All were required to provide proof of vaccination
All were tested
That area in Mass is not a high transmission area
Complies with CDC guidelines
Try again, Karen.
^^^^^^^
brainwashed hypocrite liberal
Comment
MinnesotaFats
SBR Posting Legend
12-18-10
14781
#37
Originally posted by goduke
Again he is a hired employee at a private gathering. What you are comparing it to is something in public site. He is not media he was hired to do an event. I think you’re mixing up two different things to help your narrative
Police are hired employees, they are filming.
I'm in my car I can film the police.
I'm a hired detective to snoop on a cheating wife I can take pictures.
I'm a hired server at a bar I can take pictures of the crowd & post on Facebook
See how this works. You're position is wrong.
Comment
tommir99
SBR MVP
04-17-13
1178
#38
Originally posted by The Kraken
The vaccine is extremely effective. Its not 100%. It doesnt prevent 100%. It was never touted to be 100% effective. The vaccine was also manufactured before delta so of course its less effective against the current dominant strain. Thats not hard to understand.
What I said that is most applicable to you is "we're past the point data or my words will sway you"
I'm not saying that the vaccine should be 100% effective. But those people mentioned on the website died of the vaccine, not covid. Have to double check it but I'm pretty sure that's what happened.
Comment
goduke
SBR Posting Legend
02-17-10
11668
#39
Originally posted by MinnesotaFats
Police are hired employees, they are filming.
I'm in my car I can film the police.
I'm a hired detective to snoop on a cheating wife I can take pictures.
I'm a hired server at a bar I can take pictures of the crowd & post on Facebook
See how this works. You're position is wrong.
1,2,3 are public spaces so the rules are different.
You have the right to record the police in the public doing his duty under the first amendment. This is different as well to the situation we are discussing.
The police can record you in public spaces but in private conversations they must receive consent
4 you could be fired because you are an employee and you are technically speaking on behalf of the employer so it’s conside misrepresentation
Think about this….if I’m at Tesla and I film all the new developments that the company is working on before it’s released to the public and post it I would be sued and most definitely fired.
This event was a private space that was blocked off for guests and employees and not only private but he was also an employee.
You can find all of this information easily online. It’s not hard at all but like I said it doesn’t fit your narrative so now the question is….do you accept what is easily fact checked or do you deny it because it doesn’t help your point? That’s the real test to see what kind of person you are