Originally posted by mcwmiamisc
-
get the **** outta hereComment -
Comment -
we don't give a shit about your system so get outta hereOriginally posted by mcwmiamiscComment -
Comment -
dunno what u exactly mean. But 1u=100$ would put 10k if u win 100 units overall. Of course u will lose more with 500$ as 1 unit, but u would win more instead. But that is pretty simple maths and everyone has to make sure how big 1 unit is for themselve.Originally posted by mcwmiamisc
As i already said u can not generalize every series lose on -30 units, it varies from series to series.
Watching champions league final. Pretty sure bayern will take this btw.Comment -
What triggers the certain teams inserted into the S1, S2, and S3?Comment -
Stifler is that system is your project ? And i'm interesting too why only that teams playing in systems.
For example why not Atlanta in S3 ? From 2006-2011 3 chases lose, with 2 in 2006, but about 10 units each i think.Comment -
i have the data for every team from 2006-2011. The teams showing the best numbers and constance were picked for the system. There are other teams who showed profit over the years aswell, but the listed teams had the best numbers overall.Comment -
Good luck tonight all "D" players. Let's do this.Comment -
both games 0-4 :/Comment -
Already time to chase tomorrow!Comment -
Getting our clocks cleaned if both of these D games lose tonite.........not pretty at this point.......Comment -
And system will be on -6 units now after 2 monthsComment -
Its already in the negative if both these loseComment -
This is typical. When a systems winning no one says anything, as soon as it suffers some losses (which are inevitable) everyone comes out of the woodwork bashing it.Comment -
Not bashing it, Lakey. I'm actually playing it and only stated the obvious that if both D bets lose tonite (Washington still showing signs of life as I type this while Cubs are off of life support), we are getting our clocks cleaned. I am aware losses occur in all systems but if we get two more tonite, that's 3 in the first 5 weeks or so of the season and that doesn't bode well to me.......Originally posted by LakeyComment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 7 | L 0 (+7 unit)
S2: W 7 | L 0 (+7 unit)
S3: W 56 | L 3 (-20,472)
pending:
S2 (B Bet) SD fade: B Bet on 21.05.2012
Balti fade series: -21,017 units
Cubs series: -20,475 unitsComment -
20.05.2012
S1
(A Bet) NYY: Ny Yankees 1,637 1,57u
S2
(A Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50uComment -
Thanks for posting the games!!Comment -
stick with it. don't worry about us nay sayers!! This kind of betting just isn't for everyone. way to big of a risk for me. maybe cause I don't go by the past. but good luck.Originally posted by LakeyComment -
Thx for the honesty in your overall units won/lost. So many knuckleheads out there wanting to get their ego stroked.Comment -
21.05.2012
S1
(B Bet) NYY: Ny Yankees 1,637 1,57u | NY Yankees 1,606 4,24u
(B Bet) SD fade: Washington 1,45 2,22u | St. Louis 1,559 5,76u
S2
(B Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50u | Phillies 2,08 2,315u
S3
(A Bet) Tor fade: Tampa Bay 1,68 1,47u
(A Bet) SD fade: St. Louis 1,559 1,79u
(A Bet) Stl: St. Louis 1,559 1,79u
potential plays: Balti, Pit, Cin, Oak, Cubs fade, SF fade (all depends on line movement)
St. Louis is a triple play today. Im playing every St.Louis game on the -1RL. Hopefully today will be a solid day, otherwise its pretty hard to bet that amount in the next stage. We will see!Comment -
21.05.2012
S1
(B Bet) NYY: Ny Yankees 1,637 1,57u | NY Yankees 1,606 4,24u
(B Bet) SD fade: Washington 1,45 2,22u | St. Louis 1,559 5,76u
S2
(B Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50u | Phillies 2,08 2,315u
S3
(A Bet) Tor fade: Tampa Bay 1,68 1,47u
(A Bet) SD fade: St. Louis 1,559 1,79u
(A Bet) Stl: St. Louis 1,559 1,79u
(A Bet) Pit: Pittsburgh 1,877 1,14u
.....added Pittsburgh S3Comment -
21.05.2012
S1
(B Bet) NYY: Ny Yankees 1,637 1,57u | NY Yankees 1,606 4,24u
(B Bet) SD fade: Washington 1,45 2,22u | St. Louis 1,559 5,76u
S2
(B Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50u | Phillies 2,08 2,315u
S3
(A Bet) Tor fade: Tampa Bay 1,68 1,47u
(A Bet) SD fade: St. Louis 1,559 1,79u
(A Bet) Stl: St. Louis 1,559 1,79u
(A Bet) Pit: Pittsburgh 1,877 1,14u
(A Bet) Balti: Baltimore 2,01 0,99u
...added Baltimore S3Comment -
some late line movement yesterday. Balti exactly wasnt a game, Cin and SF fade were both games due to line movement. I will leave it like it is, still thinking abou what to do with the Balti series play...Originally posted by Stifler
records:
S1: W 8 | L 0 (+8 unit)
S2: W 7 | L 0 (+7 unit)
S3: W 59 | L 3 (-17,472)Comment -
22.05.2012
S1
(C Bet) NYY: Ny Yankees 1,637 1,57u | NY Yankees 1,606 4,24u | NY Yankees 1,575 11,84u
S2
(C Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50u | Phillies 2,08 2,315u | Phillies 1,671 7,18u
S3
(B Bet) Tor fade: Tampa Bay 1,68 1,47u | Tampa Bay 1,769 3,21u
(A Bet) CHW: White Sox 1,617 1,62u
- potential plays: S3 Det
i personally take the 1u hit with the balti series, for the system Balti wasnt a play. I played NYY -15 today and Phillies -1, still the play on the ml would be the right choice, but my bankroll doesnt make it possible.
Do or die day for me personally today, as i started pretty aggressive with only 30 units.
Comment -
22.05.2012
S1
(C Bet) NYY: Ny Yankees 1,637 1,57u | NY Yankees 1,606 4,24u | NY Yankees 1,575 11,84u
S2
(C Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50u | Phillies 2,08 2,315u | Phillies 1,671 7,18u
S3
(B Bet) Tor fade: Tampa Bay 1,68 1,47u | Tampa Bay 1,769 3,21u
(A Bet) CHW: White Sox 1,617 1,62u
(A Bet) Det fade: Cleveland 1,917 1,09u
- S3 Det fade added.Comment -
records:Originally posted by Stifler
S1: W 9 | L 0 (+9 unit)
S2: W 7 | L 0 (+7 unit)
S3: W 61 | L 3 (-15,472)
i personally ****** it with playing NYY -1,5. Pretty much busted now...even Stl triple play just was a push for me the evening before, cause i played -1RL, but had to play it that way, as i started with a small bankroll for this system.
For those still playing the system, Phillies is a D Bet today and White Sox B Bet.
I will leave this thread alone, im going to put everything left on a small soccer parlay @ the weekend. If this works out i will continue playing this system, but not posting anymore (i still have faith in the systems). For those that keep playing the system (i doubt it) all rules were listed. If there are any questions left i will try to answer them.
Gl whatever ur going to do.Comment -
Hey Stifler, I still believe in this system and wanna continue it. But I am having a tough time understanding your S3 plays. So as long as the home team is favorite it qualifies? As long as road teams are underdogs, you fade them? Also do you have a spreadsheet to help find out the next S1 and S2 picks? Thanks Stifler, really hoping you continue posting...Comment -
S3 rules: Whenever a team starts a home trip of 4 games or more and this team has <+100 odds in the first game start a 4 game chase. Whenever a team starts a road trip with 4 games or more and this team has +100 odds in the first road game, start a 4 game chase. Only the teams listed in post #1 qualify for this system.Originally posted by aznknightt
I will keep posting the plays till the end of the weekend. If im going to hit the parlay im going to continue posting, otherwise there is no real motivation for me, when im not betting the games for myself.Comment -
23.05.2012S1
(A Bet) Stl fade: San Diego 3,07 0,483u
S2
(D Bet) Phil: Phillies 1,667 1,50u | Phillies 2,08 2,315u | Phillies 1,671 7,18u | Phillies 1,654 18,34u
S3
(B Bet) CHW: White Sox 1,617 1,62u | White Sox 1,662 3,958u
Comment -
Stifler, do you have a link for a spreadsheet or something that would show upcoming plays, or is it dependent on the odds of team when series starts? I will continue following it, depending on what happens with Philly, been a lot of D bets so close together, harder to play all with a smaller bankroll like mine. Thanks for your hard work.Comment -
its not possible to show the upcoming matches. For S1 + S2 streaks decide whether its a game or not. For S3 lines make the decision.Comment -
Thank you Philly!! Almost buried me, let's get hot again!Comment -
is there anyone that plans to keep this system going?Comment
