The JM "Chase system" $1000 bank roll

[smallbluedonkey]

Shouldn't the JM system filter the worst ATS road teams rather than the worst SU teams? If that is the case, then Sacramento (18-14-0 ATS on the road) are nowhere near the worst team on the road.

What is interesting is that two upcoming JM series are for teams with poor ATS road records: Washington (12-20-0 ATS and 5-27 SU on the road) and Portland (12-19-0 ATS and 13-18 SU). I think the biggest risk for the JM system to tank is on the Portland series as they play Indiana (17-12-2 ATS at home), Cleveland (22-7-0 ATS at home) and Milwaukee (17-15-1 ATS at home).

[Shortstop]

Paying for picks. You are all idiots and suckers.

[netinfo]

Paying for picks. You are all idiots and suckers.

It's no big deal bro. It's a one time payment for lifetime picks, along with the system pdf that explains how it works. It includes NBA, MLB, and NFL. The pdf alone is worth the payment in my opinion.

netinfo

[netinfo]

Shouldn't the JM system filter the worst ATS road teams rather than the worst SU teams? If that is the case, then Sacramento (18-14-0 ATS on the road) are nowhere near the worst team on the road.

This is a good point.

netinfo

[Shortstop]

It's no big deal bro. It's a one time payment for lifetime picks, along with the system pdf that explains how it works. It includes NBA, MLB, and NFL. The pdf alone is worth the payment in my opinion.

netinfo

Anyone who pays for picks is an idiot and a sucker.

You are an idiot and a sucker.

[MadStu]

Thanks for the constructive input there Shortstop I never tire of reading the intelligent posts in this thread which tell me I'm an idiot for multiplying my money by 11 times in 2 months.

[sportsbetwin]

Anyone who pays for picks is an idiot and a sucker.

You are an idiot and a sucker.

Thanks once again for your valuable input.
You post here all the time? What a life you have!
I am glad you are fascinated with idiots and suckers.

[netinfo]

I'm very surprised that Sac. ended up covering this game, but looking at the point made by smallbluedonkey, perhaps I shouldn't have been surprised after all. Earlier, sqvirrel made a similar point, and explained it very well.

Perhaps, this is why JM ended up emailing us this pick, seeing that while Sacramento had the worst road record, they did actually have a good ATS road record.

Whenever we run into this situation again, and get confused as to why JM is emailing us a certain pick, we should look at the ATS road record of the team in question, as opposed to just the win/loss road record itself.

netinfo

[MadStu]

Agreed. Though it was close! I was sweating there for a bit.

Hey, anyone know of a good place to watch/listen to the game online?


I'm in the UK, so don't have any TV channel's covering them. I've been using NBA.com's website to track the scores during games.

[netinfo]

Anyone who pays for picks is an idiot and a sucker.

You are an idiot and a sucker.

Thank you! It never felt so good being an idiot and a sucker by actually winning games and doubling my bankroll!!!

netinfo

[diogee]

Agreed. Though it was close! I was sweating there for a bit.

Hey, anyone know of a good place to watch/listen to the game online?


I'm in the UK, so don't have any TV channel's covering them. I've been using NBA.com's website to track the scores during games.

http://atdhe.net/

http://www.justin.tv/directory/sports

http://www.ppnba.com/english.html

http://channelsurfing.net/

[MadStu]

Thanks diogee, that's great

[diogee]

Not a problem MadStu.

Good luck to everyone using this...hope it keeps up for the rest of the year.

[netinfo]

Hey, anyone know of a good place to watch/listen to the game online?

You can google: myp2p

Sometimes, they carry the specific games that we are playing.

netinfo

[MadStu]

Thanks,
I've already cashed out - have left only about $30 in my account so just playing with that until the MLB season starts.

Has anyone bought JM's new MLB system? I don't see the point, the current one has only lost like 1 series in the past 5 seasons according to his website :

MLB Baseball:
2004 season: 33 wins – 0 Losses
2005 season: 38 wins – 0 Losses
2006 season: 66 wins – 1 Losses
2007 season: 35 wins - 0 Loss
2008 season: 43 wins - 0 Losses

[netinfo]

Thanks for links diogee

A couple of them look unfamiliar to me, I'll be sure to check them out!

netinfo

[Vincepcion]

Paying for picks. You are all idiots and suckers.

It's all rigged
Like the total in the NBA all star game

[netinfo]

Has anyone bought JM's new MLB system?

I bought the second version. I'm looking forward to seeing how it will perform.

netinfo

[MadStu]

I've placed my bet for Portland now.

I see this on sportsbook.com -

Everybody Bets: 91 % of the action is on Blazers to win straight up.

So hopefully 91% of the bettors are not wrong!

[Stumpage]

Hey, anyone know of a good place to watch/listen to the game online?

MadStu, here's another link. You pretty much can follow any game you wish.

http://www.atdhe.net/index.html

[MadStu]

Thanks mate, diogee also posted that link

[Stumpage]

Ah, sorry for the double. Anyway, you're set with it. Good luck on your picks.

[MadStu]

Thanks again!

[JohnMorr08]

Thanks,
I've already cashed out - have left only about $30 in my account so just playing with that until the MLB season starts.

Has anyone bought JM's new MLB system? I don't see the point, the current one has only lost like 1 series in the past 5 seasons according to his website :

MLB Baseball:
2004 season: 33 wins – 0 Losses
2005 season: 38 wins – 0 Losses
2006 season: 66 wins – 1 Losses
2007 season: 35 wins - 0 Loss
2008 season: 43 wins - 0 Losses

Madstu - These records are based on the "new" system... Not the old version. Although V2 is very similar it has a few new filters... You'll see them posted here as MLB nears.

[Syrax]

I'm very surprised that Sac. ended up covering this game, but looking at the point made by smallbluedonkey, perhaps I shouldn't have been surprised after all. Earlier, sqvirrel made a similar point, and explained it very well.

Perhaps, this is why JM ended up emailing us this pick, seeing that while Sacramento had the worst road record, they did actually have a good ATS road record.

Whenever we run into this situation again, and get confused as to why JM is emailing us a certain pick, we should look at the ATS road record of the team in question, as opposed to just the win/loss road record itself.

netinfo

Im pissed I sat the sac one out lol

[Hard10]

Paying for picks. You are all idiots and suckers.

What a Pole Smoker !!

[netinfo]

Im pissed I sat the sac one out lol

Don't worry about it bro!

My thinking is this: It's better to not play one that wins, then play one that looses.

The scale of results, in order of best to worst:

1. Play, and it wins
2. Not play, and it looses
3. Not play, and it wins
4. Play, and it looses

netinfo

[MadStu]

Madstu - These records are based on the "new" system... Not the old version. Although V2 is very similar it has a few new filters... You'll see them posted here as MLB nears.

Oh I see!

[MadStu]

Oh, anyone know a system with as good a record as JM's system for other sports? like Hockey, Soccer or American Football?

[InTheHole]

Looks like you boys are doing ok with JM...continued success

[therber2]

Paying for picks?

Why are we talking about paying for picks? The picks are all free. Where are you paying??

[therber2]

Aren't the Nets up to C now?

edit: Upon reading, I guess it's up for debate depending when everyone got the line.

Nets aren't a 3 game series. So no it isn't any sort of system play

[Syrax]

Don't worry about it bro!

My thinking is this: It's better to not play one that wins, then play one that looses.

The scale of results, in order of best to worst:

1. Play, and it wins
2. Not play, and it looses
3. Not play, and it wins
4. Play, and it looses

netinfo

I fall on number 3 there lol, but yeah you are spot

[cartytay]

Portland winner congrats to all who bet it

[brooks85]

Teams are looking ugly for A bets on 3/17. I might play Minn and just wait for a B or Possible C bet for the others.