Originally posted by Fishhead
Wilheim/TheRX's Decision of EasyStreet Casino dispute
Collapse
X
-
HedgeHogSBR Posting Legend
- 09-11-07
- 10128
#36Comment -
KGamblerSBR MVP
- 07-09-09
- 2404
#37Originally posted by HedgeHogNo offense, but you were defending this Wilheim as an honorable mediator a few days ago. The guy is a puppet with Powers' hand up his sorry ass.
Welcome aboard...Comment -
KGamblerSBR MVP
- 07-09-09
- 2404
#38This report is so absurd that it has to be viewed as a relatively positive development for the player. Cory should take this case to Bryan at Casinomeister. He should contact DGS for comment. They should be very interested in this report. He should write to the WizardOfOdds (website), who will probably have fun shredding their pathetic arguments.
It's true that no one can force ezstreet to pay. But the incompetence, ignorance and dishonesty of easystreet's management, along with that of their "mediator" (read "paid shill") Wilheim, has been exposed. I believe that EZstreet is going to go out of business, and that this will largely be due to the release of this report.Comment -
HedgeHogSBR Posting Legend
- 09-11-07
- 10128
#39Originally posted by KGamblerI could have sworn you were parroting Shilheim's attacks on Cory as if they were actual facts.
Welcome aboard...Comment -
yokspotSBR Sharp
- 11-16-05
- 287
#40Sorry, but the following statement is nonsense:
The odds of hitting 3 royal flushes in 8762 hands of poker is statistically impossible.
What kind of an expert says that one in 700 is "impossible"?
2) 3 royals in 8762 hands uses only the sessions that include a royal. This is invalid because you cannot selectively choose the data that suits your contention, you must use ALL data. This applies to players who bitch about their results, and also to casinos.
The above statement was not made by an expert. It was made by someone who understands neither mathematics nor the correct way to do tests.
It is not out of the question that the OP used a bot, but nothing in this "expert" report is relevant to the matter.Comment -
KGamblerSBR MVP
- 07-09-09
- 2404
#41Originally posted by HedgeHogNot at all. I always thought EZ should pay in full. I just felt that the Books Cory scammed should get reimbursed first before he saw a dime.Comment -
KGamblerSBR MVP
- 07-09-09
- 2404
#42Originally posted by yokspotSorry, but the following statement is nonsense:
1) No it isn't. The odds are (about) one in 700. This is comparable to winning 9 straight hands at blackjack. Has any blackjack player NOT seen such a run at some time? I've seen many such.
What kind of an expert says that one in 700 is "impossible"?
2) 3 royals in 8762 hands uses only the sessions that include a royal. This is invalid because you cannot selectively choose the data that suits your contention, you must use ALL data. This applies to players who bitch about their results, and also to casinos.
The above statement was not made by an expert. It was made by someone who understands neither mathematics nor the correct way to do tests.
It is not out of the question that the OP used a bot, but nothing in this "expert" report is relevant to the matter.
The chances are less than 1 in 700. Statistically impossible?
And Cory played over 22,000 hands at ezstreet. Shilheim just straight up lied about the number of hands played.
Cory's next step should be to use this report to make sure that ezstreet cannot advertise at any reputable websites. For example, getting easystreet rogued at Casinomeister is a slam dunk once he shows them this report.Comment -
pokerplayer22SBR MVP
- 05-09-09
- 1207
#43This is probably a dumb question, but cant anything be done if Cory contacted the Costra Rica chamber of commerce and alerted them of a company scamming money from people. Obviosuly running a sportsbook in CR is perfectly legal but stealing money from people surely cannot be.Comment -
yokspotSBR Sharp
- 11-16-05
- 287
#44It occurs to me that the "expert" has essentially accused the software of being non-random. If it's "statistically impossible", then that can be the only explanation as such a thing cannot happen on random software. However, the software provider has already stated that there were no anolalies, which is entirely contradictory.
I think that mustn't have occured to the "expert", which doesn't entirely surprise me at this point.
I'm sure Mike Shakleford (Wiz Of Odds) would be more than happy to refute this "expert" testimony, being an actual expert, as opposed to a casino hack.
This isn't the first time I've seen a casino accuse it's software supplier of being non-random. Casinos are so uniquely clueless.Comment -
duritoSBR Posting Legend
- 07-03-06
- 13173
#45Originally posted by HedgeHogNo offense, but you were defending this Wilheim as an honorable mediator a few days ago. The guy is a puppet with Powers' hand up his sorry ass.Comment -
duritoSBR Posting Legend
- 07-03-06
- 13173
#46Originally posted by pokerplayer22This is probably a dumb question, but cant anything be done if Cory contacted the Costra Rica chamber of commerce and alerted them of a company scamming money from people. Obviosuly running a sportsbook in CR is perfectly legal but stealing money from people surely cannot be.Comment -
yokspotSBR Sharp
- 11-16-05
- 287
#47My post above, which I put at RX also, was deleted. I thought it might be, which is why I copied it here.
I know mediating where business partners are involved can be very tough, but this is farcical.Comment -
McFly86SBR High Roller
- 01-15-11
- 149
#48Originally posted by stevenash6) Based on my review of the play logs, research of the EasyStreet system, and discussions with other industry professionals; it is my professional opinion that the player used a bot or some other form of machine augmented assistance to play the hands at a rate fast enough to attempt to overwhelm the RNG and provide favorable odds to the "player".
How fast do you need to play in order to "overwhelm" the RNG?
What does it mean to "overwhelm" a RNG?Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65868
#49Originally posted by McFly86How fast do you need to play in order to "overwhelm" the RNG?
What does it mean to "overwhelm" a RNG?Comment -
BirreSBR High Roller
- 08-12-10
- 225
#50Oh my god, statistically impossible to hit 3 royal flushes in 22k hands.
An "expert" that makes such claims hasn't mastered basics maths.
Also that "expert" has to take all the hands into account that cory played at EZ
We all know their is no expert. I would really like if SBR would edit his post and post the probability of hitting 3 royals in 22k hands, next to the "expert" claim saying 1 in 700 is statistically impossible
As yokspot says, you could call in a third and real expert from wizardofodds.Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65868
#51Originally posted by duritoThe rx and wilheim never had any credibility.Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39219
#52Originally posted by stevenashWil recovered tens of thousands of dollars for players that got stiffed from BoS and made sure players got paid 5 years ago.Comment -
duritoSBR Posting Legend
- 07-03-06
- 13173
#53Originally posted by stevenashWil recovered tens of thousands of dollars for players that got stiffed from BoS and made sure players got paid 5 years ago.
How about the millions sportsbook and sbg (their current sponsors) have stolen? Would Wil like to help with those?Comment -
BirreSBR High Roller
- 08-12-10
- 225
#54Originally posted by stevenashWil recovered tens of thousands of dollars for players that got stiffed from BoS and made sure players got paid 5 years ago.Comment -
FishheadSBR Aristocracy
- 08-11-05
- 40179
#55Originally posted by yokspotMy post above, which I put at RX also, was deleted. I thought it might be, which is why I copied it here.
I know mediating where business partners are involved can be very tough, but this is farcical.
Not sure if TheRX is closing shop and/or in some type of ownership partnership with Easystreet.
Perhaps bothComment -
duritoSBR Posting Legend
- 07-03-06
- 13173
#56Originally posted by FishheadPosts are being deleted, threads locked, posters banned..............INCREDIBLE.
Not sure if TheRX is closing shop and/or in some type of ownership partnership with Easystreet.
Perhaps bothComment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65868
#57ask him, all I know is he got me 100 percent of my BoS balance (4200) after they closed.
Without him, I got squat, forgive me for saying a nice thing or two about him.Comment -
pokerplayer22SBR MVP
- 05-09-09
- 1207
#58Originally posted by BirreThis gives him the right to make ridiculous claims and make up fake experts?Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39219
#59hell.......... tony is a scumbag liar at 5dimes also. why dont you all bring him down alsoComment -
duritoSBR Posting Legend
- 07-03-06
- 13173
#60Originally posted by firedawghell.......... tony is a scumbag liar at 5dimes also. why dont you all bring him down alsoComment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65868
#61Originally posted by duritoTony is a dick, but he is fair. He doesn't steal.Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39219
#62Originally posted by duritoTony is a dick, but he is fair. He doesn't steal.Comment -
pokerplayer22SBR MVP
- 05-09-09
- 1207
#63Originally posted by firedawghell.......... tony is a scumbag liar at 5dimes also. why dont you all bring him down alsoComment -
mrmarketSBR MVP
- 01-26-10
- 4953
#64Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65868
#65Originally posted by firedawgwell..... maybe your right, but he is a dick and no way they deserve A+ rating.... biggest jag off out there
5D pays quicker than quick.
I don't care how gruff Tony is, even though he's treated me right for 5 + years now, 5D does everything they promise to do, and then some.Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39219
#66Originally posted by stevenashYes, they do.
5D pays quicker than quick.
I don't care how gruff Tony is, even though he's treated me right for 5 + years now, 5D does everything they promise to do, and then some.Comment -
stevenashModerator
- 01-17-11
- 65868
#67Tony's never been rude to me for some reason.Comment -
firedawgBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-08-08
- 39219
#68Originally posted by stevenashTony's never been rude to me for some reason.Comment -
mikeygRestricted User
- 02-25-10
- 399
#69Total crap
Besides "Stevex" who like to suck dyck for freeplays from Sleezysports
Anybody that posts up there is an complete FOOL
This shop needs to be rated F..... PERIODComment -
WVUSBR Sharp
- 02-01-08
- 417
#70Originally posted by stevenashWil recovered tens of thousands of dollars for players that got stiffed from BoS and made sure players got paid 5 years ago.
Wil also failed to uncover 100's of thousands in that same BOS Fiasco. I alone got ****** out of more than he was able to recover.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code