Wallco NHL GOLD (+453 units in 6 years)

[Andy3568]

I usually check the team page on Scores and Odds as well, though you can't always trust the results in the ATS column. And for some reason, Arizona's and Winnipeg's pages have been blank since I've been following the system. Not sure why.

[danhimal]

Ditto, I personally use covers.com as well. Ultimately, I double check my findings with http://www.scoresandodds.com/ because this is what the system goes off of. Just click on the team name and review the game log. Colors make it easier on the eyes, this is what Boston's looks like today:

[sedwards86]

I have to head out to work before danhimal has had a chance to post, based on my understanding of the system, I think the plays for today are

washington ML to beat bruins		A
ottowa +1.5 to beat sharks		A

These are v1 bets (bet against teams who have won 3 straight games), didn't see any teams who have lost 3 straight games ATS for v2. Anyone know a quick way to check these ATS stats each day?

I use covers.com. Look at NHL scores and matchups. Under the "stats" tab is last 10. This will show you the the scores and who was favored for that team's last ten games. By looking at that, you can determine if a team has lost three straight up and not covered the puck line if they were underdog.

[danhimal]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2016-17 System to Date: 57-1A(fin.series)
SystemlProfit/Loss: +25.44 unit(s)A(fin.series)
Current Open Series: 2A(-2.63 units)


(12/06/16):
#53LColorado (+1½)Lv2l(C)L- Win
#54LFlorida (+1½)Lv1l(C)L- Win
#60LDallas (M/L)Lv1l(A)L- Loss

v1 Fades
(A) 23-19
(B) 9-8
(C) 8-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 12-6
(B) 2-4
(C) 3-1
Losses: BUF (-31.56u)

Games for (12/07/16):
#61LBoston @ Washington (M/L)Lv1l(A)L(8:05 pm EST)
#62LOttawa (+1½) @ San JoseLv1l(A)L(10:35 pm EST)

#58LResumes v1l(B) on 12/09/16
#60LResumes v1l(B) on 12/08/16


Note: The lines I have listed were the current lines at the time of my post and may not reflect the final lines used to determine wins & losses, or line changes later in the day. Get proper line if different than the one I have posted, based on the criteria that I have listed below.

Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (M/L) instead of the (+1½). We will always play the M/L on M/L favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a M/L dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait till closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). You may need to buy the alternate line(+1½) on occasion if the M/L dog team we are betting on is the (-1½) team with your individual book. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the M/L dog team on ScoresandOdds.comfinal lines.

System rules and back test can be found in posts #4197 & #4198.

[liqidzen]

I have to head out to work before danhimal has had a chance to post, based on my understanding of the system, I think the plays for today are

washington ML to beat bruins		A
ottowa +1.5 to beat sharks		A

These are v1 bets (bet against teams who have won 3 straight games), didn't see any teams who have lost 3 straight games ATS for v2. Anyone know a quick way to check these ATS stats each day?

[HawthornHawks]

seriously Nostra just move back to following touts on twitter.. this is a free system with a heap of time and efforts going into it......

Of course it is up to you or whoever if you want to incorporate constructive suggestions for improvements. Or me if i choose to take it upon myself.

I would have thought someone here would have access to this simple basic info. Rather than making everyone interested search page after page trying to find it. Is there something to hide about the overall record, or especially that of the past two seasons?

I see the old record was boldy posted in the title & first page of the thread. And a regular reference given to a record that is missing two years/two years out of date. Which has had months to update that. A curious omission indeed.

As for your comment about "just one more number that has to be changed EVERY day", that is funny. Having the unchanging record to the beginning of this season one would only need to add this years number to get the total. Simple arithmetic that any poster with a grade 7 education could do for themselves. So not necessary to change another number every day, as you claim.

In any case, good luck with your systems. I hope they are worth all the stress.



.

[Wallco99]

Of course it is up to you or whoever if you want to incorporate constructive suggestions for improvements. Or me if i choose to take it upon myself.

I would have thought someone here would have access to this simple basic info. Rather than making everyone interested search page after page trying to find it. Is there something to hide about the overall record, or especially that of the past two seasons?

I see the old record was boldy posted in the title & first page of the thread. And a regular reference given to a record that is missing two years/two years out of date. Which has had months to update that. A curious omission indeed.

As for your comment about "just one more number that has to be changed EVERY day", that is funny. Having the unchanging record to the beginning of this season one would only need to add this years number to get the total. Simple arithmetic that any poster with a grade 7 education could do for themselves. So not necessary to change another number every day, as you claim.

In any case, good luck with your systems. I hope they are worth all the stress.



.

Thanks, good bye!!!!

[Nostradam]

Or perhaps you could just shop for another system. It is a pain in the ass to add that, because that is just one more number that has to be changed EVERY day. Why don't you just be appreciative of the information your are getting for absolutely no cost, and stop whining about it not being enough. Or just do some reading and figure it out.

Of course it is up to you or whoever if you want to incorporate constructive suggestions for improvements. Or me if i choose to take it upon myself.

I would have thought someone here would have access to this simple basic info. Rather than making everyone interested search page after page trying to find it. Is there something to hide about the overall record, or especially that of the past two seasons?

I see the old record was boldy posted in the title & first page of the thread. And a regular reference given to a record that is missing two years/two years out of date. Which has had months to update that. A curious omission indeed.

As for your comment about "just one more number that has to be changed EVERY day", that is funny. Having the unchanging record to the beginning of this season one would only need to add this years number to get the total. Simple arithmetic that any poster with a grade 7 education could do for themselves. So not necessary to change another number every day, as you claim.

In any case, good luck with your systems. I hope they are worth all the stress.



.

[Mxs1332]

Self admit, I accidentally went for the +1 1/2 on Colorado by mistake instead of taking the M/L for the A game.
Therefore I only have 1 C game for tonight's action.
BOL everyone !!

[Wallco99]

Thanks for the civil response ;

Actually your reference does NOT answer my question. It refers to a post that gives info only up to the end of the 2013-2014 season, whereas i asked for an up to date record, not one that is more than 2 years out-of-date.

Also the reference to posts 4197-8 i'd have found much easier if the page number, page 120 of this thread, was mentioned.

And how difficult would it be to add in the overall record of units won, from 2005-6 through 2015-16, re how the Wallco Gold systems have been doing? In the regular danhimal posts with picks, that is. For all those wondering it is claimed on page 120 of this topic that through 2013-14 it was up 508.31 units.

Or perhaps you could just shop for another system. It is a pain in the ass to add that, because that is just one more number that has to be changed EVERY day. Why don't you just be appreciative of the information your are getting for absolutely no cost, and stop whining about it not being enough. Or just do some reading and figure it out.

[Nostradam]

As Arnold would say, "Chillllll out."

I've got my iced tea on the rocks beside the keyboard. Cheers.

I recall him saying "I'll be back".

Best of luck.

[thekoreanmang]

As Arnold would say, "Chillllll out."

[Nostradam]

Why don't you read 5 posts back before deciding to be a wise ass. I wasn't going to respond until this dumb comment was made. You're obviously NOT reading, because your damn question is answered every single day if you would bother to read danhimal's posts.

Thanks for the civil response ;

Actually your reference does NOT answer my question. It refers to a post that gives info only up to the end of the 2013-2014 season, whereas i asked for an up to date record, not one that is more than 2 years out-of-date.

Also the reference to posts 4197-8 i'd have found much easier if the page number, page 120 of this thread, was mentioned.

And how difficult would it be to add in the overall record of units won, from 2005-6 through 2015-16, re how the Wallco Gold systems have been doing? In the regular danhimal posts with picks, that is. For all those wondering it is claimed on page 120 of this topic that through 2013-14 it was up 508.31 units.

[betwithdaniel]

#53, #54 nadhville ?

#54 is Florida @ Philadelphia

[boycali01]

#53, #54 nadhville ?

[danhimal]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2016-17 System to Date: 55-1A(fin.series)
SystemlProfit/Loss: +23.44 unit(s)A(fin.series)
Current Open Series: 3A(-17.02 units)


(12/05/16):
#58LArizona (+1½)Lv1l(A)L- Loss
#59LWashington (M/L)Lv2l(A)L- Win

v1 Fades
(A) 23-18
(B) 9-8
(C) 7-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 12-6
(B) 2-4
(C) 2-1
Losses: BUF (-31.56u)

Games for (12/06/16):
#53LColorado (+1½) @ NashvilleLv2l(C)L(8:05 pm EST)
#54LFlorida (+1½) @ PhiladelphiaLv1l(C)L(7:05 pm EST)
#60LCalgary @ Dallas (M/L)Lv1l(A)L(8:35 pm EST)

#58LResumes v1l(B) on 12/09/16


Note: The lines I have listed were the current lines at the time of my post and may not reflect the final lines used to determine wins & losses, or line changes later in the day. Get proper line if different than the one I have posted, based on the criteria that I have listed below.

Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (M/L) instead of the (+1½). We will always play the M/L on M/L favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a M/L dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait till closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). You may need to buy the alternate line(+1½) on occasion if the M/L dog team we are betting on is the (-1½) team with your individual book. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the M/L dog team on ScoresandOdds.comfinal lines.

System rules and back test can be found in posts #4197 & #4198.

[Wallco99]

Oblivious To The Obvious

5
12

[Wallco99]

Oblivious To The Obvious

5
11

[Wallco99]

Which of the 162 pages & 5670 posts would you suggest reading for an answer to these questions? I've read numerous already.

I'd also be interested in an update on how the Wallco Gold systems have been doing since the years listed on page 1. Basic info that shouldn't be that difficult to answer. If one is capable, that is ;

Why don't you read 5 posts back before deciding to be a wise ass. I wasn't going to respond until this dumb comment was made. You're obviously NOT reading, because your damn question is answered every single day if you would bother to read danhimal's posts.

[Nostradam]

Seeing as this is your 11th post, I suggest you do some more reading before Wallco goes off on you.

Which of the 162 pages & 5670 posts would you suggest reading for an answer to these questions? I've read numerous already.

I'd also be interested in an update on how the Wallco Gold systems have been doing since the years listed on page 1. Basic info that shouldn't be that difficult to answer. If one is capable, that is ;

[allidoiswin89]

Is there any reason why this (Wallco Gold) should be profitable long term? Other than pure luck?

Would the results be the same if you bet the same games without chasing? Or started the chase on game C & after to D & E?

How do those chases compare to starting to chase teams after they've lost (or won) 4, 5, 6, 7-10, etc, games?

Seeing as this is your 11th post, I suggest you do some more reading before Wallco goes off on you.

[Nostradam]

Is there any reason why this (Wallco Gold) should be profitable long term? Other than pure luck?

Would the results be the same if you bet the same games without chasing? Or started the chase on game C & after to D & E?

How do those chases compare to starting to chase teams after they've lost (or won) 4, 5, 6, 7-10, etc, games?

[19th Hole]

If your scared get a dog! There's no crying in wagering.

[Wallco99]

Really scared and nervous for the upcoming C plays. Hopefully I wont die from a heart attack tonight.

Good luck, everyone!

If your scared get a dog! There's no crying in wagering.

[Pakaa]

Really scared and nervous for the upcoming C plays. Hopefully I wont die from a heart attack tonight.

Good luck, everyone!

[danhimal]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2016-17 System to Date: 54-1A(fin.series)
SystemlProfit/Loss: +22.44 unit(s)A(fin.series)
Current Open Series: 2A(-15.72 units)


(12/04/16):
#54LNashville (M/L)Lv1l(B)L- Loss
#57LDetroit (+1½)Lv1l(A)L- Win

v1 Fades
(A) 23-17
(B) 9-8
(C) 7-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 11-6
(B) 2-4
(C) 2-1
Losses: BUF (-31.56u)

Games for (12/05/16):
#58LArizona (+1½) @ ColumbusLv1l(A)L(7:05 pm EST)
#59LBuffalo @ Washington (M/L)Lv2l(A)L(7:05 pm EST)

#53LResumes v2l(C) on 12/06/16
#54LResumes v1l(C) on 12/06/16


Note: The lines I have listed were the current lines at the time of my post and may not reflect the final lines used to determine wins & losses, or line changes later in the day. Get proper line if different than the one I have posted, based on the criteria that I have listed below.

Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (M/L) instead of the (+1½). We will always play the M/L on M/L favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a M/L dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait till closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). You may need to buy the alternate line(+1½) on occasion if the M/L dog team we are betting on is the (-1½) team with your individual book. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the M/L dog team on ScoresandOdds.comfinal lines.

System rules and back test can be found in posts #4197 & #4198.

[MalikHusam]

redwings 4-3 WIN

[MalikHusam]

big money on islanders good time bet DET

[danhimal]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2016-17 System to Date: 53-1A(fin.series)
SystemlProfit/Loss: +21.44 unit(s)A(fin.series)
Current Open Series: 2A(-10.51 units)


(12/03/16):
#53LColorado (+1½)Lv2l(B)L- Loss
#54LChicago (+1½)Lv1l(A)L- Loss
#55LWinnipeg (+1½)Lv1l(A)L- Win
#56LEdmonton (M/L)Lv1l(A)L- Win

v1 Fades
(A) 22-17
(B) 9-7
(C) 7-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 11-6
(B) 2-4
(C) 2-1
Losses: BUF (-31.56u)

Games for (12/04/16):
#54LPhiladelphia @ Nashville (M/L)Lv1l(B)L(6:05 pm EST)
#57LDetroit (+1½) @ N.Y. IslandersLv1l(A)L(6:05 pm EST)

#53LResumes v2l(C) on 12/06/16


Note: The lines I have listed were the current lines at the time of my post and may not reflect the final lines used to determine wins & losses, or line changes later in the day. Get proper line if different than the one I have posted, based on the criteria that I have listed below.

Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (M/L) instead of the (+1½). We will always play the M/L on M/L favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a M/L dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait till closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). You may need to buy the alternate line(+1½) on occasion if the M/L dog team we are betting on is the (-1½) team with your individual book. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the M/L dog team on ScoresandOdds.comfinal lines.

System rules and back test can be found in posts #4197 & #4198.

[danhimal]

[Wallco99]

Dammit Andy3568, took away our sweep! All joking aside, really good catch. Posts have been revised... Thanks for the keen eye!

Yes, Andy has always been good with this, as are you.

[Wallco99]

I had a thought. If a v2 teams covers the P/L but does not win the game, that series is won and closed. However, that team is still on a SU losing streak. Would it be a good idea to do a v2 chase on them again? I don't see how it isn't good. An example for today (12/3) is the Lightning.

NO. They have to lose S/U and P/L.

[danhimal]

I know most of us got Colorado as the dog on 12/1, but Scores and Odds shows them as the favorite for the final line. That would mean they are a play today... by the system, that is.

Dammit Andy3568, took away our sweep! All joking aside, really good catch. Posts have been revised... Thanks for the keen eye!

[Andy3568]

I know most of us got Colorado as the dog on 12/1, but Scores and Odds shows them as the favorite for the final line. That would mean they are a play today... by the system, that is.

[danhimal]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2016-17 System to Date: 51-1A(fin.series)
SystemlProfit/Loss: +19.44 unit(s)A(fin.series)
Current Open Series: 1A(-1.19 units)


v1 Fades
(A) 20-16
(B) 9-7
(C) 7-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 11-6
(B) 2-3
(C) 2-1
Losses: BUF (-31.56u)

Games for (12/03/16):
#53LDallas @ Colorado (+1½)Lv2l(B)L(9:05 pm EST)
#54LChicago (+1½) @ PhiladelphiaLv1l(A)L(1:05 pm EST)
#55LWinnipeg (+1½) @ St. LouisLv1l(A)L(7:05 pm EST)
#56LAnaheim @ Edmonton (M/L)Lv1l(A)L(10:05 pm EST)


Note: The lines I have listed were the current lines at the time of my post and may not reflect the final lines used to determine wins & losses, or line changes later in the day. Get proper line if different than the one I have posted, based on the criteria that I have listed below.

Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (M/L) instead of the (+1½). We will always play the M/L on M/L favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a M/L dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait till closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). You may need to buy the alternate line(+1½) on occasion if the M/L dog team we are betting on is the (-1½) team with your individual book. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the M/L dog team on ScoresandOdds.comfinal lines.

System rules and back test can be found in posts #4197 & #4198.