-
Comment -
Bark if you love Ugly Underdogs
WOOF WOOF WOOF
Comment -
coo coo cooComment -
No coin doesComment -
Kill yourselfComment -
Wof woof!Comment -
Poor petrol on yourself and smoke a cigarette.Comment -
Comment -
No Coincidences = SBS
Comment -
Comment -
No Coincidences, Stop Creating Useless Threads
Every day you create useless threads. You post threads about every damn line movement you see. Even if a total drops 3 cents, you make a post about it asking why it happened. If a line moved 1 point for a side, you create a thread about it and ask if anyone know why it happened.
What is worst is when you create these stupid threads about traps and stuff like BEWARE about betting on a side or some crap about its a trap saying one of these 2 teams won't cover. You are the most delusional poster ever in sbr and many people see it as well. Trap this, trap that, fishy line this and that. Do you ever think before you create a thread? Or does every single though that comes in your mind about line movement, trap or whining about a game you lost, you have to create a thread about it.
You are the most delusional person i ever seen with the most horrible pathological lies. A $10 bettor like you with Small Bettor Syndrome warning people to not on the side because you say its a trap. Say things like they are -8 but you feel they win by 5 or 6. Do you ever just shut up? Even when people say yes we know no coincidences, we know why you like the Cowboys -4 vs the Giants, its because of line movement. Then you defend yourself and say you look at other things besides that. You then say bs stuff like you think they win by 6 according to your capping. 6 Really? Can you show the math or statistics on how you arrived at 6?
Nope. Because you just pulling stuff out of your ass
. You only say stuff like this just so it won't make you look bad. Look we all know all you do is look at line movement and like underdogs and fade the public. You don't need to make up fake excuses like you like a certain play because you think that team should win by 6. Because you basically just make up numbers. Like if a team was -10 and everyone is on the other side, you will like the -10 team and your reasoning will be something like... I see this team winning by 13 or 14 according to your capping.
Look, i understand. You are very insecure when people call you out but the pathetic part is you can't even admit that all your capping is line movement/fade the public and thats it. It just gets so funny with you defend yourself and say capping abilities when all that is, is looking at line movement 12 hours a day.
You really need to stop creating useless threads. I never seen a bigger paranoid line movement freak like you.
If you like a side and then the line moved against you 1 point, you say f\*\*k that bet will lose now.
Comment -
dynamite, i would like to stick my mossberg up your ass and pull the trigger.Comment -
dynamite, this is a useless threadComment -
thread is dripping with ironyComment -
Dynamite is coin slots step brotherComment -
Comment -
That's still more than most people bet here.Comment -
uh oh.... watch out for the IRS
Comment -
This is How No Coincidences "Cap" Games
We all know no coincidences is the biggest line movement freak on this forum. Creating threads everytime there is a line move and even if there is a 3 cent move on a total, he will create a thread about it and asking people why it happened.
Anyways, its time to expose this no coincidences because of how a psychopath liar he is. I will use some examples to make it simple. No Coincidences is one of the most delusional liars in this forum. He suffers from SBS (Small Bettor Syndrome) as well which isn't any surprise.
A guy named Dexter called him out on only playing line movement in his thread and no coincidences said that is completely wrong and even cursed him out. He defend himself by saying he "caps" other things before picking a game.
So lets go to 2 games that no coincidences plays and see how he so call "caps" these games with his capping skills.
Game 1
He then mentioned a game where in college basketball he picks Memphis -10.5 because he thought Murray State was overrated and it had nothing to do with line movement and his reasoning to another poster on why he liked them was he though he was getting a good line.
But lets translate it to how no coincidences really capped this game. He saw Murray State was 9-0 and Memphis was like 7-3 and laying 10.5 points and thought it was a sucker bet so he took Memphis. However... you would not hear this reasoning as why he liked it . He saw that the line stayed at 10 and 10.5 the whole time and thus his "capping" said Memphis was the play. Had that line went to 8, he wouldn't even play Memphis. This line movement freak can't even admit line movement and fade the public is all he does and needs to add in CAPPING ABILITIES because he doesn't want to admit that is the ONLY WAY he caps game. Funny how his reasoning is when he sees one team is undefeated at 9-0 and playing a team that is like 7-3 laying double digits... his reasoning is he thought it was a good number. He will probably say his capping skills had this number at 13 or 14. And when Memphis lost straight up, someone asked him No Coin, line movement picks every pick huh? He then got so insecure and defended himself by saying he said 10.5 was a good number WITHOUT SHOWING ANY MATH OR STATISTICS TO PROVE HIS POINT. I mean, its easy pulling numbers out of your ass. I bet even the people that follow no coincidences posts even know he is making these lies up.
Game 2
Giants played Cowboys last night. Cowboys were 3 point favorites and went to 4.5 favorites He picked Cowboys and people criticized his play. He says stuff like to other ppl... you want to be on the Giants where almost everyone is on them getting 4.5? People ask him why you like the Cowboys no coin... his reasoning was -4.5 was a good line for the cowboys.
But lets translate it to how no coincidences really capped this game. He saw almost everyone was on the Giants. Then saw line went from 3 to 4 and then 4.5. Then he loved the play even more! But his reasoning? He feels Cowboys should win by 6 according to his CAPPING. Oh really? Why 6? Care you show the math or stats on how you arrived at this number? Nope there isn't. This delusional liar is so obsessed with line movement and fade the public, he even lies to posters saying his picks isn't always to do with line movement and his capping includes MUCH MORE THAN THAT. Oh really, how come you don't show it with numbers or explain? You see guys... this is what happens when you turn into a line movement freak. You think everything is a trap and then when people say stuff about him, he gets all defensive and then comes up with delusional lies.
And had the Cowboys covered the 4.5, he would say told you so. But when it loses like when the Cowboys lost, he would complain it was a bad beat. Sure they got unlucky... but the truth with no coincidences is if he loses a game, he got unlucky. If got lucky, he would never mention he did. Don't believe me, check his baseball threads. He would complain about how he went 3 -4 but should have went 5-2 if two teams didn't blow the 1 run lead in the 8th and 9th inning. But of course you never hear about the other 2 games where his team was down 2 runs in the 8th inning and come back and won.
Basically if you want to cap a game like No Coincidences, all you have to do is look at win/loss records for both teams and if you see something fishy, just bet the other side. But if you lose, don't complain like the game was rigged because thats what no coincidences does everytime.
I mean... thats how No Coincidences caps the game but of course his reasoning will say its MUCH MUCH MORE THAN THAT.
Comment -
wow you waste so much time talking about this poster...Comment -
Jesus get off this guy's nutsack, laces out anyone?Comment -
Comment -
e= em ce vaginaComment -
Seriously, why are you so obsessed with this guy?Comment -
Obsessed... Got damn. Seek help, or a girlfriend.
Comment -
no coin is a solid capper get off his ball sackComment -
I got to admit, I love Dynamite140.
I don't really follow NoCoin threads enough to know how he caps, but I have a feeling this dynamite has him all figured out.Comment -
Who gives a fukk?Comment -
tl;drComment -
I hardly ever shop early, but last week I really liked Oak/GB over - got it at 53 and the Giants +3...Well both those lines moved against me. The over had a big time move...Yeah it freaked me out, but you know it is not what is most important.Comment -
We all know no coincidences is the biggest line movement freak on this forum. Creating threads everytime there is a line move and even if there is a 3 cent move on a total, he will create a thread about it and asking people why it happened.
Anyways, its time to expose this no coincidences because of how a psychopath liar he is. I will use some examples to make it simple. No Coincidences is one of the most delusional liars in this forum. He suffers from SBS (Small Bettor Syndrome) as well which isn't any surprise.
A guy named Dexter called him out on only playing line movement in his thread and no coincidences said that is completely wrong and even cursed him out. He defend himself by saying he "caps" other things before picking a game. So lets go to 2 games that no coincidences plays and see how he so call "caps" these games with his capping skills.
Game 1
He then mentioned a game where in college basketball he picks Memphis -10.5 because he thought Murray State was overrated and it had nothing to do with line movement and his reasoning to another poster on why he liked them was he though he was getting a good line.
But lets translate it to how no coincidences really capped this game. He saw Murray State was 9-0 and Memphis was like 7-3 and laying 10.5 points and thought it was a sucker bet so he took Memphis. However... you would not hear this reasoning as why he liked it . He saw that the line stayed at 10 and 10.5 the whole time and thus his "capping" said Memphis was the play. Had that line went to 8, he wouldn't even play Memphis. This line movement freak can't even admit line movement and fade the public is all he does and needs to add in CAPPING ABILITIES because he doesn't want to admit that is the ONLY WAY he caps game. Funny how his reasoning is when he sees one team is undefeated at 9-0 and playing a team that is like 7-3 laying double digits... his reasoning is he thought it was a good number. He will probably say his capping skills had this number at 13 or 14. And when Memphis lost straight up, someone asked him No Coin, line movement picks every pick huh? He then got so insecure and defended himself by saying he said 10.5 was a good number WITHOUT SHOWING ANY MATH OR STATISTICS TO PROVE HIS POINT. I mean, its easy pulling numbers out of your ass. I bet even the people that follow no coincidences posts even know he is making these lies up.
Game 2
Giants played Cowboys last night. Cowboys were 3 point favorites and went to 4.5 favorites He picked Cowboys and people criticized his play. He says stuff like to other ppl... you want to be on the Giants where almost everyone is on them getting 4.5? People ask him why you like the Cowboys no coin... his reasoning was -4.5 was a good line for the cowboys.
But lets translate it to how no coincidences really capped this game. He saw almost everyone was on the Giants. Then saw line went from 3 to 4 and then 4.5. Then he loved the play even more! But his reasoning? He feels Cowboys should win by 6 according to his CAPPING. Oh really? Why 6? Care you show the math or stats on how you arrived at this number? Nope there isn't. This delusional liar is so obsessed with line movement and fade the public, he even lies to posters saying his picks isn't always to do with line movement and his capping includes MUCH MORE THAN THAT. Oh really, how come you don't show it with numbers or explain? You see guys... this is what happens when you turn into a line movement freak. You think everything is a trap and then when people say stuff about him, he gets all defensive and then comes up with delusional lies.
And had the Cowboys covered the 4.5, he would say told you so. But when it loses like when the Cowboys lost, he would complain it was a bad beat. Sure they got unlucky... but the truth with no coincidences is if he loses a game, he got unlucky. If got lucky, he would never mention he did. Don't believe me, check his baseball threads. He would complain about how he went 3 -4 but should have went 5-2 if two teams didn't blow the 1 run lead in the 8th and 9th inning. But of course you never hear about the other 2 games where his team was down 2 runs in the 8th inning and come back and won.Basically if you want to cap a game like No Coincidences, all you have to do is look at win/loss records for both teams and if you see something fishy, just bet the other side. But if you lose, don't complain like the game was rigged because thats what no coincidences does everytime.
I mean... thats how No Coincidences caps the game but of course his reasoning will say its MUCH MUCH MORE THAN THAT.
*****, This ain't a post, this is a book.Comment -
Its borderline sicko the amount of time this guy took to critique no coin's capping style. Who gives a damn lolComment
