Originally posted by michael777
I suppose if you were a little more intelligent you would have mentioned the Dunning-Kruger study at Cornell University.
But you did an OK job at positing an unsubstantiated slight.
Most people have no background in Rhetoric, so they wouldn't even spot the fact that your statement violates the Meta Modal. Nor would they even realize that you've offered no objective definition of the word "dumb".
Nor would they realize that you've taken no objective measurements.
What? You drew that conclusion using your Dumb-O-Meter?
"A classic case" . . . sounds so established, doesn't it?
LOL



Yuck!
) but your arrogance and unwillingness to concede anything to others or open your mind to differences of opinions sort of negates it. Be cool, dude.