no shit Sherlock?
Attached Files
-
no shit Sherlock?
Comment -
so much winning!
Comment -
International tourism to Australia is still roughly 22.8% below 2019 levelsOriginally posted by Hareeba!Comment -
who of you lot voted to do this?
do you support it? Why?Comment -
at least this timeComment -
he/him, your posting history in a single meme ...Originally posted by He/him!
at least this time
In 2026, nearly 100% of the world's countries impose some form of tariffs on trade partners.
the SCOTUS literally told Trump he can do tariffs still, but just call it something else. LOL How dumb is that? All they did is wasted everyone's time. Also, Jackson doesn't know what a woman is because she's not a biologist (her words).
Importing goods into Australia, customs duties and tariffs are generally used interchangeably to refer to the tax imposed on goods imported from other countries.
A standard customs duty/ tariff of 5%. Importing to Australia usually involves more than just a tariff/duty:- Goods and Services Tax (GST): A flat 10% tax that applies to most imports.
Comment -
A 10% GST applies to all retail sales. It's not specially applied to imports.Originally posted by DwightShrute
he/him, your posting history in a single meme ...
In 2026, nearly 100% of the world's countries impose some form of tariffs on trade partners.
the SCOTUS literally told Trump he can do tariffs still, but just call it something else. LOL How dumb is that? All they did is wasted everyone's time. Also, Jackson doesn't know what a woman is because she's not a biologist (her words).
Importing goods into Australia, customs duties and tariffs are generally used interchangeably to refer to the tax imposed on goods imported from other countries.
A standard customs duty/ tariff of 5%. Importing to Australia usually involves more than just a tariff/duty:- Goods and Services Tax (GST): A flat 10% tax that applies to most imports.
Like you say a tariff is designed to protect local industries. If a tax is applied equally to local and international supplied products its not there to protect anything.
Trump must love how his base are too dim to even question stupid assertions like saying a GST is like his arbitrary tariffs.
.Comment -
In 2026, nearly 100% of the world's countries impose some form of tariffs on trade partners.Originally posted by Optional
A 10% GST applies to all retail sales. It's not specially applied to imports.
Like you say a tariff is designed to protect local industries. If a tax is applied equally to local and international supplied products its not there to protect anything.
Trump must love how his base are too dim to even question stupid assertions like saying a GST is like his arbitrary tariffs.Comment -
If you class Australia's GST as a tariff then I guess it would probably be near 100%Originally posted by DwightShrute
.Comment -
Biden apparently just rode coach and sat next to a random passenger. People absolutely love him. Imagine Trump trying to do the same, he’d need the army for protection.
Comment -
-
xxx
Comment -
Uh oh.
Trouble in paradise.
Humiliated Trump blindsided by three economic blows in two hours just days before State of the UnionComment -
Originally posted by stevenash
The walls are closing in . 2026 edition .
Comment -
That report just sank his upcoming speech,Originally posted by jt315
The walls are closing in . 2026 edition .
Trump's scrambling now, and he doesn't think well on the fly.
Come to think about it, his mind is pretty much meatloaf these days.
Well, if he's going to be damned, he's going to want to be damned.
Right, Meat?
Comment -
Originally posted by stevenash
That report just sank his upcoming speech,
Trump's scrambling now, and he doesn't think well on the fly.
Come to think about it, his mind is pretty much meatloaf these days.
Well, if he's going to be damned, he's going to want to be damned.
Right, Meat?
Make sure to post a link for a review of the speech from one of your “independent” sources.
I hear he might even mention cancelling the midterms like some mental midgets claim.
Comment -
Sure will.Originally posted by jt315
I know dozens of them.
Dozens of both right and left-leaning sources as well.
So much content, not enough time, I tell ya whatComment -
....-.
Comment -
Originally posted by stevenash
It will be interesting to see how Dems can 1 up themselves after the paddle fiasco .
Comment -
I'd be fascinated to learn how the resident magats feel about thisComment -
I don't really feel one way or another about it, particularly since Trump has earned my fiscal trust via DOGE.Originally posted by Hareeba!
But the comments following the video were interesting.
But some guy named Bacon Overlord had something to say about her video: "Do you look up ANYTHING... EVER??? It was set up by the United Nations (resolution 2803) and Trump was invited to join it. What's it do? Oh... STOP WARS."
To which IAmPoliticsGirl replied: "I look everything up. Yes it was set up by the UN, then Donald Trump took over and changed the mandate."
Bacon: "Then how is that being "robbed"? Plus, you said he created it. So, you admit you lied."
adds one AwsmMary: "OK then, right there you just admitted that you were wrong on your video because in your video you said that Donald Trump created this organization"
(... at this point IAmPoliticsGirl goes dark, like most people do online after getting getting checkmated after 1 or 2 moves.)
You can really pick 'em, Hareeba.Comment -
Originally posted by ByeShea
Grok shoots her down and she replies
Bullshit Grok. Listen to Kushner speech at Davos. Listen to Kushner speech yesterday. Listen to Donald Trump’s speech yesterday. Give me a fucking break.
Comment -
Read it and weep. Only time will tell who will be crying the Trump Blues soon...
Five important reasons why the Trump economy is about to really blast off
Comment -
She is 100% correct.Originally posted by ByeShea
The UN via Resolution 2803 merely recognised the Board Of Peace with the stated purpose of "promoting peacekeeping around the world".
It did not establish the BOP.
The BOP is a concept put forward by Trump and totally under his control. The UN has nothing to do with it.
As stated by Leigh McGowan the BOP is essentially a plan to develop Gaza into a resort for billionaires and tourism.
That plan was clearly set out in a presentation at the World Economic Forum by Jared Kushner whilst trying to get attendee nations to sign up to the BOP.
Are you really ok with Trump bypassing Congress and taking $10B USD out of the US Treasury to transfer to this entity?
Comment -
No doubt you know many and yet somehow strangely enough, you only seem to post nonsense from Leftist outlets like msn.com or The Raw Story and repeat their talking points.Originally posted by stevenash
That's like being stranded in a island and starving to death because you were on the part which had nothing, not even a coconut tree. While on the other side of the island, a mere 30 minute walk, there was a fresh water stream, tons of coconut trees, wild chickens roaming everywhere and a chest containing a wide assortment of knives, spears, lighters, snorkeling equipment and a Starlink router with a fully charged iphone.Comment -
wait a sec. You were all for Biden using tax payer dollars to bride voters by paying off student loans. He spent 190 BILLION! The SCOTUS said he couldn't. Pelosi said he isn't allowed. He did it anyway. He bypassed Congress to do so, and you said fukk all. In fact, you thought it was a great idea. But now all of a sudden, 10 billion OMG what a travesty.Originally posted by Hareeba!
Nice try he/him. You are only fooling dumb people.
Comment -
-
another generation of "peaceful protesters" in the making.
Comment -
...Comment -
On February 19, 2026, U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin in the case Urquilla-Ramos v. Trump, issued a 34-page ruling giving @TheJusticeDept and @AGPamBondi a schooling in the rule of law.
HIGHLIGHTS: Judge Goodwin stated:
"Antiseptic judicial rhetoric cannot do justice to what is happening. Across the interior of the United States, agents of the federal government—masked, anonymous, armed with military weapons, operating from unmarked vehicles, acting without warrants of any kind—are seizing persons for civil immigration violations and imprisoning them without any semblance of due process."
"The systematic character of this practice and its deliberate elimination of every structural feature that distinguishes constitutional authority from raw force place it beyond the reach of ordinary legal description. It is an assault on the constitutional order. It is what the Fourth Amendment was written to prevent. It is what the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment forbids."
"The overarching issue is whether the federal government may deploy anonymous agents to seize persons on American streets and highways for civil violations, without warrants, without identification, and without any process before or after. The Constitution does not permit that."
"In our constitutional republic, governmental force derives its authority from the Constitution. But that authority is not unlimited. The Government’s power is legitimate only because it is derived from the People and exercised through law by identifiable public officers answerable to the public and to the courts."
"The structure of the Constitution guarantees visibility. Both the officer and the force he employs are traceable to authority delegated by the People and subject to the limits imposed by law. When the Government uses force against the public, the citizen can recognize the officer as a lawful representative. The public can evaluate the act. The judiciary can later review it."
"Every stop, arrest, detention, and use of force can be tested against the Constitution’s protections. Not so here. For these reasons and the reasons that follow, Petitioner’s Amended Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), [ECF No. 26], is GRANTED."
"The court FINDS that both his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures as well as his Fifth Amendment right to due process have been violated. Immediate release is the only relief sufficient to remedy Petitioner’s unlawful detention."
IN HIS CONCLUSION: Judge Goodwin wrote:
"An anonymous government is no government at all. It cannot be held accountable. A masked agent freely uses force without justifying his actions, and the public cannot name him to challenge his conduct."
"A regime of secret policing has no place in our society. Here, the Government’s power is derived by the People, and the People must be able to identify the Government when it acts to infringe on their liberty. Masks obscure government action and deprive the public of its Fourth Amendment protections."
"Therefore, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, [ECF No. 26], is GRANTED. Petitioner is ORDERED released immediately from civil immigration custody. Respondents are PROHIBITED from re-arresting and detaining Petitioner absent significant change in circumstances to justify detention or subject to the determination of a neutral and detached decisionmaker."
Comment -
Not a single one of you have bothered to express a view as to why this is justified!Originally posted by Hareeba!
Comment -
but DipShit as per usual logs a laugh at it!Originally posted by Hareeba!
Just continuing his utterly childish behaviour from the old site's thread when he would post a stupid gif in response to my every post before I was forced to put him on ignore.
Just watch him post another laugh at this response. Tells you all you ever need to know about him.Comment
