(Beatles) Opinion: Paul > John

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ChuckyTheGoat
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 04-04-11
    • 38826

    #1
    (Beatles) Opinion: Paul > John
    I know this is ancient history. It's art, so people have their own opinion.

    Of course, John's demise was tragic. That goes without saying.

    I've studied this enough. I have an opinion that Paul > John. Paul was CERTAINLY more likable than John.

    1) John was about two years older than Paul.
    ...Ringo was about John's age. George was about Paul's age.
    ...Maybe a big brother sentiment. Thought John's ego was a problem.

    2) John seemingly took himself too seriously.
    ...Paul was more at ease. Paul seemingly handled stardom better.

    3) The Yoko Ono thing.
    ...Yoko was John's girl. That's cool.
    ...John brought Yoko right into the recording studio. Not cool.

    Just my opinion. I know it's an eternity ago. John rubbed me the wrong way.
    Where's the fuckin power box, Carol?
  • ChuckyTheGoat
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 04-04-11
    • 38826

    #2
    Paul remembers watching Saturday Night Live with John Lennon at the Dakota when Lorne Michaels offered $3,000 for the Beatles to reunite. #thebeatles #paulmccartney


    *There's this story about Lorne Michaels jokingly offering $$ for a Beatles reunion:
    ...Story is that PAUL wanted to do it. They were just down the road.
    ...JOHN balked and didn't want to. Would have been the coolest impromptu reunion ever.
    Where's the fuckin power box, Carol?
    Comment
    Search
    Collapse
    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
    Collapse
    Working...