Republican vs Democrat

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Optional
    Administrator
    • 06-10-10
    • 62195

    #25761
    Originally posted by DwightShrute
    That is why I don't watch CNN, CBC, MSNBC or BBC anymore.
    And that's a big part of the reason why you got so brainwashed to start with.

    Your handlers convinced you that you are too dumb to be exposed to anything but the party line... so you dont get brainwashed by the liberal media

    Even you can hear/see multiple sides of arguments and make up your own mind still! You've just been tricked to think you can't handle it and must only listen to their echo chamber messaging.



    Show me to be wrong. Have you got any personal independent thoughts about why Dan has disappeared? Can you see why I think it stinks and exposes the corruption? If you don't agree wtf do you think is going on with Dan?
    .
    Comment
    • Optional
      Administrator
      • 06-10-10
      • 62195

      #25762
      Originally posted by DwightShrute
      France just ousted their PM.
      Correct. I almost mentioned it in that list of examples of the world rejecting your maga political ideas. But figured it might be a bit too nuanced for you to understand.


      Do you know why he got ousted?

      He tried to implement DOGE type policies.

      And exactly like Canada and Australia the people immediately turned on him.


      If all you know about international politics is what you are fed by Truth social and MAGA approved media it's no surprise you would not even realize that is just another example of how "everyone else in the world is so misinformed they vote the wrong way".

      Two of the most conservative and right leaning nations in Europe, Poland and Albania, had recent elections too. Same result as everywhere else. Even with Kristi Noem openly trying to influence the Poles to vote MAGA they swung left. Showing how much soft power and influence the US has already lost in less than a year.

      Have you found any examples of MAGA aligned politicians having a win since Trump came into office this time?

      .
      Comment
      • DwightShrute
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 01-17-09
        • 101264

        #25763
        Originally posted by Optional

        And that's a big part of the reason why you got so brainwashed to start with.

        Your handlers convinced you that you are too dumb to be exposed to anything but the party line... so you dont get brainwashed by the liberal media

        Even you can hear/see multiple sides of arguments and make up your own mind still! You've just been tricked to think you can't handle it and must only listen to their echo chamber messaging.



        Show me to be wrong. Have you got any personal independent thoughts about why Dan has disappeared? Can you see why I think it stinks and exposes the corruption? If you don't agree wtf do you think is going on with Dan?
        Sorry to disappoint you. I do see what's going on at CNN, CBC, MSNBC and BBC, I just don't watch it. I used to watch, but like millions of others, we left them because you have to be a fool to keep watching news outlets which continuously lie and purposely deceive their audience.

        I see the clips from credible outlet which a track record of reliable reporting. Not only do they bring the receipts, they show clips of the lies, race baiting and the utter ridiculousness the MSM still engages in. Did you not see the recent 60 minutes interview with Trump? They still are doing it.

        Opti, you can keep going to the same dirty-ass restaurant where you have to know they are using shitty ingredients which is why you are sick afterwards every single time you eat there, or you can go to another place, a better cleaner place where they use fresh ingredients and you never get sick after eating. There are lots of places to eat. You decide. No one is holding a gun to your head to eat there.
        Comment
        • DwightShrute
          SBR Aristocracy
          • 01-17-09
          • 101264

          #25764
          Originally posted by Optional

          I am missing the point when I say the average man is more concerned with the economy, wars, world trade than you're tranny obsession eh!?



          But I am mindlessly fixated in comparison to you, by having any interest in wanting a deep state sex trafficking operation involving the elites of society fully investigated (ya know, the same deep state pedo ring you never shut up about for the previous 5 or 6 years??)



          No wonder you never go a day without calling someone else mentally ill. It's called projection you intractable extremist mentally ill lunatic!
          I call it like it is. Try it sometime.

          Pretending mental illness doesn't exist when its starring you right in the face isn't how I am wired. Being honest isn't some kind of special power I have. You have it also. It's in there somewhere if you look hard enough. If you can't be honest enough to say men can't get pregnant, then you will also likely say crazy shit like Musk did a Nazi salute on stage. Never mind that he is Jewish. It makes absolutely no sense. T

          You see, its the little things. They should be the easiest to say are true, but if we can't even admit the truth on the most obvious truths, then how can you possibly except to be taken seriously on anything?

          Forget whether you are a liberal or a conservative, if a potential Supreme court justice is asked "what is a woman?" and she wouldn't answer and her ridiculous reply was "I am not a biologist", what does that say about her? Not saying she is mentally ill, but she definitely has a mental disorder of some kind and is in no way qualified to be a judge. But she is now. For life. LOL.

          If identified as a Black lesbian tomorrow, would you think I am well? Could I get pregnant? What is I suddenly decided to identify as Dwight the Smartest man in the World, and I demanded to be called that? Should be call me that?
          Comment
          • Optional
            Administrator
            • 06-10-10
            • 62195

            #25765
            Originally posted by DwightShrute
            Sorry to disappoint you. I do see what's going on at CNN, CBC, MSNBC and BBC, I just don't watch it.
            Well you would do well to check out what all sides say for yourself. Instead of relying on what your echo chamber of approved opinion makers tell you those outlets say.

            And if you don't want to do that, here's another genuine tip.

            When a story comes up ask an AI helper to tell you what it knows about the story instead of reading any one outlets opinion.

            You'll find most of them actually try to give you an insight to multiple points of view which will see you scroll past 80% of headlines as nothing burger click bait crap.
            .
            Comment
            • Optional
              Administrator
              • 06-10-10
              • 62195

              #25766
              Originally posted by DwightShrute

              I call it like it is. Try it sometime.

              Pretending mental illness doesn't exist when its starring you right in the face isn't how I am wired. Being honest isn't some kind of special power I have. You have it also. It's in there somewhere if you look hard enough. If you can't be honest enough to say men can't get pregnant, then you will also likely say crazy shit like Musk did a Nazi salute on stage. Never mind that he is Jewish. It makes absolutely no sense. T

              You see, its the little things. They should be the easiest to say are true, but if we can't even admit the truth on the most obvious truths, then how can you possibly except to be taken seriously on anything?

              Forget whether you are a liberal or a conservative, if a potential Supreme court justice is asked "what is a woman?" and she wouldn't answer and her ridiculous reply was "I am not a biologist", what does that say about her? Not saying she is mentally ill, but she definitely has a mental disorder of some kind and is in no way qualified to be a judge. But she is now. For life. LOL.

              If identified as a Black lesbian tomorrow, would you think I am well? Could I get pregnant? What is I suddenly decided to identify as Dwight the Smartest man in the World, and I demanded to be called that? Should be call me that?
              I repeat... and this is what you think is important to the average man right now!?

              Yeah nah. You're not fixated at all. I'm the mentally ill obsessed one who won't just forget about the Epstein cover up when important issues like who pees where still need to be enacted in law.


              The world is speaking at the ballot box and rejecting your trans/illegals obsessed ideology Dwight.
              .
              Comment
              • Optional
                Administrator
                • 06-10-10
                • 62195

                #25767
                Originally posted by Optional
                When a story comes up ask an AI helper to tell you what it knows about the story instead of reading any one outlets opinion.

                You'll find most of them actually try to give you an insight to multiple points of view which will see you scroll past 80% of headlines as nothing burger click bait crap.
                EXAMPLE:



                tell me about this;

                Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	0
Size:	30.1 KB
ID:	29909688

                The post you shared is a political commentary from a user named "Hareeba!" on the SBR forum, highlighting the electoral performance of candidates affiliated with Moms for Liberty (M4L). The user claims that M4L candidates lost all 31 contested races nationwide, and adds a laughing emoji to underscore a tone of mockery or schadenfreude. ️ Who Are Moms for Liberty?


                Moms for Liberty is a conservative advocacy group founded in 2021, known for its involvement in school board elections and education policy debates. The group has:
                • Championed parental rights in education
                • Opposed certain curriculum topics like critical race theory and gender identity discussions
                • Been labeled by some watchdog organizations as extremist due to its rhetoric and affiliations
                ️ What the Post Suggests


                The claim that M4L candidates lost 31 out of 31 contested races implies:
                • A significant electoral setback for the group
                • Possibly a broader public rejection of their platform in those races
                • That their influence may be waning, at least in the context of recent elections
                Why It Matters


                This kind of result—if accurate—could signal:
                • A shift in voter sentiment, especially in local school board elections
                • A pushback against politicization of education
                • That grassroots organizing by opposition groups (e.g., pro-public education coalitions) may be gaining traction

                Would you like a verified breakdown of those 31 races or a timeline of M4L’s rise and controversies? I can dig deeper.

                yes, is the claim correct?

                No, the claim that Moms for Liberty candidates lost all 31 contested races nationwide is not correct. At least 17 of their endorsed candidates won school board races in 2025. Verified Election Outcomes for Moms for Liberty (M4L)


                Contrary to the forum post’s assertion, multiple sources confirm that M4L candidates did win some races:
                • EIN Presswire reported that 17 school board candidates endorsed by Moms for Liberty won their races nationwide in 2025.
                • Ballotpedia lists several successful endorsements, including candidates in Wisconsin and Ohio school districts.
                • However, GLAAD and The Advocate noted that the majority of M4L’s 130+ endorsed candidates lost, especially in high-profile races in Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Ohio.
                Breakdown of the Discrepancy


                The forum post likely reflects a localized or cherry-picked subset of races—perhaps focusing on a specific state or region where M4L was completely shut out. But nationally:
                • Some candidates won, especially in conservative-leaning districts.
                • Most candidates lost, particularly in contested or high-profile races where progressive coalitions mobilized against M4L’s platform.
                Context Behind the Losses


                Several factors contributed to M4L’s broader underperformance:
                • Backlash against politicization of education, especially around LGBTQ+ and racial topics
                • Well-funded opposition, including PACs like Agenda PAC
                • Voter fatigue with culture war narratives in school board politics
                ✅ Summary
                • Claim: M4L lost 31 out of 31 racesFalse if referring to national results
                • Reality: M4L won at least 17 races, but lost the majority of their contests

                Would you like a tabulated breakdown of wins/losses by state or a timeline of their rise and electoral strategy? I can build that out.
                .
                Comment
                • DwightShrute
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 01-17-09
                  • 101264

                  #25768
                  Originally posted by Optional

                  Well you would do well to check out what all sides say for yourself. Instead of relying on what your echo chamber of approved opinion makers tell you those outlets say.

                  And if you don't want to do that, here's another genuine tip.

                  When a story comes up ask an AI helper to tell you what it knows about the story instead of reading any one outlets opinion.

                  You'll find most of them actually try to give you an insight to multiple points of view which will see you scroll past 80% of headlines as nothing burger click bait crap.
                  If you keep trusting people who continuously lie to you, then you are a fool. The Multiple view points thing had validity years ago when you were limited as how to do your homework on certain topics. Times have changed. Today, there is more than enough credible sources at your fingertips that you don't need to waste your time searching for multiple points of view. The credible sources will show me the lies the MSM keep spewing. They have a track record they can run on which the liberal media cannot.
                  Comment
                  • jt315
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 11-12-11
                    • 20662

                    #25769


                    Click image for larger version  Name:	image.jpg Views:	0 Size:	78.5 KB ID:	29909724
                    xxx


                    Comment
                    Search
                    Collapse
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...