I'm not sure what your question is, but both of the latest bets are for the respective player to win the match, now non-void as the first set has been completed in both matches.
-
Comment -
Yes I was wondering if you picked both to win outright. I like to follow your picks as you seem very knowledgeable about tennis.Comment -
I'd say I'm better at betting tennis (reading specific matches and how they are reflected in the odds) than at having knowledge of the actual sports and its technicalities, but thanks!
Also, if the bets are not ML (money-line/match-line/outright), it will be noted in the post.Comment -
Any thoughts on Nadal?. Im used to high juice but made a good but last year betting tennis and high juice, mainly majors and favorites in early rounds.Comment -
I think the odds on offer for Nadal @ 1.16 are shit, and would not touch them. If anything Verdasco looks tempting as Nadal brand inflates the odds of his opponent; partly justified, partly not.Comment -
Errani @ 3.95
Comment -
Bellis @ 14.5
Comment -
Might take the spread on Verdasco or the over at 20.5, that's probably what I end up going with.Comment -
Verdasco could lose 6-0;6-0, or he could win in straights. What I do know is this: Nadal has not been consistently good at all this year. He simply has not played anyone that good. Raonic beat him last week and he didn't play great; barely even good IMO.
Also, Verdasco's form the past couple of weeks seems decent or better, whereas Nadal was shit against Almugro and Young both.Comment -
Tailing you on Bellis. But taking her at +7 for 1 unitComment -
My thoughts on that one is that Serena's status is very questionable, and she wasn't playing well at all last week either. Even if she doesn't retire, it is quite reasonable to expect her to perform poorly, by her standards. Bellis meanwhile has been putting in impressive results this week and isn't the worst case for fading Serena, especially at such high odds.
Again, much like in the case of Nadal–Verdasco, she could get smoked 6-0;6-0, but I foresee a mediocre Serena potentially struggling against an audacious and confident youngster.Comment -
F-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-fer-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-rNANDOo-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o @ 7.8
Comment -
Lisicki @ 3 – 2 units
Comment -
Rafa looking like poo wish I tailedComment -
It's not like it's a newsflash. Is this the first time you're watching Nadal? He has been looking like whoreshit all year, and he keeps winning matches against the midgets that constitute most of the ATP tour. It's just what he does best: Winning doing absolutely nothing. The most hilarious thing of all is that he'll probably win Roland Garros in the exact same fashion!
Thoroughly expect Fiasco to find a way of losing this one too!Comment -
Only the second time I've been laid up on the couch in time to catch him play actually. He didn't look bad in whatever it was I saw him play previously, but as you mentioned, it was probably against some cupcake. Incidentally, I do think the wind is partly to blame for fugging him up a bit.Comment -
If Fiasco does manage to go up a break in 3:rd I'm hedging the f*ck out, lol...Comment -
Just didComment -
Hedged for 70% of initial profit after the hold with Verdasco @ 1.39 (Nadal @ 3.6).Comment -
What's best site to watch tennis live ESPN sucksComment -
The bookies are the best since they are the only ones whose feeds aren't delayed by five or more seconds.
Secondary alternatives:
Now why the f*ck would you post this here?
Comment -
Lisicki @ 3.2 – 2 units
Comment -
Garcia-Lopez 2-1 @ 5.2 – 2 units
Comment -
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Total Wins: 44
Total Losses: 79
Total stake: 177u
Yield (including commission): +29.3149u
Return on investment (rounded): 16.56%Comment -
Good times, bad times... lucky day that Sunday!
I recognize that this thread is unsatisfactory in terms of tailability (making words up is enjoyable, after all), more than anything because a lot of bets are posted more or less close towards the start of a match. This is generally speaking due to late odds movement (meaning in this case either that odds become better just before a match starts prompting me to make a bet, or that my bet just wasn't matched until late for that same reason), or myself just making the actual decision to bet with short notice.
Because of the aforementioned, I will attempt to:
1. Post bets earlier whenever feasible.
2. Post thoughts on potential bets – leans, if you will – of mine, so as to be more helpful and with longer notice.Comment -
On the men's side, there is not a whole lot in today's pre-match markets that appeals to me. Bellucci @ 4+, Darcis @ 25+, and Rosol @ 8+ might be worth a shot, although I'm not sure. The only thing that really stands out to me on the men's side is Dimitrov @ 1.7+, who I think will win rather comfortably against an over-rated Isner.
As for the women's pre-match markets, a red-hot (in the strictly figurative sense) Suarez-Navarro to beat a pathetic wanker @ 2.3++ is a must-play for me, as is Gavrilova @ 3+, to a lesser extent. Petkovic around @ 3 might be worth a try given how well she was playing against Mladenovic, although troll-faced Makaron has been playing well in her past couple of matches, seemingly. Lisicki (who is granted yet another night-session) @ 1.65+ and possibly Venus @ 1.8+ are the only favorites that really catch my eye.
N.B: None of the above bets have been made at this time, and there is no guarantee whatsoever that they ever will be. Only bets posted individually and in bold herein (this thread) have actually been made by me.Last edited by Hardcoar; 03-30-15, 04:30 AM.Comment -
Suarez-Navarro @ 2.44 – 3 units
Comment -
First of all, great job yesterday! Big underdogs were winning left and right. It was kind of a day that I like as well.
You have some interesting leans today. It would be interesting to hear if you have any special reasons why you like them. For example, I will most likely get on Rosol today. He is one of those guys who really struggles to get out of the lossing streak. But once he gets couple of consecutive wins under his belt, he becomes really dangerous and a potential giant killer. He had a decent run in IW. He started of well in this tournament and imho David is not as solid as he was before. These odds look really nice.
Speaking about Isner, you are probably right about him being overrated. But imho, Grigor is getting very close to him in that category. Also, surface similar to one in IW. Bouncy. Great kick serve which is difficult to control for single-handed backhands...
Bellucci maybe. Just because Dolgopolov is still Dolgopolov. But match should be played out pretty similar as the one against Roberdo, I believe. These dirtballers doesn't like to be rushed into their shots and ukrainan does exactly that.Comment -
Now there's the real badger, not that phony badger-king-usurping bitch!
With Rosol, like you say, it's that he can win against essentially anyone if he has a good performance, and with a few matches won excluding a tight loss to Birdshit in Indian Wells that isn't all too unlikely to happen. Meanwhile, Ferrer has not been looking anywhere near his great and unless he lifts his level he could easily struggle.
I absolutely agree that Dimitrov is overrated in general, but I think that has not been the case this particular tournament. He was quite outstanding against Pospisil, as well.
I also agree on Bellucci. It being Dogpoolove and those odds makes it worth a try potentially, however. If the Ukrainian is solid throughout Tomaz likely won't stand a true chance, but that isn't too likely to happen, to me. Also, the commie-bastards will be out in force for that one!
I suppose we mostly agree then? lol...Last edited by Hardcoar; 03-30-15, 05:09 AM.Comment -
When was I a phony Badger? I had to google what "usurping" means.
If I understood well, you do not appreciate that I am not as active as I was before in this tennis sub-forum. Guilty. 
Speeking of WTA, I am undecided on CSN, but gonna tail you with that one, considering you seem pretty confident .
Petko @3 not enough for me. Have a lot respect for Makarova. Most of the times she is just too solid for these girls "in the middle of the pack/ranking".Comment -
I never said you are a phony badger. I'm saying you're not, actually. This is the imposter:
Comment -
Oh, I get it now. We're cool
(despite the fact you reffered to me as "serbian piece of shit" in that other thread )
Comment -
I was wondering whether you'd seen that. I suppose that eliminated the possibility of you not seeing it.
You are Serbian, are you not?
Comment -
Yup
Comment -
CASH DAT N1GGA!
Comment
