I'd like an assist from someone with 400+ posts

[Justin7]

On June 9, 2009, Ecuador and Argentina played.

What were the closing 1-x-2 prices for both game and first half odds?

[Toit]

I've got some extra posts with another account.

Betfair:

Match odds: 2.77 - 3.19 - 2.73 (netto)
Half time: 3.42 - 2.08 - 3.38 (netto)

My oddschecker says it was played june 10th 23.00 hrs CET.

[Justin7]

Thanks. Do you have a shilbet history also?

[Toit]

Thanks. Do you have a shilbet history also?

No, never even heard of the book until I read about it on this board.

[Frank]

I have 400 bets placed this week.

What does 400+ posts have anything to do with anything.

http://www.flashscore.com/detail/soccer.php?match=187428&gmt_offset=-7200&tab=1

Click show more bookmakers

Those are the 3 ways. 1st half not listed.

Shillbets numbers were way off market.

[Justin7]

Frank,

Thanks for the reply. Mainly I wanted line histories, and I wanted people that weren't involved in the dispute (like you) to show me.

Shilbet is claiming that this line was actually their first half line, which I find incredulous. 3.1 for h1 tie?

[Toit]

Frank,

Shilbet is claiming that this line was actually their first half line, which I find incredulous. 3.1 for h1 tie?

That's ridiculous.

2.1 was the highest odd on offer.

[Frank]

Frank,

Thanks for the reply. Mainly I wanted line histories, and I wanted people that weren't involved in the dispute (like you) to show me.

Shilbet is claiming that this line was actually their first half line, which I find incredulous. 3.1 for h1 tie?

I am not involved in the dispute.

You must be thinking of someone else.

[InTheHole]

I am not involved in the dispute.

You must be thinking of someone else.

like you (ie you werent involved in the dispute)

[noyb]

justin, go to oddsoddsodds.com (register a free account for more books), you have full odds archive ("Odds Archive" in left menu, and change "Default" to "Details") of this particular match and when which book moved what, so it has every line move, not just closing prices.

You will see books which opened the match on Sunday the 7th did so at appr. 1: 3.50, X: 3.20, 2: 2.00, and the days after the price moved down to appr. 1: 2.70, X: 3.20, 2: 2.60.

HT odds opened on Sunday at appr 1: 4.00, X: 2.20, 2: 2.70, and closed at 1: 3.50, X: 2.00, 2: 3.00.

If I remember the dispute correctly the wager was at about 4.00 and the book is claiming the wager was meant for Half Time, not Full Time. Judging by the odds for the Home Win this could be the case, but in the screenshot I saw the price for the X of the same bet was at around 3-s which would have been ridiculous for HT-lines and completely correct for FT-lines. Anyway, you can look up all the data for yourself.

I have no involvement in this case btw (I didn't even know the book) and the website I mentioned does not carry the odds history for shillbet.

[betpartners]

Justin not sure why 400+ posts etc but i can confirm that the prices for full time on this game were as follows

Ecuador 4.00
Draw 3.10
Argentina 1.70

This link here has the full time odds for quite a few bookies including shillbet

http://www.betexplorer.com/soccer/international/world-cup-2010-qualifiers-s-america/matchdetails.php?matchid=6197130

Hope this helps a little.

[betpartners]

I should also say that 3.10 odds for half time in that game is impossible, well not impossible if you want to go out of business.

[moonbeam]

Frank,

Thanks for the reply. Mainly I wanted line histories, and I wanted people that weren't involved in the dispute (like you) to show me.

Shilbet is claiming that this line was actually their first half line, which I find incredulous. 3.1 for h1 tie?

Why are you that interested in a book like shillbet?

Are they a new sponsor of SBR?

[Justin7]

Why are you that interested in a book like shillbet?

Are they a new sponsor of SBR?

I was investigating a complaint against them. On the surface, it looks like they defrauded a player.