Scott matusow thoughts on Trayvon Martin and race and why vote republican

[icancount2one]

There has been a massive misinformation campaign by groups such as Stormfront, attempting to cloud Trayvon's character. Be careful where you are pulling your info from. There has been faked facebook stuff out there before. The bottom pic in particular looks shopped.

The only source with any credibility cites Trayvon's suspension for an empty dimebag. I was guilty of this offense, as were a great deal of my friends (I even knew some people who *GASP* sold herb!), and we all got the opportunity to on to college and not get gunned down by a crazed vigilante drunk on authority and the privilege of connection.

[andywend]

Any opinions regarding this Martin/Zimmerman fiasco coming out of the mouths of coloreds or liberal democrats carry no weight whatsoever.

Coloreds are unable to look past the fact that one of their own was finally the victim as opposed to always being the criminal and will ALWAYS side with their own race no matter what the evidence shows. OJ slaughters 2 white people in cold blood and gets away with it and black racists celebrate across the nation. The cops that gave Rodney King the beating he clearly deserved are found not guilty and these same black animals loot and destroy everything in sight.

Once the liberal democratic messiah Barack Obama chose to get involved with his race baiting statement "If I had a boy, he would look like Trayvon", every die-hard liberal democrat has become the judge and jury and has already found Zimmerman guilty even though all of the evidence that has been released clearly shows Zimmerman acted in self-defense.

The only reason Zimmerman was finally arrested was to cool racial tensions started by black racist animals like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the terrorist Black Panther Groups. I would be highly surprised if the case ever goes to trial but if it does, the only way Zimmerman can possibly get convicted is if the jury is made up of 12 colored members.

There's also no question that when the charges are dropped against Zimmerman or when he is found not guilty, black animals will begin rioting all across the country.

I've seen many documentaries about how poorly blacks were treated during slavery and all the way up to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and I could never understand how whites during that time could do the things they did. However, seeing what has taken place over the last 50 years, it is becoming easier and easier to understand why whites felt such a strong need to "keep the black man down" and things are only going to get even worse unless drastic steps are taken.

Its unfair to punish all the black people for the ultra-high percentage of crimes committed by members of their race so I'm not sure what solutions exist to solve these problems.

[icancount2one]

Any opinions regarding this Martin/Zimmerman fiasco coming out of the mouths of coloreds or liberal democrats carry no weight whatsoever.

Coloreds are unable to look past the fact that one of their own was finally the victim as opposed to always being the criminal and will ALWAYS side with their own race no matter what the evidence shows. OJ slaughters 2 white people in cold blood and gets away with it and black racists celebrate across the nation. The cops that gave Rodney King the beating he clearly deserved are found not guilty and these same black animals loot and destroy everything in sight.

Once the liberal democratic messiah Barack Obama chose to get involved with his race baiting statement "If I had a boy, he would look like Trayvon", every die-hard liberal democrat has become the judge and jury and has already found Zimmerman guilty even though all of the evidence that has been released clearly shows Zimmerman acted in self-defense.

The only reason Zimmerman was finally arrested was to cool racial tensions started by black racist animals like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the terrorist Black Panther Groups. I would be highly surprised if the case ever goes to trial but if it does, the only way Zimmerman can possibly get convicted is if the jury is made up of 12 colored members.

There's also no question that when the charges are dropped against Zimmerman or when he is found not guilty, black animals will begin rioting all across the country.

I've seen many documentaries about how poorly blacks were treated during slavery and all the way up to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and I could never understand how whites during that time could do the things they did. However, seeing what has taken place over the last 50 years, it is becoming easier and easier to understand why whites felt such a strong need to "keep the black man down" and things are only going to get even worse unless drastic steps are taken.

Its unfair to punish all the black people for the ultra-high percentage of crimes committed by members of their race so I'm not sure what solutions exist to solve these problems.

I am white, and barring a freak turn of events, am not voting for Obama/democrats this go around. Does this mean my opinion is qualified? Please answer the following questions:

How did Zimmerman draw and fire a gun with his head being pounded into the pavement?

How did Zimmerman win contested control of the gun against a stronger opponent who has gravity on his side?

Is your opinion of Zimmerman at all influenced by the other violent charges against him that were dropped, coinciding with the fact that his father is a judge?

How does the possibility Trayvon sold weed factor into the discussion at all?


Other comments:

Your perspective on OJ is horribly skewed. Though the incompetent prosecution failed to convict, and the LAPD screwed up by allowing that nazi Fuhrman in a uniform, OJ lost everything and went from a beloved celebrity to a total pariah. He was held liable in civil court, and is now in prison where he likely belongs.

Excessive force was used against Rodney King, period. All of America should mourn the lack of accountability and standards for our police.

[andywend]

I am white, and barring a freak turn of events, am not voting for Obama/democrats this go around. Does this mean my opinion is qualified?

Icancount2one, the absolute worst kind of democrat is the white liberal democrat (WLD) as its the WLD that is responsible for giving so much power to black racists such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc. WLD's have caused more damage to the United States of America than all other groups of people combined.

I see you have chosen your above words most carefully in an attempt to confuse and deceive but its NOT working. I most certainly believe you are a die-hard liberal democrat and its easy to tell by your most recent post and every single other that you have contributed to this political forum. Therefore, I don't believe your opinion about Martin/Zimmerman is qualified and I do believe you will be voting for Barack Obama in the upcoming election.

However, there is always the possibility that you are one of those truly fanatical socialists (i.e. A Bernie Sanders type of guy) who believe Obama and the democratic party have NOT been liberal enough and won't be supporting the Dems on those grounds.

Am I accurate in my above assessment and would you even admit to it?

Be honest about it and I'll give you my input on all the questions you asked.

[itchypickle]

I promise you this is different IRL than wrestling or karate class, lol... The issue isn't the ability to reach the waistband, the issue is the ability to do so while receiving massive head trauma from a downward fist and a sharp chunk of concrete. Maintaining consciousness would be difficult if his head was lined up with a sharp piece of concrete where "the wound" is, let alone effective resistance.

This "quick pull and shoot" technique directly contradicts the claim that there was a struggle for the gun. The claim that there was a struggle for the gun contradicts the claim that Trayvon was far bigger and scarier than Zim. I haven't seen any forensic evidence, but a shot in the back seems more likely than our "big and scary" black antagonist doing a 180 before landing. We also don't see blood spray all over Zim.

Looking at the whole picture, I cannot put together a narrative that looks good for Zimmerman. Every time I try, there are huge holes.

Of course, I'm speaking directly about real world tactics. The basics I gave are at the beginner level even in military combatives. I'm not saying Zimmerman would have to know the foundations of ground fighting I am saying it's VERY easy amateur or not, to do what you described. You said it's hard or impossible to reach for something in your waist if you are on the bottom and being struck...I say it's simple.

[sharpcat]

I promise you this is different IRL than wrestling or karate class, lol... The issue isn't the ability to reach the waistband, the issue is the ability to do so while receiving massive head trauma from a downward fist and a sharp chunk of concrete. Maintaining consciousness would be difficult if his head was lined up with a sharp piece of concrete where "the wound" is, let alone effective resistance.

This "quick pull and shoot" technique directly contradicts the claim that there was a struggle for the gun. The claim that there was a struggle for the gun contradicts the claim that Trayvon was far bigger and scarier than Zim. I haven't seen any forensic evidence, but a shot in the back seems more likely than our "big and scary" black antagonist doing a 180 before landing. We also don't see blood spray all over Zim.

Looking at the whole picture, I cannot put together a narrative that looks good for Zimmerman. Every time I try, there are huge holes.

So are you a forensic scientist? or did you just happen to stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?


WTF are you talking about? The quick pull and shoot?

We don't see blood spray on Zimmerman? you saw a low quality fukking clip of him wearing a red fukkin jacket

Massive head trauma from a downward fist and a sharp chunk of concrete.

Holy fukk 1 month ago these idiots were able to make up simple stories and now that more and more evidence comes out the liberals and blacks are left to resort to "putting together a narrative".




Kid go back to your college studies save your energy making up stories on what may have happened for your homework in your civil rights class because your black professor is the only moron ignorant enough to buy the nonsense you are trying to sell here.

[sharpcat]

NEW YORK — A judge says an Occupy Wall Street protester can’t stop prosecutors from getting his tweets as part of a case surrounding his arrest at a demonstration.A Manhattan criminal court judge ruled Friday there are reasonable grounds to believe the information is relevant. The judge also says Malcolm Harris can’t legally challenge the subpoena sent to Twitter Inc., not him.Harris was among more than 700 demonstrators arrested Oct. 1 on the Brooklyn Bridge.Harris’ lawyer, Martin Stolar, says he strongly disagrees with the ruling. He argues that although the tweets were sent publicly, some of the information sought violates Harris’ privacy and free association rights.The Manhattan district attorney’s office has said it’s fair to pursue messages Harris sent worldwide. Prosecutors say the tweets may contradict his defense.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...#ixzz1t00Ja0zn

Looks like Al and Jesse will be looking like idiots in the courtroom again along with Trayvon's money hungry parents when Zimmerman's defense attorney brings Trayvon's tweet's and facebook updates into the trial and destroys Trayvon's innocence to defend his client.