John Morrison 2010 NBA

[ParlayKing]

What's the record so far this season guys? Interested to see how this system is doing.. Thanks

[stevex]

It was posted a page or two ago.

[Brian891]

Glad to see indiana cover on a. Portland should get their shit together vs philly.

[dukipl]

11/28/2010 Indiana [a bet] WIN
11/28/2010 Portland [a bet] LOST :

Next system pick bet on Tuesday 11/30/2010 Portland [b bet] vs. Sixers

[jphil]

OT: MLB:

[quote=Wilba;7624687]nope. Except for one the losses were by teams who actually had a HIGHER rpi rating than the opponents they got double swept by. (except for one, for only one the RPI 0.010 or 0.015 filter difference relevant, and in that one the opponents RPI actually dropped more than 0.015 below after losing the A and B bet, which is prob why JM magic'ed the loss out of his records) Was just a crazy season


OT: What were the BEGINNING RPI'S of the 4 losing teams in mlb '10? (Giants,padres,pirates, angels?) There were 2 TEAMS that began their series more than .010 below their higher opponent.



here you go guys he was soooo f ucked up this past season on MLB 2010 v1.0 system if u remember (and sorry I know this is a NBA thread but u guys are asking so its all good) anywho he sent out an email about betting Pirates and then later renigged saying it didnt make the rpi filter after we f ucking lost remember that? he is soooooo f ucking causal with that nonsense oh Im sorry u lost all of your money but sorry folks it wasnt a true f ucking play and lies about it f uck you John or Chau whomever u are b/c Ive concluded he is an asian guy like I care but I think u guys know that John is all a false front


MLB 2010 True Losses:
1. Giants (A) vs. Padres May 11th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) - This was the only game this yr he admitted that we truly lost

2. Pirates (A) vs Astros July 6th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) (should be considered an unofficial play) - He sent this out stating it was a real play up until we lost the f ucking C bet and said it didnt met the rpi filter after he lied and upped the rpi standard from .01 to .015 for real guys check your emails and check your pdf file f ucking geek lies like a bitch its so lame man

3. Angels (A) vs Red Sox July 26th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Push - starting pitcher stratched bet didnt happen) - Remember this series anyone? I cant stand betting the Angels they f ucked us twice this yr we losts the A & B bets then the starting pitcher change on the C bet and then causally says oh we just move on and we push.........we push??? we f ucking lost the A & B bets and no C bet now unreal

4. Angels (A) vs Baltimore Aug 27th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) - This was the one that broke the straw on the camels back if you fine folks remember this series he actually changed f ucking teams in the middle of the bet he sent out the A Bet when it was a B bet against the Orioles and the C bet was against the Mariners which isnt a rule in his system requirements and he says oh we won the series........really????!!!!! after we switched teams from the A & B bet thats a straight up f ucking clown of a lie


Let me know what you guys think thats 4 genuine losses last yr 2009 was much better 2010 was unfortunately f ucking brutal hopefully 2011 will be very good -)



OT: What were the BEGINNING RPI'S of the 4 losing teams in mlb '10? (Giants,padres,pirates, angels?) There were 2 TEAMS that began their series more than .010 below their higher opponent.

[jphil]

you will still definitely make money buying no points with only B/C bet. however you will make slightly more when u do buy the points. For some reason, possibly a statistical anomaly, buying the 3 points on the C's turned out to be particularly important, no idea why. So on C's I would def buy points, but personally I always buy the points regardless of situation.

If you were going to reduce each series to a 2 game series, I have no idea why you would suggest only playing A/B when I pointed out a few posts ago that C's are way more profitable than B's, and B's are way more profitable than A's. At a guess I would say that you would make a small amount each season if you only played the A/B and called series loss if B loses (this is a guess and not based on tested stats). However this makes zero sense to me as the C is the best %, followed by B. So why would u not do B/C if reducing to a 2 game series. Maybe I misunderstood your question?

Fair enough, and ya didn't misunderstand the question. If ya have no stats on the A/B's only, when i'm blindly assuming that they have the better winning %'s based on the more plays, then so be it. Thanx for the opinion.

[krzychu78]

11/28/2010 San Antonio @ New Orleans - V3, A bet - WIN

V3 stats so far: 11-0
(A): 7-4
(B): 4-0
(C): 0-0

Next V3 play:
12/01/10 Orlando @ Chicago - V3, A bet

[hagball52]

[quote=jphil;7683943]OT: MLB:

nope. Except for one the losses were by teams who actually had a HIGHER rpi rating than the opponents they got double swept by. (except for one, for only one the RPI 0.010 or 0.015 filter difference relevant, and in that one the opponents RPI actually dropped more than 0.015 below after losing the A and B bet, which is prob why JM magic'ed the loss out of his records) Was just a crazy season


OT: What were the BEGINNING RPI'S of the 4 losing teams in mlb '10? (Giants,padres,pirates, angels?) There were 2 TEAMS that began their series more than .010 below their higher opponent.



here you go guys he was soooo f ucked up this past season on MLB 2010 v1.0 system if u remember (and sorry I know this is a NBA thread but u guys are asking so its all good) anywho he sent out an email about betting Pirates and then later renigged saying it didnt make the rpi filter after we f ucking lost remember that? he is soooooo f ucking causal with that nonsense oh Im sorry u lost all of your money but sorry folks it wasnt a true f ucking play and lies about it f uck you John or Chau whomever u are b/c Ive concluded he is an asian guy like I care but I think u guys know that John is all a false front


MLB 2010 True Losses:
1. Giants (A) vs. Padres May 11th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) - This was the only game this yr he admitted that we truly lost

2. Pirates (A) vs Astros July 6th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) (should be considered an unofficial play) - He sent this out stating it was a real play up until we lost the f ucking C bet and said it didnt met the rpi filter after he lied and upped the rpi standard from .01 to .015 for real guys check your emails and check your pdf file f ucking geek lies like a bitch its so lame man

3. Angels (A) vs Red Sox July 26th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Push - starting pitcher stratched bet didnt happen) - Remember this series anyone? I cant stand betting the Angels they f ucked us twice this yr we losts the A & B bets then the starting pitcher change on the C bet and then causally says oh we just move on and we push.........we push??? we f ucking lost the A & B bets and no C bet now unreal

4. Angels (A) vs Baltimore Aug 27th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) - This was the one that broke the straw on the camels back if you fine folks remember this series he actually changed f ucking teams in the middle of the bet he sent out the A Bet when it was a B bet against the Orioles and the C bet was against the Mariners which isnt a rule in his system requirements and he says oh we won the series........really????!!!!! after we switched teams from the A & B bet thats a straight up f ucking clown of a lie


Let me know what you guys think thats 4 genuine losses last yr 2009 was much better 2010 was unfortunately f ucking brutal hopefully 2011 will be very good -)



OT: What were the BEGINNING RPI'S of the 4 losing teams in mlb '10? (Giants,padres,pirates, angels?) There were 2 TEAMS that began their series more than .010 below their higher opponent.

Yeah that last series with the Angels took it over the top for me. I use his systems but can't stomach the asshole. He is trying to market a product so his records lie about the results. Anyone who has been with this jerk for awhile knows him well enough not to believe anything he has to say. That being said I still bet his systems and use good money management and discipline and in the long run come out ahead.

[J.M. Disciple]

I got the date mixed up and missed the last 3 system bets. Will pick it back up tomorrow with Portlands "B" bet.

I was wondering if any of you are following "Laker_crazy" or Therbe thread? Seem like good cappers, but idk how much profit in a season they make. Both claim to hit around 60%. If they were to make 500 plays on the season at 60% that would net around 70 unit profit.

I seen DVB post in their thread. Anyone else follow it?

[EasyHustlin]

I got the date mixed up and missed the last 3 system bets. Will pick it back up tomorrow with Portlands "B" bet. I was wondering if any of you are following "Laker_crazy" or Therbe thread? Seem like good cappers, but idk how much profit in a season they make. Both claim to hit around 60%. If they were to make 500 plays on the season at 60% that would net around 70 unit profit. I seen DVB post in their thread. Anyone else follow it?

I've been tailing LC since mid October. Recently I've been using his totals picks with labby lines and making a nice profit. He is a great capper and his totals are hitting at a very good percent, around 65% I think. He was up over 50 units on all his plays a few days ago and then had a rough go yesterday, but is still well in the green for the season. Have not been tailing therber but I know he's been doing really well on cfb and nfl. His NBA thread has been slow so far but starting to pick up. I plan on keeping an eye on it.

[jmjj]

[QUOTE=hagball52;7688487]

OT: MLB:



Yeah that last series with the Angels took it over the top for me. I use his systems but can't stomach the asshole. He is trying to market a product so his records lie about the results. Anyone who has been with this jerk for awhile knows him well enough not to believe anything he has to say. That being said I still bet his systems and use good money management and discipline and in the long run come out ahead.

I totally agree hag that was too much for me to take after a complete and utter lie switching teams lol in the middle of the series....really??? what the hell is he thinking that he is getting away with it

thanks for at least reading my post I put time in writing it a lot to post that silliness but worthy b/c if I did anything I woke people up to this bs so if you are new to him get your money back if u get mislead like this and then just follow the system on your own w/o him emailing you the plays b/c hes already proven he likes to lie

which is insane b/c hes system is good so why f ucking lie? just admit from time to time we will lose and move on but nooooo he wants to hide behind them and so on so lame guys

[krzychu78]

Opening odds for Portland (B): -3.

[Charlieflip]

Opening odds for Portland (B): -3.

So we go ML ?

[lilb999]

So we go ML ?

Ill go ML unless buying 2.5 points is cheaper. (-.5, so even if they win by 1 point ill win...I havent seen the ML yet)

[krzychu78]

ML for Portland was -147 yesterday, today is -156 at Pinnacle.

[hagball52]

Ill go ML unless buying 2.5 points is cheaper. (-.5, so even if they win by 1 point ill win...I havent seen the ML yet)

Yeah at some places it's already up to 3.5 and the ML at 3.5 is usually cheaper than buying three points for whatever reason.

[isg2010]

This is one of those games where I decided to put half the amount on Portland ML and half on a Portland + Orlando ML. It reduces the amount at risk by at 15%

[bauerranch]

Thanks----- I need to get into this as well

1/28/2010 San Antonio @ New Orleans - V3, A bet - WIN

V3 stats so far: 11-0
(A): 7-4
(B): 4-0
(C): 0-0

Next V3 play:
12/01/10 Orlando @ Chicago - V3, A bet __________________
sbr

[lilb999]

Yea I bought 2.5 points to go to -.5...Cheaper for me

Good luck everyone!

Lets go Blazers!

[mitchp]

This is one of those games where I decided to put half the amount on Portland ML and half on a Portland + Orlando ML. It reduces the amount at risk by at 15%

Can you explain this, are you parlaying a Portand/Orlando ML?

[hagball52]

Can you explain this, are you parlaying a Portand/Orlando ML?

That's what it looks like. I teased the same combo probably for a little better price and got Portland +2.5.

[J.M. Disciple]

Lock it in Portland -1 (really worried about this one)
ML - Parlay
Orlando, lakers, pacers, spurs, & Boston. (getting 4:1 on what seems like an easy win )

[qwerty123]

portland locked in, hope they come out strong and play a full game!

[stevex]

Anyone get the official e-mail from JM?

[jmjj]

I know this isnt the forum but it seems the pricks who started that forum are just simply that pricks and they dont post anymore b/c they were making way too many comments about sily things so at any rate is James Jones's NBA triple system play tonight the Pistons +11? anyone know or keeps up with it let me know please thanks -)

[JW Cash]

Anyone get the official e-mail from JM?

I told JM not to email me unless its really, really important.....

[million2one]

Sixers are really bad. I'd be surprised if they win, but anything can happen.

[Kev the Brit]

JFM sent out 2 e-mails today. The first one was a repeat of his e-mail about the Phoenix guy Nash's injury. His 2nd e-mail told us to ignore the 1st one, but it linked us to Portland as an A bet. Without any apology, JFM then corrected the linked web page, which then indicated Portland as a B Bet. Either he is overworked or he has got an apprentice on the job. Either way, he is a cock.

I can confirm, as one of his subscribers, that James Jones has picked the Pistons as an NBA Triple play tonight. The system is currently 100%

Regards to all

[Stevier100]

I told JM not to email me unless its really, really important.....

Got this one first......A bit of copy and paste going on lol!!!

Our [B] wager with Phoenix did not cover, and the ONLY reason why
it didn't is because their best player Steve Nash was announced to
be out due to injury just hours before game time.

CAUTION: Phoenix's best player Steve Nash is still out due to
injury and will NOT be playing tonight's game. This is an optional
series if you are to continue because one of the system's filter is
to pass on a team when their best player is out to injury.

Go to the link below to see our upcoming system bet(s):

http://www.sportsbettingchamp.com/786438

This page shows the bet(s) that you will need to place. The team
on top is the team you need to bet for. The team on bottom is the
team they're playing against. The letter in bracket is the bet type.




Then got this one shortly afterwards Lol....... The man's a loony!!

Please ignore the message in the previous email that was sent.
Indiana easily outright won against the mighty Lakers to bring in
yet another [A] winner a couple days ago, and I have no doubt that
we will be able to complete the other betting series today as well!

Go to the link below to see our upcoming system bet(s):

http://www.sportsbettingchamp.com/786438

This page shows the bet(s) that you will need to place. The team
on top is the team you need to bet for. The team on bottom is the
team they're playing against. The letter in bracket is the bet type.

[Stevier100]

BetUs up to their old tricks again, the left one is before i log in then watch the moneyline change on the right once logged in!!

The Bastards!!!
Whoops, how do i get to post a jpeg up to show you the evidence??

Steve

[jmjj]

JFM sent out 2 e-mails today. The first one was a repeat of his e-mail about the Phoenix guy Nash's injury. His 2nd e-mail told us to ignore the 1st one, but it linked us to Portland as an A bet. Without any apology, JFM then corrected the linked web page, which then indicated Portland as a B Bet. Either he is overworked or he has got an apprentice on the job. Either way, he is a cock.

I can confirm, as one of his subscribers, that James Jones has picked the Pistons as an NBA Triple play tonight. The system is currently 100%

Regards to all

thank Kev I appreciate it -)

[JW Cash]

BetUs up to their old tricks again, the left one is before i log in then watch the moneyline change on the right once logged in!!

The Bastards!!!
Whoops, how do i get to post a jpeg up to show you the evidence??

Steve

Yea.....you should not use BetUS for Morrison's picks
if you used his promo code when signing up with them....

I did that...and when I found that they were screwing with
the lines....I just played the system picks with the Greek..

[Stevier100]

This is what i was trying to show in the picture attachment with this post

BetUs up to their old tricks again, the left one is before i log in then watch the moneyline change on the right once logged in!!

The Bastards!!!
Whoops, how do i get to post a jpeg up to show you the evidence??

Steve

[rickbo528]

[quote=jphil;7683943]OT: MLB:

nope. Except for one the losses were by teams who actually had a HIGHER rpi rating than the opponents they got double swept by. (except for one, for only one the RPI 0.010 or 0.015 filter difference relevant, and in that one the opponents RPI actually dropped more than 0.015 below after losing the A and B bet, which is prob why JM magic'ed the loss out of his records) Was just a crazy season


OT: What were the BEGINNING RPI'S of the 4 losing teams in mlb '10? (Giants,padres,pirates, angels?) There were 2 TEAMS that began their series more than .010 below their higher opponent.



here you go guys he was soooo f ucked up this past season on MLB 2010 v1.0 system if u remember (and sorry I know this is a NBA thread but u guys are asking so its all good) anywho he sent out an email about betting Pirates and then later renigged saying it didnt make the rpi filter after we f ucking lost remember that? he is soooooo f ucking causal with that nonsense oh Im sorry u lost all of your money but sorry folks it wasnt a true f ucking play and lies about it f uck you John or Chau whomever u are b/c Ive concluded he is an asian guy like I care but I think u guys know that John is all a false front


MLB 2010 True Losses:
1. Giants (A) vs. Padres May 11th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) - This was the only game this yr he admitted that we truly lost

2. Pirates (A) vs Astros July 6th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) (should be considered an unofficial play) - He sent this out stating it was a real play up until we lost the f ucking C bet and said it didnt met the rpi filter after he lied and upped the rpi standard from .01 to .015 for real guys check your emails and check your pdf file f ucking geek lies like a bitch its so lame man

3. Angels (A) vs Red Sox July 26th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Push - starting pitcher stratched bet didnt happen) - Remember this series anyone? I cant stand betting the Angels they f ucked us twice this yr we losts the A & B bets then the starting pitcher change on the C bet and then causally says oh we just move on and we push.........we push??? we f ucking lost the A & B bets and no C bet now unreal

4. Angels (A) vs Baltimore Aug 27th (A Bet Loss/B Bet Loss/C Bet Loss) - This was the one that broke the straw on the camels back if you fine folks remember this series he actually changed f ucking teams in the middle of the bet he sent out the A Bet when it was a B bet against the Orioles and the C bet was against the Mariners which isnt a rule in his system requirements and he says oh we won the series........really????!!!!! after we switched teams from the A & B bet thats a straight up f ucking clown of a lie


Let me know what you guys think thats 4 genuine losses last yr 2009 was much better 2010 was unfortunately f ucking brutal hopefully 2011 will be very good -)



OT: What were the BEGINNING RPI'S of the 4 losing teams in mlb '10? (Giants,padres,pirates, angels?) There were 2 TEAMS that began their series more than .010 below their higher opponent.

I remember the July 26th Angel series well. I traveled to Vegas to bet the Marlins and Angel series. I lost a boatload of money on the Angels that week. that was the last JM baseball wager I made last season. Haven't really been playing his NBA plays either. All it takes is one series loss to ruin you. NEVER AGAIN.

[jphil]

[quote=rickbo528;7710393]

OT: MLB:



I remember the July 26th Angel series well. I traveled to Vegas to bet the Marlins and Angel series. I lost a boatload of money on the Angels that week. that was the last JM baseball wager I made last season. Haven't really been playing his NBA plays either. All it takes is one series loss to ruin you. NEVER AGAIN.

OT: i hear ya. Still curious if ANYONE has the beginning rpi's of those losing tms. @ the time? i still seem to think that there were at least 2 tms. that could have been eliminated from play if using jm's orig. .010 rpi filter. Probably most people (incl. myself) just chucked their mlb records out of disgust. Maybe i'll go through all the 2010 mlb posts for a clue.