Women and people with an IQ under 100..

[str]

Are you saying women aren't emotional sacks of shit who have no clue what they are talking about?

I love women. I stick up for them all the time. But when it comes to the government, those who actually have the ability to logistically deduce why it is they stand for what they stand for beyond an emotional feeling equates to roughly .01%. And that's probably a generous estimate.

And I don't say that out of anger or spite or misogyny. I say it out of disappointment. Because I refuse to marry any woman who can't explain to me why she feels what she feels. And in my travels very few can. In my entire life I've personally known about three. That's it. Two were married and the other was fat. So no dice for me. I have hope I will meet another before I die. But I'm not holding my breath.

Shari,
he speaks for himself,not all of us.

[chilidog]

Gamblers generally do not think logically as there is rare if no circumstances in which you can beat the house....

Fallacy. Men, as a whole, think logically. Women think emotionally. Emotion cannot be used to make decisions to run a nation. Logic must prevail. If one is not capable of forming reason by using logic, then one should not have a say in the matter.

Shari,
he speaks for himself,not all of us.

He speaks for real men; men that have not let themselves become emasculated. You try to belittle another man, for what reason? To make yourself look better to the opposite sex? That shows weakness. A real man will never need to do this. There is a reason why the Founding Fathers of the United States used this very logic to run their nation. They knew what they were doing. If they were alive today, they would look at us with such sad, pitiful eyes, and then laugh hysterically at what we have allowed ourselves to become.

[cc440unn]

So fkin stupid thread. Im not fat, im not under 100, im not religious and im obv not a woman.

They still human.

P.S Only woman have to be restricted. Overweight poeple are nice. Take a look at LOST and Hugo with his happy face.

[chilidog]

So fkin stupid thread. Im not fat, im not under 100, im not religious and im obv not a woman.

They still human.

P.S Only woman have to be restricted. Overweight poeple are nice. Take a look at LOST and Hugo with his happy face.

Just because you are human, does not mean that you have an adequate mental capacity in order to create rules and laws in order to run a nation. I liked how it was originally setup; you had to own property in order to vote.

And being nice is irrelevant to this topic.

[str]

Fallacy. Men, as a whole, think logically. Women think emotionally. Emotion cannot be used to make decisions to run a nation. Logic must prevail. If one is not capable of forming reason by using logic, then one should not have a say in the matter.



He speaks for real men; men that have not let themselves become emasculated. You try to belittle another man, for what reason? To make yourself look better to the opposite sex? That shows weakness. A real man will never need to do this. There is a reason why the Founding Fathers of the United States used this very logic to run their nation. They knew what they were doing. If they were alive today, they would look at us with such sad, pitiful eyes, and then laugh hysterically at what we have allowed ourselves to become.

Seems as though you are belittling me.

[chilidog]

Seems as though you are belittling me.

I assume that you have allowed yourself to have become emasculated as well. You are not certainly not alone.

[str]

I assume that you have allowed yourself to have become emasculated as well. You are not certainly not alone.

Don't pull that crap with me.
You assume wrong but that is not a shock.
I think it best to stop responding to you now.
I try very hard to not argue with childish stupid people within this forum.

[chilidog]

I refuse to argue with childish stupid people.

And yet, you responded.

[The Madcap]

Shari,
he speaks for himself,not all of us.

Don't be such an obvious ass kisser.

Besides, Shari seems to have a strong head on her shoulders. You have to develop one to become a successful single mother. So she'd probably agree with me.

[The Madcap]

Based on the choices people generally choose from it seems like no one's vote counts.

True. Sad, but true.

[will2survive]

I like to be around intellectuals. Just the same, I'll be nice to anyone that's nice to me.

[chilidog]

Besides, Shari seems to have a strong head on her shoulders. You have to develop one to become a successful single mother.

If I ever get divorced and come across a single mom that I want to hook up with, I'm definitely going to use this line.

[stealthyburrito]

didn't care to read the thread as im sure its silly banter over a joke, just wanted to express my LOL for the OP

[thechaoz]

People with an IQ over 100 can easily realize it's all a front and nothing changes from prez to prez. Wallstreet is where our attention needs to stay.

[Mikail]

I nominate this guy.

[The Madcap]

If I ever get divorced and come across a single mom that I want to hook up with, I'm definitely going to use this line.

Only use it if you believe it. Strong women can sense insincerity faster than a drunk can sense happy hour.

[tad0matic]

anybody drawing welfarechecks or foodstamps or any entitlement program should be unable to vote.
can you say republican landslide?

[The Madcap]

When the United States was founded, only white, male, property-owners were allowed to vote. The Founding Fathers felt that only property-owners would take this right of citizenship seriously since they owned a literal stake in the young nation. To them, it was self-evident that only those with a stake in society should have a voice in determining who would govern that society. They believed that, since government was established to protect property and personal freedom, those involved in choosing that government should have some of each.

While this is true,

you do see how one could take this thought and infer you're an elitist/racist asshole right?

At the time women/blacks were mostly stripped of their right to self-determination. Why would they care about a government that sought to prevent them from owning property and deliberately prohibited them from gaining personal freedoms?

[downsouth]

Didnt read whole thing but was amused by OP. Funny stuff

[chilidog]

While this is true,

you do see how one could take this thought and infer you're an elitist/racist asshole right?

Yes.

At the time women/blacks were mostly stripped of their right to self-determination. Why would they care about a government that sought to prevent them from owning property and deliberately prohibited them from gaining personal freedoms?

I realize that I did bring race into the conversation when I pasted something in here concerned our Founding Fathers and having to be a white male property owner in order to vote. However, I did not mention race anywhere else, and I do not believe that intellect has anything to do with the pigmentation of your skin.

[The Madcap]

I realize that I did bring race into the conversation when I pasted something in here concerned our Founding Fathers and having to be a white male property owner in order to vote. However, I did not mention race anywhere else, and I do not believe that intellect has anything to do with the pigmentation of your skin.

That's good. Just as long as you realize why those with a "non-white" pigmentation are so hesitant to openly accept and promote the ideals that founded this country.

[Squareguy]

Voters should need to be in good physical and mental condition. They should also have to take a test over the main candidates prior to voting...

And while we are at it...we should get rid of political parties and start looking for smart people who won't be easily corrupted.