Do you know of a formula to input into an excel spreadsheet?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#4
Originally posted by oilcountry99
I appreciate the response.
Do you know of a formula to input into an excel spreadsheet?
You mean to convert probability to ML?
If greater than 50%, then -(probability/(1-probability)). So 55% would be -.55/.45 for roughly -122
If 50% or less, then +((1-probability)/probability). So 40% would .60/.40 for +150
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#5
thanks again for the post. What I need is a formula to convert win% to point spread
Appreciate your efforts thanks LT.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#6
Originally posted by oilcountry99
thanks again for the post. What I need is a formula to convert win% to point spread
Appreciate your efforts thanks LT.
There is no such thing because all point spreads are priced differently, and it varies from sport to sport. That is what makes the converter valuable, it is based on historical results.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#7
LT,
What if I input different point spreads in the converter and created a table of WIN% = PT SPREAD and put that table into excel to reference from? so if team X has a win% of 56% excel will then look up the corresponding pt. spread in the table. Does that make sense? Would it work? I'm just trying to avoid having to input the numbers into the table and then input the results into excel...to time consuming.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#8
LT, I found this...
W% = 1 / (1 + e^(-0.13959 * (Avg. Pt. Diff)))
Using a win% of 0.663 as an example:
0.663 = 1 / (1 + e^(-0.13959 * P))
Solving for P (i.e., the point spread) we get:
P = -ln(1/0.663 – 1) / 0.13959 = 4.85
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#9
Originally posted by oilcountry99
LT, I found this...
W% = 1 / (1 + e^(-0.13959 * (Avg. Pt. Diff)))
Using a win% of 0.663 as an example:
0.663 = 1 / (1 + e^(-0.13959 * P))
Solving for P (i.e., the point spread) we get:
P = -ln(1/0.663 – 1) / 0.13959 = 4.85
I do not know if that formula is right for the specific sport you are looking at, but I DO know it is not good universally over all sports. You can test it for the sport you are looking at by inputting -197 (.663/.337) in converter and seeing how close it is to -4.5
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#10
I was more exact and inputed -196.7 and got the following:
Doesn't really prove anything but you may be close for NFL. And it seems fluky that your formula gets 4.5 for both NFL and CBK given the mass difference in the scoring distributions for those two sports.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#11
LT, the example was specific to the NBA, so the -5.5 is off.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#12
here's a link to what I'm looking into...maybe it will help further
This seems to make a lot of sense, so I would go for it for NBA if you want to. I wasn't too thrilled at first with usage of end-of-season SRS, but he addressed that later.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#15
Originally posted by LT Profits
This seems to make a lot of sense, so I would go for it for NBA if you want to. I wasn't too thrilled at first with usage of end-of-season SRS, but he addressed that later.
I believe I would have to apply the formula's set out by TomTango in the comments below the article...
Justin’s equation can be rewritten as:
x = EXP(-dSRS * .167)
win% = 1.844 / (1.844 + x)
However, that dSRS in the model is the UNREGRESSED value.
If you used a regressed value (meaning Games / (Games + 12) x dSRS), then the “x” equation becomes:
x = EXP(-reg_dSRS * .191)
Comment
The Hat
SBR Wise Guy
09-24-16
676
#16
IMO, point spread and win probability do not correspond. The spread corresponds to public perception and does not reflect or equate to win probability.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#17
Originally posted by The Hat
IMO, point spread and win probability do not correspond. The spread corresponds to public perception and does not reflect or equate to win probability.
Precisely the reason you can gain an edge with a model that CAN generate an accurate unbiased spread.
Comment
The Hat
SBR Wise Guy
09-24-16
676
#18
Originally posted by LT Profits
Precisely the reason you can gain an edge with a model that CAN generate an accurate unbiased spread.
I see what you mean in regards to comparing the 'vegas spread' with the spread that that model generates and betting accordingly, but IMO, I don't think you can actually begin the process with an accurate win probability. What generates the win probability percentage? What comes before the win prob prcntg?
Comment
The Hat
SBR Wise Guy
09-24-16
676
#19
OP starts off with 'I have an estimated win probability'.
What margin for error are you dealing with in regards to the estimation? 2%? 5%? 7%?
Do you run the model plugging in the various 'win prob %'s' due to the margin for error? Once you get into doing that, not sure that you would see any significant variance between 'model line' and 'vegas line'. And again, just my opinion and I very well may be wrong.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#20
Originally posted by The Hat
IMO, point spread and win probability do not correspond. The spread corresponds to public perception and does not reflect or equate to win probability.
The calculations however would give a 'base' as to what the spread should be, from there one can evaluate whether or not there is any value in the selection based on the given ML and PS on the game.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#21
Originally posted by The Hat
OP starts off with 'I have an estimated win probability'.
What margin for error are you dealing with in regards to the estimation? 2%? 5%? 7%?
Do you run the model plugging in the various 'win prob %'s' due to the margin for error? Once you get into doing that, not sure that you would see any significant variance between 'model line' and 'vegas line'. And again, just my opinion and I very well may be wrong.
Refer to the link in post #12 for more insight.
I'm no expert here just looking at options, thanks for your thoughts
Comment
The Hat
SBR Wise Guy
09-24-16
676
#22
Originally posted by oilcountry99
Refer to the link in post #12 for more insight.
I'm no expert here just looking at options, thanks for your thoughts
Yeah I checked it out. IMO, the formula doesn't have enough criteria built into it. In basketball, you have to take into account teams playing back to back games vs a team that isn't. Also, coast to coast travel factors in. Injuries. etc etc etc.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#23
Originally posted by The Hat
Yeah I checked it out. IMO, the formula doesn't have enough criteria built into it. In basketball, you have to take into account teams playing back to back games vs a team that isn't. Also, coast to coast travel factors in. Injuries. etc etc etc.
That's where the handicap comes in. The formula only gives a lean.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#24
Originally posted by The Hat
I see what you mean in regards to comparing the 'vegas spread' with the spread that that model generates and betting accordingly, but IMO, I don't think you can actually begin the process with an accurate win probability. What generates the win probability percentage? What comes before the win prob prcntg?
The SRS is what generates the base. This stat is powerful in that it takes past games point differential and opponents strength and incorporates it into a number or rating based on the average NBA team.
Look at the tables in the article, there are some great correlations based on the formula.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#25
How do you enter this formula into excel:
p = 1 / (1 + e-(0.613230 + 0.167546 × (-3.01)))
Comment
Waterstpub87
SBR MVP
09-09-09
4102
#26
=1/(1+exp(-(0.61323+0.167546*(-3.01))))
I assume you mean raising e to that power. Not subtracting it from e
The result is
0.527202
is that close to what you want?
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#27
Thanks Waterstpub87...appreciate the reply! worked like a charm
how about this one:
Where dSRS is a cell reference, the number in the cell could be positive or negative.
Select Name manager
Select New
Type dSRS
Select the cell where you will have dSRS in the refers section
Close the name manager
you can use this formula
=EXP(-drRs*0.167)
is there a reason you want to lock it to a specific cell? You know that you can just select the cell and get the same result, right? If you type -A1, it will give you the negative of what is in cell A1
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#29
Originally posted by Waterstpub87
Go to Formulas on the ribbon at the top.
Select Name manager
Select New
Type dSRS
Select the cell where you will have dSRS in the refers section
Close the name manager
you can use this formula
=EXP(-drRs*0.167)
is there a reason you want to lock it to a specific cell? You know that you can just select the cell and get the same result, right? If you type -A1, it will give you the negative of what is in cell A1
Maybe the above forumula is the incorrect one to use. I'm getting a decimal number result which seems way off.
Comment
oilcountry99
SBR Wise Guy
08-29-10
707
#30
l also have this last one:
Where win% is a cell, for example N7
= -ln(1/N7 – 1) / 0.13959
Thanks again for your help
Comment
Waterstpub87
SBR MVP
09-09-09
4102
#31
You need to specify order of operations.
Do you want
The natural log of 1/(N7-1) or the natural log of ((1/n7)-1)