bet for the betus bettor?

[Wallco99]

post # 2518.

Thank you very much.