000
-
000Comment -
Originally posted by Hareeba!...
Comment -
No he/him, I simply proved you were lying and you couldn't defend your lies. That is why you put me on ignore. You are still lying and posting garbage. A man will defend himself and his position. I coward runs away and hides. Your post history is proof.Originally posted by Hareeba!
Comment -
They're not capable of original thought.Originally posted by Hareeba!
Trump tells them what to think.
Reasonsable republicans figured that out months ago.
Comment -
Dwight doesn't have independent views Hareeba.Originally posted by Hareeba!
He just parrots what his Russian hate troll bot handlers or the MAGA cult from Truth Social feed him daily. Notice how discombobulated he gets if you make any point not about his scripted party talking points?
That's why he reposts such dumb stuff as Australia has a GST so that is the same as Trump's tariffs.
His posts are meant for stupid people to get emotional over. Not make real sense.
You're trying to have a meaningful debate with a handful of morons and a bad actor. Not worth the waste of time..Comment -
Still with the Russia hoax huh? The Leftist cult TDSers are always pushing the narrative they are told by the redicals and the MSM. The same one you use pronouns and believe that men dressing up as women isn't a mental illness. Let's not forget you made several post claim Musk did a Nazi salute.Originally posted by Optional
reasonable republicans? funny that you consider yourself one CostanzaOriginally posted by stevenash
Comment -
You use one source, the bots at 'X''
And that Truth Social platform you're addicted to is an echo chamber.
Yet you rag on me for using dozens of sources from across the political spectrum.
Please don't be butt-hurt when I say you're a dime to my dollar, pal.
Comment -
Yep the same old Dwight. Every response is a Tweeter post he read. Will not even try to search and find anything from other sources.Originally posted by stevenashComment -
WASHINGTON — Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch pulled no punches in taking aim at his colleagues on the Supreme Court for a lack of consistency in approaching broad assertions of presidential power made by Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
Gorsuch was part of the 6-3 majority that struck down most of Trump’s tariffs on Friday, but he wrote a separate 46-page opinion that chided several of his fellow justices over how they approached the case.
His colleagues were effectively applying the same Supreme Court precedent differently under Trump than they did under Biden, he argued, writing: “It is an interesting turn of events.”
His invective focused on a theory known as the “major questions doctrine,” which adherents say bars sweeping presidential action not specifically authorized by Congress. The conservative-majority court embraced the doctrine while Biden was in office to strike down broad plans, such as his effort to forgive student loan debt.
But in ruling against Trump on tariffs Friday, the conservative majority splintered. Gorsuch, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts were in the majority, finding in part that Trump’s tariffs needed to go through Congress. Three others, Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito, dissented.
“It shows you how much internal dissension there is on the Supreme Court right now,” said Robin Effron, a professor at Fordham University School of Law.
Roberts’ 21-page majority opinion reads as if he hoped it would attract nine votes, she added, but instead it was a “huge internal fail.”
Even some of the justices who agreed with the outcome did not sign on to the part of Roberts’ opinion that sought to adopt the major questions doctrine in curbing Trump’s tariffs, raising questions about how it will be applied in future cases.
While the court’s three liberals, who backed Biden and criticized the major questions doctrine in past rulings, were in the majority against Trump, they again did not embrace the theory.
Gorsuch, who has wholeheartedly supported the major questions doctrine, pointed to his colleagues’ waffling on the issue in his opinion.
“Past critics of the major questions doctrine do not object to its application in this case,” he said, in a reference to the liberal justices.
“Still others who have joined major questions decisions in the past dissent from today’s application of the doctrine,” he added, referring to the dissenting conservatives.
Comment -
BS NOW MADDOWBLOG
The absurd claim at the heart of Trump’s suit against JPMorgan Chase
“You’re not allowed to do what they did,” the president said of the banking giant, making a claim that’s difficult to take seriously.
Comment -
Proof Democrats are the scum of America and the world.?. Hypocrites is too mild of a term to describe them.
Haters, liars, killers and slimy are better descriptions...
https://youtu.be/PIr7nsJPSGA?t=286
Comment -
Is the Russian hate troll bot handler in the room with you now?Originally posted by OptionalComment -
A man named John Barron called into C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” on Friday morning to complain about the Supreme Court’s ruling against President Donald Trump’s tariffs.
Barron was described as a Republican from Virginia, and as he began talking about the “worst decision” the Supreme Court has ever made, his voice sounded a lot like Trump’s. It just so happens that John Barron is also the pseudonym Trump used throughout the ’80s when he wanted to talk to journalists directly ― but instead pretended to be his own spokesperson.
“This is the worst decision you ever have in your life practically,” Barron said on C-SPAN.
He continued: “This is a terrible decision, and you have Hakeem Jeffries, who ... he’s a dope. And you have Chuck Schumer, who can’t cook a cheeseburger. Of course these people are happy. Of course these people are happy. But true Americans will not be happy.”
Greta Brawner, host of “Washington Journal,” cut off Barron and took a call from another viewer.
Barron’s call came during a segment that hears opinions from viewers. Barron voiced his opinion on the Supreme Court’s ruling right after the court ruled in a 6-3 decision that Trump doesn’t have the authority to impose tariffs.
Neither C-SPAN nor the White House immediately responded to a request for comment.
After the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump’s opinion was similar to Barron’s. During a news conference Friday afternoon, Trump called the court a “disgrace” and said the ruling was an “embarrassment to their families.”
“The Supreme Court’s ruling on tariffs is deeply disappointing, and I’m ashamed of certain members of the court, absolutely ashamed, for not having the courage to do what’s right for our country,” Trump said.
According to a 2016 Washington Post article, Barron was “Trump’s go-to alias when he was under scrutiny, in need of a tough front man or otherwise wanting to convey a message without attaching his own name to it.”
Barron was quoted several times throughout the 1980s, but in 1990, Trump testified in a lawsuit: “I believe on occasion I used that name.”
Trump also has reportedly used a different pseudonym apart from John Barron. A former People reporter said that in 1991, Trump admitted to her that he pretended to be a spokesperson named John Miller.
“He said that he was sorry that he made the call, that was a joke that went awry,” Sue Carswell said in 2016.
Comment -
This guy will NEVER be President...
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MGpPW...&feature=sharehttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/MGpPW...&feature=shareComment -
...
Comment -
further evidence that the Left hates America
Comment -
Originally posted by DwightShrutefurther evidence that the Left hates America
Dwight, do you see the irony and the hypocrisy of the lefties in here calling out people they say we '' believe everything Trump says '' without any thought to question it...???
Yet, everything Trump does and says is absolutely false and erroneous to them??!!. Even though Inflation is down over 5 points, gas down over 2 dollars, border should be closed ........................ ETC ETC.....................?
I would not argue with their foolishness in this matter.
GREAT HOCKEY GAMES BY THE WAY...!!!
Comment -
Just so everyone is clear:
Obama already had an Iran Nuclear Deal.
Trump ripped it up when he came into office, choosing a policy of "maximum pressure" instead.
So now he's saying we might go to war in order to get an Iran Nuclear Deal.
You cannot make this stuff up.Comment -
I guess they will go to Puerto VallartaOriginally posted by Hareeba!
no shit Sherlock?
Comment -
101
Comment -
except you are making it up as usual. I used to think that you were only pretending to be dumb. Its obvious you aren't pretending. The jab and 20 booster makes you sound retarded.Originally posted by Hareeba!
Obama never made a nuclear deal. Sure, that is what they called it, but all it did was literally delay the time where Iran could developed nuclear weapons. He send planes full of cash to the terrorist regime so they would wait until he was out of office before they could have nukes, so that someone else would have to deal with it. He could have ended their nuclear weapons program like Trump did. The plan was there already. Obama was weak. Enemies didn't respect him or fear him. Trump did what had to be done.Comment -
Just because you are a judge, doesn't mean you are a good judge. That goes for any occupation. The US has a supreme court judge who can't define what a woman is but if you ask a kid in grade school, they can.Originally posted by Hareeba!101
Comment -
dude, a couple posts ago you you were trying to push another one of your lies, and you literally posted a chart showing the price of eggs at over $3 while stating they were $2. Then your doubled down telling me you know how to read charts. You are too lazy to do your homework. Deliberately believing the lies knowing they're false.Originally posted by pavyracer
Instead of taking the loss, you now make up some other bullshit that I don't search other sources LOL. Do you smoke a lot of weed? I always bring the receipts pavy. You are too lazy to do your homework.Comment -
This is sad. You still can't read the graph I posted. Maybe print it out and use a ruler and a pencil to find the $2 egg price. This is elementary school skills you should have had by now.Originally posted by DwightShruteComment -
-
Why California is broke and Texas is not..
Comment -
-
Comment -
Is every citizen deserving of the same rights and respect under the law?
Egalitarianism means every person deserves equal rights. Even the mentally ill or criminals or non-white people and even trans people.
.Comment
