John Morrison 2010 NBA

[J.M. Disciple]

Yo dude don't tell me what is wrong and what is wright cause I know better!
I stated what the plays is. It was a V1 play on LAL and thats it. They won on B bet.
What you played was the v2 version. If you dont like my post so dont read them simple

I dont see how we are playing v2 and yours is v1 with the same road series lol. If you are betting the first 3 games and we are betting the first 3 games how is one of them v1 and the other v2? LOL!!!!!!!!

Your future apology is accepted no worries. The rules are simple, i think you should reread them so that you know what your talking about.

Just because its a 4 game road trip or whatever, doesn't make it a v2 starting with the 2nd road game. Series always starts on the FIRST ROAD GAME! Its stated in the rules. You do not skip the first road game or first couple road games and start some where in the middle of a series.

I believe the PDF file shows an example of this in a 6 game road trip where one is a v1 and other is a v2. It says to bet the first 3 road games!

[krzychu78]

Quote from JM's pdf:
"I recommend that you only start betting on a series if the team’s consecutive 3-game road trip begins immediately after their home game. This also means that if a team is on a 6-game road trip vs. 6 opponents from the opposing conference, then you should only wager on the first 3 games (assuming that they played a home game immediately before starting the road trip).
Now, an exception would be that if a team has been playing road game(s) within their own conference before they start 3 consecutive games vs. 3 opponents from the opposing conference, then you should only treat the 3-game series vs. the opposing conference as eligible for play ONLY if that team has lost ALL of its road games from the beginning of the road trip by more than 3 points against the spread.*"

* - i'm not sure if we should apply FAV ML rule here or not.

[J.M. Disciple]

Quote from JM's pdf:
"I recommend that you only start betting on a series if the team’s consecutive 3-game road trip begins immediately after their home game. This also means that if a team is on a 6-game road trip vs. 6 opponents from the opposing conference, then you should only wager on the first 3 games (assuming that they played a home game immediately before starting the road trip).
Now, an exception would be that if a team has been playing road game(s) within their own conference before they start 3 consecutive games vs. 3 opponents from the opposing conference, then you should only treat the 3-game series vs. the opposing conference as eligible for play ONLY if that team has lost ALL of its road games from the beginning of the road trip by more than 3 points against the spread.*"

* - i'm not sure if we should apply FAV ML rule here or not.

Your " * " is a great point. I do believe it applies though.

[jphil]

could anyone post the original & updated(last yrs.) pdf's.? mine are sittin stagnant on old comp. i know the -3 or less thingy is the update. i've seen about 10 diff. spr. sheets, but no pdfs.(although someone may have listed the differences in filters between the 2 at some pt.). i realize we're goin by old v1, just thought it might avoid alot of confusion, & then people could decide how they want to play. for instance K78, was your post from the original? or only half of it? whatever ya can do. pm me if necc.

FROM HERE FORWARD, I, JPHIL, HEREBY PROMISE TO PRINT THEM OUT & FRAME THEM!

stanley's old site is no longer up, otherwise i would have picked 'em up there. Or, didn't there used to be a place somewhere on this board(sbr), that one could get pdf's,links,etc. from?

[bruce0]

I took a look at the last few threads, but is JM now requiring ML plays on ALL favorites, rather than buy three points? I remember he changed that to play the ML but I though that had a limit. Unbelievable if so, you're really supposed to risk -600 or worse when you're chasing, espeically when a "valid" C bet lost yesterday? One loss and one win is hardly a "split" re yesterday plays.

[jphil]

cleveland's a waste! onward to another 81% win rate, C bet, (on wed.) boyz!

no wonder they practically burn their city down!

[atari5200]

[quote=J.M. Disciple;7899770]"I think you misunderstood what i said Atari. i said if the ML covers! which it did for the lakers on A the series is over! If you want to continue with the series because you lost A after buying 3pts you can, but you should not count it towards the system.

I agree that you should play the spread, but dont count it as a loss for the system because of the ML filter. I believe if you lose at the spread and ML covers the rest of your series gets canceled or becomes a personal chase"



I completely understood you. You play the spread at -170 like the original system but throw it out the window if the ML covers. So if you bet on the spread for lakers series A bet and lost, then that's it for you. But you still bet the spread on the Magic.

You don't want to count series losses and wins on the spread like we used to for more than 5 seasons. You only want to count the loss for favs if they lose on the ML.

John Morrison has rubbed off well on you. You're sbr name is very fitting.

[atari5200]

let's get something straight here once and for all. We play the system here on the spread and we buy three points. We don't agree with JM's ML favs filter from last year. That was a bullshit attempt of covering up a loss and THE ML VALUE IS HORRIBLE.

all wins and losses are a result of the spread. If you don't agree then you follow John Morrison, NOT THE SYSTEM.

[jmjj]

let's get something straight here once and for all. We play the system here on the spread and we buy three points. We don't agree with JM's ML favs filter from last year. That was a bullshit attempt of covering up a loss and THE ML VALUE IS HORRIBLE.

all wins and losses are a result of the spread. If you don't agree then you follow John Morrison, NOT THE SYSTEM.

lol yeah I seriously doubt if u dont take the spread u will get burnt a whole lot when a team is favored by more than -3 pts like tonights game isnt over yet but I would say Orlando will beat the Clippers by more than -5 which is what most got if u bought the 3 if u went ML and u can afford it then cool too it really depends on each persons bankroll how much u got and how much u are in profit for how long u been doing it and so on

and yes it was very weasely way to escape a loss last yr but for some reason hmmm he didnt say s hit about the Pistons loss how cute and u know what hes wonderful website hasnt been updated either saying hes taken a loss hmm sure pal what a joke he has become he didnt use to be like this at all last yr

[knugen]

Whats the play for today?

[J.M. Disciple]

There are no plays for today 12/13/10

12/14/10
Sac [A** vs Houston v3 >>> Its not profitable to bet on A wagers so i suggest waiting for the B.
Minnesota [B] vs GSW >>>>PLAY THIS ONE

12/15/10
Cleveland [C] vs Miami v2
Charlotte [A] vs Memphis v3
LAC [A] vs Philadelphia v3

*Also Washington for Hockey has now lost 3 straight games and they are above .500, so bet on them to win on 12/15

[J.M. Disciple]

gsw +10.5 vs utah
NOH +11 vs Miami

These should be in the Tripple play system if you all want to bet on them.
*These qualify as double digit underdogs, however another criteria that has to met is that the ML has to be atleast +500, so only bet on these games if that criteria is met.

*Also note that Double digit underdogs since 1990 win around 58% ATS without buying points, so long run it will show a nice little profit.

*Also note that the public usually drives the lines a little higher, so wait until just before game time to place your bets ats.

[ghislaine]

my labby lines keep getting longer and longer...
lets finally get us some winners

[J.M. Disciple]

my labby lines keep getting longer and longer...
lets finally get us some winners

Bet on the double digit underdogs regardless of the ML being +500 or not. 58% will clear a lot of your lines long run.

Just remember to bet just before game time.

stick with it and you'll make money.

Last couple of days my picks haven't went so well, but with John Morrisons system you would be down around 20 units right now if you were following all three systems. I'm sure we will make them all back though sooner or later. Lucky some of my own bets keep me afloat. Only down about 2 units right now. And sense the season is getting rough im dropping my bet size down a little bit to cut back on the variance some.

[J.M. Disciple]

i'm sure SBP will have a bet tomorrow, so just check the service plays in the morning.

[Kev the Brit]

we're in agreement then. This thread supports the original system. JM disciple and Kev the brit are big contributors to this thread but if they wanna throw the lakers series out and play the spread on the magic, then it doesn't make any sense to me.

I didn't say that I would play the ML, just because JFM says I should. My point, along with JM Disciple, is that this discussion is called "John Morrison 2010 NBA", not "John Morrison, when we feel like it, NBA". So, when someone posts a list of plays and doesn't add any caveats, such as, "but I'm not buying 3 pts (against system rules)", or lists a team that has already won a previous bet due to a ML play (as per the current 2010 system as per the discussion title) they will cause confusion.

"We're in agreement then". Certainly the popular opinion among regular contributors, is contrary to the current "John Morrison 2010 NBA" rule, which is that if a team is fav by -3 or more then the system player bets on the ML. So go ahead and ignore the rule and you will invite even more questions. This is not a private club for the knowlegeable people only.

I fully support the principle of free speach and, yes, I think it is a good idea to publicly question JFM's rules and to discuss other ways, compared to his methods, to make money, but that is purely discussion, as against posting unofficial system plays.

Finally, as individuals, we bet on who we like and when we like and that is our private business. I'm not going to bet on the ML just because of something I read on a pdf nor am I going to bet on the spread just because "we're in agreement, then"

Please see attached the current pdf. It should clear the air about the Fav on the ML and the V2/V1 faff over LAL. LAL was Morrison series complete after their game against the Clippers.

Regards
Kev the brick

[JW Cash]

I am getting a lot of PM's about what is better .......chasing or Labourchere....



Check this out....


I am testing different ways to implement labby...
-----------------------------------


OK


One test had 50% 3 Wins and 3 Losses

and it had +1.99 Units of Profit!
--------------

Another test had 10 Wins and 8 Losses

and it had +7.5 Units of Profit

------------------

And still another test had 14 Wins and 8 Losses
and this baby had +13.5 Units of Profit...........

--------------------


Cool, huh ????????

[Wilba]

Please see attached the current pdf. It should clear the air about the Fav on the ML and the V2/V1 faff over LAL. LAL was Morrison series complete after their game against the Clippers.

Regards
Kev the brick

Hi Kev, the people who are saying to ignore the ML filter are well aware of what the updated PDF says, myself included. But we are realising something more than what you are realising - JM introduced that filter (after the fact) as a way of covering up houstons series loss last season. I dont think you realise that - the ML rule has nothing to do with JMs system, and it is not part of the system. All it is a part of is covering up for JMs perfect series record, and that is all it is a part of.

There was a very good post earlier by someone saying that by NOT playing the ML (or stopping series after ML win/series loss) we ARE following the system. By being fooled by JM's marketing ploy, you are not following the system, merely the man. The system has been around long before JM has been around for! and the stats speak for themselves, with no filters included.

Of course it is up to each individual to follow it how they like. Maybe in the future, as per Kevs suggestion and just to be safe, if a game falls under this criteria put a star next to it or somethin, in case noobies come in and dont understand how it works! then there can be no confusion and hopefully everyone is happy.

Nice win today to everyone who played the 2 C bets

[Wilba]

There are no plays for today 12/13/10

12/14/10
Sac [A** vs Houston v3 >>> Its not profitable to bet on A wagers so i suggest waiting for the B.
Minnesota [B] vs GSW >>>>PLAY THIS ONE

12/15/10
Cleveland [C] vs Miami v2
Charlotte [A] vs Memphis v3
LAC [A] vs Philadelphia v3

*Also Washington for Hockey has now lost 3 straight games and they are above .500, so bet on them to win on 12/15

washington have now lost 6 straight games, not 3..

[Wilba]

I also forgot to mention that if a team loses a 3-game series and has another road series for at least 3 games within a month after that, it's better to ride starting on the B bet. This works for both NBA and NHL.
.

I am really not meaning to be cynical here, but this has an awfully familiar ring to it. Saying to play a bet (cleveland) one way, and then after the bet loses saying that it souldn't be a bet because ... (the why is not really relevant).

As I said, sorry, really not trying to be cynical, but if this is the case then maybe in the future you should post it before the bet loses, not immediately after. Only saying this because you basically ridiculed people a few days ago after the detroit loss for not listening to you.

Well I am looking forward to seeing cleveland cover on thursday as you have all but stated that they are a certainty as you say teams have 0 chance in losing 3 consecutive 3 game road trips by 3 or more over the spread in the same month. (you stated that this filter would remove all series losses)

im currently in the process of taking out a 3rd mortgage on my house for the cleveland C bet. The 1st mortgage happened when I funded my pinnacle account and the 2nd when I put it all on the detroit losing C bet!

now my kids wear old oil rags as daipers LOL!

[Wilba]

GUYS SORRY I HAVE BREAKING NEWS!

i have just come up with a filter which if you apply to JM series, it has never, ever lost. in the history of the NBA!

The way you play is this - you only plays ML favs or -1200 OR WORSE, and you play them on a 6 game chase.

this system has gone 189-0 all time and has never, EVER LOST!

From now on I am only going to play series which fit this criteria. And while ya'll are counting your lossing Ill be counting fat stacks and sipping cristal!

[SolidDala]

- this reminds me of the old emails before I stopped my subscription

[atari5200]

Hi Kev, the people who are saying to ignore the ML filter are well aware of what the updated PDF says, myself included. But we are realising something more than what you are realising - JM introduced that filter (after the fact) as a way of covering up houstons series loss last season. I dont think you realise that - the ML rule has nothing to do with JMs system, and it is not part of the system. All it is a part of is covering up for JMs perfect series record, and that is all it is a part of.

There was a very good post earlier by someone saying that by NOT playing the ML (or stopping series after ML win/series loss) we ARE following the system. By being fooled by JM's marketing ploy, you are not following the system, merely the man. The system has been around long before JM has been around for! and the stats speak for themselves, with no filters included.

Of course it is up to each individual to follow it how they like. Maybe in the future, as per Kevs suggestion and just to be safe, if a game falls under this criteria put a star next to it or somethin, in case noobies come in and dont understand how it works! then there can be no confusion and hopefully everyone is happy.

Nice win today to everyone who played the 2 C bets

Well said Wilba. This thread is about the original system that has been in place for many years. Just because the title of the thread says 2010 on it doesn't mean we are gonna buy into anything "JFM" says or adds on as additional filter. ESPECIALLY if they cost ridiculous sums of money like the lakers vs. the clippers on the ML. You gotta be kidding me. The lakers was an official V2 win on the C bet.

We need to get everyone on this thread to understand this and play these bets because the odds are strong, the stats are backed up from official system records (none of which have been calculated with the idiotic ML filter)

Kev, you are a solid member of this thread and i"ve been reading your posts for a long time. I respect your thoughts but you have to agree with Wilba on this, his backtesting and our ability to distinguish the real system from this garbage that JM threw on us last season with the ML favs.

PLAY THE ORIGINAL SYSTEM. ALWAYS BET ON THE SPREAD. if you wanna do your own thing, not buying points, playing ML, parlaying, labby, B and C only, then i respect that. But for the "newbies" we need stipulate what this system is, how its always been played, and how to avoid listening to JM and his stupid filters, comments etc.

I recieve all his emails and I delete them without reading them. This thread is our link, support system, database of knowledge and source of upcoming bets.

[Kev the Brit]

Guys, I have been playing the Morrison NBA system since the 2008/09 season and I know, and suffered, the changes he has made. I fully agree with you that his change to the ML bet was nothing more than an expensive band-aid to protect his stats. I even received the infamous request from him to vote on the concept that his band-aid should be integrated into his historical stats so that his system remained at 100%. I'm not new to this.

My point is that many people surf sbr looking for sports betting info and news and they will see, "John Morrison 2010 NBA" and they will reasonably assume that the bets that are posted on these pages, without caveats or cautionary words such as "unofficial", will be in accordance with the current Morrison pdf. I believe Wilba, from his last post, agrees to some extent with my point (ie an explanatory note when required). There are about a dozen regular contributors, but there are many more tourists (readers only), or noobies, whom we should consider.

Anyway, I guess that the next time this scenario comes up, we will be on the same page.

My apologies to dukipl for being less than good-humoured in my post #2332.

Regards
Kev the boy (playing nice for ghislaine)

[ghislaine]

Bet on the double digit underdogs regardless of the ML being +500 or not. 58% will clear a lot of your lines long run.

Just remember to bet just before game time.

stick with it and you'll make money.

Last couple of days my picks haven't went so well, but with John Morrisons system you would be down around 20 units right now if you were following all three systems. I'm sure we will make them all back though sooner or later. Lucky some of my own bets keep me afloat. Only down about 2 units right now. And sense the season is getting rough im dropping my bet size down a little bit to cut back on the variance some.

Very sound advice and I trust any from You giving it a go, betting on Warriors and Hornets in addition to the SJ55 bet with Grizzlies !!
Thanks for this, will keep this in mind, double digit underdogs....

[J.M. Disciple]

washington have now lost 6 straight games, not 3..

http://www.nhl.com/ice/standings.htm

says washington's streak is @ lost 3.

Lost on the 9th, 11, and 12th and won in overtime on the 6th so 3 straight.

Play ducks on the 15th.

Overtime wins don't count toward the system?

[dukipl]

Next V2 play is Cleveland [c bet] @ Miami

[J.M. Disciple]

Is there an under system for the nba wilba? If not there should be! Hornets have hit under on 9 out of their last 10 games so im going to continue to ride the under train.

GSW +11 ...............Statistically proven to win around 58% over last 20 years
NOH +11.5 ...............Statistically proven to win around 58% over last 20 years

NOH TOTAL under 187.5 .... went under 9 out of the last 10 games. With only CP3 getting double figures last game i can see why every game goes under for hornets pretty much.

GSW TOTAL under 207.5 .... Didn't mean to bet on the under for this one, but well see what happens

[J.M. Disciple]

Parlay ML: Utah, Miami, BUlls, & dallas 1:1 on your money with pretty big favorites.

[DustyDiamond]

GUYS SORRY I HAVE BREAKING NEWS!

i have just come up with a filter which if you apply to JM series, it has never, ever lost. in the history of the NBA!

The way you play is this - you only plays ML favs or -1200 OR WORSE, and you play them on a 6 game chase.

this system has gone 189-0 all time and has never, EVER LOST!

From now on I am only going to play series which fit this criteria. And while ya'll are counting your lossing Ill be counting fat stacks and sipping cristal!

This can't be for real?

[Kev the Brit]

Next V2 play is Cleveland [c bet] @ Miami

Indeed, and that is set for Wed 15 Dec. Before that we have a couple of V3 plays on Tue 14:
Minnesota @ GSW B Bet
Sac @ Houston A Bet

[Wilba]

This can't be for real?

no it's not. I was paying tribute to the king!

[Wilba]

"

[krzychu78]

OK guys, maybe someone will find it interesting:
I've checked five seasons (2004/05 - 2008/09) for situations where playing favs ML would be important. I've found 12 series.
In five of them playing favs ML would save us from loss.
However there were seven series where playing favs ML didn't change anything. Of course those seven losses are worse than usually because of low odds. Unfortunately i don't know where to find exact odds for those games to do some calculations.

These are all series i've found (based on stats from covers.com):



Phoenix – V1, V2 loss

01/17/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404153.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore684683.html Regular Season L 3.5 U 193
01/15/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404067.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore684547.html Regular Season L 2 U 211.5
01/14/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404155.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore684467.html Regular Season L -6.5 U 212.5
01/12/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404031.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore684403.html Regular Season L -8.5 O 210.5

Washington – V2 loss

02/15/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404137.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore688743.html Regular Season L 8.5 O 198.5
02/14/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404101.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore688689.html Regular Season L -5.5 O 192.5
02/12/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404153.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore688524.html Regular Season L 9 O 189

Houston – V3 loss

04/05/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team403993.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore729050.html Regular Season L -4 U 179.5
04/04/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404316.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore729040.html Regular Season L 4.5 U 201
04/02/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team403977.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore729023.html Regular Season L 6 O 187

Oklahoma City – V3 loss

02/06/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team664421.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728635.html Regular Season L -6 O 212.5
02/04/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404047.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728623.html Regular Season L 10 U 209.5
02/03/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404137.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728613.html Regular Season L 5 U 200.5

Minnesota – V3 loss

02/04/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404119.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728626.html Regular Season L 4 U 188
02/03/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team403993.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728615.html Regular Season L -3.5 U 181
02/01/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404153.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728598.html Regular Season L 8.5 U 184.5

Utah – V1 loss

03/16/07 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404083.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2006-2007/boxscore741587.html Regular Season L -4 U 188.5
03/14/07 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404013.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2006-2007/boxscore741576.html Regular Season L -3.5 U 193
03/13/07 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404171.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2006-2007/boxscore741566.html Regular Season L -1.5 U 191.5

Detroit – V1 win

11/13/04 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404031.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore679413.html Regular Season L 8 O 183
11/11/04 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404065.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore679277.html Regular Season L -1 O 181
11/08/04 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404135.html W covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore679085.html (OT) Regular Season L -6 O 183

Cleveland – V1 win

03/28/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404101.html W covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore691325.html (OT) Regular Season L -4 O 185.5
03/26/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404047.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore691214.html Regular Season L 8 O 197
03/24/05 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404137.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2004-2005/boxscore691024.html Regular Season L 7 U 183

Detroit – V3 win

02/07/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404085.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728639.html Regular Season L -10 O 191
02/04/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404155.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728620.html Regular Season L -8 U 178.5
02/03/06 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404083.html W covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2005-2006/boxscore728612.html Regular Season L -11 U 182.5


Dallas – V3 win

04/06/07 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404065.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2006-2007/boxscore741748.html Regular Season L -2.5 U 211
04/03/07 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team403975.html W covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2006-2007/boxscore741722.html Regular Season L -7 U 205
04/01/07 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404029.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2006-2007/boxscore741708.html Regular Season L 2 O 214.5

Sacramento – V3 win
01/27/08 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404316.html W covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2007-2008/boxscore754313.html Regular Season L -5 U 215
01/25/08 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404031.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2007-2008/boxscore754297.html Regular Season L 8 O 214
01/23/08 @ covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/teams/team404135.html L covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/results/2007-2008/boxscore754282.html Regular Season L -2.5 U 200

[J.M. Disciple]

"