-
Comment -
Systems
All three of his baseball systems have been out for more than one full season.
It really has nothing to do with JM anymore. He's just the marketer. The systems win with proper discipline are a basis for some smart plays. Can't lose your head tho...
Good luck rest of season!Comment -
Does anyone know exactly when V3 was released? Was it last August or beginning of last season?Comment -
Goooo ColoradoComment -
Stickbit, you probably think about the "unofficial plays", because there were a few losses last year..But in the V3 MLB system, there were no losses last year.
The "unofficial plays" come from the V1 system. They are the plays that do not fall under the .015 RPI criteria. That is why they are "unofficial".Comment -
Nice. Colorado won 3:2 ! I had it on ML, and very small on the -1.5 RL.. oh well, at least we didn't lost the B bet..Comment -
yes I had the same thing.Comment -
The 7 V3 wins were as follows (and all won on the A bet):
8/5/2009 FLORIDA
8/12/2009 COLORADO
8/12/2009 TEXAS
8/22/2009 PHILADELPHIA
8/26/2009 PHILADELPHIA
8/26/2009 CHICAGO CUBS
8/29/2009 LA DODGERSComment -
When are the NeXT v1 bet?Comment -
OAK vs LAA
However current RPI is greater that .15 but I/m not sure if ESPN site is updated. Let's wait for a few hoursComment -
nicee guys, thank you a lot, really
dont know do you remeberme, but im from croatia and i joined here about month ago. im playing only official games that you post here and for now im about 200€ in plus 
so, when will be next official game?
Comment -
200€ plus on only 6 games or something, that's just over 30€ /game! Take it easy, you have have been lucky and hit Every game ob the A level so long, right? Imagine it goes to à C bet, then it Will be really expensive! If it goes to C bet and the odds is bad, around 1,5 then the B bet Will cost you around 200€ and C bet around 400 €! So u neeed à bankroll around 700 € to cover it!Comment -
isn't seat. an unofficial play also? (& possible v3 if they win?)
hey mminkovski: got a question for yourself or anyone. it's kinda got me stumped, & maybe you or someone could simplify & help me see the light.
Of the two jm quotes below,(from 3 different pdf's), i have found the first one easier to understand than the 2nd. And it almost seems like they contradict one another, unless jm is talkin about swept teams vs. teams that swept. It's probably just the wording, but not quite sure.
1. Pass on any series where the team you’re supposed to wager on has an RPI value that's more than .015 lower than our opponent's.
2.On the first day of the rematch between the two teams, as long as the team that was swept previously has an RPI value of no less than .015 than the opposing team, make a bet for the team that was swept.
I get lost on #2, so i just follow #1. With oak. currently having a .017 rpi, it simply tells me that they're just a couple pts. shy of being official. Any input & enlightment would be appreciated.
Could be i just suck w/ #'s.
Comment -
Jphil, I also read rule #2 somewhere in his pdfs, and decided that he made a mistake, because of other statements and examples he has written. The principle is that the team that was swept (ie the one we bet on) must be good enough to win (on the ML or +RL if available) at least one game in the series. The official criteria is that the swept team's RPI, if not higher than, must not be more than, .015 less than their opponents.
So, you are correct to follow #1. JM could write better.
Regards
KevComment -
I see 2 plays for today:
(ML play) Seattle Mariners [bet A] vs. Texas Rangers (Unofficial: 0.33 rpi difference) -> probable v3 play on Texas tommorow if Seattle wins tonight
(ML play) Oakland Athletics [bet A] vs. Los Angeles Angels - 0.15 rpi difference but like "mminkovski" wrote earlier it can be updated through the day. Both teams won their last game so there is also a chance that nothing will change.Comment -
So u guys gonna make this bet or not? We lost one unofficial last week with Baltimore!Comment -
Oak is exactly .15 lower than LAA- It looks like a good bet.Comment -
If Oakland lose the A bet, then Oakland might be more than 0.015 lower than LAA on the B bet. Should Oakland then be a play?Comment -
Consider this scenario:
At the moment, OAK is just nice at 0.15 RPI less than LAA.
When [A] bet loses, OAK's RPI will drop such that the RPI is more than 0.15.
Then [B] and [C] lose.
JM will then say "series is void, because RPI is more than 0.15".Comment -
True- but I follow the west pretty close and the A's look like a good bet even without the system- but it does fit the systems parameters.Comment -
Like Sheep to the Slaughter.Comment -
John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ Official System Pick(s)
6/7 Oakland Athletics [A]
LA Angels
Note: My MLB system has only lost 1 time in 6 years! We are 5-0 in the last 5 [A] bets!
Note #2: There is also an unofficial series with Seattle starting with the [A] bet if you wish to wager on them. The betting series is unofficial because the RPI difference between the 2 teams are just too great.Comment -
Bah Bah!!Comment -
Any method that relies on any variant of a progressive betting scheme will ultimately self-destruct. The problem is betting a lot to win a little which is the opposite of proper risk/reward money management theory. When you lose a [c] bet or bets, you run the risk of gambler's ruin. It doesn't matter if Morrison or any other progressive schemer wins for 10 years without a loss. At some point it time, you will lose and lot and destroy your bankroll. Professional sports bettors (who bet a lot per unit) do not employ progressive betting. Many amateurs (who bet a little per unit) do. Logically, that should tell you a lot.Comment -
I have the V1 plays as 7-1, V2 plays as 2-0 and V3 plays as 1-0 so far this year (not including unofficial). Could anyone confirm if I am missing any?Comment -
I know it's not the right place to write this, but as the LA lakers are traveling to Boston for the next 3 games, they qualify as A B C BetsComment -
Today the Chicago Cubs play at Pittsburgh the 3rd game of their series, since the Cubs lost their first 2 games (May 31st. and June 1st.), losing today will make them elegible to play in the re-match in June 28 - 29 - 30 at Chicago.Comment -
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR KELLOGGS
Kelloggs, you transposed Texas and Seattle on your spreadsheet, such that it appears that Texas are the team to play. I didn't check the history between them and played Texas this morning, before I received JM's e-mail. You can imagine that I was quite surprised to see Seattle as the team to bet on (unofficially) in JM's e-mail.
Its not a huge problem because Texas will probabaly win, as the better team, and if they don't win they become a V3 play, anyway.
Thought I would let you know.
Regards
KevComment -
SpookyFellow:Yes. If a team is eligible for the system you then start the series and you must see it to the end.If Oakland lose the A bet, then Oakland might be more than 0.015 lower than LAA on the B bet. Should Oakland then be a play?
Regards
KevComment
