ive parlayed every bet since superbowl with gsp -470

[tbird509]

[QUOTE=MD;17994922]Yes, as Hobbes said, it's been explained many posts back.


i didnt think you would have anything to say except small minded response,ill keep posting and we will see where number are at daily

[Grabaka]

[QUOTE=tbird509;17995520]

Yes, as Hobbes said, it's been explained many posts back.


i didnt think you would have anything to say except small minded response,ill keep posting and we will see where number are at daily

He gave you a small minded response since you cant understand math nor english. How the hell should we explain it to you? Apples and oranges?

[tbird509]

when your risking 20k and have won the first half of the bet,and IF the second leg gsp wins..i collect over 12k...u do the math...my way you collect more unless i lost alot of parlays...im done explaining,just pay attention to the picks...watch and learn cause class is in session

[FindTheLock]

when your risking 20k and have won the first half of the bet,and IF the second leg gsp wins..i collect over 12k...u do the math...my way you collect more unless i lost alot of parlays...im done explaining,just pay attention to the picks...watch and learn cause class is in session

if you want to be taken seriously then you must post all of your alleged wins prior to the games starting. If you post a win and say you forgot after the game is already over, then you give yourself zero credibility. Why should we believe the integrity of a guy that appears to be oozing out the fluids of an internet troll? Mathematically you're doomed from the start without the ability to past post, so quit trying to add in bets after games are already over.

[Grabaka]

I did the math. You are wrong. Now you do the math.

[tbird509]

if you want to be taken seriously then you must post all of your alleged wins prior to the games starting. If you post a win and say you forgot after the game is already over, then you give yourself zero credibility. Why should we believe the integrity of a guy that appears to be oozing out the fluids of an internet troll? Mathematically you're doomed from the start without the ability to past post, so quit trying to add in bets after games are already over.

i know nobody will trust the past,thats why i started posting everygame since 3/1..go through the thread and look at picks

[FindTheLock]

i know nobody will trust the past,thats why i started posting everygame since 3/1..go through the thread and look at picks

you tried to add the clippers after the game was over.

[tbird509]

[QUOTE=FindTheLock;17996038]if you want to be taken seriously then you must post all of your alleged wins prior to the games starting. If you post a win and say you forgot after the game is already over, then you give yourself zero credibility. Why should we believe the integrity of a guy that appears to be oozing out the fluids of an internet troll? Mathematically you're doomed from the start without the ability to past post, so quit trying to add in bets after games are already over.[/QUOTE
the game you are talking about was the clipper game and i posted at halftime and they were up by 9,either way all picks posted prior to games with that exception,no need to explain again

[FindTheLock]

[QUOTE=tbird509;17996144]

if you want to be taken seriously then you must post all of your alleged wins prior to the games starting. If you post a win and say you forgot after the game is already over, then you give yourself zero credibility. Why should we believe the integrity of a guy that appears to be oozing out the fluids of an internet troll? Mathematically you're doomed from the start without the ability to past post, so quit trying to add in bets after games are already over.[/QUOTE
the game you are talking about was the clipper game and i posted at halftime and they were up by 9,either way all picks posted prior to games with that exception,no need to explain again

one 1000 dollar loss would ruin your idea, so saying it like it does not matter is a complete joke. You have to understand how shitty your theory is before you can understand how shitty past posting is.

[tbird509]

[QUOTE=FindTheLock;17996124]you tried to add the clippers after the game was over.[/

if you want lock,take that game away and i still havent loss since i posted everygame starting march 1st

[tbird509]

i havent bet above 500 per game this week,so dont think that theory works here

[FindTheLock]

[QUOTE=tbird509;17996182]

you tried to add the clippers after the game was over.[/

if you want lock,take that game away and i still havent loss since i posted everygame starting march 1st

you're betting on teams that have an 80 percent chance to win. You won 4 days in a row, but you have 4 losses coming and they will neutralize your wins instantly. You just have to hope you don't lose more than 4 to get GSP at worse odds than are being offered currently.

[tbird509]

watch and learn,theirs a posted 3 teamer alive,just waiting on den 2night,its on the 7th page

[FindTheLock]

watch and learn,theirs a posted 3 teamer alive,just waiting on den 2night,its on the 7th page

I am not learning anything from you. I understand 8th grade math and that means I understand your strategy is doomed to fail.

[hobbesITD]

You realize -350 and -400 teams don't win 100% of the time, right? Neither do -1000 nor -1500 teams. It isn't even that uncommon for them to lose.

[tbird509]

[QUOTE=FindTheLock;17996222]

you're betting on teams that have an 80 percent chance to win. You won 4 days in a row, but you have 4 losses coming and they will neutralize your wins instantly. You just have to hope you don't lose more than 4 to get GSP at worse odds than are being offered currently.

im well aware,my plays will be posted and the numbers will speak,just notice nobody will say anything when my teams win,and im keeping it that way

[tbird509]

You realize -350 and -400 teams don't win 100% of the time, right? Neither do -1000 nor -1500 teams. It isn't even that uncommon for them to lose.

this is true,gota stay on the right side,like i said,its hard enough to pick a winner,but im well aware of the variables that go into play

[FindTheLock]

this is true,gota stay on the right side,like i said,its hard enough to pick a winner,but im well aware of the variables that go into play

if you know that the teams you're backing in the first leg are going to win, then it would still benefit you mathematically to bet on them with all of your confidence. Parlaying them is just exposing yourself beyond your available profit margin.

[tbird509]

You realize -350 and -400 teams don't win 100% of the time, right? Neither do -1000 nor -1500 teams. It isn't even that uncommon for them to lose.

in this order,mlb,nba,nfl not to often you will ever see baseball money line over -400...the other 2 have huge favs

[tbird509]

if you know that the teams you're backing in the first leg are going to win, then it would still benefit you mathematically to bet on them with all of your confidence. Parlaying them is just exposing yourself beyond your available profit margin.

i dont wana risk -2500 when the nba calls for it 5x a week

[tbird509]

you risk more money betting straight up,thats the whole reason i parlay the bets

[hobbesITD]

i dont wana risk -2500 when the nba calls for it 5x a week

Why not? Aren't you always on the right side?

[FindTheLock]

you risk more money betting straight up,thats the whole reason i parlay the bets

no you don't actually. What are you betting on these teams in the first leg? I can actually prove to you that you do not risk more mathematically if you will just be honest about your bet sizes

[tbird509]

no you don't actually. What are you betting on these teams in the first leg? I can actually prove to you that you do not risk more mathematically if you will just be honest about your bet sizes

500 per parlay,dont usually and havent bet over 1000 this year on a parlay...all parlayed with gsp...look at 2days parlay,mia and den...both were over -500...

[tbird509]

3/4

gsp-470/mia-570/den-615 $250 pays $164

ok we won again

[FindTheLock]

If you bet 1000 on a -500 bet to win 200 and you win, then you have 1200 dollars. You started with 1000, and Now you have the option to bet the 1200 on GSP at -470. You will win the exact same amount (455.32) while risking the original 1000 dollars by parlaying these odds as a two team parlay with odds of -500 and -470. The difference is, when you bet on them straight up you do not need to win the second leg of the parlay to win 200 dollars.

[tbird509]

since march 1st and posting all plays risking $3000 to win $2326 all plays posted...were undefeated ...ive been on the heat since the superbowl when they started their streak....mia again for the cash

[FindTheLock]

since march 1st and posting all plays risking $3000 to win $2326 all plays posted...were undefeated ...ive been on the heat since the superbowl when they started their streak....mia again for the cash

you would actually win the exact same amount playing all of your bets straight up for each leg of the parlay. So while you think you are increasing your odds, you're really not.

[hobbesITD]

That's cool about March. On February 27th you went

GSP with Hou, so that's $500 to win $250 Loss
GSP with OKC so that's $1000 to win $130 win
GSP with SAN so that $1000 to win $121 loss

The same thing is going to happen this week. The odds will level out and you'll be wondering why you didn't just take GSP straight up.

[tbird509]

If you bet 1000 on a -500 bet to win 200 and you win, then you have 1200 dollars. You started with 1000, and Now you have the option to bet the 1200 on GSP at -470. You will win the exact same amount (455.32) while risking the original 1000 dollars by parlaying these odds as a two team parlay with odds of -500 and -470. The difference is, when you bet on them straight up you do not need to win the second leg of the parlay to win 200 dollars.

its common to see games -1500...no way in hell im putting up 3k to win 200,i guard my money not having to risk so much,i usually chip away at a very high percentage with different teams risking 500 a bet,that being said,im sticking with my way and if your way is better,then take these pick and bet away...this isnt a debate,this is what works for me....undefeated since fri,and doing this since 2007

[tbird509]

That's cool about March. On February 27th you went

GSP with Hou, so that's $500 to win $250 Loss
GSP with OKC so that's $1000 to win $130 win
GSP with SAN so that $1000 to win $121 loss

The same thing is going to happen this week. The odds will level out and you'll be wondering why you didn't just take GSP straight up.

read the march 1st again ..i said i had okc for 1000 and 250 on hou/spurs/gsp so if you go through the thread and reread it,you will see i didnt bet these plays

[tbird509]

and i still won $44 that day lol

[hobbesITD]

Winning four days in a row betting solely on heavy favourites has got to be one of the least impressive internet brags ever.

[tbird509]

my plays were okc-1500/gsp-470 1000 to win 293...gsp-470/spurs-3000/okc-1500/hou-350 i bet 250 on that 4teamer,its payed out179...so i still won 43 bucks... i wasnt sold on hou at home and spurs -3000 kills any parlay so i just tied then in with okc,and gsp....i called okc as my main bet last night....go back in the thread and look

their you guy for the who said i made those plays,so many idiots on here trying to hate,your lucky im posting these nba plays

[FindTheLock]

its common to see games -1500...no way in hell im putting up 3k to win 200,i guard my money not having to risk so much,i usually chip away at a very high percentage with different teams risking 500 a bet,that being said,im sticking with my way and if your way is better,then take these pick and bet away...this isnt a debate,this is what works for me....undefeated since fri,and doing this since 2007

haha if you bet on odds like this in the NBA then you're asking to get bent over eventually.