correlated parlay question

[stefan084]

I have a correlated parlay bet that can't lose but I am afraid I will be kicked out of my sportsbook if I raise the amount bet. So far I just tried it with small bets---does anyone how I should proceed with this? --new member

[Fishhead]

Make certain you give the shop other action.

Throw some other parlays into the mix.

Fwiw, I don't think you have to worry much if your wagers do not exceed $200-300........but still would throw the other parlays in the bunch on occassion, as well as straight wagers.

[ABEHONEST]

I have a correlated parlay bet that can't lose but I am afraid I will be kicked out of my sportsbook if I raise the amount bet. So far I just tried it with small bets---does anyone how I should proceed with this? --new member

Sounds like Betcascade ?

[ManOfValue]

I would LOVE to know what is "the bet that can't lose" ...All due respect.

[LT Profits]

Book that allows +1.5/Under same game parlays on games with total of 7.5 or less?

[Bluehorseshoe]

Book that allows +1.5/Under same game parlays on games with total of 7.5 or less?

That lost twice on Sunday with San Diego and Boston.

[stefan084]

it is a golf bet where you parlay 2 sets of (golfer x,golfer y) vs field, then (golfers x,golfer y,golfer z) to win, placing the mathematically correct amounts

[xyz]

it is a golf bet where you parlay 2 sets of (golfer x,golfer y) vs field, then (golfers x,golfer y,golfer z) to win, placing the mathematically correct amounts

I don't see how this is a can't lose parlay. What if golfer w wins the tournament? I agree it is a 100% correlated parlay. But golf odds, especiallly the ones for winning the tournament are highly juiced up, much worst than your normal -110/-110 variety.

[LT Profits]

That lost twice on Sunday with San Diego and Boston.

But it won't lose long term.

Anyhow it is irrelevant, the OP was taking about Golf matchups and tourney odds.

[stefan084]

parlay answer

by parlaying slightly different bets with the same golfers ex (golfers x,y vs Field)+(x,y,z vs Field ) as one parlay,then (x,y to win)+(x,y,z to win) as your second parlay which reduces vig. I then put a very small amount on "z" alone who was at +675 (Tom Watson)

[stefan084]

CORRECTION----Field vs(x,y,z)+Fieldvs(x,y) as one, then (x,y,z to win)+ (x,y to win) +z --sorry, no much sleep last night

[stefan084]

not