My reasoning is the same reasoning I gave in chat before the Nadal/Sod match and believed before the Fed/Monfils match. My problem is that I got bored and bet the other matches today for fun.
Anyway my reasoning is this: Every time one of these "big" matches happens, in any tournament, men or women, people naturally lean or even bet the over. Stats don't normally support it - just like they don't here regardless of who wins (even worse so because they're on clay) - yet it's almost like people NEED to see an epic match.
And it doesn't happen more often than not. I've fallen into this trap many times. There are no stats to support this play. This is sheer hope. Hope that Federer can keep it close and ruin Djoko's streak, hope that Fed can keep it close but Djoko can ultimately prevail, etc...
I've been sucked into this too many times and the numbers don't lie. Four months ago Djoko beat Fed on his best surface in straight sets. For me to think that this will be a close match now, on clay, would be ridiculous of me. Fed didn't look infallible yesterday - not even close. He merely came up against a jackoff player who is lucky to have enough natural talent to allow him to get to that stage. He's a twit - no consistency, physical form is off, etc...
I'm not saying Djokovic is going to smoke Federer here but I've learned my lesson after too many times doing the opposite. In fact I was most likely on the over in the Aussie Open. Fed has too many errors for me to back an over here. If he's going to win, he'll do it in 3. He'll come out like a flash of lightning and destroy Djokovic. He's not going to beat him in a grinding match - definitely not on clay. If Djoko is going to win, I think he'll do it in 3, MAYBE 4. I'd be very surprised if this is an epic 5 setter and I'll be more than happy to suck up my $200 loss if I'm on the under and it is