1st let me say, i am far from an expert in all this and what rules do and do not apply.
With this only being my 3rd week in following all this it does intrigue me with the plays that do not fit requirements exactly,, # of bets,, Percentages on a specific side,,all other rules,etc,etc,,,,,,,,,I just see a lot of plays with a little tweaking could be plays and have an excellent win percentage,,so why exclude them,,,?????
As i said i'm far from an expert in all this as some are well more knowledgeable in all this,, but i wanted to post my finding over a very short period( 2 weeks),, and if someone else has been tracking all this i request you to get involved and post your findings as well.
I know from watching the experts here post what must happen but what if all the requirements are not met,,,one of these teams still will win and one will lose,,i don't want to discard them that quickly
This is what i have found over the last 2 weeks in review,,,,Remember we all get opening and closing lines at different times so all must review their past records for legitimacy,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I have found the following
If the opening line and closing line does not change or is the same at kickoff,the favorite wins more that they lose,,,last 2 weeks my lines went ( 16-7)
If the opening line and closing line has a .05 differential between both ,,,the favorite win percentage was 12-2,, pretty good ( example -6 to -6.5),,,(-7.5 to -8) an increase of -.05
If the reverse happened to occur,,,Example ( -6.5 to -6 ) the result was 4-7,,,,
Thus i guess the rule for a 1 point requirement,,,,,but why do we need to lose playing that 12-2 win %,,??????
Maybe the 2 week experiment is not long enough and could be a negative approach and if anyone has any records of all this for past seasons please jump in,,,
additionally I have found the full 1 point requirement has a more valid RLM both for the favorite and dog regardless of # of bets on either side,,thus against the actual RLM understanding and meaning,, so what i'm saying is forget RLM and if either side gets a 1 point advantage play it,,,if you like it,,,( -1 increase went 4-1 and - 1 decrease went 7-4)
1.5 went more as the true RLM requires -1.5,,,,play the dog,,+1.5 ( 4-0) the opposite went 1-2,,,,,,,
there were not many in higher #'s to take a position on,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Understand this for me is just last 2 weeks as i have seen it and yes a season under ones belt would be a more definitive review,,, maybe someone else has tracked all this and i'm not the only one out there alone in all this,, trying to make sense out of all this
Anyway it is what it is and i will track it for the season and maybe next year i will have a better handle on all this,,,,,,
With this only being my 3rd week in following all this it does intrigue me with the plays that do not fit requirements exactly,, # of bets,, Percentages on a specific side,,all other rules,etc,etc,,,,,,,,,I just see a lot of plays with a little tweaking could be plays and have an excellent win percentage,,so why exclude them,,,?????
As i said i'm far from an expert in all this as some are well more knowledgeable in all this,, but i wanted to post my finding over a very short period( 2 weeks),, and if someone else has been tracking all this i request you to get involved and post your findings as well.
I know from watching the experts here post what must happen but what if all the requirements are not met,,,one of these teams still will win and one will lose,,i don't want to discard them that quickly
This is what i have found over the last 2 weeks in review,,,,Remember we all get opening and closing lines at different times so all must review their past records for legitimacy,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I have found the following
If the opening line and closing line does not change or is the same at kickoff,the favorite wins more that they lose,,,last 2 weeks my lines went ( 16-7)
If the opening line and closing line has a .05 differential between both ,,,the favorite win percentage was 12-2,, pretty good ( example -6 to -6.5),,,(-7.5 to -8) an increase of -.05
If the reverse happened to occur,,,Example ( -6.5 to -6 ) the result was 4-7,,,,
Thus i guess the rule for a 1 point requirement,,,,,but why do we need to lose playing that 12-2 win %,,??????
Maybe the 2 week experiment is not long enough and could be a negative approach and if anyone has any records of all this for past seasons please jump in,,,
additionally I have found the full 1 point requirement has a more valid RLM both for the favorite and dog regardless of # of bets on either side,,thus against the actual RLM understanding and meaning,, so what i'm saying is forget RLM and if either side gets a 1 point advantage play it,,,if you like it,,,( -1 increase went 4-1 and - 1 decrease went 7-4)
1.5 went more as the true RLM requires -1.5,,,,play the dog,,+1.5 ( 4-0) the opposite went 1-2,,,,,,,
there were not many in higher #'s to take a position on,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Understand this for me is just last 2 weeks as i have seen it and yes a season under ones belt would be a more definitive review,,, maybe someone else has tracked all this and i'm not the only one out there alone in all this,, trying to make sense out of all this
Anyway it is what it is and i will track it for the season and maybe next year i will have a better handle on all this,,,,,,
