128 Man R1- MonkeyF0cker vs rjt721

[SBR Lou]

MLB: ML/Totals (no favs over -155)
NFL: Sides/Totals/ML (no favs over -150)
NCAAF: Sides/Totals/ML (no favs over -160)
Tennis: ML's/spreads/totals (no favs over -170)
Soccer: Sides/Totals (no ML's over -165)
WNBA: Sides/Totals/ML (no favs over -150)

You MUST use the lines from the Daily lines thread. If you do not, the play will not be counted.

7 plays in 5 days must be made, no max per day anymore. Have 7 picks in by Saturday evening.

[MonkeyF0cker]

My plays for today:

Oakland A's +235
Milwaukee Brewers +106

[SBR Lou]

Monkeyf0cker 1-1 (+0.06)

[MonkeyF0cker]

Milwaukee Brewers +141
Cleveland Indians +162
Boston Red Sox +107

[rjt721]

Wednesday:

914 St Louis Cardinals -149
926 Tampa Bay Rays Under 9 -117

Best of luck, MF.

[MonkeyF0cker]

You too, bud.

[rjt721]

Thursday:

962 Tampa Bay Rays -148

[SBR Lou]

Monkeyf0cker 3-2 +1.75
Rjt721 2-0 +2.00

[MonkeyF0cker]

166 New Mexico +7 -120

[rjt721]

Saturday:

150 Michigan -3
972 Boston Red Sox -113

[rjt721]

972 Boston Red Sox -113

I'm assuming this play will have action even though Pauley's listed as the starter in the contest lines thread. Been known since last night it was Bowden getting the ball for Boston. Pinny line is currently -114, so the pitching change hasn't had much of an impact on the price.

* -110 juice on Michigan -3 (didn't want to edit my post).

Good luck today, MF.

[SBR Lou]

You're fine RJT, pitching changes would be insane to keep track of.

[MonkeyF0cker]

You too, rjt. I've got one play left. Gotta make it good.

[MonkeyF0cker]

161 Washington +13.5 -110

[rjt721]

Saturday:

150 Michigan -3
972 Boston Red Sox -113

111 Ivan Calderon by 12-round decision -129
187 Alabama +4 -110

[MonkeyF0cker]

Nice job, rjt. I should have stuck with baseball. At least I might have given myself a fighting chance. NCAAF is always hard for me in the first two weeks.

[MonkeyF0cker]

Good luck in the next round.

[ShamsWoof10]

Good luck in the next round.

You're such a b*tch... I was looking forward to being the one that knocked your as* out...

Well I think I am going to call you "Liberty" from now on... haha you know the small team that is happy to make the tourny but get their as* kicked every time in the first round...

[SBR Lou]

Monkeyf0cker 3-4 -1.65
Rjt721 5-2 +0.81 (if boxing score is mistake let me know, either way you've mathematically advanced) WINNER

[rjt721]

Good luck in the next round.

Thanks man. That Brewers/Cards game on Wednesday ended up being a huge swing in my favor. If Milwaukee holds on to that late 2-run lead, it would have given you a nice cushion and completely changed my strategy going forward. With such a small sample size, luck is a huge factor, and I was very fortunate St. Louis pulled that game out, otherwise you'd likely be the one advancing in the tourney.

Monkeyf0cker 3-4 -1.65
Rjt721 5-2 +0.81 (if boxing score is mistake let me know, either way you've mathematically advanced) WINNER

Correct -- boxing play lost. Final record was 5-2, +2.61, but like you said, that's irrelevant.

[MonkeyF0cker]

You're such a b*tch... I was looking forward to being the one that knocked your as* out...

Well I think I am going to call you "Liberty" from now on... haha you know the small team that is happy to make the tourny but get their as* kicked every time in the first round...

Ahh Mr. Maturity returns. FYI, I was in this contest for fun since that's all that any serious handicapper could possibly take this contest. Of course a genius such as yourself would think otherwise. The fact that this contest limits the amount of plays you can make and has such a small sample size should be a clue to even a halfwit such as yourself that it proves nothing about handicapping abilities. Real handicappers don't "pick winners", they bet value. But what would you know about anything?

[MonkeyF0cker]

And I should be 3-4 -0.55, Crazy...

[pimike]

Ahh Mr. Maturity returns. FYI, I was in this contest for fun since that's all that any serious handicapper could possibly take this contest. Of course a genius such as yourself would think otherwise. The fact that this contest limits the amount of plays you can make and has such a small sample size should be a clue to even a halfwit such as yourself that it proves nothing about handicapping abilities. Real handicappers don't "pick winners", they bet value. But what would you know about anything?

Dam RIght He knows nothing he is nothing

[MonkeyF0cker]

Thanks man. That Brewers/Cards game on Wednesday ended up being a huge swing in my favor. If Milwaukee holds on to that late 2-run lead, it would have given you a nice cushion and completely changed my strategy going forward. With such a small sample size, luck is a huge factor, and I was very fortunate St. Louis pulled that game out, otherwise you'd likely be the one advancing in the tourney.





Correct -- boxing play lost. Final record was 5-2, +2.61, but like you said, that's irrelevant.

Yeah that was huge. It changed my strategy for sure. That's how I ended up on Washington at the end. Was waiting out some of your plays to see what I may need to win. After Michigan lost, I figured I only needed a spread to have a shot. If Milwaukee holds on there, the roles would have been reversed. I had fun anyway. I'll be pulling for ya in the next round.

[ShamsWoof10]

But what would you know about anything?

I know you are eliminated hahaha

[pimike]

I know you are eliminated hahaha

[MonkeyF0cker]

I know you are eliminated hahaha

Brilliant observation, Captain Obvious. Can you please inform me as to why that should matter to me in the slightest?

[ShamsWoof10]

Monkeyf0cker 3-4 -1.65
Rjt721 5-2 +0.81 (if boxing score is mistake let me know, either way you've mathematically advanced) WINNER

[MonkeyF0cker]

If you think that bothers me, you're sadly mistaken. And when you lose, you won't hear a word from me since I couldn't care any less of your pathetic existence. It's sad really that I embarrassed you so much that you feel the need to seek vengance in some way. Unfortunately for you, you simply continue to make yourself look the fool. Although, it's apparent that to do otherwise is categorically impossible for someone of your mental difficiencies.

[ShamsWoof10]

No I just love seeing you lose...

If you think that bothers me, you're sadly mistaken. And when you lose, you won't hear a word from me since I couldn't care any less of your pathetic existence.

THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP RESPONDING..???

I'll see you in round 2... ooopps you won't be there haha

[donjuan]

Anyone who thinks this contest is about actual handicapping ability is a moron of the highest order.

[ShamsWoof10]

Anyone who thinks this contest is about actual handicapping ability is a moron of the highest order.

WHAT F*CKIN' BULLSH*T....

For all of you that think this I want you to tell me how chosing a game for this contest and chosing one you actually bet on is any differant as far as handicapping...?

Are you saying you bet games you handicap and just pick games out of the air for the contest..?

[MonkeyF0cker]

No I just love seeing you lose...



THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP RESPONDING..???

I'll see you in round 2... ooopps you won't be there haha

Because I'm a generous person who allows anyone that chooses to enter my threads equal opportunity to confound themselves in their own chagrin. Bravo, Shams. You've succeeded once again. Never a disappointment...

[ShamsWoof10]

Because I'm a generous person who allows anyone that chooses to enter my threads equal opportunity to confound themselves in their own chagrin. Bravo, Shams. You've succeeded once again. Never a disappointment...

yeah.... yeah .....yeah.....

Do you have an explanation on why this contest is not about handicapping..?

[MonkeyF0cker]

If you can't comprehend the concepts and practices of probability, standard deviation, modelling, value, line shopping, sample size, and contest rules and practices including, but not limited to: limits on the amount of plays and playing from behind, then you are as square as they come. And there is absolutely no way that I would ever assist someone such as yourself in ever bringing that knowledge to fruition because quite frankly, it's beyond your intellect and you would never be worthy of such insight.